abcdefghijklmnop

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: OU Missing In Action Over Yeshiva Issue #1648132
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    @DaMoshe: Any way to link to that statement? or a URL?

    in reply to: "…To date there have been 72 Shidduchim…" -NASI ad #910274
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    Popa – that was my joke! 🙂

    in reply to: "…To date there have been 72 Shidduchim…" -NASI ad #910255
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    @WIY – Thank you 🙂

    in reply to: "…To date there have been 72 Shidduchim…" -NASI ad #910252
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    Maybe they are taking credit for the death of Ahmad Jabari?

    in reply to: Need Source for Allowing or Not Allowing Teacher to Confiscate Items #906965
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    very simply: part of attending an institution is following the rules. if the rules state that items can be confiscated, then by staying in said institution, you are tacitly agreeing to that rule. why is this so complicated?

    in reply to: No hockey #921232
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    in any case, junior hockey is waaay more exciting than the NHL … 10 times more intense, and the players actually care about the games.

    in reply to: Facebook #890867
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    whats the point of having a website if no one can use it anyways, because the internet is assur to have in one’s home. But, once one realizes that people are using the website (ostensibly in contradiction with the “psak”), why not just keep the facebook page?

    in reply to: Facebook #890864
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    So which people are now going to use mostly music? the ones who have internet at home for business purposes? If so, mostly music falls under the category of “business use” in what sense.

    Just another P.R. stunt, being disingenuous while still not actually listening to the supposed “psak.” Keep the facebook page, and allow people access to good, wholesome Jewish music, while maintaining Jewish Parnassa.

    in reply to: Can someone with unfiltered internet be a ???? ?????? #1134133
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    @lakewhut way to be disingenuous

    in reply to: Can someone with unfiltered internet be a ???? ?????? #1134120
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    Would the fact that I have unfiltered internet and a TV cancel each other out?

    Or maybe, its per tv and per device without filtered internet. In which case, an even number would allow me to daven, and an odd number would not?

    in reply to: Citifield Asifa After-Thought by R' Reisman #877822
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    so we’re good then 🙂

    in reply to: Citifield Asifa After-Thought by R' Reisman #877819
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    @coffee addict … so where does that leave all of us?

    in reply to: Citifield Asifa After-Thought by R' Reisman #877817
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    @Coffee addict. If that was the p’sak, then common sense dictates that one uses a filter (And better yet, monitoring software, which although not a guard against initial exposure, will most likely prevent extended exposure) and that is not what I was referring to.

    The way I understand that most people understood the psak is that all internet use in the home is assur, and for business is a b’dieved.

    in reply to: Citifield Asifa After-Thought by R' Reisman #877815
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    And the message of the gedolei yisroel was? even they couldn’t agree on what the “psak” should have been.

    besides for the fact that this is hardly qualifies as a psak for the Jewish people. Not to mention the fact that the reason anyone has a mechayev to listen to the “psak” is because ……..

    in reply to: R' Ilson's Yeshiva #878089
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    @chulent why should it not be in Mea Shearim? My guess is its a financial decision and/or someone who has connections within Mea Shearim.

    @lakewhut Rav Ilson is not your stereotypical YU rebbe. While he learned there many years ago, he does not seem to be overly fond of 90% of what is going on in YU.

    in reply to: R' Ilson's Yeshiva #878083
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    @Chulent No, it is not. Know some people who went there. Specific questions?

    in reply to: I have a problem with internet filters.(And I'm frum) #878407
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    Lessons learned at the asifa:

    1) the internet is assur

    2) it is pronounced the interNet

    3) We must apologize whenever we speak English

    4) Zionism is evil

    in reply to: What Is YOUR Heter to be on the Internet? #876072
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    @cheftze … only if you accept that there are acceptable uses for the internet other than business

    in reply to: Technology and the Third Beis Hamikdash #1015961
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    @sam2 – If I am not mistaken, and please correct me if I am, did the Rambam not believe that he himself achieved nevua?

    in reply to: What Is YOUR Heter to be on the Internet? #876070
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    1) Rav Shmuel did not. And, not to rehash this argument, but the psak of the Poskim in Eretz Yisrael are not binding on Americans (although neither are those of the American Rabonim; see next comment)

    2) I have (as should everyone else) my own posek, who as well did not agree with the asifa and did not give the same psak. As such, who says I need a Heter?

    3) To say that any decision made at the asifa is binding is ludicrous for several reasons.

    a) the entire klal Yisrael was not represented (I did not see half of Satmar, Lubavitch, the Modern Orthodox, or many people who would probably be referred to as “centrist.”

    b) There was no consensus amongst the Rabbonim at the asifa as to what the “psak should be.”

    4) Defrosting: I am not sure what you would like me to take out from that ???? . Perhaps you could please explain? (I assume the dark side joke is that, not an ad-hominem attack? 🙂 )

    5) My total lack of acceptance of this psak does not mean that I believe that a filter is not neccessary. EVERYONE who uses the Internet should be using a filter. We are human after all, and all possess a ??? ???. I just don’t accept the fact that the only positive use for the internet is business related. hebrewbooks.org, YUTORAH, GTORAH, and the many other sites from which one can download shiurim and/or find divrei torah, and l’havdil, the broadening of my horizons by the amount of secular learning I can accomplish, are all legitimate, and appropriate uses of the internet.

    in reply to: hockey #875998
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    Any contact between opposing players while pursuing the puck on an icing must be for the sole purpose of playing the puck and not for eliminating the opponent from playing the puck. Unnecessary or dangerous contact could result in penalties being assessed to the offending player.

    The puck striking or deflecting off an official does not automatically nullify a potential icing.

    in reply to: What Is YOUR Heter to be on the Internet? #876059
    abcdefghijklmnop
    Participant

    Who says I need a Heter?

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)