Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
The Kanoi Next DoorMember
TLIK:
“nearly all of the poskim that are the leaders of our generation, are stating clearly that the drunkeness that is involved in so much danger (alcohol poisoning, accidents, getting rowdy and fighting, drunk driving etc.) is not the preferred way to go”
Name them.
TCG:
1) Care to name this Rov?
2) Does he hold there is no maylah in fulfilling shitah the Shulchan Oruch and rov Rishonim?
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberWIY:
Agreed.
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberYes, there should be a book called “The Bais Yaakov System: The Root of all Evil”. After all, everyone knows that its the systems, particularly the right-wing systems, that cause all of the problems. Heck, we just outlaw any and all systems. That should solve all of our problems.
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberWIY:
On Chanuka, people often end up burning down their houses and quite a few of them have ended up in hospitals with serious burns.
Should we forbid lighting the Menorah?
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberrebdoniel:
True, alcohol is not usually suggested by Judaisim (although I wouldn’t go so far as to say that it’s “frowned upon”; that’s Christianity), but on Purim there is clearly a chiyuv to drink. THere are many shittos as to how to best be mekayem this this chiyuv, but you cannot just pretend that the chiyuv doesn’t exist.
The little I know:
Please explain how one would go about “smelling” wine until they do not know the difference between boruch Mordechai and uror haman.
“Thus, it becomes offensive when people argue that getting drunk is a “mitzvah”… Drinking? Yes. Getting drunk? Absolutely no.”
Seeing as the Gemora, Rambam, Tor, and Shulchan Oruch are all on the list of those who “offend” you, perhaps you should change your sensibilities. You cannot simply dismiss a very real and legitimate shitah, held by many prominent poskim, because you don’t like it.
“Rav Shteinman shlit”a just made a public statement against heavy drinking.”
Could you provide a link?
“those who advocate shikrus have disposed of the Mishna Berura”
…and instead, were machmir like the Shulchan Oruch. Again, please do not pretend that a halcahic shitah doesn’t exist just because you don’t like it.
January 24, 2013 12:37 pm at 12:37 pm in reply to: English is Absent and Math Doesn't Count at Brooklyn's Biggest Yeshivas #924899The Kanoi Next DoorMemberLet’s be honest here for a minute: exactly how much of the secular studies that are taught in school are truly necessary for life? Personally, I think it’s a very small percentage; the rest of it just gets forgotten within the a month of the last test. All you really need (and therefore all the yeshivos really need to teach you) is basic english and math.
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberbenignuman:
The problem with that cheshbon is that the hesder yeshiva bochrim would not be the only ones getting shorter stints in the army; sow would the chilonim. So you would still be taking time spent learning by the Charaidim and transferring it to the chilonim, who will probably not spend it learning Torah.
zahavasdad:
All that proves is that the chilonim still don’t like us. No big shocker there.
The Kanoi Next DoorMember(Take 2:)
Can someone kindly provide a coherent, articulate explanation of why the Charaidim should have to serve in the Israeli army?
I personally don’t think it makes any sense to drag the learners out of the Bais Medrash and make them serve in the army when the army has no need for additional soldiers. All that will accomplish is that each person would serve for a shorter amount of time. So we would end up with less people learning, and yet the army wouldn’t get any bigger.
So why draft the Charaidim?
The Kanoi Next DoorMembertahini:
The arrogance of those thinking they are not meant to serve because they protect Yiddishkeit with their learning and observance is breathtaking. There are plenty of soldiers who keep mitzvot and do their army service, or if they wish opt out and do a communal voluntary posting instead.
This has absolutely nothing to do with arrogance and everything to do with halacha. One is not supposed to stop learning Torah to fulfill a mitza she’efshar laasos al yiday acharim, a mitzva that will be done by somebody else. Perhaps you should do a little more research before you start hurling around insults.
Speak to Israeli social workers about child abuse or domestic violence in places like meah shearin and they will tell of you a community that will riot against the police or medical crews, but not stop internal suffering amongst their own weakest and most vulnerable.
Ah; insults, loshon hara/motzei sheim ra, and disparaging generalizations. Sinas chinom at its best.
I cannot understand the concept of those engaged in Torah learning being disengaged from the world around them
Well, let me try to explain it to you. The theory is that one who does nothing except for learn Torah, will by definition be learning more than somebody who is also doing something else. Crazy, I know.
Fear of breaking away with traditions which are in themselves only recent minhagim dominate the charedi rabbonim, who politically are busy using imagined slights against Gadolim to canvass opinion against the State as well as each other.
So bashing the Charaidim in general isn’t enough for you? You feel the need to go disparage their Rabbonim too?
Israel is a young new country and needs all hands on deck to make things work.
That is simply not true. The Israeli Army does not want or need the Charaidim to serve; they have said so themselves.
Right now Satmar are campaining in Israel against the elections, people here in the CR are saying that Satmar are taking nothing from the State. Well who is paying for the policing and security bill for this grand show against the evil zionists?
Actually, they hired private security.
Miriam:
Why is the child of a Haredi more precious than a child of any other Israeli?
Nobody besides you has claimed anything remotely like that.
Learning is very important and so is serving.
True. Now, let’s try to figure out how can get the most of both: If we were to require the Charaidim to serve in the army, it result in less learning and no additional serving (the chillonim would simply have to spend less time enlisted). However, if we do not draft the Charaidim we will end up with more learning, and the same amount of people serving in the army.
mdd:
Kanoi, theconflict was brought by the creation of the Medinah, but so was the flow of cash to the Yeshivos. It is very crooked to accept and use only those aspects of the Medinah that are beneficial.
Again, the Charaidim who refuse to serve in the army at all are the same ones who do not take any government funds. There is no hypocrisy here.
benignuman
However, the Chareidim (other than those in Nachal Hacharedi) are not risking their lives.
Neither are the generals; but without them, the army would be an absolute disaster.
Health:
you don’t have a Frum upbringing, only a MO one.
That’s disgusting.
The Kanoi Next DoorMembermdd:
Kanoi, and if the Chareidim do not hold of them, they should not insist on living off them!
First of all, the Charaidim who do not hold of the Medina at all do not take any government funds.
Second, this has absolutely nothing to do with what I was saying (that the Israeli army is merely taking care of a problem that they themselves created, and should not be demanding the Charaidim’s help).
benignuman:
If one accepts that it is only due to the Torah being learnt by the Charaidim that the army is successful, are the Charaidim not doing their part? Would one claim that it’s “not right” that only the soldiers risk their lives in the IDF while the generals stay behind the lines? Or would you say that everyone must do their part to keep the country protected?
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberAvi K:
One must stop learning to do the mitzvos of tefillin and davening because they are ei efsher laasos al yisay acharim; serving in the army is not.
As for “those who are registered in yeshivot and kolelim but are not exactly learning every second”, somehow I don’t think it’s realistic to have them serve in the army only during whatever time they may be wasting. Therefore, having them serve in the army is still a problem of bittul Torah.
benignuman:
Again, there is no mitzva for the Charaidim to stop learning in order to protect their fellow Jews if the chilonim are able to do it just fine by themselves.
mdd:
akuperma’s point is actually quite a good one. Before 1948, when Arabs had no quarrel with us, we all lived together in relative peace and prosperity (not only in Israel, but all across the Arab lands). The problems began when the Zionists decided to create a state in the Arab lands, and the Arabs didn’t take too kindly to it. Therefore the argument could be made that the Israeli army is merely taking care of a problem that they themselves created, and should not be demanding the Charaidim’s help.
dveykus613:
+1
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberI know I’m late to the game, but there’s a couple of points that have been brought up here that I’d like to address:
1)The Charaidim should serve in the army out of hakaroa hatov, to “give back” to the State.
According to that logic, why shouldn’t all those of us living in America have to enlist in the US Army to sow our hakaros hatov to America?
2) It is hypocritical for the Charaidim to take government aid while not serving in the army.
First of all, one must realize that there are two major groups/ideologies within the Charaidim: The Badatz and the Agudah. The Badatz believes that due to its utter lack of respect for Hashem and his Torah, the Medina is inherently evil, and that cooperating with it in any way is shituf li’minus. Therefore they do not accept any government aid, vote in elections, etc.
The Agudah holds that while the Medina is not run al pi Torah right now, one should try to work within the system to try to improve it (ie, vote for the Charaidi parties.) Since they do not hold that one may not give any legitimacy to the State they take the aid that they, just like every other law-abiding, tax-paying citizen, are entitled to. However, they do not serve in the army (primarily due to bittul Torah, but also because they do not believe the Israeli Army is good environment for a Charaidi Jew to be in) so they, due to Israeli law, cannot work. The Israeli government made these rules; the Charaidim are just playing by them.
3) Serving in the army is not bittul Torah because it is a mitzva
We (= Rambam, Shulchan Orach, etc) hold that one should not stop learning to perform a mitzva she’efshar laasos al yidai acharim, a mitzva that can be done by somebody else. The chilonim are doing jus fine manning the army by themselves; they do not need any help from the Charaidim (or the Mizrach, for that matter). Therefore, al pi halacha there is no reason to stop learning and go to the army.
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberWhen I read PBA’s comment on the mesirah thread I literally burst out laughing. Yes, it is funny. Offensive, disgusting, horrible, etc. but still very funny.
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberAlso, going back to the “hypocrisy” bit (where some questioned how the school could encourage their students to sign up for Facebook to enter a contest, then ban it):
Couldn’t it be that the hanhala of the school simply did not realize at the beginning exactly what Facebook is? Perhaps they didn’t realize how much objectionable material can be accessed via Facebook, and once they realized their mistake they reversed their policy.
Hevai dun es kol ha’adam li’kaf zchus.
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberlesschumras:
Find me somebody half as accepted as the Baal Shem Tov who advocates not doing metzitzah bi’peh and we’ll talk.
Toi:
“the obtuseness of this thread is astounding. the biggest rabbis say yes, the left-leaning westernized clergy-dudes say no, and all of a sudden the frumme’ become reshaim.”
What do you mean, “all of a sudden”? The frummies have always been (and always will be) the reshaim.
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberSam2:
Yummy cupcake:
Actually, there is a very real interpretation of Chazal that says that not only does one have an excuse to get sickly drunk, but that one is obligated to do so. This is the interpretation of a radical, extreme sefer called the Shulchan Oruch.
That could very well be. However, we do not change the Halacha in the interests of PR.
How about the Shulchan Oruch?
Wolf:
Why do you say that?
Health:
April 2, 2012 4:34 am at 4:34 am in reply to: Are these young women nuts, selfish, out of it or something else? #865133The Kanoi Next DoorMemberI try to hold doors open for anyone of any gender, religion or race, and I simply do not find that frum people are half as obnoxious as they’re being made out to be in this thread. Maybe I bump into completely different people than everyone else here.
apushatayid: +1
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberfedup11210:
“it does not say that you should get drunk until you know nothing. It says that you should drink “ad dlo yadha bein arur haman and boruch mordechai!”
You’re right. I meant to right “practically nothing”, as I think it’s fair to assume that one who doesn’t know the difference between boruch Mordechai and arur Haman doesn’t know too much else either.
yummy cupcake:
“it is so backward to think that chazal would want us to make ourselves sick and throw up and act so disgusting. i can’t stand when i see ppl like that on purim”
Why do you consider this “backwards” and “disgusting”? Why can’t you stand seeing people like that? I would assume that the reason (and the reason for much of the opposition to drinking on Purim in general) is rooted almost entirely in modern Western culture that looks down upon drinking. But to judge a halacha as “backwards” and “disgusting” based upon outside values is absolutely wrong. Remember, today’s culture considers our approach to mishkav zachor to be “backwards” and “disgusting”, too… But does that mean we should change our views on the subject?!
“and just as a side point- which really is not really a side point, but also very important- it is SUCH a chillul Hashem! what do you think goes though the minds of other ppl when they see drunken jews throwing up on every block?”
Again, what do you think passes through the minds of the Goyim when they hear that we think mishkav zachor should be punishable by death? I doubt its very positive. Does that mean that make the issur of mishkav zachor a chillul Hashem?
“does it make sense that that is what Hashem wants from us?”
Does Hashem want us to follow the Halacha?
Does the Halacha say to drink?
I believe the answer to both of these questions is yes. And therefore, it is most certainly the ratzon Hashem that we drink on Purim. You may not understand it, you may not like it, but I don’t see how you can deny it.
Sam2:
“The Kanoi Next Door: So it’s a Kula to not get drunk?”
Some hold you must get drunk on Purim, others hold you do not have to. Sounds like a kulah to me.
Wolf:
“Sorry, I’ve got too much to do on Purim to get drunk.”
Are you too busy to listen to the Megilah? Or give shalach manos?
yummy cupcake:
“you should just be aware that there is drunk as in ranging from being a little high to being mildly drunk, then there is drunk as in more than mildly drunk to being grossly throwing up drunk. the first type i am ok with. the second type i am not.”
Again, what you do or do not like to see has little bearing on what the halacha is.
“and i don’t think that the rishonim/acharonim would be ok with it either if they saw to what degree many ppl do it.”
Why do you assume that? The simplest reading of Gemora, Rambam, Rosh, Tor and Shulchan Oruch all seem to say that one must drink until you are very, very drunk.
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberWolf:
“Even if you subscribe to the opinion that one should get drunk on Purim, it’s only to the point of ad d’lo yada. There is no mitzvah to keep drinking to the point of getting physically sick or being unable to stand or perform any of the other mitzvos that need to be performed (such as davening Ma’ariv, for example).”
The most pashut pshat of ad di’lo yadah is to drink until you know absolutely nothing. Getting physically sick and being unable to stand would seem to be a lesser level of drunkenness than that, so one would usually need to go through these stages before becoming drunk to the point where they do not know the difference between boruch Mordechai and arur Haman.
Now, there are certainly Poskim who define the chiyuv of ad di’lo yadah differently; however, there are many (TOr, HSulchan Oruch, etc) who hold this way.
“I am proud of the fact that I have never been drunk in my life — and that includes Purim.”
And I am proud of the fact that I have rarely been sober on Purim.
stuck:
“both shittas of psak halacha on ad dlo yoda are fully legit. So no one should be knocking the other shitta. So if ones shitta l’halacha is that one must get blind drunk on Purim, accept that.”
+1
PLONIALMONI4:
“I am also sure that you would not disagree with me that we both wish that people would focus on being as diligent in keeping the halachos of lashon hara, financial honesty and not speking during davening as they are in observing this once a year event.”
True. However, there is one rather large difference; there is nobody (to the best of my limited knowledge) who not only denies but actually advocates against keeping the halachos of loshon hara, genievah, etc. while there are plenty of people who seem to feel perfectly comfortable denying and advocating against the chiyuv of drinking on Purim.
(Again, there is some argument as to how far this chiyuv goes, but to pretend it doesn’t exist (or that there isn’t a legitimate halachic basis for getting very, very drunk) is just flat out wrong.)
Sam2:
“So many people nowadays are so Makpid on everything the Mishnah B’rurah says. They are Choshesh for a Da’as Yachid in the Achronim and consider people who don’t follow the M”B’s Eitzos Tovos as not being Medakdek in Mitzvos. So why are people so quick to dismiss the M”B here and say that the other Derech of P’sak is just as legitimate?”
The difference is that these people are makpid on the Mishnah Brurah, not meikel on it. And this shittah of the Mishnah Brurah is certainly a kulah.
(Not that that makes it any less of a legitimate shitah, only that you cannot fault those who are “Makpid on everything the Mishnah B’rurah says” (makpid being the key word) for not relying on the kulah of the M”B here.)
The Kanoi Next DoorMemberMiddlePath:
“As I said earlier, schools should not have control over what their students do out of school. I don’t mind if schools block Facebook on their own computers in the computer lab. But it should not be in the school’s power to control what their students do OUT of school.”
Why not? A Frum school should be instructing its students how to lead a Torah-true life, not just how to behave in school. If the school believes that Facebook can be harmful to its students Yiddishkeit, it can and should ban it.
“That is what PARENTS are for. Too often, parents will point fingers at the schools for things that they themselves should be responsible for.”
True, parents should show their children how to lead a Toarh-true life. However, the fact that parents do not always do that should be a reason for the school to be more, not less involved in their students lives.
“Also, I don’t like when people throw blame at objects instead of taking the blame themselves. For example, saying “Facebook is bad, the Internet is evil, etc..” That is just foolish. Everything can be used in a good or bad way. It is US who make that choice. If someone uses Facebook in a bad way, it’s not because Facebook is bad. It’s because the PERSON made the CHOICE to use it in a bad way. The PERSON is to blame, not the OBJECT.”
I don’t think anybody is claiming that Facebook is inherently evil, only that it enables people (usually teenagers) to do certain things that could be highly detrimental to their Yiddishkeit. And since Facebook gives people access to much more negative things than positive things, I don’t think it’s such a bad idea for a Frum school to ban it.
-
AuthorPosts