Torah613Torah

Squeak thank you for your clear explanations. If only my professor and textbook was more like you.

OOM I’m pretending I didn’t see your post because it is just going to confuse me.

The Golem Speaks: Yes. 11:59

squeak: Yay! I now have a 50 on your course! (stop ruining the curve icot) I guess one at a time ad infinitum is not correct.

As for how: I don’t see why you can’t just move them all up one, then move each guest into room 1, then move them up one again, and move the next guest into room 1, infinite times. Instead the rule is that you can do 2n-1 (double each present guest’s number and take away 1, then move the first guest into room 1 and each guest n into room number 2n-1.)

I suppose the rule way is more convenient if you are trying to do it quickly but I don’t get why moving them up one is wrong or different. Feel free to answer questions since it is a new day and new rules.

00:01

Squeak: You’re right, I looked it up. ICOT and squeak, thanks for helping me catch a mistake on an extra credit homework.

I think so, one at a time, but I’d better review this. I really struggle with the theoretical aspects of infinity. Every time I memorize the rules, I just forget them all the next day, it doesn’t click in my head. Can’t wait until this is over, and there had better be a reason they are forcing me to learn this some day. Do you (or anyone else here) have any advice for “getting” infinity topics? (11:45)

SaysMe: Because she has problems (9:21)

Squeak: Both great questions. There are more numbers between 0 and 1, which is an uncountable infinity, than between negative and positive infinity of integers, which is a countable infinity, since uncountable infinities are larger than countable infinities. Therefore the infinity between 0 and 1 is larger. (9:23)

As for the trees, none. 9:25

ICOT: Start your own thread to answer questions. This is my thread and I don’t appreciate your infringement on answering. Feel free to ask any question you want though. 9:27

Popa_bar_abba: Very deep question. Without knowing the properties of the genie in question, and as a general principle based on oral traditions, it would seem wise to escape as fast as you can, and not ask for anything. 9:31

RT: More like she would be related to the Torah in the future, no?

yiddishmeidel: Well, I can speak from experience. When people say Torah, I do not think of myself. 🙂 (I do wish I had picked a different screenname, but it’s too late now.)

Thanks OOM.

George Eliot? That’s a girl?

OneOfMany: LOL. Very cute. Everyone reading this thread, I advise you to google “the answer to life, the universe and everything.” You will find that my answer was correct according to Google. (it is now 11:00)

SecularFrummy: Even though you didn’t say what “equal numbers” are I figure you must be asking about let’s say the set of all integers vs. the set of odds? They’re equal because you can establish a one to one correspondence. (it is now 11:01)

Popa: Was he? I don’t know.

OneOfMany: That would greatly enhance my anonymity.

Excellent work.

OneOfMany: 42. That was an easy question, even a moderator could have answered it.

LOL, I had no idea that there was such an inyan. Good to know!

Yet another minhag to make sure my future husband doesn’t have.