Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,501 through 1,550 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Should Schools Ban Facebook? #903667
    Toi
    Participant

    mp, we know you hate to take on any real opinion in any matter, thats not a chiddush to us. what is a chiddush is that your american morals, your western respect for others, can allow you to be totally ambiguous in regards to a matter that our rabbonim have spoken on. why cant you allow yourself the torahs view on something.

    in reply to: YU for girls #866483
    Toi
    Participant

    yes it does. people who act upon taavos or make them known should be ostracized. why does your policy of appeasement end there? if someone were to make known that they enjoyed the company of children, would you be silent? or ostracize them. I know what i would do. if a person has a problem, something inside them that doesnt fit in with the torahs framework, (except li’inyan oinshim) they should kep it inside them, and seek therapy. not proudly tell the world the worst corruptions of the mind and soul.

    in reply to: Friday in Geulah #866044
    Toi
    Participant

    protest against people that are knowingly feering shello al pi derech ahtorah! Oh, that doesnt qualify, must not be importnant.

    in reply to: Listen to the rabbis and common sense sometimes. #866081
    Toi
    Participant

    go zees go.

    in reply to: Friday in Geulah #866037
    Toi
    Participant

    1. a neighborhood in which the majority, or really nearly all, of the people who live there have a standard of dress and action have the right to expect it to be maintained. the world isnt america, and isnt mishubad to be michabed every person who wants to shtell their krumme ideas.

    2. being in proximity isnt taaruvos, obviously, and thats obviously not what the op was broaching. the problem of shmoozing or having to deal with being squished up against a sem girl was the original post, as i understand.

    in reply to: Asking Questions #866206
    Toi
    Participant

    mdd- ive no idea what you mean to shtel tzu.

    zdad- your ability to bring in things with no shaychis is astounding.

    in reply to: YU for girls #866478
    Toi
    Participant

    this isnt jew on jew hatred. this is jews hating things that upset Hashem. or more accurately jews hating what another jew does as a matter of policy, when not in line with the torah. you hate neturai karta for the physical problems they create, and i hate several things that yu does due to the spiritual things it does.

    in reply to: Should Schools Ban Facebook? #903659
    Toi
    Participant

    logician- maskim. i thought you meant to let them use it etc.

    mp-putting a sixteen yo on the internet basically unsupervised (youre giving the kid a fb account) is like a ten yo in a candy store. the gedoim already said its worse. not me. i disagree about spiritual ups and downs. we should be mishtadel to only have ups, no downs, and deal with downs when they come. they are to be taken more seriously then a bump on the head. i just thought of a rayye- the gemara that says an amorah poked his eyes out, or tried to (dont remember) in order to avoid seeing bad things.

    in reply to: Friday in Geulah #866035
    Toi
    Participant

    again- not for kiruv. the majority of people in geulah are chareidi/yeshivish. mingling of the genders is bad. done!

    in reply to: Should Schools Ban Facebook? #903655
    Toi
    Participant

    mp- i believe that spiritua sakanos are to be avoided more carefully than a child scraping a knee. that wil heal. if my kids wearing a helmet etc., he’ll be ok. but allowing children access to things that their yetzer hara is excited for is like putting a ten year old on a motorcycle without a helmet. the potential for long-lasting damage is greater; the possible outcome infinitely worse.

    logician- even if they must happen, their din to happen is as a totza’ah of trying to do right and messing up. in essence they are an inevitable silver lining. they may be needed, the may happen no matter what, but its our job to try to avoid them and deal with them when we must. not embrace them.

    in reply to: Asking Questions #866204
    Toi
    Participant

    feif- wanting to understand is fine, but as said above, critical questioning, not trying to farshtey, is wrong, and seems to be what you mean. youre not asking pshat, youre asking mihaichah taise, lets do it differently because i want to.

    in reply to: Should Schools Ban Facebook? #903651
    Toi
    Participant

    mp- so vaguely youre saying that your kid being marginally affected detrimentally by facebook is acceptable, if he learns from his mistakes. just clarifying. I would guard my childs neshama with all ive got, and therefore wouldnt allow them near facebook. the same way i wouldnt let them near cocaine.

    logician-learning from mistakes is the silver lining of making them.

    we do not put ourselves in situations where we expect to fall and learn. we try our best and if we still fall, we endeavor to learn from those failings, to see where we went wrong and not repeat it. allowing a kid on dangerous sites on purpose doesnt qualify.

    Toi
    Participant

    so he shouldnt call a task force? ok, my married sister has a husband who mistreats here. should i call sholom task force?

    in reply to: hotel problem ?? #866123
    Toi
    Participant

    dont go. there, problem solved.

    in reply to: YU for girls #866464
    Toi
    Participant

    they can protest all they want. doesnt mean it didnt happen. in fact, no-one ever protested roswell.

    in reply to: Neturei Karta. #1106113
    Toi
    Participant

    they dot discredit satmar. thats like saying that a tziyoni in a mental home discredits hertzel, lihavdil.

    in reply to: Friday in Geulah #866033
    Toi
    Participant

    modern looking americans approaching israeli boys only occurs for one reason. and its not kiruv. Does MO approve of that. and these guys had curly payos. come on, gimme a break, its bad and wrong. why cant you just say it?

    in reply to: Bein Hazmanim important? #867446
    Toi
    Participant

    in my house the boys do everything the girls do plus all the shlepping etc.

    in reply to: Do you hold in acapella? #865565
    Toi
    Participant

    R Shlomo miller shlita paskined that acapella is ossur during sfira.

    in reply to: Should Schools Ban Facebook? #903648
    Toi
    Participant

    middle path- you only let them learn from mistakes because the possible issurim clearly arent so chamur by you. no sane parent would let their child learn from there mistakes concerning drugs or being involved in something against the law, maskim? well, if your childs’ spirituality is as importnant, how can you think to allow them to mess up and learn? the same way you wont let them learn from being in rehab. and if you dont like the tzushtel then you should reconsider the holiness of a childs neshama.

    in reply to: Friday in Geulah #866030
    Toi
    Participant

    i used to be from those who thought uit wasnt bad in geulah on friday afternoon. i wasnt there much but i almost never saw it. one or two maasim proved me wrong. its not always the boys who start it, i saw two modern looking girls approach shabobs numerous times and start shmoozing. its not good and should be discouraged if you dont need to. and the comparison above to shefa is a bit nuts. ok, just nuts. ive never seen anything in shefa not tznius, except for maybe the cashiers.

    in reply to: Bein Hazmanim important? #867440
    Toi
    Participant

    as if boys dont help. you know what? leave the boys in yeshiva and see who shleps the couch/fridge/extra beds/tables/ponies!

    Toi
    Participant

    ya really, if this were the reverse ie. husband abusing wife, everyone here would tell her to call the cops. wife on husband- no biggy.

    in reply to: Asking Questions #866175
    Toi
    Participant

    he means- if we have a mesorah and an established approach to something, then questioning is bad. if you dont undertsnad something, questioning is good. and MO seems to do the former. if youre fine with that than great.

    in reply to: Coca~Cola #865931
    Toi
    Participant

    or he’s saying that an ou alone doesnt suffice for him for pesach, which for all you know is based on a psak from a reliable rov, and isnt a chumra at all, and that when a riv says certain things made by OU are ok for pesach, he’ll rely on that rov.

    in reply to: Should Schools Ban Facebook? #903642
    Toi
    Participant

    zdad- you say that tools should be taught. like how to use facebook. youd agree that teaching a child to use heroin is dumb? well, maybe facebook, ruchnius-wise, is also dangerous. some tools arent supposed to be within the reach of children. youre not helping a kid by giving a bit, because kids are smarter than that; you give finger and theyll take a hand. i agree with big deal. and i think your priorities and values need reorganizing.

    in reply to: Bein Hazmanim important? #867434
    Toi
    Participant

    on the ball- al kol ponim in america, theres seder till twelve or one, and then a few hours to eat lunch, learn a bit, shave and shower, remove ingrown toenails etc. hardly a vacation.

    in reply to: Metzitzah B'Peh #865812
    Toi
    Participant

    zees- those of us who base our opinions on what we are taught by leading RYs and poskim are not called baalebatim. the guys with personal agendas are. we need not be poskim to have a torah view on a subject.

    in reply to: Places for dates #899878
    Toi
    Participant

    zoo

    in reply to: YU for girls #866455
    Toi
    Participant

    morarach- maybe their values and yours are at odds. go look at who the daughters of the current RYs and magidei shiurim are married to, happily, i may add. i was considering these bochurim the top, the cream of the crop, and if you think the shaar yoshuv boys are, than there is no conversation here. derech agav, two of my former best friends learnt in shaar yoshuv, and while certain people may need it, it is in no way doimeh to the top litvishe yeshivos. my friend in second year was in the top shiur there and said it didnt compare to our first year shiur- and this guy can learn.

    in reply to: YU for girls #866454
    Toi
    Participant

    sam2- i dont know the particulars, but the head of the group used to to daven in my shul. the very fact that the notion is possible speaks volumes more than its actual existence could.

    in reply to: Metzitzah B'Peh #865809
    Toi
    Participant

    lgician- im assuming your post needs clarification. care to?

    in reply to: Selling the Chometz to the Goy #866066
    Toi
    Participant

    klal yisroel is noheig not to sell chametz gamur.

    in reply to: Bein Hazmanim important? #867430
    Toi
    Participant

    I really do trhink it works and is needed. i can attest that one year my pesach bein hazmanim was cut very short due to a bunch of circumstances, and my summer zman suffered.

    Toi
    Participant

    logician- thanks for the compliment. you could be right, but i tire of having to deal at length with people who wont admit that they seek to further their agendas, as opposed to trying to see things in a torah light. my mother always said i shoulda been a lawyer rather then a yungerman. but you cant curl youre thumb at a judge; i just wouldnt be able to deal.

    in reply to: Bein Hazmanim important? #867418
    Toi
    Participant

    logician- i simply mean that the fact it isnt needed or useful by all doesnt mean it shouldnt exist. the tzushel was to be mekarev it el haseichel to daas baalebatim. i do agree after elul zman its a bit much.

    avi k- Married men went to learn?? are you insinuating that kollel existed before twenty years ago and isnt a product of lakewood??

    in reply to: How do i say ___ in hebrew? #866995
    Toi
    Participant

    such as…

    in reply to: Bein Hazmanim important? #867416
    Toi
    Participant

    yes, the bochurim who do what theyre supposed to during the zman need amonth. yes, there are those who dont need it. but the same way you baalebatim wont give up internet just because some people do aveiros with it, so too is the yeshivish world entitled to bein hazmanim.

    in reply to: Metzitzah B'Peh #865804
    Toi
    Participant

    when the most qualified halachic decisors, ie. the current gedolim and RYs (who arent quite as off the ball as youd think) decide that the mohalim are killing children, they will react accordingly. till then, we wont change.

    in reply to: YU for girls #866449
    Toi
    Participant

    Sam2- the top yu guys are not as good as the top bochurim from the top yeshivos. i dont consider myself the best at all and ive hanndled with the top guys in kby and although they might know 4 masechtos by heart, their iyun is lacking. vi’oid- i didnt say they wouldnt find shidduchim, they will, but it wont be the best guys, itll be the shaar yoshuv (read: off the beaten path, not worse) guys.

    I agree with loyal jews opinion that the yu that was isnt what is, and that you cant bring a rayye from years gone by. i dont think R shimon shkop would agree with an alternate lifestyle club. his point about BY is ridiculous.

    Toi
    Participant

    logician- the second. thanks for being my miturgamen lol.

    Toi
    Participant

    as my chosson teacher opened up the shmooze with “women are nuts”, you dont need to buy a book to learn that. there, i just taught you all you need to know. please send 17.99+s&h to me.

    in reply to: Metzitzah B'Peh #865785
    Toi
    Participant

    the obtuseness of this thread is astounding. the biggest rabbis say yes, the left-leaning westernized clergy-dudes say no, and all of a sudden the frumme’ become reshaim.

    in reply to: YU for girls #866440
    Toi
    Participant

    firstly, this will define who she marries, whether you like it or not. no bochur from any top yeshiva is going to look at this girl.

    secondly, the ruach of the place may be too much for her to handle. im not bashing (this time), im just saying that the change in societal norms from by to sterns can be overwhelming and she might get swept up in things she didnt count on. (or did count on.)

    in reply to: Friday in Geulah #866019
    Toi
    Participant

    Honestly, the yeshiva world cr is advocating taaruvois in geulah on friday afternoon. if there was strong enough language to condemn the people in here who clearly arent in full control of their faculties, i would use it. but it will get modded and no-one will listen. feh and shame on you.

    in reply to: Breslov Booklet Handouts #864575
    Toi
    Participant

    it should be noted that different breslov factions have their own agendas, and they edit or add into r nachmans books accordingly.

    in reply to: Alternative meanings for common words #892488
    Toi
    Participant

    calories: little creatures that live in my closet and sew my clothes a little tighter every night while i sleep.

    in reply to: Husband Nullifying Wife's Oath #863919
    Toi
    Participant

    thats what i said.

    in reply to: Husband Nullifying Wife's Oath #863917
    Toi
    Participant

    sam2- fakhert- women cant make any deal or transaction at all. the chachamim exempted a case of small value like tzedaka in order to preserve the relationship.

    in reply to: Being Ostentatious #864893
    Toi
    Participant

    yay death to nochrim!

    wolf- i side with you in regards to the hiddur shaila.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,501 through 1,550 (of 2,664 total)