Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ujmParticipant
Reb Shayala’s brother moved to New York. His Kever is in Staten Island.
ujmParticipantIf the author or publisher commissioned a crime to obtain this document, the author and/or publisher should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
ujmParticipant“Dear Ujm,
“must do her husband’s will” Please quote correctly.”
Dear N0mesorah,
Per your request, here’s the exact original:
וְכֵן צִוּוּ עַל הָאִשָּׁה שֶׁתִּהְיֶה מְכַבֶּדֶת אֶת בַּעְלָהּ בְּיוֹתֵר מִדַּאי וְיִהְיֶה עָלֶיהָ מוֹרָא מִמֶּנּוּ וְתַעֲשֶׂה כָּל מַעֲשֶׂיהָ עַל פִּיו. וְיִהְיֶה בְּעֵינֶיהָ כְּמוֹ שַׂר אוֹ מֶלֶךְ. מְהַלֶּכֶת בְּתַאֲוַת לִבּוֹ וּמַרְחֶקֶת כָּל מַה שֶּׁיִּשְׂנָא. וְזֶה דֶּרֶךְ בְּנוֹת יִשְׂרָאֵל וּבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל הַקְּדוֹשִׁים וְהַטְּהוֹרִים בְּזִוּוּגָן. וּבִדְרָכִים אֵלּוּ יִהְיֶה יִשּׁוּבָן נָאֶה וּמְשֻׁבָּח:
ujmParticipantAAQ: You’ll notice that when the King is sovereign, his wife is entitled Queen Consort. But when the Queen is sovereign, her husband is not entitled King Consort. This is because the title of King, by definition, outranks the title of Queen.
ujmParticipantAAQ: American/Western culture has absolutely zero to do with the Kesuba, Torah Judaism or with Klal Yisroel.
ujmParticipantUser176, what are you referring to?
ujmParticipantCoffee Addict: A Queen is not equal to the King. Similarly, the Halacha is that a wife must do her husband’s will, whereas the reverse is not the case.
ujmParticipantAAQ: Are you suggesting we learn from the interactions described by Chazal between the heilige Tanna Rabi Meir and his Rebbetzin Bruria?
ujmParticipantN0m: Halacha is cancelling them. Avira is merely explaining the Halacha.
ujmParticipantIn modern Western society, contaminated by feminism, it is deemed verboten to discuss men’s rights or women’s responsibilities. According to the powers that be in American culture, it is only permissible to discuss women’s rights and men’s responsibilities.
ujmParticipantBecause any threads outside of Decaffeinated doesn’t display on the main Coffee Room page.
ujmParticipantNow that Roe v. Wade is B”H about to fall into the dustbin of history, IY”H the newly constituted Supreme Court will soon overturn other despicable decisions such as Obergefell v. Hodges, Lawrence v. Texas, etc.
ujmParticipantIt took its course after having its day in the sun.
ujmParticipantStalin is the natural result of Marxism.
May 8, 2022 3:11 pm at 3:11 pm in reply to: Classics and Beyond Emor: Vort With A Mothers Day Twist #2084405ujmParticipantMother’s Day was enshrined into law by a Klu Klux Klan congressman.
ujmParticipantEvangelicals also have an affinity to Judaism.
ujmParticipantThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has held an intangible item, like information, can be a “thing of value” under 18 U.S.C. §1030, and since the Supreme Court is located within the District of Columbia Circuit, this would be a chargeable offense.
Additionally, 18 U.S.C. §1001 makes it a federal offense to knowingly and willfully make a materially false statement “in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial branch of the Government of the United States … ” The chief justice could ask all the law clerks, and anyone else who had access to Alito’s draft opinion (less than 50 people in total), to sign a statement saying that they were not the source of the leak. Assuming that they all sign the statement denying being the source of the leak, the chief justice could then ask law enforcement agents to interview each of those individuals. If the interview exposes the leaker, that individual could be prosecuted for having made a false statement in the declaration.
In 1919, the Department of Justice indicted Ashton Embry, Justice Joseph McKenna’s law clerk, for sharing the court’s decisions with Wall Street traders before the decisions were officially released.
Another possibility is prosecution for so-called honest services fraud. As the Congressional Research Service has said, Congress amended 18 U.S.C. §1346, “which defines the crimes of mail and wire fraud,” to make clear that this statute extends “to conduct that deprives a person or group of the right to have another act in accordance with some externally imposed duty or obligation, regardless of whether the victim so deprived has suffered or would suffer a pecuniary harm.”
Another remote possibility is prosecution under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986, which is codified at 18 U.S.C. §1030. The act makes it a crime “to access a computer with authorization and to use such access to obtain or alter information in the computer that the accesser is not entitled so to obtain or alter.”
ujmParticipantBored-Teen: Do you have any knowledge of Halacha that allows you to dispute my point?
ujmParticipantAmerican communists honor Biden, Harris and AOC.
ujmParticipantA husband he has both more responsibilities and rights.
ujmParticipantThe business with the picture and the mice effect sounds very fishy. I gravely doubt any veracity to it.
ujmParticipantIf the document was obtained illegally in any manner, such as through a hack, that itself is a criminal matter.
Even if it was not hacked, it is still a crime under U.S. Code Title 18, Section 641.
ujmParticipantThe leak is a criminal matter.
ujmParticipantWhatsApp facilities and enables a great deal of loshon hora, rechilus and ms”r.
ujmParticipantAvira, I believe mdd said you can read the Chazon Ish to say that anyone who became a full time baal aveira, including those that come from Frum families and were brought up Frum, to be tinokos shenishbu. And the CI was moida that his position is a shvere kula that goes against the accepted widespread Psak and interpretation of what Tinok Shenishba means. He didn’t indicate that’s an excuse for doing aveiras.
ujmParticipantIf you have a WhatsApp capable device, it is absolutely imperative to also have a very strong filter to control what is accessible on said device outside of WhatsApp.
ujmParticipantYour view is colored by the PR from the Kiruv professionals, who have every incentive, and do loudly, proclaim such views. But the Gedolei Rabbonim and the large majority of mainstream Roshei Yeshivos have not espoused that. As evidenced by Reb Moshe and Reb Shlomo Zalman.
ujmParticipantMarxist, Reb Moshe Feinstein and Rav Shlomo Zalman’s opinions regarding Tinok Shenishba is, in fact, the default normative Psak Klal Yisroel is noheg to follow. If that means (and it certainly does) that the majority of non-Orthodox Jews today are not Tinokos Shenishbu, that’s exactly what it means and is.
May 5, 2022 7:54 pm at 7:54 pm in reply to: The Longest Seder Contest�How Late Will Your Seder End? #2083698ujmParticipantIf you finish your Seder at Zman Krias Shma Shel Shachris, you can daven Shachris Vasikin, right after the Seder.
ujmParticipantYou’re welcome.
ujmParticipantReb Shayala’s brother moved to New York and his Kever is in Staten Island.
ujmParticipantRav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach said that non-frum Jews nowadays are not in the category of Tinok Shenishba. If they (a) know they are Jewish, and (b) know that they have the option of being religious, and (c ) the government will not persecute them if they become religious, then, he said, if they say they still do not want to become religious, they are no longer in the category of Tinokos Shenishbu.
ujmParticipantMarxist, he knows about Torah Judaism. That makes him absolutely not a tinok shenishba.
ujmParticipant“At least at my end, the first time I’ve seen a beekeeper in a Tallis katan.”
He kept the Tzitzis hanging outside his pants? Was he also wearing a fedora?
ujmParticipant“Could you share the name of her Rav??”
Avi Weiss.
ujmParticipantAbortion doctors practicing after it is outlawed should be imprisoned for a lengthy term.
ujmParticipantMarxist, no he’s not a tinok shenishba. He’s a rasha Mechallel Shabbos treif fressor.
ujmParticipantIt isn’t possible to back up an untruth.
ujmParticipantHadora: It is a halacha that the wife is to adopt her husband’s minhagim and halachic customs.
ujmParticipantWolf: Your apikorus shtick is old and stale. Try something new for the next five years.
ujmParticipantAAQ: The wife automatically becomes and adopts whatever her husband is. So if the husband is Ashkenaz, whoever he marries, regardless of what she was previously, the wife assumes all Ashkenazic minhagim and halachos.
ujmParticipantMale Ob/Gyn.
ujmParticipantYseribius: Someone else told me he got a heter to taste treif meat, as he was a professional restaurant reviewer, so long he spits out the meat.
ujmParticipantEhrlich is used very frequently.
ujmParticipantPAA didn’t address any of the many points in your quotation marks, Marxist.
ujmParticipantOr, perhaps, he posts on other sites, too.
ujmParticipantThat’s a bunch of malarkey. Abortion bans will not apply if the mother’s life is at risk. There will certainly be exceptions permitting abortions if the mother will otherwise die.
ujmParticipantCongress needs reforming. Expand the House to 555 congressmen.
ujmParticipantIf you write a megilla, the mods often leave it for last, to make sure you didn’t slip in something inappropriate. If they approve it after a later post, the earlier post will appear after the later one that was approved first. That’s simply a function of how the software was programmed, and the mods have no control over (other than deciding which posts to approve first.)
Infrequently, a post may mistakenly get stuck in the spam queue until (and if) someone notices it and approves it.
ujmParticipantYou didn’t answer the question. Are you opposed to capitalism?
-
AuthorPosts