Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ChachamParticipantChachamParticipant
Trasnslation [although not from a chushoveh poster yw-21]
IN Pas habah b’cisnin [lit. bread that is with cisnin -sweets– snack bread..] The early sages [also referred to as rishonim but since we do not know hebrew i am not sure if you use that term] In the rishonim there are three main shitos.
1 dough that is made like a pocket? that is filled with nuts and honey and other sweets.
2. Bread made with many nuts and spices
3. Like dried acin [whats that?!?!] eaten by itself at a beis hamishtah
L’halachah the Shulcahn Aruch paskens l’koolah and says to make mezonos and al hamichya
but one who looks in the words of the rishonim and poskim will see that they argue on this. [ not like how the derech hachaim and ma’amer mudcheh [mordechai]
l’choirah [ anyone knows how to translate l’choirah {the mesoros hashas brings down the aruch kesubos 54 a on the bottom of the amud that it means when you open something and look at it at first light and it is loshon arami http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14309&pgnum=108&hilite= on the side of rashi by the bottom]]]]
either way lchoirah there is what to look into when you eat sweet bread since it is a safef [because of machlokes] and [the nafka minah is ] by a seudah of pas drinks [except wine] are potur from a brachah after the pas and from the safek [ there is a rule safek brachos l’hakel– a safek by brachos we are lenient and do not make a brachah.] you should not make a brachah on the drinks.??
[i must look into this inyan more
well now the cr also has a part time translator.]
ChachamParticipantunregistered………………..welcome to the CR…….
thats a new name
ChachamParticipanti still exist
January 27, 2009 3:26 am at 3:26 am in reply to: Wait for The Guy Behind You to Finish Shemona Esrei #950443ChachamParticipantrav shlomo zalman zt”l said that if one is davening by a door or you must leave than you can walk in front of him
ChachamParticipantfeivel– surprised it hasnt been suggested before (maybe because no one is interested?)
there actually already was such a thread that never seemed to take off
ChachamParticipantjothar speaking on those lines they probably will have not assured the internet..
it is better to learn [not do] the daf yomi than to just blog all day…
ChachamParticipanthere is another great post on the us airways story …
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/article.php?p=28882 #22
yesterday a lady fed a pigeon some bread and out of appreciation the bird told her not to go on a plane out of laguardia on thursday!!!
wow!!!!
ChachamParticipantfirst of all yes i also learn the daf yomi for some excelent material check out http://www.dafyomi.co.il
maybe somebody can help us with yesterdays daf.. [25] it was quite hard
ChachamParticipante
ChachamParticipantA—I DID NOT KILL HIM; I DON’T KNOW WHO DID KILL HIM
B—I DID NOT KILL HIM; I WAS NOT AT THE MURDER
C—I DID NOT KILL HIM; ‘A’ WAS NOT WITH ME ATTHE MURDER.
D—I DID NOT KILL HIM; ‘A’ IS SAYING THE COMPLETE TRUTH.
remember 1 liar 1truth 2 half
1murderer 1witness 1guy who knows who did it 1 innocent
step number 1. there is only one statement that is true in the second statements.
since there is only one complete truth, everyone must use their truths to make themselves not the murderer. the complete liar is naturally the murderer.
2. with this explained ‘d’ second statement can not be true since he is saying ‘a’ is the complete truth. therefore it is false and ‘a’ is not saying the complete truth—meaning he is one of the halfs. so we no d is saying at least one lie and a is also.
3. naturally ‘a’ is saying the first truth and second false since only the complete false is the murderer.
4. going back to ‘d’ if his first statement is false [murdered] than it will come out either b or c is lying on the second statement [their first statements are true since ‘d’ is the murderer] now no matter how you put ‘c’ true or false he is still the witness. just the matter is whether a is there or not.
so if c is lying there will be two witnesses a and c so that can not be.
and if b is lying than b was there and c still has to be there so it can not be d
5.so d must be true on the first and false on the second and a is true on the first false on the second–meaning he is the guy who knows who did it.
6. so we have left a complete liar and complete truth.
now if b is truth and c is lie it will be some sort of answer but we will never find out who knows- it cannot be ‘a’ since he is the witness and ‘c’ is not the witness since he is the murderer.
so we will never know who knows and i wrote their will be a definite answer.
7.now if c is true and ‘d’ is false everything works out.
a true lie knows who did it.
b false false–murderer
c true true– witness
d true false-innocent
this is the only way it works
there is one big hint in this riddle about who knows… ‘a’ is the only one who talks about knowing and since we are not just making assumptions it must be him
you chap?!?!?!?!
ChachamParticipanttehillim
ChachamParticipanthow is that who is lying who is truth ….
i think it is impossible because i think you are saying A is half [he is not the murderer but he knows meaning first statement true, second false] ‘b’ complete truth [did not kill him and not there] and ‘d’ is the murderer [because whoever is the liar is the murderer]
But what about c? we only have a half left meaning that a is there. [second statement will be false]?
this is not the answer
ChachamParticipanthave some seichel,
you definitely have SOME seichel but you are slightly wrong
I wont give away the answer but by
‘A’ you say he just knows it and by c you say ‘a’ was there
also in your answer there are two witnesses ‘a’ and ‘c’ [because even if it is false ‘c’ will always be there] keep trying
ChachamParticipantcorrection on my riddle
it said at the end if c second statement is false it would be
A was not with me etc.
it should say A WAS WITH ME
ALSO C NAME IS
ICH-BIN A. MATziv
ChachamParticipantHERE IS A RIDDLE I RECENTLY MADE.
The facts- The police interrogated 4 people. They know one of them is a murderer, one a witness, one knows who did it and one is innocent.
THERE IS ONE COMPLETE LIAR, ONE COMPLETE TRUTH-TELLER, AND TWO ARE HALF WAY.
THEY EACH SAID TWO STATEMENTS.
YOU WILL FIGURE OUT EXACTLY WHO EVERYONE IS WITH ONLY ONE POSSABLE WAY FOR EVERYONE.
THIS IS WHAT THEY SAID…
A LEE TUCKER – I DID NOT KILL HIM; I DON’T KNOW WHO DID KILL HIM
B LEROY LANDRY- I DID NOT KILL HIM; I WAS NOT AT THE MURDER
C ICH-BIN A. MATVAV- I DID NOT KILL HIM; ‘A’ WAS NOT WITH ME ATTHE MURDER.
D I.M.A. SHMOIGEL- I DID NOT KILL HIM; ‘A’ IS SAYING THE COMPLETE TRUTH.
NOTE: IF C SECOND STATEMENT IS FALSE IT WILL BE A WAS NOT WITH ME ETC. IF D STATEMENT IS FALSE IT WILL
BE THAT A IS NOT SAYING COMPLETE TRUTH. [ALTHOUGH ME AND MY CHAVRUSAH CHESBONNED A VERY LUMDISHE CALCULATION THAT IF D IS SAYING A IS SAYING A COMPLETE LIE [THIS IS ONLY IF HE IS LYING] THE REST OF THE RIDDLE WON’T WORK OUT. TRY IT WHEN YOU ARE DONE]
ChachamParticipantI think everyone should read this http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/jewishsociety/The_Madoff_Madness.asp
ChachamParticipantlkjhgfdsa- now we are going backwards on the keyboard?!
ChachamParticipantDecember 28, 2008 11:04 pm at 11:04 pm in reply to: UPDATE: Mishnayos for the Mumbai KEDOSHIM – 1-TEVES (TODAY) IS THE SHLOSHIM #628526ChachamParticipantmdlevine yasher koach to you
December 28, 2008 9:12 pm at 9:12 pm in reply to: UPDATE: Mishnayos for the Mumbai KEDOSHIM – 1-TEVES (TODAY) IS THE SHLOSHIM #628524ChachamParticipantmaybe you should put a post on the main site about this
yasher ko`ach
ChachamParticipantFirstly-the rambam holds it is assur to predict it. look in his biur to 13 ikarim #12 [it is in siddur vilna after ani ma`amen. also look at http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pagefeed/14302_249.pdf hayesod 12. [the ramban is cholek on this.]
Mashiach doesn’t come by talking about it the gemara says in chelek 97b
????? ?’ ?????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?? ??? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ???”? ????? ??? ??? ???????? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ????? ??????? ????? translation [found this on the online soncino talmud] R. Eliezer said: if Israel repent, they will be redeemed; if not, they will not be redeemed. R. Joshua said to him, if they do not repent, will they not be redeemed! But the Holy One, blessed be He, will set up a king over them, whose decrees shall be as cruel as Haman’s, whereby Israel shall engage in repentance, and he will thus bring them back to the right path.
WE SEE FROM THIS THAT MOSHIACH ONLY COMES FROM TESHUVAH. IF WE ARE NOT READY HKB`H WILL FIND A WAY TO GET US TO DO TESHUVAH. NOW TRUST ME I WANT MOSHIACH TO COME BUT INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT– CAUSE HIM TO COME WITH
TESHUVAH
ChachamParticipantrabbiofberlin
watch who you are attacking a killjoy. and yes the minhag to play dreidel is brought down by the bnei yisochor [or more commonly known as the bnei yisuschor] and the chasam sofer kept this minhag.playing with money there is no makor.
i saw in shu’t mekadeish yisrael on chanukah
http://www.hebrewbooks.org/9663
that you should play with pennies so each time you get is less than perutah or you are vadai gomer da`as with a penny that the other guy is koneh. vcholuwhat bothers me is in the times of the yevonim they played dreidel when they would be killed if they were caught learning, bzman hazeh we all run away from are gmaras to a game of dreidel. We are still fighting the yevonim
ChachamParticipantare you using different zemanim 42, 72, 99? what about 18,36,60
ChachamParticipantwhats pshat you wants more names and numbers for what
ChachamParticipantThis agav is big takalah in the shidduch crisis is when the parents do not want the same thing as the girl. The parents might want a more with-it or wealthy person, when this girl just came back from seminary brainwashed how her husband must be from a-z. and vice-versa. I have heard of an unmarried 31 year old who it did not work out for her when she was younger because the father chas v`shalom can not have an eidim who has a square back [ while the father himself is clean-shaven and naturally does have a square back!] while the girl wanted a regular guy. It would be a good joke if it would not be reality;
December 19, 2008 3:07 am at 3:07 am in reply to: Looking For a Mamar Chazal About Cosmetics #635072ChachamParticipantbava barah 22a top of amud ???? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??????? ??? ????
??????? ?????? ????? ?????
and a gemarah at the end of merubah that talks about the ten takonos of ezrah and a gemarah in yevamos that talks about rochlin and yichud chulo
ChachamParticipantas far as i know they are all just one person with names like [joseph] joe shmo yw editor,yw moderator etc. infact 72 86 99 5786346865 are all one guy who wants to see which number makes a better impression or people like better.
ChachamParticipantthere are many eruvim in Lakewood. supposedly the cong. sons of israel has one which the oilam does not use at all. Then each community has its own eruv. In the 14th street area a lot of eruvim were put together from the area of hope road to forest ave.
Rabbi forcheimer does not hld in the eruvim that cross 14th since it is a mavui haposuach lerishus harabim [rt 9] .
December 12, 2008 2:47 am at 2:47 am in reply to: UPDATE: Mishnayos for the Mumbai KEDOSHIM – 1-TEVES (TODAY) IS THE SHLOSHIM #628514ChachamParticipantsh`vous and avodah zarah and zevchaim completed.
ChachamParticipantSmoking Is 100% assur. No heter whatsoever. R` shmuel kaminetzky said there is no heter for purim and it is a yom simcha so please keep that way.
other rabbomim include
R moshe
R elyasiv
R yitzchok zilberstein
The steipler
R chaim kanievsky
and a lot more rabbonim
r moshe shterbuch paskened it is assur that they will be
emes make a gezeirah about smoking, but ein gozrin gzeirah al hatzibur sh
ein rov hatzibur yochul la
amud buh???? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ??”? ??? ???? ?????? ????? ??
ChachamParticipantbogen- maskim by the way gmab responded so attacked he must be a youngster
ChachamParticipantwow i am number 1949
December 1, 2008 12:07 pm at 12:07 pm in reply to: UPDATE: Mishnayos for the Mumbai KEDOSHIM – 1-TEVES (TODAY) IS THE SHLOSHIM #628405ChachamParticipantzevachim
December 1, 2008 2:34 am at 2:34 am in reply to: UPDATE: Mishnayos for the Mumbai KEDOSHIM – 1-TEVES (TODAY) IS THE SHLOSHIM #628399ChachamParticipantShvout and avodahj zarah
ChachamParticipantthe honest truth is i am a bochur younger than you TOHIGHSCHOOLGUY
[but older than everybody else in chachmah.
the gemarah in bava basrah says 120a : ??”? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ?”? ??? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ?????? ?????
The gemarah l
choirah says that in yeshiva you go after chachmah and by a party ziknah. but r
ashi says when one is an ultra chacham (or ultra zakain) { look at my username} he is mechubad in both placesSO therefore even though I am mistamah the youngest I am still the wisest.
ChachamParticipantI call myself Chacham because that is what (I am now).
ps i used to be called a baal gaaveh to answer that up i caleed myself then the biggest anav
ChachamParticipantyashrus how ioronic your name is Yashrus means being straight doing what is right
ChachamParticipantgoogle ‘iran deyanat’
ChachamParticipantMashiach doesn’t come by talking about it the gemara says in chelek 97b
????? ?’ ?????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?? ??? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ???”? ????? ??? ??? ???????? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ????? ??????? ????? translation [found this on the online soncino talmud] R. Eliezer said: if Israel repent, they will be redeemed; if not, they will not be redeemed. R. Joshua said to him, if they do not repent, will they not be redeemed! But the Holy One, blessed be He, will set up a king over them, whose decrees shall be as cruel as Haman’s, whereby Israel shall engage in repentance, and he will thus bring them back to the right path.2
Although this gemara as some say could be talking about obama still moshiach soes not just come teshuva still must be done.
ChachamParticipantrav elyashiv said all you can learn from these names is weather he keeps shabbos
ChachamParticipantanother great site is
ChachamParticipantthe mishnas reb aharon says it is gezel zman and bitul torah…….
also what is worse is when people take a sefer that says muter b`mikomah and leave it IN ANOTHER BAISmedrash somewhere else and everybody thinks that is the place for it AND YOU LOST YOUR SEFER
July 28, 2008 7:01 pm at 7:01 pm in reply to: Should pro-freikeit commentors be given a voice? #625954ChachamParticipantb`emes the only people to have a voice are people who never went on the internet in their life
-
AuthorPosts