Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Health
You haven’t repeated yourself.
In fact you STILL haven’t replied t oa straight forward simple question.Whether I got the timing you meant right or wrong is completely irrelevant (I don’t listen to fake prophets I was going by what YOU said)
Bottom line is the prophet you quoted (and said you thought might be telling the truth) was wrong (exactly what dat you realized he was wrong doesnt change the fact that he was wrong)My question is when you though he might be right, did you think he was deaf, a child or Crazy?
“Maybe that Gemorrah is only by Jews, not by Goyim?!?”
Is that what the Gemara says?
And at any rate so that leaves a 4th possibility for me !It is great to see justice done
Occasionally the justice system works“Well one prophet I answered”
no you didn’t
Here is my question
you called these people “prophets”
you also said that the prophets are either “deaf kids or crazy”question about 2 prophets:
1) the prophet who correctly predicted that Trump will be impeached twice. Was he deaf a kid or crazy?
2) The prophet who you quoted on 3/18
that “within a month, Trump will be President again.”
This prophet was wrong. Is he still a prophet? Is he a liar?
At the time when you thought he was worth listening to, that he might be a real prophet.
given that prophets are deaf kids or crazy, At the time which did you think he was ?dovrosenbaum
well put. EXACTLY what I said
The historical tidbits, while very fascinating don’t really help our aspiring author.
The bottom line is today, in 2021/5781 Talmudic literature in languages other than Hebrew are not perceived as being serious.
Similarly comments that it shouldn’t be this way are similarly useless. I don’t think the author plans to singlehandedly change the current perception.
His question is simple how to sell books.
Comments that well once upon a time they would have been more mainstream or people should get over themselves and accept emes in any language, while true , aren’t helpful .bottom line. it is unlikely to become popular* among “many top yungerliet who are alumni of prestigious yeshivos” (their loss)
I think you will find more success marketing it to “non-top” bochurim and yungelit who are struggling a bitand/or
People out of yeshiva as a reminder to the lomdus they once appreciated back in the day. “Relive the glory days of yeshiva ” or something like that
*certainly not openly
“That leaves one Choice!”
That may very well be
At least you don’t have to reinvent wordsAnd So which one is Mike Lindel and the False prophets you kept believing so far ?
You call them “prophets” are they Deaf, Kids or Crazies?“But if their prophecy comes true – they are real.”
what if, hypothetically a person predicted that , I don’t know , say that the Supreme court will dismiss a case as moot. If that were to come to pass, would that predictor be a prophet?
AFAF
Health
“I got news for them – M. Lindel says Trump will be President this coming August!”
Is he the same wrong guy who you quoted as saying on March 18 that Trump would be President in a Month?
Or was that a different wrong guy?
“when”
mid 2010’s
“how”
Marketing / social media“Why”
Depends on the person, some are moved by his life , others by peer pressure, others by food Its a big planet there’s something for everybodystart the website
you can have several tabs for all potentially awkward situations
A tab for divorces, broken engagements, people who don’t have children, have children off the derech got firedNu tachlis,
so what step are we up to?“The reason that gun control works in other countries is because they don’t have a constitution that allows gun ownership”
1) Neither do we , at least not until it was reinterpreted in Heller. We can always just interpret it as it was originally understood for the first 200 years of its existence or so
2) Even if there was a constitution that allowed individual private gun ownership, that would have no bearing on whether “gun control works” or not.
It sounds like you are saying ok gun control works but we are “stuck” because of the constitution, but the constitution can be amended so this argument doesn’t make much sense“then make it mandatory for everyone to take it and carry a passport for it as well”
putting the side that no one is forcing you to take any vaccine you. You don;t want to gezunterheit (not literally obviously) but don’t force us to let you into our stores, shuls etc
1) Ok no problem (though I don’t have that power) I’m not sure how this is an argument for you
2) none of those 3 (not 4) diseases are currently pandemic, so the comparison today makes no sense
3) Again that just further ruins your theories. why DIDNT Obama make H1N1 mandatory in 2009 (when there was a pandemic) ? If the whole thing is just a nefarious plot to take away our freedoms why Didnt Obama do it? (I understand Trump was sent by Q to route out a secret Cabal or whatever you believe so he wouldnt steal freedom, but Obama?)English is not the new yiddish
As you correctly note “Yiddish was THE language of German and Eastern European Jews” (emphasis added) it was not the local language that Jews just happened to speak. It was THEIR language.
I agree it is incumbent on Jewish schools to teach English. and your last sentence is true as well (I am no exception) .
But the answer to your title is an unequivocal no“Why stop there what about the flu shot why should anyone be at risk from you”
Ok I give up, why should they be?
“. What about making vaccines for h1n1 and ebola and swine flu and bird flu and anything else so that no one is at risk from you.”
Excellent news! There is a vaccine for H1N1 (I had it in 2009), Ebola , Swine flu (H1N1 see above) AND bird flu (H5N1)
Its odd that you want vaccines for a list of diseases, some of which are the same and all of which already have vaccines.
It sounds like you don’t know much about vaccines
AAQ
“this link is yet unclear.”
Yes very. As I said in my post :
“It MIGHT BE unrelated to the vaccine. … time will tell…. it makes sense to pause this one while this is sorted out.”
Rightwriter
“Anyway there’s little to do in order to make you understand since you just aren’t capable. ”
Thanks, but I’m not looking for you to help me understand anything. You do not have an elementary understanding of hosw syudioies or evidence works, and arent even willing to listen.
What I am trying to do, is point out the gaping holes in your theories, and your blatant dishonesty.
Exhibit B: You say “Also I didn’t say anything about depopulation”
Yet on March 31 2021 at 11:33 AM you posted the following ” Bill Gates has been talking about depopulation for years especially “through vaccines”.” * you also wrote “But when a person who has been crying out for pandemics, depopulation and vaccines for so many years is now suddenly in charge of this whole project, it’s a bit concerning.”
* for the record, Like everything your write this isnt exactly true either
bill Gates said “Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%”As he explained elsewhere Vaccines lower infant mortality and “Amazingly, as children survive, parents feel like they’ll have enough kids to support them in their old age, so they choose to have less children,”
All the best!
rightwriter
As you can see if there is concern, the government says so. They recommended pausing the vaccine.
This shows the OPPOSITE of what you contend. There is no secret nefariosu plan to depopulate the world“Can’t be must be unrelated to the vaccine since there is no proof. ”
It might be unrelated to the vaccine. all 6 of these people (out of 7 million does given !) were young women where they taking OCP’s which are knwon to predispose to blood clots? If so does the vaccine exacerbate the risk or was it just bad timing. time will tell. but now when there are other vaccines available, it makes sense to pause this one while this is sorted out.“can be enjoyed by everyone from mesivta bochur and up.”
Can be enjoyed and will be enjoyed are not the same
I find it hard to imagine, such a sefer becoming popular among “many top yungerliet ”
I think you will find more success marketing it to “non-top” bochurim and yungelit who are struggling a bit
and/or
People out of yeshiva as a reminder to the lomdus they once appreciated back in the day. “Relive the glory days of yeshiva ” or something like that
just my 2 cents
“Now can we wrap this up, since it’s leading nowhere? ”
You can wrap anything you want to. I don’t know why you are so angry. All I’m pointing out is that there is not much demand for such an item and even if there were it would be impossible to implement to your satisfaction .
My pending post is wrong
There are an equal number of cardinal (counting) numbers. so the number of numbers and even numbers is the same (if you take a list of numbers, double each you now have a lsit of even numbers just as long as original list) .
nonthless there are different llevels of infinity
see “Some infinities are bigger than others” From cosmos as well as the excellent ted ed video on the “hotel infinity” paradox (linked to there)
Redleg
“something cannot be MORE infinite than something else.”
while we are nit picking that is not quite true
There are degrees of infinity.
For example there are an infinite number of Numbers and there are an infinite number of Even numbers.
yet there are more numbers than Even numbers.Then of course there are an infinite number of numbers BETWEEN any two numbers
The different degrees of inifnity are represented by aleph-0 aleph-1 etc
5T
He’s more likely thinking of the documentaries he has seen online. like ET and Men in Black
CA
it was excellent thanks for recommendingRabbi Reisman says very similar sentiments yearly, always worth hearing again.
It is a minhag Yisroel to criticize others especially when it makes you feel superior.
As a Rebbe of mine once says “ITs hard to be frum its much easier to be frummer”
So instead of working on ourselves we say
“Hey at least I’m better than all those going to ORlando who are don’t have the “therapeutic exercise” (whut?) of cleaning”or
“Hey at least I didn’t go to a Pesach program in Dubai that serves deer meat”Or
“Hey at least I’m better than the bitter yidden insisting they aren’t jealous of those in Orlando and that their way is better”ITs an old minhag
one I’m being mekayem right now“cannot wear a face mask due to a disability. Do I have to wear a face covering or mask onboard a Spirit flight?”
I didn’t check the website
but based on the information provided by a source you need to do the following things to board:
1) notify them 48 hours in advance that you will be requesting an exemption
2) complete a Spirit ADA Medical Exemption form or get a letter from a doctor dated 10 days before the flight. These Documents need to be presented 3 hours before the flight
3) get a negative Covid test within 24 hours of the flight.According to my source if you satisfy these 3 requirements you will not need to wear a mask. Otherwise you will if you choose to fly with them.*
Good luck and safe travels
*worth noting that this is the official company policy whether each individual flight attendant is familiar with the policy is an entirely different matter. I would print out their policy to show them and keep your doctors note, completed form and Negative Covid test handy
ywnjudy
I don’ t fully understand your gripe
1) Why do their need to be videos for all these things? If you are unsure thats ok ask if you cant ask your Rabbi, call a hotline, ask many of the online ask -the-rabbi sites,
2) why does EACH thing need its own video. Search “toveling electric appliances” there are hundreds of results. Why do you need a video for pizza maker, then one presumably for hot water urn, for sandwich maker, George foreman, Pannini press, Keurig, blender, Why do these all have to exist seperatly and why in video form?
Similarly a search for “cutting nails on chol hamoed” yields hundreds of results the second of which is a detailed guide to the laws of chol hamoed from the OU. why does it have to be in video form?3) Who is paying for the filming of thousands upon thousands of hours of video addressing every possible question someone may have, who is paying for storage, and organization of this ?
how much would you be willing to pay to have access to such a database? per question? unlimited monthly access?Lol!
“He’s on You Tube – if you’re interested in his Prophecies.”
no I am definitely not interested .
Thanks for the offerHealth
Thanks for providing new information
(I’m ignoring the previous post, since IT provided no new information just repeated the same debunked idea over and over I rpplied to it dozens of times you cant ignore my reply and expect me to keep repeating myself)
On this thread: https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/democrats-cheated-biden-won-2
You wrote That it was ok for a “Goyish prophet” to say that “that within a month [from 3/18], Trump will be President again.” even though he says for sure because he claims to be a prophet.
I have lots of questions.
when by 4/18 (a month from the above post) Trump will not be President, will this prophet have lied? *
If I tell you I’m a prophet then my correct predictions, are no longer “lies of fabrication” because I’m a prophet who is qualified to make predictions correct? It is only because they were educated guesses (based on fact and reason) that they are “lies of fabrication” even if true. IS this correct?
*I am telling you this with as near certainty as humanly possible. That Trump will not be President in a month.
Is THIS another “lie of fabrication” of mine? (even if true)Health
“I believe it’s possible”
how? what do you believe is possible to happen that would result in Trump being President within a month?
Also did this prophet say “I think…” ?
“Who knows what you meant at that time?”
I meant that the supreme court would decline to hear the case . Which is waht I said, AND is what happened
I said it as clearly as I could: ““The case will not be heard” short succinct, to the point. and 100% accurate.
It was not a lie, as has been pointed out over and over.
It doesnt sound like you have any new information t oadd, nor are you willing to stop lying
When new information pops up (eg in Sydney Powel”s case) I will update you
Until then unless you would like to apologize for wrongly calling me a liar, Or would like to respond to my questions to help you understand why your “understanding” of “lie of fabrication” ifs at best faulty, Or If you have any new information to add, I’ll let yo uhave the last wordKnowing my costumers, this is goodbye for now (Yes this is a prediction and no it doesn’t become a prediction only becasue I labeled it as such)
“and your conclusion is correct that he must give a Get”
Even if no beis din has so required?
“Your saying “I was making a prediction”, came way before your post “The case will not be heard.”
yes
Still not following, why is a clarification “way before” worse than one that occurs later? (and yours only occurred becasue I called you out on violating the nonsensical rule you invented)
“It’s amazing how you can think that you Never did anything wrong”
Thats not true. continuing this conversation is wrong, and frankly crazy, but what can I do it is my guilty pleasure
” but the husband disagrees and believes that there is hope for reconciliation,”
not the case I mentioned. The case I mentioned was: “If the marriage is over, certainly if he has moved on and remarried a get should be given in (nearly?) all circumstances.”
Duvee ? UJM
“If you’re suggesting Reuven lied to Beis Din, which is not the case I presented, ”
you didn’t present a case.
Obviously each of these cases involves a myriad of details” then that’s the Halacha. The request for divorce is rightfully, under explicit Halacha, denied”
Again, That’s the halacha in Even Haezer
There is no explicit halacha that prevents me from practicing my bagpipe “skills” every day when my neighbor tries to take his nap.
Yet most people , would grant that is not a very nice thing to do.There are many cases where A Rav will encourage someone to give a Get where there is no hope of reconciliation, although m’ikar hadin he isnt obligated too and he is hoping things will change. Are those Rabbonim wrong for needlessly causing gittin that are not required?
“How’s it possible that her Bein adom lechaveiro is to agree to continue the marriage while at the same time his Bein adom lechaveiro is to give a Get??”
I gave you an example: Bein adom lechaveiro involves 2 people. It is your bein adom lechaverio obligation to not let a door hit me in the face, and it is mine ot not make a big deal if you did. The two are not exclusive.
I think I made my point clear.
I will sum up concisely:
All I am saying is causing tzar to another person by forcing her to remain in a marriage that has no hope of reconciliation, is a wrong thing to do.
דַּעֲלָךְ סְנֵי לְחַבְרָךְ לָא תַּעֲבֵיד — זוֹ הִיא כׇּל הַתּוֹרָה כּוּלָּהּ
I am not saying anything controversial
“That effectively answers/addresses those questions.”
So it doesnt.
see Shulchan Aruch 154 few of those cases are grounds to force him to divorce.
and besides you are dodging
LEts say the beis din got it wrong.
Reuvein knows the truth. Are you saying there is no bein adom lechaveiro reason for him to give her a get ?“If you agree that her Bein Adom Lchaveiro obligation is to tell Reuven that she’s willing to continue the marriage then obviously he doesn’t have the contradictory obligation to give her a Get.”
That doesn’t hold true in the slightest., as I already pointed out.
Bein adom lechaveiro often goes two ways“If you wrote – I think or I’m guessing, that wouldn’t be a problem.”
I don’t get it . why do I have to write it in every post, but you don’t?
You said “She doesn’t believe it” and LATER clarified “I don’t know for sure. I’m guessing.”
And yet yo uclaim, when I said “The case will not be heard.” it WAS a “Lie of fabrication” (Even though it wasn’t a lie nor a fabrication) when at that point I ALREADY had said I was ” make[ing] a prediction,” that may turn out to be wrong?
Why do I have to put “I think” in every post, and you don’t ?
“Suppose Dina asks Reuven for a Get. …”
You left out a lot of details
Is Dina crying herself to sleep everynight? miserable? Can’t stand him. Maybe he is even being verbaly abusive to her
In a case where the answer to the above is yes.
Are you really saying him forcing (no quotes that is what he is doing) her to stay married is a nice thing to do?“Dina should try her best to put on a smile and tell Reuven that she’s willing to continue the marriage. That would be her Bein Adom Lchaveiro obligation.”
That may very well be, but that wasnt the discussion. what of HIS Bein Adom Lchaveiro obligation THAT is the question
Bein adom lechaveiro involves 2 people. It is your bein adom lechaverio obligation to not let a door hit me in the face, and it is mine ot not make a big deal if you did. The two are not exclusive
Same as above but it didn’t yet get to the point of a Beis Din trial. Reuven has no Bein Adom Lchaveiro obligation to give a Get.
same as above, depends on the circumstances.
If you think forcing a man forcing a woman to remain married to him when she doesnt want to. IS not lacking in bein adom lechaveiro. But her bein adom lechaveiro requires her to remain in an abusive marriage . We must be speaking different languages.
: “A Get refuser without a Siruv” is the same oxymoron”
This is incorrect.
You are making the same mistake as earlier. You mean the the Hilchos Even Haezer sense. however in the bein adom lechaveiro sense, you are incorrect
(to be clear that does not necessarily allow for pressure shaming etc THOSE halachos are found in Even Haezer, whci his the source of your confusion)
““And to be clear, so she is lying now. correct?”
Of course, she is!”
amazing
when she tells the truth you think she lied when she lies you think she tells the truth.
I have never met anyone whose reality compass is as backwards as yours.
I’m not going to rehash your nonsensical interpretation of “lies of fabrication” again as I already explained to you how If something is not a Lie or if not a fabrication it cannot be a “lie of fabrication” certainly if it is neither.
I had left some questions for you that you are too dishonest to answer, I won’t bother posting them again
but just for fun’s sake . Yo usaid “If you would have just said – I’m guessing what SCOTUS would do – it would have never been a problem.”
Lol! I basically did say that on Jan 7′
“If her case gets heard by the supreme Court. wow was I wrong. …But I did make a prediction, and if it turns out wrong it is wrong… No big deal It is ok to be wrong.”I acknowledged that I was making a prediction that could be wrong.
“She’s only saying that to get out of her lawsuit.”
Lol!
To be clear, so she is lying now?
“She doesn’t believe it.”
Lol!
How can you possibly know that?
What was it you called someone who says things they don’t KNOW to be true (even if it was true which of course this isn’t)And to be clear, so she is lying now. correct?
Hope youve been well
I don’t plan on repeating the same points over and over.
But to follow up on your request:
On Feb 7 (and again and again on the 8th and 9th) I asked
“When (if?) Powell settles or loses her court case against Dominion, and either agrees that she lied, or it is ruled that she lied.
Will you then agree that she lied”after dodging for a bit you replied “It’s too early to even ask questions about this lawsuit.
Ask me much later.”she now says “no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact.”
yowza
I should hope so. Not only did she admit that she lied, but she also called anyone who didn’t realize she was lying a not a “reasonable person”
You sound angry
Which part of it do is getting to you, your kids or the Torah ?
“Is it okay to use them on Pesach?”
yes“How would I clean them?”
washing machine“What’s everyone here planning to do?”
Can’t speak for everyone, but washing machine is pretty easyujm
Is that question geared to me?
If you are asking me, the simplest way is for the parents not to eat Gebrokts , as many do, and it sounds like ywnjudy’s family did.
The other possibility is to be violate the minhag for the sake of Sholom bayis, her kibbud av, though he might need hatarsa nedarim (ask your LOr) though seems rather obnoxious on the family’s part which understandably might make him not want to go.“I think the biggest problem is that someone would look on line for the answer to a halachic shaila.”
meh
not a problem and not a halachic shailahywnjudy
“Well, speak of minhag, as a child we ate gebrok”
sounds like it isnt your family minhag. ITs nice that your family changed to accommodate a sibling in law, but that in no way obligates you.
Of course if said sibling will be joining with you , you should check with them (though odds are if they keep gebrokts they wouldn’t put any dip, certainly none containing water on matzah)ujm
Not necessarily see last line https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=25074&st=&pgnum=486
ywnjudy
There isnt really “hilchos Gebrokts” It is a minhag, keeping minhagim are important. The exact nature of the minhag varies some are makpid on keilim some are not. Some are makpid only on cooked dishes or something that is soaked not if it gets wet 30 seconds before it goes in your mouth (where it will get wet anyway) .Of course some won’t even put it on the table .
So ywnjudy is it “ok” to dip the matza n it on PEsach?
Well there is some water so strictly speaking it is Gebroks. If your family is very strict then don’t dip it. If sort of strict go for it.Shabbos Hagadol you have a different issue, as matzah shouldn’t be eaten next Shabbos Erev Pesach
” , but we claim that we are unchanged.”
Who claims that?
So much has changed We don’t have a Beis hamikdash a king, not too mention countless modern inventions like printing presses, cars etc. Why are all those changes “ok” but changing the script, THAT is where you draw the line?
“What makes us different than the italians, iranians, egyptians and so on ”
That we keep the Torah.
” what is the proof that we have not changed”
We have!I’m not dismissing your questions.
Just pointing out that your angst over the sudden realization that not everything we do/practice etc is EXACTLY the same is a bit misplaced