ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,951 through 3,000 (of 4,813 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Political Bechira Chofshis #2045111
    ujm
    Participant

    Mike Pence would certainly make an excellent candidate and superb President. I should have included him.

    Scott Walker is also excellent.

    in reply to: Why aren’t autistic people that are orthodox open about their diagnosis #2045060
    ujm
    Participant

    There are Asperger’s people all over the place. 1/3 of them don’t even know they have Asperger’s, 1/3 of them know but don’t care or do anything about it and the last 1/3 runs around getting treated.

    The very idea that Asperger’s is part of the autism spectrum itself is relatively newfangled.

    in reply to: Sanctions against the enemy #2044972
    ujm
    Participant

    “A possible case may be made that trade will make life of Cuban people better”

    That’s really the entire case. Sanctions cause that innocent civilians to suffer. Usually the regime is living in luxury despite the sanctions. And sanctions have historically NOT effected regime change. That much is proven. So what exactly IS gained with the sanctions?

    in reply to: Political Bechira Chofshis #2044998
    ujm
    Participant

    R: Cruz, Desantis

    D: Joe Manchin

    in reply to: Sanctions against the enemy #2044893
    ujm
    Participant

    To huju: Congress codified sanctions against Cuba into US law. The president is powerless to discontinue them. Congress are mostly non-experts.

    in reply to: Why aren’t autistic people that are orthodox open about their diagnosis #2044892
    ujm
    Participant

    Asperger’s is normal. There’s no more reason to share that he or she has Asperger’s than he would share that he’s colorblind, has an ingrown toenail, a toothache, he’s a lefty, he’s underweight, he had his gallbladder or wisdom tooth removed, etc.

    ujm
    Participant

    1. It isn’t limited to Jews or Orthodox. Non-Jews with the condition don’t usually purposely wear it on their sleeves.

    2. You could ask the exact same question about lack of “openness” regarding those diagnosed with schizophrenia, depression, bipolar, psychosis, anorexia and any number of other conditions.

    in reply to: Happy Cranniversary! #2044758
    ujm
    Participant

    Two more days, popa.

    in reply to: Imamother thread #2044748
    ujm
    Participant

    CA: What does that mean?

    in reply to: Democrats Love Crime #2044741
    ujm
    Participant

    Because BLM demanded Democrats go soft on crime and handicap the police.

    in reply to: Police Woman Potter #2044717
    ujm
    Participant

    Are you anti-Torah and anti-nature? Both dictate women should not be placed in a position requiring they be armed.

    in reply to: Police Woman Potter #2044619
    ujm
    Participant

    Jack, when you utilize rhetoric such as “the blue wall of silence”, you display an antagonism towards law enforcement and opposition to law and order.

    Let us not forget the fact that this deceased individual was a criminal who was resisting arrest at the time of his death, thereby bearing a large portion of responsibility for his own demise.

    in reply to: Police Woman Potter #2044616
    ujm
    Participant

    huju: Your misplaced sarcasm is duly noted.

    Women shouldn’t be in any position that requires arms. This is independent of how effective or ineffective they may be in a fight with a male.

    in reply to: Sanctions against the enemy #2044614
    ujm
    Participant

    huju: Sanctions are imposed by politicians, not by diplomats, high-ranking armed forces personnel, or even by foreign policy experts. Politicians on both sides of the aisle crave for the Cuban-American vote (to take one example.) The Cuban-American man on the street demands sanctions. He is no foreign policy experts and neither are the vast majority of the 535 Congressmen and Senators who coded the Cuban sanctions into US law.

    Politics wins over the best foreign policy any day of the year.

    in reply to: Imamother thread #2044532
    ujm
    Participant

    Philosopher, you’re a bit over five years late in your welcome. Indeed, sparkledout hasn’t even shown back up in this neck of the cyber-woods in over five years.

    Getting back on topic, can anyone share what sort of topics are found on the site discussed in the title here?

    in reply to: Sanctions against the enemy #2044499
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: What third-rate product would you expect from Ukraine?

    in reply to: Police Woman Potter #2044498
    ujm
    Participant

    Commonsense1, my apologies, I mis-remembered. The other fellow I was thinking of uses the screen name “commonsaychel”; so I don’t think there’s a conflict with your name.

    in reply to: Imamother thread #2044459
    ujm
    Participant

    What kind of posters does the site attract?

    in reply to: Police Woman Potter #2044446
    ujm
    Participant

    Women have no business being police officers.

    in reply to: Police Woman Potter #2044442
    ujm
    Participant

    Commonsense1, what happened to the old commonsense?

    in reply to: Sanctions against the enemy #2044431
    ujm
    Participant

    It does not work. Cuba has been under US sanctions for the last almost 70 years in order to attempt to get rid of the Castro regime. Total failure. The same with North Korea. And virtually all other examples.

    in reply to: Edim Zomemin #2043860
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: If there’s a third, fourth, fifth, etc. set of witnesses, Beis Din still accepts the last set of witnesses.

    So if there’s a fifth set of witnesses, Beis Din will execute (all 4 people of) the fourth and second sets of witnesses.

    in reply to: Edim Zomemin #2043669
    ujm
    Participant

    Can Beis Din execute Edim Zomemin as soon as they receive testimony that they were, in fact, Edim Zomemin, without even giving the alleged/accused Edim Zomemin the opportunity to rebut the testimony against them?

    in reply to: America should trade Taiwan for North Korea #2043409
    ujm
    Participant

    Beijing and Taiwan both claim to be the legitimate government of China. In fact, while Beijing calls the country the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan calls itself the Republic of China. They both agree that Beijing and Taiwan are part of the same nation and country.

    in reply to: Achdus #2043315
    ujm
    Participant

    I remember in camp one of the popular theme songs was “Alef!, Ches!, Daled!, Vov, Suf!, we’ve got Achdus and that’s more than enough!!”

    in reply to: Achdus #2043312
    ujm
    Participant

    “Not you or me, that’s for sure.”

    So if the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah decide to make a Torah world event (Siyum, Asifa, rabbinic meeting, protest or whatever else) unifying the various segments, kehilas and communities in Klal Yisroel including Litvish, Chasidish and Sefardic, but there’s no official MO leadership participation or invitation, then we can presumably assume the Tzadikim on the Moetzes made an informed decision resulting in the inclusion that was selected.

    in reply to: America should trade Taiwan for North Korea #2043299
    ujm
    Participant

    The US has no national interest in spending significant American blood to defend Taiwan. Taiwan and Beijing both agree they are part of the same nation. They only disagree who should govern it. This isn’t America’s fight. Just like we’re not going to send American troops to defend the Ukraine from Russia, we shouldn’t pretend we’re going to go to war with a nuclear armed China to defend Taiwan.

    in reply to: Achdus #2043293
    ujm
    Participant

    And who judges the level of adherence to Halacha of the community’s Rabbi?

    in reply to: Anti-soros=anti-semitism? #2043286
    ujm
    Participant

    I don’t keep up with the antisemites. But all the attacks on Soros I’ve seen have been well deserved and not antisemitic.

    I’ve seen the left and media describing non-antisemitic attacks on Soros as antisemitic. It is one of the left’s tactics. They do the same things by falsely accusing their political opponents of racism.

    in reply to: Anti-soros=anti-semitism? #2043279
    ujm
    Participant

    CS: All the well deserved attacks on Soros, and they are all well deserved, are because they are well deserved and not because he is Jewish.

    Just like the Democrat and left-wing attacks on Trump, Bush, Reagan, Limbaugh, etc. (Except, in those cases, they are mostly not well deserved.)

    in reply to: Conspiracy theories #2043172
    ujm
    Participant

    I can’t speak of any other SNs, but all I know is that this one was never used by Joe.

    in reply to: Covid takeaways #2043136
    ujm
    Participant

    HaLeiVi, can you expound on how Yeshiva administrations during Covid demonstrated more than their usual selfless dedication to Chinuch under pressure?

    in reply to: Anti-soros=anti-semitism? #2043079
    ujm
    Participant

    .

    in reply to: Anti-soros=anti-semitism? #2043055
    ujm
    Participant

    chiefshmerel: Is it anti-Christian to blame Trump, Bush or Reagan for everything you don’t like? Then Democrats must be almost universally anti-Christian.

    in reply to: House January 6th Commission #2043047
    ujm
    Participant

    “And if those two rabbis had accurately reflected the Torah perspective, I wouldn’t be either.”

    Charlie: Just to reiterate, if the Torah supports slavery, then you don’t support the Torah.

    Copy.

    in reply to: Public menorah lightings and rooftop menorahs #2043056
    ujm
    Participant

    RW: Who said the Rambam said that?

    in reply to: Achdus #2043017
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: So if I’m keeping good count, you’ve got OO, Lev Tahor, Shuvu Bonim, Brisk, Peleg Yerushalmi, Neteurei Karta, Satmar, Lubavitch and Ponoveze included in the achdus but Conservative affiliated people are out.

    in reply to: Achdus #2042940
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: Why are you excluding OO, while including all the other groups? Where is your line being drawn — why is OO excluded? If you exclude OO, how can you object to others excluding other Orthodox claiming groups?

    in reply to: Achdus #2042908
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: Jewry presumably includes OO (which was founded by a YU rabbi and it identifies itself as part of MO), Lev Tahor, Shuvu Bonim, Brisk, Peleg Yerushalmi, Neteurei Karta, Satmar, Lubavitch, Ponoveze and even Conservative Judaism.

    Are you similarly upset those Yidden were not included in the achdus of the event you’re discussing?

    Reb Eliezer: Open Orthodox claim they’re Orthodox and uphold the mesorah. Other groups also claim to be Orthodox and follow a mesorah. Who should judge which Orthodox-claiming groups are really Orthodox and correctly observing the mesorah versus which are Orthodox claiming but really anything but, and thus excluded from your call for achdus?

    in reply to: Achdus #2042804
    ujm
    Participant

    CA: Are you trying to say “Love the sinner, hate the sin”??

    in reply to: Achdus #2042797
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer, is Open Orthodox enough Orthodox? If not, when is it enough?

    in reply to: Anti-soros=anti-semitism? #2042783
    ujm
    Participant

    Soros is a lowlife scumbag. Anytime anytime criticizes or mocks that fool, the far left in the media and politics falsely call it antisemitism.

    in reply to: Achdus #2042750
    ujm
    Participant

    Achdus with whom? Conservative? Reform? Open Orthodox?

    in reply to: House January 6th Commission #2042749
    ujm
    Participant

    Yseribus, why are you opposed to the Torah and the Torah’s authorization of having Eved C’na’ani?

    in reply to: Trump Incitement VS. Sanders Incitement #2042600
    ujm
    Participant

    No one knew there would be trespassing. The official plan was to head to the Capital for a legal protest outside on public grounds.

    in reply to: Died by sneezing #2042576
    ujm
    Participant

    Other aspects of nature that changed are there used to be extremely tall people, people at one time could live hundreds of years, etc. Historians, archaeologists and all the secular professionals deny these facts.

    in reply to: Conspiracy theories #2042566
    ujm
    Participant

    P.S. The moon landing doesn’t count.

    Completely agree with the OP, Zaphod Beeblebrox. The claim that the moon landing really happened has been so thoroughly discredited that it is a bore to keep hearing about the conspiracy theory that a man actually went to the moon.

    in reply to: Kiddish/Chillul Hashem #2042551
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ, there’s no need to try to feel superior. We are superior.

    HaLeiVi, if you are making no gender distinctions then we are in agreement.

    in reply to: House January 6th Commission #2042549
    ujm
    Participant

    “George Washington is probably rolling in his grave at the total lack of slaves and the fact that Jews can be part of the government.”

    George Washington was an Oheiv Yisroel.

    in reply to: House January 6th Commission #2042548
    ujm
    Participant

    “Do you think that the concept of slavery as it existed in the US 200 years ago resembles our concept of Eved C’na’ani?”

    If it wasn’t then it should have been modified and corrected to bring it to the proper standards required by the principles of Eved C’na’ani.

Viewing 50 posts - 2,951 through 3,000 (of 4,813 total)