torahvaluesoverparty

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 45 posts - 351 through 395 (of 395 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: “Give me liberty or give death”! #1923988

    Ubiquitin, catch yourself
    Your replies are based on the assumption that either we get our liberty, or everyone is put in great danger. Which is completely false. These lockdowns at this point are purely politically motivated. Look at the actions of so many Democrat leaders-Deblasio, Gavin newsom, Nancy Pelosi, Lori lightfoot and some more -they preach their “safety motivated” restrictions , and then go violate them themselves. States, that have been open,(florida, texas..)have not seen any significant spikes any more so than blue states. And I’m curious, according to your words, is one not allowed to drive a car, being that there is a risk to do that? I dont think so. I’m pretty sure the line would drawn between something that carries significant risk vs something that carries little risk. So again, you will base your replies based on “covid is a death sentence” -which is completely false.

    in reply to: Are anti trumpers actual liberals? #1923980

    Jackk, firstly, are you sure your not a conservative?
    And not sure where that cheap shot throw in comment at the end came from, but it’s completely unwarrented.

    in reply to: why did our conservative news site go liberal? #1923925

    Yytz “neutral fact checkers”๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚What, like snopes???๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚
    It’s a joke! Trump says “i built the best economy…” , “fact checkers” count that as a lie, and similar meaningless statements ….All that is important is Trump did what he said he’ll do UNLIKE your standard politician! He is an unapologetic conservative, and he pushed his conservative policy -THAT is precisely why you and the left hate him so much. Politicians don’t make “misstatements”. They lie about what they’re supposedly gonna do to gain your vote. Not trump. Don’t talk about conspiracy theories when you guys own the spygate, Russia hoax, impeachment hoax….
    And perhaps you should read the lawsuits, they’re pretty easy to find online, and I can’t post them here. You don’t who I don’t hear barking? The statisticians on the left. They know.

    in reply to: “Give me liberty or give death”! #1923785

    Most of us are adults, understand the risk of covid, and can act accordingly when going about business. The same way we all understand the risk of driving a car. This disease can kill, but it’s not exactly the bubonic plague, nor is it ebola. Lockdowns have their own side effects as well. And haven’t at all proven effective.(if it was effective, countries wouldn’t currently be locking down for the third time). Point is this virus poses little-to-zero risk for most of the population. Not ch’v to say I don’t care about those who it affects. But to say that we are adults and those to who the virus is a great risk, can take precautions as they see fit. I wouldn’t say this 9 months ago when we didn’t know anything about this virus. But enough is enough these lockdowns have pretty awful side effects, and that needs to be recognized. There is no reason for our constitutional rights to still be suspended.

    in reply to: why did our conservative news site go liberal? #1923725

    Quayboardwarrior
    Firstly, the grammar is irrelevant to the claims. Perhaps it was done intentionally to attract the attention of the left wing media. It worked perfectly.
    Secondly, in general, one can KNOW there is fraud even if there is no “evidence” to hold up in court. For example, if across america, there was 100% voter turnout, you KNOW that is impossible and clearly a result of fraud. Doesn’t mean there is necessarily irrefutable evidence. So yeah, due to many mathematical irregularities and impossibilities, every honest person understands there was fraud committed. Does that mean that the evidence would hold up in court? Read the lawsuits and decide for yourself.

    in reply to: If Trump does win, how would you react…? #1923724

    Ens- thanks for telling me how to better myself as a person. I guess I’m supposed to adopt liberal views, support the power hungry, self serving democrat tyrants. What makes trumpism a “cult” is the fact that trump is the first Republican to unite *most* of the GOP base, in standing up the Swamp. Liberals hate that. So they demonize trump and his supporters.
    Now you seem confident that neither sidney powell or lin wood has presented any substantial evidence. Have you by any chance read the lawsuits filed in michigan and georgia?

    in reply to: why did our conservative news site go liberal? #1923608

    Charlie, perhaps you should actually read the lawsuits just recently filed by Sidney Powell in Georgia and Michigan. Might, *might* , make you sound smarter in your future posts. Not sure how any of trumps “goons” would go about overturning a “fair and free” election.

    in reply to: Mandatory Vaccines #1923596

    simply googled “smallpox boston”. showes there was a population of 11,000 6,000 contracted the disease, 850 died. thats a 7.7% death rate.

    in reply to: If Trump does win, how would you react…? #1922829

    So fascinating to see how everyone is so informed on all the evidence that currently exists to conclude that there is nothing there๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚.
    Anyone observing the unfolding events should ask themselves one question: does it make any sense at all for highly regarded attorneys/lawyers such as Lin Wood and Sidney Powell to knowingly willingly and intentionally light their reputation on fire for no reason or benefit whatsoever?
    What evidence do they possess that they believe can overturn the results? I have absolutely no idea. But it is senseless to believe that they would put a death date on their careers by “floating out conspiracy theories” . So to all democrats: give them a chance! And assuming that you all believe Biden won cleanly-don’t be afraid to give them that chance!!

    in reply to: If Trump does win, how would you react…? #1921484

    Democrats: cleanest election ever!!!
    Republicans: There are many statistical anomalies and irregularities that should be investigated if on only to convince the 73 million trump voters that biden is the legitimate winner.
    Democrats: NO, YOU RACIST BIGOTS!!!
    There are now over 1000 signed affidavits alleging fraud, so the notion that there is “no evidence of fraud” simply isn’t true. Will this thing be overturned? I have no idea what significant evidence
    exists currently, but I do know I’d be scared to death if I was a democrat….

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1919975

    I’m not gonna get into details of alleged fraud, all anyone needs to see to understand this election was stolen, is the democrats’ refusal to audit every single vote. If they thought they won cleanly, they would invite the Republicans to investigate absolutely everything, if only to make them look foolish. Let’s see how this plays out, as sidney powell seems pretty confident she possesses sufficient evidence to overturn this thing.

    in reply to: ADVOCATING FOR TRUMP #1916349

    Firstly trump never advocated for here immunity. It’s an issur in the Torah to lie and you just did. Secondly, with all the spikes occurring around the world to countries that have previously been shut down, perhaps herd immunity is not avoidable. It can only be delayed. Maybe that explains sweden. But leave it up to you dems to gaslight the issue to create your own anti trump TDS argument.

    in reply to: Vote biden #1916229

    Yserbius, I’d love to hear what Rav Aharon Feldman ACTUALLY said because I’ve heard of different rabbanim that have endorse clinton 4yrs ago and endorsed trump now. (Not surprising considering how the left has completely lost their mind the last few yrs…) Either way I’ll just leave this hear.

    Historic Letter Of Rabbonim And Admorim Praising President Trump Released Ahead of Election

    in reply to: ADVOCATING FOR TRUMP #1915871

    Awarenessvad
    Firstly, considering that 100% of known rabbanim that have given endorsements have endorsed Trump, id assume that not only is it not against halacha to vote trump, if anything, one should vote Trump. You utilize the tactic of GASLIGHTING to twist facts and create your own fake narrative that trump hasn’t always followed the experts, and taken early proactive measures to combat the virus. Just so happens that fauci himself disagrees with you. The only time trump has made fun of mask wearing is instances where mask wearing should have been made fun of. Such as Joe Biden wearing a mask outdoors with no one within 50 feet of him. Completely anti-science, and completely politically motivated. So while in February trump made comments aimed at reducing fear, he actually took protective measures such as the China travel ban-which Biden called him racist and xenophobic for! Who remembers Pelosi inviting everyone to come to China town? Who remembers all of the media saying it wasn’t more than the flu? And oh how hypocritical and ironic is it for you to be blaming trump when it was the left wing media that has helped suppress the life saving treatment-hydroxychloroquine -which Dr Harvey Risch has said (a couple months ago when the death toll was much lower) “could have saved 100,000 lives”. Perhaps you could indeed blame trump for all of this. He should have predicted the media’s reaction to him informing the country of the potentially life saving hydroxychloroquine -and he should have come out trashing the drug. Only then would the media have given it proper honest coverage. Who knows how many lives could have been saved had he done that. So yea, in that regard, trumps a failure. The rest of your post is meaningless baseless TDS fueled hatred. The average frum jew is able to see past the fake news spewed out of the mainstream media, and maybe that’s why, according to a recent ami poll, 85% of frum Jews will be voting trump. All of this is why one shouldn’t not vote for trump based on the virus. I didn’t even get to why one should stay FAR away from the left(blm, antifa, riots, liberalism, socialism, anti religion, anti america, anti israel, pro killing unborn babies…………………..) But we’ll save that for another post……

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1915521

    Charlie is MIA. haven’t heard from him in a while.

    in reply to: character vs policy Which is more important? #1915506

    GH
    Obviously in a perfect world we have a perfect candidate-trump minus trumps character. But that’s not the case so…it’s policy vs character
    Reb eliezer
    Wow where do I start…you don’t want foreign nations interfering in the election(no one does) but your fine with illegals voting. You claim Biden will cut taxes on those making under 400k yet all he’s said is that he’ll repeal the trump tax cut. You seem to indicate that the dems will move to implement greater border security which is patently false. What do you have against the wall?
    You don’t seem to understand that replacing fracking with solar energy would take many many years while destroying jobs, our economy and our energy independence in the process. You say law enforcement doesn’t have the right to shoot anyone on sight, indicating that you believe something of that sort happened. (Your probably referring to the most recent incident where a career criminal, armed with a knife, was going after the police when they shot him.) You say guns are being used at polls to used to intimidate voters indicating you believe the 2nd amendment should be taken away as a result; instead of criminally charging those committing voter fraud. You seem to have a problem with patriotic education, celebrating how far we’ve come as a diverse nation with opportunities for minorities and all, but you have no problem with education that teaches children, essentially, to hate our flag, to hate our country. That our country is systemically racist, founded on racism, that we are all “subconsciously racist”, and that our terrible country needs to be completely torn down and rebuilt. Reb eliezer, I don’t believe for one second that you truly believe what you write. Not for one second.

    in reply to: New Conservative Supreme Court Supermajority #1914521

    Don’t know about 1973, but id say if roe vs wade is overturned, they will almost certainly still allow for abortion in cases where the mother is in danger…

    in reply to: Finding out who won the presidential election 2020 #1914520

    Sam
    Being really honest, I do believe trump will have a sizeable lead by midnight November 4th(based on polls that were accurate in 2016+voter registration ), though he probably won’t officially be declared winner as some states allow for mail ins to be received a few days after election day. Regardless I think it will be clear by midnight November 4 that trump won.
    ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ctlawyer you tell Sam to stop with conspiracy theories, then pivot to the mail box conspiracy theory๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚
    GH, in the short time since I’ve joined YWN coffee room, you’ve really stuck out as the only participant with no intention of participating in an intelligent conversation. Dunno what your trying to accomplish.

    Edited

    in reply to: If Trump Wins Reelection #1913754

    Interesting that you say that, yaakov doe, I wonder what led you to that conclusion…The only pollster that was accurate in 2016(all othes were way off) has trump winning re-election…plus voter registration trends from 2012-2016-2020 is key swing states is all in trumps favor….

    in reply to: Is hydroxychloroquine really proven ineffective?? #1913050

    Yserbius
    I could not find the first two studies you mentioned. The 3 is a study comparing HCQ w/ azithromycin vs HCQ w/azithromycin w/ zinc performed on hospitalized patients. Totally irrelevant here. You say you don’t believe hydroxychloroquine is being suppressed -how do you explain the media’s inability to point out obvious flaws in the studies discrediting HQC? Why won’t the media give voice to the doctors advocating HQC’s use? They only interview the doctors who present these very obviously flawed studies as irrefutable “proof” HQC is ineffective…(The lone exception that comes to mind is cnn interviewing Dr Harvey Risch where the host repeatedly interrupts the Dr not allowing him to make a point…)
    Again the notion that only RCT is acceptable is FALSE! It defies all logic! When doctors have combined to treat thousands and thousands of high risk patients with close to 0 deaths-yes, you can absolutely compare that result to the death rate that is 10x higher among the rest of the population! I will once again point out what Dr Risch says, that nearly HALF of cancer treatments never underwent RCT! How to you explain that yserbius? Fact is hydroxychloroquine has always been considered a very safe drug, and yet many doctors have limited access to this drug due to restrictions many governments have put in place. This is unprecedented.
    Qbw, GH
    You repeating there is “no miracle cure”…is an irrelevant argument and isn t gonna make you sound smarter…why don’t you try debating with some facts?

    in reply to: Is hydroxychloroquine really proven ineffective?? #1912964

    Yserbius
    You didn’t describe how the trial was conducted. Which patient group. Dosage information. Group size. What the statistical results were. Not sure what you by “the idea that it’s being repressed by the media is an antisemitic fake”. Not sure where that comes in. Fact is that fail to report on the obvious flaws in the many studies being touted as proof of hydroxychloroquine’s ineffectiveness. And this that you state that there is no double blind controlled study showing effectiveness -that may or may not be true-but as Dr Harvey Risch points out, nearly half of cancer treatments never underwent RCT. And considering that hydroxychloroquine is a very safe drug when given in low dosage, there is no need for RCT when there are doctors such as Dr Brian Tyson in California who treated 1700 high risk patients with this protocol-0 deaths 1 hospitalization. When nearly all countries utilizing hydroxychloroquine liberally have a far lower death rate. Yserbius, do you need a RCT to determine whether parachutes will save the life of one jumping off an airplane?
    GadolHatorah
    You state “doctors are free to use these drugs in individual case if they
    believe…. ” you are so right on that!! The doctor -patient relationship should not be disturbed by the government! Why then have so many Democrat states restrict its use? Why have doctors been threatened if they use the drug?
    Either way nobody has explained to me how all these obviously flawed studies are being used as “proof” hydroxychloroquine is ineffective.

    in reply to: Is hydroxychloroquine really proven ineffective?? #1912965

    Yserbius
    You didn’t describe how the trial was conducted. Which patient group. Dosage information. Group size. What the statistical results were. Not sure what you by “the idea that it’s being repressed by the media is an antisemitic fake”. Not sure where that comes in. Fact is that fail to report on the obvious flaws in the many studies being touted as proof of hydroxychloroquine’s ineffectiveness. And this that you state that there is no double blind controlled study showing effectiveness -that may or may not be true-but as Dr Harvey Risch points out, nearly half of cancer treatments never underwent RCT. And considering that hydroxychloroquine is a very safe drug when given in low dosage, there is no need for RCT when there are doctors such as Dr Brian Tyson in California who treated 1700 high risk patients with this protocol-0 deaths 1 hospitalization. When nearly all countries utilizing hydroxychloroquine liberally have a far lower death rate. Yserbius, do you need a RCT to determine whether parachutes will save the life of one jumping off an airplane?
    GadolHatorah
    You state “doctors are free to use these drugs in individual case if they
    believe…. ” you are so right on that!! The doctor -patient relationship should not be disturbed by the government! Why then have so many Democrat states restrict its use? Why have doctors been threatened if they use the drug?
    Either way nobody has explained to me how all these obviously flawed studies are being used as “proof” hydroxychloroquine is ineffective.

    in reply to: Is hydroxychloroquine really proven ineffective?? #1912823

    Firstly, while I agree one should wear a mask a social distance when necessary, there is hardly any actual science to that. The WHO recently underwent a complete flip flop on lockdowns, saying that they do not help contain the spread. While I myself can’t prove this at all, perhaps this can be attributed to the idea that we can only delay herd immunity -not prevent it. Regardless, you haven’t answered any of my questions. I don’t know about any of the studies you referenced, please describe how they were conducted. Because although they may have been given the correct protocol of treatment, the studies may have been conducted on young not at risk patients, which is a very important factor. Because being that that group has a near 100% survival rate, there is no room for improvement between the control group and the group treated with HQC+zinc.
    The doctors advocating for hydroxychloroquine have been. Very clear. High risk patients. Low dose. With zinc. In an outpatient setting. All these doctors have seen tremendously lower death rates among the high risk patient group they treat (over 80% ) than the general population. So my question is why have so many studies been designed to fail? Not only that, but fauci and co. use these obviously flawed studies as “proof” of hydroxychloroquine’s ineffectiveness. To me it’s mind boggling. I’m also outraged when all these doctors attempt to point out this corruption, and are then silenced by Big Tech!! Maybe you could explain.

    in reply to: Biden would Radically Change the Courts #1912743

    ctlawyer
    Is there any legitimate reason you want biden to win other than Trump’s character? Do you and other ywn biden supporters agree with biden that 8yr olds should be able to make the decision to be transgender? Do you side with the radical left? Do you realize that a biden presidency is a Harris presidency?

    in reply to: ANTIFA.com #1911976

    Doe
    Pretty terrible take to put it nicely. Antifa may stand for anti fascist, but it’s anything but that. Anybody who doesn’t unite with them, doesn’t riot with them is automatically labeled a white supremacist. Any mildly different opinion than their own is “dangerous”. Take a look at what they do to those peacefully eating outdoors by restaurants when the antifa movement passes by. They want to control what you do and what you think.
    Same with Black Lives Matter. They have clearly shown they don’t give a darn about black lives. But of course if you oppose them (even if your black yourself) you get labeled as a white supremacist. Pretty insane times we’re living in.

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1911483

    Se2015
    Do you really think for one second that fauci is unable to differentiate between a study conducted on hospitalized patients given without zinc and given in high dose, and a study performed on pre-hospital patients, given in low dose, and with zinc? I have a hard time believing that.

    in reply to: Trump vs Biden -who is actually ahead? #1911482

    Frombtootd
    Very nice, but how do you explain the state polls being way off? You gotta win the popular vote within a state in order to win that state….

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1911298

    Se2015
    The truth is “conspiracy” is the wrong term to label this situation. A conspiracy usually refers to something completely unknown. This is not something unknown. This is happening out in the open. The arguments being used to discredit hydroxychloroquine can be dismantled by a ten yr old. This is medical malpractice being performed in front of our eyes. The majors flaws in the studies being used to discredit HQC are being pointed out by top medical experts, but the truth is anyone can point them out. They are so glaringly obvious. There is not one anti-HQC doctor who can answer the questions listed above. And maybe the reason you haven’t heard from the doctors promoting HQC is because they are constantly being censured and silenced. By youtube, by twitter ect..This is unprecedented. Doctors being silenced for not expressing views the mainstream media wants you to see…truly disturbing. Fake studies being published in the Lancet and NEJM. Unheard of. And despite being retracted, the ramifications they caused were devastating. Trials were discontinued and never resumed, other trials were never able to get underway due to lack of participants resulting from the participants fear of the “dangerous” drug, as it was described by that fake fraudulent debunked retracted study….all that I’ve just said isn’t a conspiracy. It isn’t a theory. It actually happened in front of everybody’s eyes.

    in reply to: Trump vs Biden -who is actually ahead? #1911290

    Aaq, just curious what the betting averages were 4 yrs ago…

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1911240

    Firstly, “most of the medical community” -don’t know where you pulled that one from as there are hundreds of doctors around the country, (wherever it’s not illegal that is) who are currently successfully using hydroxychloroquine. My proof is those doctors as well as every country using it has a far lower death rate. The notion that only RCT are acceptable as evidence of efficiency is made up fauci garbage(-Dr Harvey Risch, Yale epidemiologist). “If you have evidence to support your wild conspiracy theories, please share it”.
    -retracted Lancet study, a study aimed at discrediting hydroxychloroquine, a study that was caught using fake manufactured data.
    -fauci touting studies performed on hospitalized patients as proof hydroxychloroquine is ineffective -despite the fact that it’s OUTPATIENT usage that makes hydroxychloroquine effective!
    -touting studies that give patients lethal doses(800-2400mg)as proof hydroxychloroquine is dangerous when given in low dosage.(200mg)
    -touting studies that exclude zinc when hydroxychloroquine is far more effective when given with zinc.

    These aren’t flaws that I dreamed up. These are flaws that doctors around the country are calling fauci out on. This is not a “wild conspiracy theory” . This has actually taken place. Now you explain why you think I’m wrong.

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1911195

    se2015
    This is not about defending trump. This is about political and pharmaceutical interests taking precedence to 215k lives. This is disgusting. This is frightening. Your lack of concern(assuming you aren’t ignorant on this subject) reflects the type of person you are. It is becoming increasingly clear to me that liberalism, and TDS are indeed mental disorders. I dont see any other way an orthodox jew can stoop so low as to politicize this issue.

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1911121

    Its really incredible to watch the liberals suppress this life-saving drug, and then go on to blame trump for the 215k deaths. Would be hilarious if it wasnt so sad.

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1910906

    Charlie it would be interesting to see you try and actually put forth a logical argument instead of touting your credentials. You try to discredit my arguments by stating I have no clinical experience(100% true). Your credentials are irrelevant; you can be fauci himself. It’s irrelevant because for one: all that I’ve said has been stated by medical experts, at least some(if not all) of whom have significantly more knowledge and experience with hydroxychloroquine. Secondly: you fail to present any counterargument whatoever. You seem very confident that hydroxychloroquine has been debunked. I want to understand how an expert with his name on 180 scientific publications came to this conclusion. Id also assume you believe hydroxychloroquine is dangerous. If so please explain what led to that conclusion. Because all due respect, I have a feeling that the reason you refrain from actually debating is because you understand that the only thing you have is credentials; not facts. Just tell me if I’m wrong on that.
    -explain to me how studies that used extremely high doses can used as proof hydroxychloroquine is dangerous when given in low dosage
    -explain to me how studies performed on hospitalized patients can be used as proof hydroxychloroquine is ineffective when utilized in an outpatient setting
    -explain to me how studies that exclude zinc can be as proof hydroxychloroquine is ineffective when given with zinc
    These are not my questions. These questions can be attributed to many hundreds of doctors around the country. But you are the expert. Surely you can answer these questions with ease. I’ll wait patiently.

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1910857

    Yep, I’m sure Dr harvey risch, Dr steven smith, Dr didier raoult, zelenko,and literally hundreds-if not thousands-of other doctors, they’re all clueless…yep anybody who suggests hydroxychloroquine is effective is a quack…great tactic.
    Besides, you’ve claimed hydroxychloroquine is “debunked”.
    I’m curious how you came to that conclusion. I’m also curious why you insist 1700 high risk covid patients treated with 0 deaths(not a typo) and 1 hospitalization (not either a typo) is worthless.

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1910832

    Based on facts and only facts, is there any reason not to believe the doctors who are claiming that fauci is perpetrating a genocide by suppressing hydroxychloroquine? The facts are clear. Every country using hydroxychloroquine widespread has a far lower death rate. Fact. Doctors who are using hydroxychloroquine early in an outpatient are seeing around 90% less death s and hospitalizations. Fact.
    Hydroxychloroquine is being tainted as a “dangerous” drug based on obviously flawed studies using between 4-12x the recommended dosage! Fact. Hydroxychloroquine is being labeled ineffective based on stupidly flawed studies where they
    -leave out zinc
    -perform them on hospitalized patients where nobody in the world expects it to be effective (see latest trial conducted by the WHO)

    Please respond only if based on something I’m missing, I should not actually believe fauci is murdering thousands. Not TDS anti trump baseless factless “it’s all a conspiracy” rants.

    It’s called “law enforcement” !! Just imagine whose riots were taking place in front of your home! Would you really not want law enforcement at the scene??
    (Reconsider who your calling “thugs”!!!)

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1910722

    Besides, charlie, I’ve seen you claim in a different thread that “hydroxychloroquine is debunked”. Really?

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1910721

    Yserbius123-bingo! That’s why “pro-HCQ” doctors are recommending hydroxychloroquine in an outpatient setting! (Before hospitalization where it will have a much greater impact)
    Charlie-desperately trying to understand how “1700 patients treated 0 deaths 1 hospitalization” is ” useless”. You have the best of the population to compare against. Picture this. A 75 yr old man with fever and shortness of breath walks into a doctors office. The doctor tells him we have 2 options. Either hope it goes away, and if it doesn’t you’ll be hospitalized and probably survive. Or, I know a bunch of doctors who use a certain treatment, they have together treated thousands of patients. Not one of their patients died. Only a few hospitalized. Which option would you rather? The idea that no treatment is acceptable until we have RCT is completely made up. Again, as Dr Harvey Risch notes, nearly HALF of cancer treatments never underwent RCT.
    Se2015-so you are claiming that I am “politicizing medicine”. No. I’m exposing corruption. The fraudulent Lancet study is more than anyone needs to prove that there is corruption taking place. But if you need more, Google and read HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE: A MORALITY TALE.
    If anyone has any arguments that are based on facts…..

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1910686

    Se2015
    Never suggested anyone taking any drug without doctors consent. Let me be clear about that. Let’s also make clear that this isn’t “me vs doctors” . I see that’s the narrative your trying to put forth. This is about doctors vs doctors. I’m literally parroting the talking points of top medical experts. And to any fair minded person, this argument is completely one sided. We are perhaps witnessing perhaps the biggest medical scandal of all time. There is a reason Dr Harvey Risch has accused Fauci of potentially costing tens of thousands of lives. Not me accusing. But Yale epidemiologist accusing. And to any innocent observer , these accusations are well founded and easy to understand.
    (Your claims of me getting paid for this is laughable and flat out lunacy)

    in reply to: Is Joe Biden A Racist? #1910676

    Eliezer , you are the only proof I will ever need that TDS is a real disease. Good day.

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1910668

    @jewinthepew
    1-I honestly don’t know whether the perfect golden standard RCT exists. as in the article that I referenced explains, many trials were derailed and abandoned once that bogus Lancet study became public. Despite being retracted many study were never able to get underway due to lack of participants who were now afraid to take this “dangerous drug”. However, as Yale epidemiologist Dr Harvey Risch pointed out in a CNN interview, nearly half of cancer treatments never went through the RCT. The narrative that we don’t know anything without RCT is simply false. You don’t need RCT to determine whether parachutes will save someone’s life when jumping off an airplane. When you take note that nearly every country that uses hydroxychloroquine freely has far lower death rates, when doctors around the country report there own success with it(example: Dr Brian Tyson, a frontline doctor in California who treated 1700 covid positive patients, 0 deaths, 1 hospitalization)when you hear patient testimony where at one point they had fever and was short of breath-and symptom free just hours after taking the drug-this all leads to the same conclusion, and hydroxychloroquine is indeed effective and should be used. There is perhaps one argument that would say despite all this anecdotal evidence, hydroxychloroquine’s should not be used. And that is “it’s dangerous” . It can cause cardiac arrhythmia, and then cardiac arrest, and death. Well what is the evidence of that? As it stands, hydroxychloroquine has always been considered a very safe drug for 65 years, a drug that can be taken by all: children, adults, pregnant women….but now all of the sudden the drug is dangerous. Why? Because there were trials conducted where patients received 800mg, or in some cases 2400mg!! These are indeed fatal doses! The “pro-hydroxychloroquine” doctors recommend just 200mg! But this obvious flaw for some reason was missed by fauci. Was missed by the media.
    2-I’m not gonna get into scientific terms, but the general idea is that while hydroxychloroquine does have some limited antiviral properties, it’s main effect is that it lets the real antiviral-zinc-into the cell where it destroys the virus’ copying machine.
    3-expert doctors are indeed reaching the intellectual standards of a 7th grader. I’ll refer you to an “open letter to Dr fauci” written by Dr George C. Fareed, from Brawley Ca, Michael M. Jacobs, M.D. MPH from Pensacola FL, and Donald C. Pompan, MD, from Salinas Ca.

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1910588

    I suggest everyone read the article “HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE: A MORALITY TALE”. Fascinating article. shows how ”trustworthy” the medical establishment is.

    in reply to: REALLY disappointing clinical trial results #1910581

    Hydroxychloroquine. Every doctor who recommends hydroxychloroquine recommends it be give in a very specific way. Low dosage. With zinc. Early, not to hospitalized patients. And to high risk patients. Seems real simple to me. How am I supposed to trust Fauci when he refers to studies that don’t remotely resemble this protocol, as “proof” hydroxychloroquine is ineffective. A 7th grader observing can easily point out major flaws in the studies that show hydroxychloroquine ineffective. Why hasn’t Fauci and the NIH run a study that followed these very basic rules? Why has the Lancet, a very well known and respected medical journal, had to retract a study that was supposed to be the “nail in the coffin” for hydroxychloroquine -for using fraudulent manufactured data? Every study that abides to these easy to understand rules concludes hydroxychloroquine is indeed very effective in combating covid. Charlie, I challenge you to refer me to a one single study -that abides by these “rules”-and indicates otherwise. I’ll wait.

    in reply to: Is Joe Biden A Racist? #1910563

    I am astounded and beyond words. How fortunate are you eliezer that I am unable (due to YWN policy) to post the many video clips of President Trump REPEATEDLY condemning white supremacy. What a shameless liar. Or maybe not. I really should be dan lkaf zchus and assume you are incredibly uninformed. For now that will be my assumption. But do some research. Understand that the narrative that President Trump “endorses white supremacy” is a FAKE, MADE UP LIBERAL TALKING POINT!

    in reply to: Is Joe Biden A Racist? #1910465

    charlie, reb eliezer, either youve publicly admitted that you get your news from the fakenews liberal media, or your blatant liars. Regarding Charlottesville, Trump literally said “im not talking about the white supremacists, or neo nazis, they should be condemned totally”. He’s condemned them countless times, and if i could post videos of him doing so, i would. You, just like the Fakenews media, are simply hoping that the average person is uninformed on these topics and will take your word for it. Will you apologize?

Viewing 45 posts - 351 through 395 (of 395 total)