ubiquitin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 4,901 through 4,950 (of 5,346 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051571
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Nequeim,

    BTw in my comment regarding juries I use jury and grand jury interchangeably. This isnt accurate. The case of garner involved a grand jury. Grand juries dont get screened for bias and such. In a borough like Staten Island which is heavily populated by police officers and their families, it is not improbable tha the jury was biased. Even if they said hey I used to be a cop and I think cops shouldnt be indited they still can serve on a grand jury. Please keep that in mind as you evaluate whether a grand jury decision should be “doubtless”

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051569
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Health

    I dont know fake halacha so well, but I’ll bite. Why was he a treifa?

    You also didnt respond to my question to you. here it is again:

    “If it tuns out that Officers Ramos and Liu have ever stolen anything in their lives (even a shava perutah or less), ever been mevarech Hashem, gilui Arayos etc, then it is “very good” that they got shot!?”

    Nequeitam

    – “The Jury decided that there was no case to answer” I beleive the jury was wrong. And this isnt the first time

    -“the Jury’s verdict is doubtless better informed that mine or yours'” Doubtless? A jury of 12 people too dumb to get out of jury duty is now doubtless? You are aware that in choosing a jury lawyers avoid educated people as thye prefer people they can manipulate.

    also you have quite a few “probably”s in your post.

    -“but you appear unclear as to the process, and freely say that you have no idea how the law can be improved.”

    I have lots of ideas bu we are already of topic, if something is worng I dont think you have to offer a better solution inorder to be allowed to protest.

    -“don’t actually seem to know why”

    Weve been going at this for quite a few posts, you can disagree with me obviously, but I think Ive been pretty clear on why I think an injustice occured here.

    -Your congress suggestion was hilarious btw (I assume you were kidding, if you were serious that paragraph is more naive than the one about the infalliable jury)

    – “That enough for ya’?”

    No! Thats a “probably” and “almost certainly” Definitely not enough to get off scot free fur killing (even accidentally)

    -“And I will always support the right to protest”

    Again so we agree! as Ive said from my very first post that mentioned you.

    -“th officers had no idea he had asthma”

    The guy looked like a walking health disaster. YW fan says he wheezed when he taked and couldnt walk a block.

    -” But the system then was not the system of today”

    Not sure if you are serious. It is exactly the same!

    -“that case is evidence of a possible incorrect jury ruling is both conjecture and inaccurate.”

    Agreed! it was definitely incorrect jury ruling (Oj later all but confessed). (Though I wonder how you can judge that case if you arent clued in to the events of that trial)

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051562
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Netiquaim

    – “You agree the law has been adhered to,”

    I dont agree, Ive heard different reports regarding the “chokehold” ranging between “illegal” and “discouraged” I’ve avoided that line of argument simply because I’m not clear on the facts The the most leniant take i ahve heard is that it is “discouraged” do you know if anyone says it is a routine (encouraged?) use of force such as mace?

    -“Can you please come up with a fairer system of choosing when to indict. “

    No, that is not my job (thankfully).

    – “despite them having far more access to the facts of the case than you have,”

    I’m not sure what more evidence they can have than a videotape.

    -“So feel free to protest.”

    Again so you dont agree with YW fan (read the op) as I have been saying all along.

    -“single episode involving a stupid man (I don’t wish to speak ill of the dead, but he shouldn’t have resisted)”

    Agreed.

    -“being stupid is not a crime”

    It absolutely is if it leads to death! I’m not sure if driving with my eyes closed is illegal, though it certainly is stupid, If somebody dies as a result of that of course I committed a crime!

    Question for You. (Depending on your age I guess) What did you think of say the OJ Simpson verdict?

    YW fan

    knowledge isnt always a factor. If I don’t know red means stop,I still get a ticket for driving through it.

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051558
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    YW fan glad to help (though we have covered this)

    If he didnt have asthma they would be LESS culpable in murder. I gave an example of pushing on a person’s head. with a tiny bit of force. If by some freak accident a person died as a result of that, it wouldnt be murder, (maybe manslaughter). However if the persn was an infant with a open fontanelle (“soft spot”) you wouldnt say (I hope) well the baby’s physical condition led to its death.

    Or (more direct nalagy) if I find a chronic COPD’R who is oxygen dependent and I clamp down on his oxygen supply watch him die as he gasps “I cant breathe” Would you say, well if he wasnt so sick clamping on oxygen wouldnt kill him so his medical issues are what casued death not my choking off his oxygen supply.

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051556
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Neutiquam

    You have many comments in your last post worthy of rsponses, I will go in order:

    – I am not using “murder” in the legal sense. They used waht you agree is “excesive force” which directly led to death. Legally it is probably negligent homicide.

    – I agree regarding Halacha.

    – It is not the exact same as in court, it doesnt need to be unanimous, odds are it was a heavily biased Jury in a borough were many are related to police officers. (I am of course making assumptions but hey so are you in your last paragraph.)

    – “That is democracy, that is law. ” If the law is wrong then there is a moral duty to protest in some way *This is the point YW fan originally disagreed with*

    – Whats amazing about this case is it is clear, it is on tape. What I find so frustrating about this story is thta after Fergusen which was largely a he said he said (or he said she said he said she said… if you count all the eyewitness accounts) I gave the benefit of the doubt to the grand jury. I thought, as Obama and other suggested that equipping police officers with cameras would solve these issues as events would be plain for all to see. Yet here we have tape of an unarmed nonthreatening person, literally with his hands up! jumped on and choked to death. The video is widely available and the perpetrators still got off scot free!

    YW Fan,

    almost definitely not.

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051552
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Health,

    I’m not sure if you are serious, Garner wasn’t being arrested/killed for grand larceny. What does that have to do with anything? Are you aying becasue of his stealing in the past it allows for him to be killed?

    If so, it would follow based on your “logic” that any body who stole ever can just be killed.

    If it tuns out that Officers Ramos and Liu have ever stolen anything in their lives (even a shava perutah or less), ever been mevarech Hashem, gilui Arayos etc, then it is “very good” that they got shot!?

    And you have the nerve to attribute this gross krumkeit to Hashem?

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051546
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Neutiquam

    ” if what they were doing is what the law permits, then it cannot go to trial” Circular reasoning, whether the law permits it should be determined at trial

    At any rate: “Of course, protests should always be allowed,” As I said we agree!!

    (It was forseeable as YW fan helfully provided: “He wheezed when he talked and could not walk a block without resting,” It was certainly forceeable when he began saying “I cant breathe” and they stood around not helping. If EMs was called then and he was treated, I MAY have had less of a case, but when you squeeze the life out of a obese man who “wheezed when he talked” and then stand around doing nothing, you don’t need a Medical degree to guess what will happen)

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051542
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Health

    you are making less and less sense, in the wild west theri was free reign to kill whomever you didnt like, we do not live in the wild west, that is why the police should be held to a standard and answer for their actions.

    you must have a different list of 7 mitzvos, mine doesnt include selling loose cigarettes. What on Earth are you talking about,.

    Please don’t insult the Torah by dragging it in to defend your krum bloodthirsty shitos. Everybody from Reform going full circle to Neturei karta also claims they have the Torah on their side. If you have a source indicating that selling loose cigarettes or resisting arrest is punishable by the death penalty fine otherwise stop claiming to speak for Hashem.

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051539
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    nequetaim, wether or not it can be called murder is a (relevant) side issue.

    the main issues are: 1) is there enough to go to trial, from your post “there was culpability on both sides” “the measures they used were excessive.” I would think you’d agree, What should be done with “culpable” police who use measures that are “excessive”?

    and more to the point, can you agree that the video is ambiguous enogh justify (peacful) protest, and those who protest do not deserve to “lose police protection for a week” (that is what this discussion is about, no need to read the entire thread it is in the OP)?

    This part is incorrect: “was certainly unforeseeable at the moment the force was applied” It should have been forseebele, th guy looks like a walking health disaster

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051537
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior

    So we agree, this discussion was if there is a right to protest. Yw fan in the op says no.

    Health

    Are you serious “very good” that a person was killed. I can disagree with those who say it was sad but unavoidable and the police shouldnt be held accountable. You don’t deserve talking to. Killing unarmed, harmless people for crimes that dont carry the deatg penalty, is never “very good” and I dont see how a good person can call it such.

    Gamnit,

    Not good enough, after holding his breath causing him to gasp for air, they shouldve provided oxygen and probably albuterol and steroids too. Not doing so is part of their act of murder.

    Yw fan

    Neutiquam does not agree with you “in this case it (violence) was too much”

    Yw fan

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051525
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior, my comment was in jest.

    To be honest I’m not sure what they should have done, it isnt relevant. Bottom line is an non-violent man dies at the hands of the police, and it was deemed so acceptable that the case wont even go to trial.

    It is perfectly reasonable to protest this gross miscarriage of justice, I don’t know what they shouldve done (for arguments sake) let their lawyers make their argument in front of a jury, and they Garner will never have theoppurtunity, is a compelling reason to protest (peacefully)

    Do you and YW fan really find the above to be so unreasonable?

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112639
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior, yes

    DY, I briefly alluded to that earlier. among Asian cultures the custom on Christmas is davka to give money and not presents, though I am not sure if that would be a factor, since if we were to ban every custom any society has that is related to A”Z there woudlnt be much left to do. What are your thoughts. Shoudl the Asian custom be a factor (according to the Gr”a) or do we limit it to custom’s that surronding society does?

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051523
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior, how far could he run?

    To quote YW fan “He wheezed when he talked and could not walk a block without resting, they said”

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051515
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    In English that is called choking to death

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112634
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior (To a lesser extent DY), if I show you a source indicating that christmas gelt precedes chanukah gelt would you say gelt is assur?

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051513
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    YW are you serious? It means he is about to stop breathing A body cant sustain breathing @ 50 for too long, especially if in spite of that he isnt oxygenating well.

    So let me get this straight, if im choking somone he says I cant breathe I cant breathe then passes out and dies. I didnt kill him, since obviously he was able to breathe while I choked him (since he was talking), and then he just happned to pass out for some other reason nothing to do with my chokehold on his neck. Do you actually beleive this?

    Picturesq, resisting arrest doenst carry the death penalty

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051508
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    YW Fan, “I cant breathe” , If somebody is maintaining an oxygen saturation of 80% and breathing at a rate of 50 breaths/minute. You can bet the person will be gasping and saying I cant breathe. This would indicate impending respiratory failure. To say “well, obviously you can breathe since you are able to talk, so let me just stand around doing nothing, or better yet, keep choking you” Is simply absurd

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051503
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    YW fan there is nothing there to change anybody’s mind. I hope.

    The video of Garner being killed is widely available. If not enought o convict, at the least it shouldve led to a trial that it didnt is a travesty of justice that should lead all to protest.

    This line “he died as a result of poor health and cardiac arrest. Mr. Garner was obese and had a history of asthma, diabetes, and other health issues resulting from his poor medical condition.” is even more nonsense, so using this “logic” if I kill someone who is oxygen dependent by say clamping on his O2 supply, I am not culpable since if the victim dint require a steady oxygen supply, my clmaing a tube wouldnt have harmed him. That he suffered from chronic ailments is reason for the police to have been even more cautious in how they subdue the non-violent felon, not less so!

    in reply to: No police protection for a week #1051497
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    YW Fan

    so in your view the choices are a Police force that kills unarmed felons with no consequences or nothing?

    in reply to: #1049521
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    shoejoe. Those tunes are kown as “misinai” as an expression they arent litterally from Sinai.

    As to the OP’s question outside of written word it is hard (impossible?)to pass down a mesorah over that long a period. Think of tzaras/exact color of techeiles which have been lost over the years. Even within the written word think how many machlokasim have arisen over the years, even involving basic things like sounds of shofar, orders of parshiyos of tefilin, of course explanations have been given as to how those disagreements arose, but the interuptions/confusion/disagreement in our mesorah is real (we have ways to deal with it, his isnt a question). Even within the written Torah their are differences between ours and chazal’s and even among ours their are 10 differences between most of ours and Teimanim (the most well known of which is Dakah with a “heh” or “aleph”) That tunes have been lost is o be expected.

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112622
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY for arguments sake assuming you are correct (as an aside gift giving on Decemebr 25th is a Western European thing, Asians exclsively give money. Though like us, in America their minhag is evolving somewhat too)

    So what would be assur:

    Gift giving ever?

    Gift giving on Yom tov in particular?

    Gift giving specificaly on chanukah: always even November/early december or only when it is near Dec 25th.

    in reply to: Why is everybody anti anti-vaccine theories, a dissertation #1100437
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    scared not quite. Anti-vaccinators are not interested in the truth, if they were this one would be easy since they can look at any of dozens of peer reviewed studies proving the safety of vaccines.

    Anti-vaccinators are guilty people putting theri own and other children at risk.

    If an ignoramus came along and innocently asked vaccine safety be proven, no problem do a quick pubmed search.

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112612
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    In case my last point wasnt clear. What I mean is that claiming something “isnt in the spirit” is subjective. If I dont view it as copying goyim, but as a celebration of chanukah, then it is in the spirit for me.

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112610
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    What? DY and I are in agreement, (baruch shechiyanu…)

    Also here is where your point really falls apart. You (now) say there isn’t anything technically wrong with it, which of course make it mutar. But it isnt “in the spirit”

    Now most people giving gifts, arent giving it to be like goyim, they are either giving it because that is the present day minhag (or “minhag” if you prefer, i.e what is done lemaseh) So you are saying that they should think they are doing it to be like goyim, making it not in the spirit and therefore avoid it. Being “in the spirit” of something, by definition requires people to think about the connotation you ascribe to the act

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112608
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    ummmm lior: “ubi: The Rema doesn’t support you at all. You fardreit the Rema into the results you want in this case.”

    ?????

    in reply to: Chanuka Cookies are worse than gifts. #1050576
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    That doesnt necessarily make it assur, please see the chanukah gift thread for further info. (Or Y.D. 178 if you are really adventurous)

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112604
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior the minhag of gifts is spreading faster than I thought. Kupas Ha’ir raising money to “Give Them Strength! This Chanukah, send a toy to a needy child and bring light and joy to their life! Kupat Ha’ir will donate one wrapped toy to a child in need this Chanukah, thanks to your generous donation.”

    I know, maybe they aren’t “ehrilche yidden” as you put it

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112601
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Thanks DY great source.

    Lior in case you have trouble, he lumps together both gift giving/money using them interchangebly and wonders whether BOTH are chukas akum, ofc ourse cites the Rema that since has a rational reason both are allowed.

    (As an aside oomis the chashmanoim were far far from the first to mint coins)

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112597
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY even if so, Gift giving on Chanukah is certainly rational, especially when you consider that Lior agrees that money is ok or even commendable as a minhag in its own right. Giving gifts in place of money can hardly be considered irrational.

    Even without that gift giving is a fairly common, and more to the point: rational, way of celebrating

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112595
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior, Not quite the rema says a minhag thta has a rational explanation his example is special outfit for doctors) isnt assur.

    Are you saying gift giving isnt rational?

    Did you read the Rema?

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112586
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Ok so its a machlokes between the Rema and lior.

    Be careful who you write of since by far most frum jews do in fact give presents. A simple glance through advertisements in yated confurms this. Who do you think they are advertising to? (hint it isnt pope francis)

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112584
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    The funniest part to me is that if we were having this discussion a century from now (or if our Grandchildren would), once the minhag has completley evolved to gifts, EEK and Lior will be defending the ancient heilege minhag of giving davka gifts on chanuka. Pointing out all sorts of hidden kabbalastic interpretations, If you take the first to letters of “matana” in mispr kattan it equas 8 keneged the days of chanukah, while the mispar kattan of the last to letters is 10 keneged the seva sephiros and the three avos etc…

    While I (or Grandchildren) will point out actually, minhag of gifts are fairly new and a century ago people argued it was actually goyish.

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112581
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Um Lior not quite. don’t guess halacha. the Rema says (source provided above) If an act has a rational toeles it is allowed. Giving gifts has a rational toeles. Of course others (Gr”a have stricter interpretations as to the prameters of Chukas akum, but you cant fault others for following basic Rema,)

    BTw Religous Christians are opposed to gifts as it is a “commercialization” of their religious-holiday.

    in reply to: what is the origin of chanukah gifts? #1112579
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Minhagim always evolve. chazal don’t mention chanuka Gelt, neither do any Rishonim The minhag of gelt started later and like many minhagim evolved now the minhag is changing to Gifts (among some).

    Is the mekor from Goyim? Probably (Though I’m willing to bet that Gelt came from Goyim too but no source at the moment)

    does that make it assur? Well we have halachos for that go through Y.D. 178. It is quite hard to argue that it is assur.

    in reply to: What would you answer? #1045071
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    It isnt complicated at all, you don’e feel comfortable supporting a religous organization you are not apart of so you will donate in his memory to say american red cross or to the poor or something.

    (as an aside, saying “it’s nothing personal” makes it sound personal)

    in reply to: Westboro baptist church? #1044782
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Voos epes, by far most people here (and not here for that matter)disagree with you.

    That we don’t comment is becasue of several reasons, including:

    1) PBA and others are doing a fine job pointing out how wrong/foolish you are

    2) You arent bright enough nor honest enough to realize the errors of your ways, so arguing with you may be a waste of time

    in reply to: Westboro baptist church? #1044585
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    voos epes,

    You don’t mean Rabbi Weiss you mean Yisroel Dovid Weiss. Rabbi Weiss is quite opposed to NK.

    Secondly, you are on very bad footing when a list of atendees includes David Duke.

    in reply to: Mishpacha vs. Family First #1043751
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior, we can discuss that separately, as they did in fact promote the cult but this is waaay off topic. Regardless though you havent answered my question:

    “can you give an example that makes you view Ami as left of center?”

    in reply to: Mishpacha vs. Family First #1043748
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior can you give an example that makes you view Ami as left of center?

    You either have a funny center or you have right and left backwards

    I can think of plenty of right wing stories for example defending/prmototing the very Right wing lev tahor cult (granted they probably did it to create controversy and sell magazines, nonethless they couldve done the same by defending say, Avi Weiss)

    Can you povided any counter example?

    in reply to: Statistician Dr. Charlie Hall's analysis of the marital age gap data #1040797
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    DY, it you keep claiming that my point has been addressed whn it has not. Though I dont want to hijack this thread for that point.

    As to your question why boys arent dateless, it is becasue the system as set up favors the boys (favors is an understatment.) The boys are essentially given a list of girls and told to start picking. Boy says “Yes” To A even if she says no, he will then say “Yes” to B and so on and so forth until he gets that Yes. Therfore a guy is essentially gauranteed a date, regardless of the age gap.

    Thanks for conceding though that the the age discrepency of married couples isnt based on hard data.

    in reply to: Statistician Dr. Charlie Hall's analysis of the marital age gap data #1040786
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Even with an age gap TM In ordere for it to be a significant cause related to any shiduch disparity. Data regarding age difference among couples is needed too. Has that been adressed anywhere?

    (And of course as explained elsewhere the Age Gap TM while it MAY explain the shiduch crises it in no way explains why many girls arent even getting dates aka the dating divide TM)

    in reply to: Dangerous or scary? #1037523
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    The question is a non-sequitor: Sacry movies are less dangerous than both French fries and Roller coasters,and less dangerous than walking down the street. Yet they are scarier.

    in reply to: Calling uncles and aunts without using their title #1136698
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    I’m so confused Isnt it up to the uncles and aunts in queston? If Uncle Shimon is comforatble being called “Shimon” are we to tell him too bad, lior says it is “unacceptable”?

    in reply to: Nuclear Iran #1036588
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Will Iran get nuclear weapons? Yes

    Will Israel stop it? no

    What is behind all this? A desire to show how strong they are.

    There is a medrash somehwere thats says anything you want.

    What is the reason that Hashem put us in such a matzav? Nobody can know

    And is this connected to Gog Mimagog in any way? ditto

    in reply to: Torah codes #1034157
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lamud vav, the chances of finding it are one in a million before you look for them.

    however once youve found it you can attach significance to it.

    For example say i spit out 4 numbers at random. The odds of randomly generating today’s date 10 05 are 1/10,000 Would be pretty cool. However once ive generated any 4 numbers you can attach significane to it, it can be your birthday, your wifes birthday, this year, the year you were born, the year your wife was born, your house number, etc… Once the number is generated it is easy to see what an amazing machine it guessed my uncle’s birthday the odds are 1/10,000. While true, the odds of generating ANY “significant 4 number combination” quite high. If you really grasp and throw in gematrias the odds of generating a “significant” four digit code are certain if you attach the significance once youve found it.

    It isnt hard to search the Troah for Obama, Barack, BarackObama BarachHObama etc once he is elected. you will find something if you look for enough stuff as they have and has been found in War an Peace

    in reply to: Torah codes #1034150
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    1) “Codes” have been found in Moby dick War and Peace among other works.

    2) “Codes” can be found in any string of ranodom letters if you don’t decide beforhand what you are looking for. For example If you spell out the first letters of the names of the months January, February etc… You get jfmamjJASONd. Cleary a secret code to Jason, if your name is Jason they are alluding to you.

    It allways struck me that the codes are used to predict facts after they occur. After Obama is elected they found codes alluding to it. ItMAy be impressive if before the election they had looked for Obama and Romney and bad news for Romney his name isnt there.

    Or better yet, I’d like to see the codes predict who will win in 2016, it shouldnt be too hard it can probably be broken down to at most say 50 possibilities thats nothing for a computer to run. Have them predict the winner, then we can talk.

    in reply to: Source in Torah and/or Gemara for Kapparos #1034369
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Lior are you serious? That the rema lived in 16th century poland is a boich sevara?

    Or that the logistics of providing chicjens for an agrarian 16th century society are different than a 21st Century city?

    And as sam2 said I in no way am dreaming of overruling the rema?

    in reply to: Source in Torah and/or Gemara for Kapparos #1034366
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    No Lior the Rema lived in a rural society (16th century Poland) when all had access to chicken to how to feed them hold them and care for them. It is a minhag tbut as others have pointed out their are halachos too. The Rema would not recognize kapporas today .

    in reply to: 3 in 1 shabbos #1034009
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    shabbos on Yom kippur isnt rare (in fact it is the most likely day though not by far) it occurs slightly less than 1/3 of the time. Shemitah as You know is one in 7 years so about every 3-4 shemitah or 21-28 years you can expect your “3 in 1 Shabbos”

    in reply to: Source in Torah and/or Gemara for Kapparos #1034364
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Sam2. I think it is because the Yeshivish world is terrified of calls for change even if warrented. Especially when it is called for by “animal rights activists” or scientists or those perceived as “liberal”

    Lior Kapparos as practiced today has zero to do with the Rema. In the Rema’s days people had chickens so once a year before shecting it anyway they twirled it around their head first. I assure you the Rema didnt have thousands of chickens trucked into to cite is from who knows where then stored in the sun with little food and water. Then to be shechted and discarded. And no most of the cickens do not go to the poor. There is too much effort to clean all thos echickens most are killed and thrown in the garbage. This was not the minhag as practiced byt the Rema or even a mere century ago.

Viewing 50 posts - 4,901 through 4,950 (of 5,346 total)