ujm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 551 through 600 (of 4,650 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: If You Were a Goy #2247905
    ujm
    Participant

    SR (OP): If you’re embarrassed to be a Jew, just come right out and say so. No need to itemize every part of being Jewish that you’re embarrassed about.

    In prewar Europe there were many towns that were majority Jewish. And many Goyim there spoke Yiddish.

    in reply to: Zos Chanukah #2246961
    ujm
    Participant

    Among the many other great things Zos Chanukah is known for, it will forever now be associated with the great Neis in our own Dor with the release of the Tzadik Reb Shalom Mordechai decades earlier than the antisemites hoped and expected in line with their corrupt “judgement”.

    in reply to: RFK’s second wife #2245702
    ujm
    Participant

    Yet the media buried anything negative of their hero JFK, who in fact was a demagogue and antisemite.

    in reply to: Joe, I need your help here #2245361
    ujm
    Participant

    DaMoshe: You missed the boat. In fact, you made the same mistake again. “Successful” is in no way, shape or form quantified in terms of income.

    An ani (monetarily poor person) can be successful. A monetarily rich person can be unsuccessful. Your terminology is dismissive of this.

    in reply to: RFK’s second wife #2245335
    ujm
    Participant

    Ashifromrockland: Was JFK confronted about his infidelity?

    in reply to: RFK’s second wife #2245334
    ujm
    Participant

    RFK was a Mormon?!

    in reply to: Annoying pop-ups #2245324
    ujm
    Participant

    akuperma: TheChesedFund. (Or GoFundMe.)

    in reply to: Joe, I need your help here #2245323
    ujm
    Participant

    BMG, it’s true, there are people who are successful without going to college. But it is much more difficult, please don’t forget that.
    I just looked up average household incomes by town in NJ. Lakewood has an average household income of about $43,000. Teaneck, where most people are college graduates, is $125,000.

    Bingo! And herein lies the problem.

    People in Teaneck quantify success by a person’s income. If you earn $125,000/year, they call you
    “successful”; if you earn $43,000/year, they call you “unsuccessful”. Whereas in Lakewood, the $43,000/year talmid chochom is the success, while the $125,000/year am ha’aretz is unsuccessful.

    in reply to: Reasons for the Dreidel #2245226
    ujm
    Participant

    Because when the Yevonim came to find Yidden to see if they were illegally learning Torah, the Yidden quickly hid their Seforim and took out their dreidels, to make believe they were just playing and not learning Torah.

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #2245220
    ujm
    Participant

    ubiq, were you successful yet this year in wrapping up your Chri—, er, Chanukah presents shopping?

    in reply to: Chanukah: A Reminder of the Dystopia that Exists in the Frum Community #2244921
    ujm
    Participant

    People have gone very upscale across almost all our communities over the last 15-20 years. This has affected everything. Year round.

    in reply to: Annoying pop-ups #2244565
    ujm
    Participant

    Pine: Add uBlock Origin to your web browser and you won’t have the annoying popups the OP is complaining about (or any ads, for that matter.)

    in reply to: Joe, I need your help here #2244399
    ujm
    Participant

    The standard of livelihood required is bare minimum. “Kach hi darkah shel torah – pas b’melach tochal etc.” – Bread, salt and water – if you have that, you have parnasah. The Rambam writes that a typical Baal Habayis (working man) works three hours a day and learns eight hours a day.

    The Rama 246:4 rules explicitly that it is absolutely prohibited according to Halachah to engage in a curriculum of secular studies. To read secular studies now and then, is permitted, he says. The source of the Rama is the Yerushalmi Sanhedrin.

    It has been suggested the difference between a curriculum and just a glance, is that this prohibition is not due to Bitul Torah but rather a Bizayon HaTorah, by establishing studies in areas other than Torah, it shows that you believe they have some value that would justify learning them when you could have been learning Torah.

    Rav Shimon Schwab ZT’L sought the Torah opinions of two great authorities, Rav Boruch Ber Liebowitz ZT’L and Rav Elchonon Wasserman ZT’L, regarding college education. Their responses were as follows:

    Conclusion of Birkas Shmuel (Kiddushin #27 p.42):

    “What emerges is (a) that according to the Torah the obligation of Banim Ubeni Banim means you must make your children into Geonei and Chachmei Torah – and not merely to prepare them for life as a Jew. But rather, you must teach them and get them to learn the entire Torah, and if chas v’sholom you do not, you violate the entire Mitzvah of learning Torah as per Banim Ubnei Banim.

    (b) Universities and gymnasiums (i.e. secondary schools) are prohibited because of Apikursus [that they teach]. My Rebbi (i.e. Rav Chaim Soloveichik ZT’L) prohibited them even in war time, and even to save a life, for to avoid violating this, even a Jewish life is to be spent.

    (c) To learn secular studies on a regular basis is prohibited, as per the Rama 246:4 …

    Brothers, please do Teshuva while there is still time, for the enlightenment (Haskalah) has blinded our eyes and weakened us. For we have no benefit in this world at all – both spiritually and physically – except from Torah. All the strength of Klall Yisroel is from the Torah … we should do Tehsuva and repair the Batei Medrashos that have been broken by the Enlightenment.”

    Kovetz Shiurim II:47:

    Question: Under what circumstances is it permitted to learn secular studies?

    Answer:

    (a) If you must learn books that contain apikursus, it is prohibited … needless to say even to make money or to prevent a loss thereof.

    (b) If you must sit in school with Goyim, and it causes someone to befriend the Goyim and their ways, it is prohibited as per the Lo Saseh of Hishomer Lecha etc. for the Torah commanded us to distance ourselves from the Goyim in every way…

    (c) If the studies do not cause you to learn Apikursus or to befriend Goyim, and you learn secular studies in order to know a skill to make a living, it is permitted, and it is a Mitzvah. However, this is only in general. But if a person sees that his son wants to learn Torah and he is prepared to be a Gadol B’Torah, in such a case R. Nehuray said: “I will forgo all skills in the world and teach my son only Torah.”…

    (d) If you don’t need the studies for Parnasa, and you just want to be involved in them, there is reason to prohibit because of Bitul Torah, as per the Rama in YD 246, who writes that it is forbidden to learn secular studies on a regular basis….perhaps it is not due to Bitul Torah but rather it ia an affront to the honor of the Torah … someone who set out to learn secular subjects indicates that he believes that they have a purpose in and of themselves [besides for parnasa], and that is against the Torah’s opinion. [see above]…”

    Reb Elchonon continues, saying that the confusion in Germany happened when people thought, mistakenly, that by Jews possessing secular knowledge the Goyim will hate them less. This caused a “negiyos” – a vested interest – that caused the German Jews to desire that their rabbis have a secular education as well.

    Rav Moshe Feinstein ZT’L also denounced college in a Teshuva, and in a famous speech delivered to his students, published under the title “The Counsel of the Wicked” (Vaad LeHaromas Keren HaTorah, New York, 1978). There he reiterates that everyone has an obligation to become great in Torah, we should not care so much about Cadillac’s (yes, this was said in the “olden days”), and that learning Torah is what we should be pursuing, not secular stuff. He says in America you do not need college to make a Parnassa, and we should be willing to live on little, not a lot, for the sake of Torah, and that R. Nehuray’s statement of abandoning all skills in favor of Torah applies all that more today that we live in a country where you can make a parnassa without college, with no miracles needed.

    There is a tape available in many Seforim stores called “The prohibition to learn in Colleges” (Yiddish), which contains addresses by Rav Moshe Feinstein ZT’L and Rav Aharon Kotler ZT’L condemning college.

    Regarding High School, the only reasons it is allowed is either because education is mandated by State Law (in New York it is until age 17), or simply because if they did not have High School education in the Yeshivas, parents would simply send their kids to worse places to get it.

    But it is definitely looked upon not as a l’chatchilah, but rather as something that is annoyingly necessary in the current environment.

    Today, there are a small number of High Schools in America – particularly in Lakewood – that do not teach English. Also, many Yeshivos do try to reduce the amount of secular studies as much as possible, through knocking out the last semester of English, and a number of kids are leaving HS early to enter Bais Medrash.

    Rav Chaim Segal ZT’L, the Menahel of the High School at Yeshiva Chaim Berlin was once told by Rav Shach ZT’L that if possible, he should not be teaching English studies. In Eretz Yisroel, almost all Chareidi Yeshivos do not have English at that age. Rav Aharon Kotler ZT’L made some kind of commitment not to allow English studies on the HS level in Lakewood. The exact details, and if this was actually a Takanah or merely a preference, is not clear and depends who you ask. In any case, Rabbi Elya Svei, Rosh Yeshiva of Philadelphia and a student of Rav Aharon’s, was asked why he allows English in Philly if Rav Aharon was against it. What difference can there be between the town of Lakewood NJ and Philadelphia PA? Reb Elya answered that he has no choice, and that currently, the Baalei Batim would not send their kids to the Yeshiva except under these circumstances.

    Is any of this the ideal? No. It is not. Is it justified? The schools say it is, as they have no choice. But the point is not what the Jews do, its what Judaism wants. Everyone agrees that it would be a higher level, a preferable situation if we would indeed not learn English even at the HS level, at least not beyond what is necessary to survive. Nobody claims it is an ideal.

    The Chasam Sofer in Parsha Beshalach states clearly that certain secular knowledge is useful for learning certain Torah topics, such as cow anatomy being useful for shechitah, and arithmetic for Eruvin and Sukkah. But that before we embark on obtaining secular knowledge – and of course that means only to the extent that it is useful for our Torah studies – we must first fill ourselves with Torah-only knowledge. After we are strong in Torah, only then can we move to acquire the useful secular knowledge that we need for our Torah studies.

    He quotes the Rambam, who he describes as “the father of philosophy” in our religion, in Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah, stating that a person may not learn philosophy until after he has “filled his stomach” with Shas and Poskim, which are the things, and only the things, that bring us Olam Habah. Then he quotes the Rashba, saying that there is a cherem against learning any secular studies if you are under age 25! The he quotes the Gemora in Brachos “Keep your children away from science” (higayon, as some meforshim translate it), noting that the Gemora is directing its prohibition at “your children”, but not at the adults, for adults, who are already advanced in Torah knowledge, need some secular knowledge, such as cow biology (I keep emphasizing that so that we do not make the error of thinking that the secular knowledge that we need is a college education). But it is dangerous for us to pursue it until we are armed and ready with a Torah foundation. This is because someone with a Torah perspective looks at the value and culture of of secular studies differently than does someone ignorant of Torah. And we do want to get the proper perspective.

    It’s kind of like firemen putting out a fire. They have to (a) dress in their heat-resistant protective outfits, and (b) run into the fire and put it out. But of course, they have to do it in the right order.

    And that is indeed what it boils down to – do we value the Torah’s standards of education more than that of the secular world or vice versa? The choice is simple: All the secular “education” that you get will be useless to you in the next world. There, they will not ask you if you know how many US presidents were re-elected in history, or whether you are familiar with the policies of Chairman Mao, or if you know how to program a computer. They will bring a Sefer Torah scroll to you and ask “do you know what it says in here?” The more you know of that, the more you will be considered “educated”. The less you know, the more you will be considered ignorant. So the question is – do I want to be educated on this world or on the next?

    And here we thought that a secular education is expensive! Its much more expensive than you think – you can acquire it only at the expense of your time and effort that you could have been putting toward becoming educated in Olam Habah.

    Two things, though. First, the prohibition is only to learn secular studies as a regular curriculum. To read about them occasionally in your spare time is permitted.

    in reply to: Annoying pop-ups #2244357
    ujm
    Participant

    uBlock Origin.

    in reply to: How to delete my account here #2244094
    ujm
    Participant

    Once in, never out. You are a lifetime member, like it or not.

    in reply to: ShopRites are disappearing from predominantly orthodox communities #2244080
    ujm
    Participant

    1. Which ShopRites closed down?

    2. How are you sure it was the mall owner that terminated their lease rather than the store owner themselves deciding to close the store?

    in reply to: Bibas Family is probably alive #2243894
    ujm
    Participant

    Are you sure that your psychoanalysis is a 70% probability and not a 45% or 88% probability?

    in reply to: I guess ChaBaD is Zionist now? #2243654
    ujm
    Participant

    Dr. Berger has no credibility.

    in reply to: Chris Christie – why can’t Jews rally around him? #2242890
    ujm
    Participant

    coffee: Christie is a social liberal. He should become a Democrat.

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2242115
    ujm
    Participant

    DaMoshe: commonsaychel’s comment (that you challenged) is 100% correct.

    And so is coffee addict’s comment, despite your poor attempt to camouflage Rabbi Bender’s stance on this.

    in reply to: Political Conversations of Old #2241790
    ujm
    Participant

    By ditching his hat, that heretofore society considered proper and essential.

    in reply to: Chassidishe Out of town Kollelim? #2241657
    ujm
    Participant

    As many have written (inc. women from the Chasidish Kollel

    The Baltimore Chasidish Kollel eschews the “Chumros of the week” so much, and is so live and let live, that they even have women in the Kollel?

    That truly does demonstrate their taking a stance against the “We can always be more Frum by…” attitude!

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2241527
    ujm
    Participant

    “sending out flyers to the Agudah mailing list announcing the event and its importance”

    That verbiage is not a request that anyone attend.

    And even THAT was withdrawn and the rally denounced by the Gedolim.

    Not one Godol is on the record as having endorsed attending.

    And even the unsigned pareve letter regarding its importance, even before that was withdrawn, was not signed by name by any Rabbi.

    in reply to: Chassidishe Out of town Kollelim? #2241468
    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: Rabbi Schwab didn’t have mixed seating. Nor did they have mixed seating in Lita.

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2241438
    ujm
    Participant

    Not even one of the Gedolim on the Moetzes is on the record supporting attendance at this secular rally.

    In fact, there isn’t even one Godol anywhere, including outside the Moetzes, that supported it once it became known who the speakers were and what the program would be.

    ujm
    Participant

    Does anyone here think it isn’t worth the deal to get back the Jewish hostages?

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2241123
    ujm
    Participant

    Even the few Rabbonim who approved the initial pareve letter from the Agudah saying it is okay to attend the Washington rally last week Tuesday, officially withdrew that permission to attend, once they learned what the rally was really all about.

    They, too, then said it was forbidden to attend:

    READ IT: Rav Aharon Feldman Shlit”a Responds To Massive Controversy Surrounding Pro-Israel March

    .

    ujm
    Participant

    Even the few Rabbonim who approved the initial pareve letter from the Agudah saying it is okay to attend the Washington rally last week Tuesday, officially withdrew that permission to attend, once they learned what the rally was really all about.

    They, too, then said it was forbidden to attend:

    READ IT: Rav Aharon Feldman Shlit”a Responds To Massive Controversy Surrounding Pro-Israel March

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2241114
    ujm
    Participant

    Even the few Rabbonim who approved the initial pareve letter from the Agudah saying it is okay to attend the Washington rally last week Tuesday, officially withdrew that permission to attend, once they learned what the rally was really all about.

    They, too, then said it was forbidden to attend:

    READ IT: Rav Aharon Feldman Shlit”a Responds To Massive Controversy Surrounding Pro-Israel March

    in reply to: I guess ChaBaD is Zionist now? #2241096
    ujm
    Participant

    Menachem Shmei: Thank you for your comment. It is very insightful.

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2241091
    ujm
    Participant

    Zeff: What about the Roshei Yeshivos and Gedolei Torah of Open Orthodox circles, are they inferior, or is it only the Roshei Yeshivos and Gedolei Torah of Modern Orthodox circles that you are concerned with?

    Do you insist that those on a higher spiritual plateau lower themselves to the standards of those who espouse ideals outside the acceptable Torah life demanded by Gedolei Yisroel?

    in reply to: Chassidishe Out of town Kollelim? #2241090
    ujm
    Participant

    Why has the Baltimore MO community dwindled? Where did they go to?

    in reply to: Bli Neder no music until all hostages are free #2240845
    ujm
    Participant

    Isn’t there an issur against listening to music before the Beis Hamikdash is rebuilt?

    ujm
    Participant

    Dofi: Here’s the letter you asked me for:

    UPDATED – ADDITIONAL GEDOLIM SIGN KOL KOREI: “Bnei Torah Should Not Attend Washington Rally”

    Names and signatures are on it, as per your request.

    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ:/Dofi The original Aguda letter was NOT from the Moetzes. It was from the laymen/executive office of the Agudah. It was very pareve and didn’t tell anyone to go, just that it would be nice for a large turnout. It said they asked their Rabbonim, but didn’t specify which Rabbonim that was. Previously, that meant, in the singular, just the Novominsker, who was the Rosh Agudah, before he was niftar.)

    I had one of the members of the Moetzes in my car on Tuesday and asked him. He told me that the decision was for people not to go. (I then asked him about the Agudah executive office letter, but I then realized he fell asleep by that time.)

    ujm
    Participant

    290,000 is another figure pulled out of a hat. Where did it come from? Not from the DC police. It’s about as accurate as Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan’s so-called “Million Man March”, also in Washington, DC, really had a million million blacks attending.

    ujm
    Participant

    AAQ: Which hat did you pull that out of? None of the Gedolim on the Moetzes expressed any support whatsoever to attend the rally. Please cite which ones, by name, you are alleging otherwise, along with producing any evidence you have of a signed letter to such effect.

    Marxist: You can make the same point about the Orthodox, in general. 90% of American Jews are non-Orthodox.

    And within Orthodoxy, the Chareidi oilam constitutes 66% of Orthodox Jews.

    ujm
    Participant

    user: Which part of what the Gedolim wrote in their above signed letter are you having difficulty understanding?

    In particular, to quote the Gedolim’s own words:

    “its organizers and participants are not משלומי אמוני ישראל. And as is known, the opinion of our Rabbanim, z’tl whose mesorah we hold, warned us from joining with religious streams who are far from the Derech HaTorah and Mesorah. And especially after the speakers’ schedule of the rally was published, and it is known to all that the main speakers are a mixture of people whose entire essence is the opposite of Torah and yirah and tzninus, r’l. Since then, the matter is simple – we must distance ourselves from them and the masses.”

    How many negative effect on Klal Yisroel can you count in just this small quoted portion of their letter? If your comprehension is poor, I’ll be more than glad to help you along. Some, but not limited to, of the negative effects cited by the Gedolim are:

    1. Its organizers and participants are not משלומי אמוני ישראל.

    2. Our Rabbanim, z’tl whose mesorah we hold, warned us from joining with religious streams who are far from the Derech HaTorah.

    3. The main speakers are a mixture of people whose entire essence is the opposite of Torah and yirah and tzninus, r’l.

    4. Since then, the matter is simple – we must distance ourselves from them and the masses.

    Is that enough negative effects for Klal Yisroel for you, or do you need more?

    in reply to: WANTED — Looking to Hire Immediately #2240145
    ujm
    Participant

    “The check is in the mail.”

    ujm
    Participant

    user: Right, they said much worse and stronger than I. The Gedolim wrote it would have a negative effect on Klal Yisroel, not just that it wouldn’t have a positive effect.

    in reply to: Speakers by rally #2239886
    ujm
    Participant

    Herzog quoted a lot of passukim

    He would help end Arab terror far more by starting to keep Shabbos than by quoting a lot of posukim.

    in reply to: WANTED — Looking to Hire Immediately #2239834
    ujm
    Participant

    You get paid daily or annually. The choice is yours.

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2239614
    ujm
    Participant
    ujm
    Participant
    in reply to: Speakers by rally #2239612
    ujm
    Participant
    ujm
    Participant

    Amil: No real Beis Yaakov is sending their girls.

    in reply to: Why was the page about a jewish man ripping down posters removed? #2239254
    ujm
    Participant

    What’s this emotional hangup about these useless posters? They accomplish nothing.

    in reply to: Obama: Sonei Yisroel Par Excellence #2239217
    ujm
    Participant

    SR: Carter is an antisemite and a rasha. But your history of the $2 bill is completely inaccurate. It long predates Carter’s presidency, which he took office of in 1977.

    in reply to: I guess ChaBaD is Zionist now? #2239067
    ujm
    Participant

    coffeeroomguy: The last Lubavitcher Rebbe didn’t call anyone freiacks… even if they were freiacks.

    ujm
    Participant

    It is important to note that so far, despite all the commentary, not one person, not one, has yet explained how this rally will save even one Jewish life.

    Will Hamas stop their terrorism if they see such a big rally?

    If instead of 25,000 people showing up to this rally, 35,000 people show up, will a second Jewish life somehow be saved? How will a bigger rally save more lives than a smaller rally? Let alone, how will any rally save even one life.

Viewing 50 posts - 551 through 600 (of 4,650 total)