Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 10, 2013 9:37 pm at 9:37 pm in reply to: Who does V'ahavtah L'reiacha Kamochah Apply to? #958071HaLeiViParticipant
It also makes sense to feed your kids, yet Rabbeinu Bachye lists feeding your children as one of the greater types of Tzeddaka. There is also a Mitzva of Mibsarcha Al Tis’alem, to take care of those who are close to you.
These Mitzvos are Din, and are about doing what is right and appropriate. When we return a lost item, it is not being extra kind. It is doing what must be done. All Jews are connected and we are commanded to love each other. But in application we see it playing out in different degrees.
Just as in Tzeddaka, we give some more and some less. If a person is a Meyuchas and is accustomed to honor it is a Mitzva to give that to him. Otherwise it will be missing from him. If you don’t supply a Gabbai for a regular person he is not missing anything.
The Torah uses the term Ahavta Larei’acha. The more Rei’ah, the more Ahava. Not because you want it but because it will be missing without it. This applies to more than immediate family. Every situation has to be addressed with its appropriate approach. For the complete stranger we have the Mishna, Hevei Mekabel Kol Adam Besever Panim Yafos, and Ma Disani Lach Lechavrecha Lo Saavid. Whereas for a Shidduch you have to make sure you will be able to love the person.
HaLeiViParticipantIndigo itself can be either cool blue or green.
HaLeiViParticipantA person has an ability to create an attitude within himself. You condition yourself. You prepare for Shabbos saying inwardly that a great and holy day is coming. This day is a queen. This, coupled with the above advice as per how to spend the day, elevates the Shabbos. It is a day to look forward to.
June 10, 2013 3:59 pm at 3:59 pm in reply to: Who does V'ahavtah L'reiacha Kamochah Apply to? #958069HaLeiViParticipantSince when is easiness the metric? A lot of Mitzvos are easy and a lot of Divrei Reshus are hard.
The closer a person is the more more love there is supposed to be. This is not about Lifnim Meshuras Hadin or a utopian ideal. This is Din.
We see that Hillel applied this in practice to mean that what you wouldn’t want to be done to you, don’t do unto others. This is not quite the ultimate definition of love. The Gemara says not to marry someone that you won’t end up loving since you are supposed to love your wife because of the Pasuk, Ve’ahavta Lerei’acha Kamocha. So, as we see, it goes in stages and is in proportion to Rei’acha.
June 9, 2013 11:01 pm at 11:01 pm in reply to: Who does V'ahavtah L'reiacha Kamochah Apply to? #958063HaLeiViParticipantThe closer the person is to you the more it applies.
HaLeiViParticipantYou mean, you want your repentance back.
HaLeiViParticipantRegards to Chuck.
HaLeiViParticipant??? ???? ????? ?? ???? ????? ????
HaLeiViParticipantIf they can stick in two ads in that place, why waste it?
HaLeiViParticipantYou borrowed a large question. (Inspired by his answer.)
HaLeiViParticipantI think that topic was henpecked by roosters.
HaLeiViParticipantSam, perhaps Melach Sedomis, although rare, was found in that region. Tosafos, being in Europe, didn’t get from that salt at all.
The Aruch Hashulchan might be implying that the particular Bal Tosfos who said that was on a mountain. It is true though that the Poskim who are Sod oriented to say to continue with this Halacha. The Maharal also says this. He says that Melach Sedomis is itself a reference to more than just the sharp salt.
We have a rule that Ein Beis Din Yachol Levatel … Ella Im Gadol Bechachma Ubeminyan. Tosafos would not be Mevatel a Derabanan. The Gemara in Eiruvin said that Shlomo Hamelech had 1005 reasons for all Divrei sofrim. However, what we do find is that Tosafos would refer to a Derabanan that was not practiced, and say that due to the new circumstance we do not need to reinstate it. If even a small part of the original reason still existed, Tosafos insisted that it must be adhered to. This we find by the case of burial on Yom Tov.
The Tosafos on clapping, jewelry and Mayim Acharonim, among others, are addressing the fact that it wasn’t practiced.
The concept of Halachos of the Gemara not being followed to the T is not new. Tosafos says that we sometimes follow Sefarim Chitzonim (such as Maseches Smachos, Sofrim). There were obviously different Mesoros which might have originated from Eretz Yisroel or whatever, that we got from. There is a framework for how to deal with such things in retrospect, which we can learn from Tosafos.
Talmidei Chachamim, who study and know Kol Hatorah, and care about it too, are the right choice for giving an insight into these matters. Outsider’s perspective might be fun to read but cannot be used seriously.
The Chazon Ish knew all these Tosfos, and yet remained Frum!
HaLeiViParticipantWhen Yisro had an idea he went to Moshe Rabbeinu. When Korach had an idea he rallied the masses.
HaLeiViParticipantI think, and noticed, that the teenage years is a time of forming strong bonds. This shows out in many aspects. Students become very connected to their mentors, friends become very close and hang on each other — at times to point of being annoying, and in the context of what this thread is about as well. It is also a time when many things are intense, and the image of a Bochur that is an Oved doesn’t resemble anything else. Wouldn’t that make it the best time to get married and form a powerful bond?
HaLeiViParticipantIn societies where boys and girls interact constantly, the girls tent to form into a certain mold. When around boys, or men,a they try to act ‘cute’, or perhaps babyish. You can witness this wherever you turn, on the street or in a business. A good reason for girls to hang out among themselves is to retain their personal identities.
HaLeiViParticipantAll of them are being eaten so it is actually a case of Shnei Shvilin. In that case we would have to rely on ????? ???? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ?????, which works only by a Derabanan. I don’t know if we consider the Bassar Vechalav variants (chicken, 6 hours, Chad Betrei) Kula’ble Derabanans.
The most puzzling thing about chicken is that we apply the Sakana of eating it with fish. If we would be eating it with milk, I don’t think it would cross anyone’s mind to bunch it together with meat in this regard.
By the way, ice cream doesn’thave a Zman Heter. It won’t be ice cream anymore. (Yeah, OK.)
HaLeiViParticipantChatzi Eved Chatzi Ben Choren.
HaLeiViParticipantYou remind me of an argument I had with a friend from another country. I said C is here and he insisted that what I pointed to is A. After a long while I thought of asking him how he knew to be so sure if he didn’t even grow up with this alphabet, he obviously didn’t call the notes by the ABC in the first place. He answered that he actually called it Do Re Mi. In other words, he took it for granted (reasonably enough) that Do is A. I’m actually not too sure why it isn’t.
Perhaps our system is designed be bass writers.
HaLeiViParticipantRegister is what you call the playing a new set of notes on top of the old. A flute, clarinet, recorder and saxiphone can play more notes than the amount of keys they sport. Playing the higher octave, or register, can either simply be with the release of a key (or half a key) or might include different blowing methods, which makes it harder. I don’t think it is called register on a trumpet, but I’m not sure.
HaLeiViParticipantYou mean the upper staff. Anyhow, I’m pretty sure Sibelius can export to MusicXml as well. Any better software is supposed to be able to do that.
MuseScore is a free open-source program that uses soundfonts to play and save. It isn’t so stable but the autosave is pretty good. It is also a bit rigid and the controls are through shortcuts that you have to dig up in the help PDF rather than the UI. I thought I recognized the fonts and layout.
HaLeiViParticipantWIY, it might be very hard to say that every time. Perhaps you should make an easy to remember acronym.
HaLeiViParticipantPicked it up. Very nice.
It looks like you used MuseScore. Why don’t you also make it available as in MusicXml format, for that matter? This way, someone can enhance it and send it back.
HaLeiViParticipantIs my current post included in your parenthesis?
HaLeiViParticipantRD, and Hashkafa influences Halacha. Scary thought.
Where did you find the Ri Sagi Nahar’s Sefarim?
Some of what you mentioned is self admitted but not all. I’m not sure we have the right to make such assumptions.
By the way, what was your point?
HaLeiViParticipantWhat is .nf, North Africa?
HaLeiViParticipantIt means that the Shopping list gets longer.
HaLeiViParticipantBy saying that, you threw out quite a few of the 39 Melachos. That can’t be the case.
HaLeiViParticipantI think you are taking 147 way too serious. I can’t even tell if he is a zionist or not.
HaLeiViParticipantKabbala predates the Zohar Hakadosh, as we are all aware, and it is Rashi who told us how to find the Shem Ayin Beis. We see that many Rishonim express Kabbalistic ideas here and there. The Raavad even figured that the Rambam knew Kabbala. There is no reason why he shouldn’t have, if he learned from a Rebbi.
I say we don’t give it a second thought, because we know how to take it, whether we actually learn it or not. Every elementary kid, at least in my upbringing, knew that there is no Guf and we still translate those Pesukim and Mamarei Chazal exactly as Rashi did.
Yes, there is a form that is being discussed. This form belongs to Hashem. Hashem cannot be defined, and He therefore is not in a certain form. Sounds confusing? Fine. We don’t understand everything. Or, we can delve into the topic and learn the ins and outs.
The Rambam was fighting a crusade and had to turn Hagshama into a taboo. In doing so he discarded Medrashim as Daas Yachid and the such. Those Mamarim are nicely explained by others, but for the Rambam’s purpose he chose to discard them.
We are, Baruch Hashem, way past that point. My second graders never thought of Hashem as physical, and yet they still had no problem understanding that certain terms are used that sound physical.
Actually, most of the first Chelek of the Moreh Nevuchim sounds extra and not particularly enlightening. Yes, I’m aware that Pi Haaretz doesn’t mean that the earth can talk, and Ein Haaretz doesn’t mean that it can see. I’m equally aware that Ha’aniya Chashva Lehishaver doesn’t mean that the boat had a meeting with its captain.
Rashi, on the Gemara of Ein Ben David Baa Ad Sheyichlu Kol Neshamos Shebaguf, says that there’s a place called Guf where the Neshamos are from. In Shabbos, when the Gemara says that the Ruach stays in the body until the Stimas Hagolel, Rashi explains that Yesh Bo Tzad Chayos. Does that sound physical? I think you should look out for these types of Rashi’s as well.
Just realize, all the Mefarshey Rashi deal with these Rashi’s without batting an eyelash. Whatever it means it means. It’s not the first funny sounding Medrash. The fact is that Yecheskiel Hanavi saw KiDmus Mar’eh (which is three stages of comparison). There is a form to speak of, and it doesn’t mean that you are defining Hashem with that.
I mentioned researchers because I’ve heard of this before, together with some other very shallow proofs.
I quoted the Zohar Hakadosh not to say that Rashi won’t say that in the face of the Zohar Hakadosh, but to show how far it is and therefore Chas Veshalom to pin something like that on Rashi Hakadosh.
If Rashi and Rabbanei Tzarfas would actually hold a certain way Hashkafically, we would probably hold the same.
HaLeiViParticipantThe Gemara is clear. He is simply explaining it.
If you found a certain Baal Tosfos, fine. But to put this on Rashi is a terrible accusation, pinning on our greatest Rishonim what the Zohar Hakadosh says is part of Arur Asher Yaase Pesel Umaseicha Vesam Basseser, is horrible. These references were glossed over for a thousand years and nobody thought of it what the recent researchers found with their newly found zest for all things odd.
It is actually pretty ridiculous to claim something like this when our Neshama is not Megusham and does not have a form. The Gemara says that Hakadosh Baruch Hu fills the world like a Neshama fills the body. Was Rashi ignoring this when he translated Bitzalmeinu the way we all do today?
Does the Gemara in Brachos 6 also show this Shita when Rebbe Yishmael mentions nodding of the head? Does the Gemara later discussin clapping hands, kicking feet, sighing and crying also promote this ‘shita’? Why does Rashi go at such lengths to explain Vayisatzev El Libo? Why does he find it necessary to explain Erda Na?
Just because Rashi didn’t make a More Nevuchim to explain how such terms come in, that doesn’t mean that he didn’t have any deeper understanding of such matters. As the Yashar Micandia writes, if I were to write you a math book does that show you that I don’t know philosophy?
It is also hard to gleen what someone held from a critique against him. The Rambam complained about a Sefer Shiur Koma. Presently, we don’t give such a thing a second thought.
HaLeiViParticipantIs it really Parush? You don’t know which one you are taking but they are all there.
HaLeiViParticipantYekke, the Terutz is nice but it seems like something needs to be understood better with the concept of Ho’il.
The Kasha from Choleh is even bigger. Even when you are doing it for a Choleh, you can’t be Mosif.
I guess this goes back to Hutra or Dechuya. If it is Dechuya then we can’t say Ho’il.
HaLeiViParticipantSam, I am really surprised that you would slander the greatest Rishonim based on nothing. Such heinous accusations just because Rashi and Rashbam explained the Pshat of the words!? If the idea of Tzelem bothers you, take course #1 in Kabbala, Chassidus, or even certain types of Chakira and Mussar.
Just like we can draw a diagram of meta-physical concepts, of how they interrelate, something (or in this case, someone) can be formed in that shape. We know, and you expressed an awareness of the fact, that there is a Shiur Koma, of the Hanhaga, Hashgacha, Hashpaa, Haora, or whatever else you call it. Most of us take this for granted.
It didn’t cross the mind of any Meforash on Rashi to say what you are saying about him. The Pasuk referes to Malachim as Ruchos; do you seriously think Rashi held more Hagshama about Hakadosh Baruch Hu, Rachmana Litzlan?
It is mind boggling that people would not be afraid of the Achrayos of tampering with such things.
Besides for the above, even had you found such a thing, do you really think it is a ???? ??????
HaLeiViParticipantTry dowsing.
HaLeiViParticipantYou’re right. Here’s the point:
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/a-nekumeh-oif-hitler#post-467332
HaLeiViParticipantOr not eating turkey on Thanksgiving Day, Josh.
HaLeiViParticipantWolf, you are the king of footnotes.
HaLeiViParticipantE-O-M, does your Safek outway the Vadday of Gedolei Hador? Do you really dismiss years of toiling on the Torah, Gemara, Rishonim, Poskim, Achronim, that it leaves one as he began?
Do realize, Rav Shteinman is quite open-minded. He was pro the Nachal Chareidi. Now he is calling this a war and a Shmad.
HaLeiViParticipantThere was discussion beforehand about getting more Chareidim into the army. Did we all forget about that? They were discussing opening positions that are more inline with our values. In fact, the number of Chareidi soldiers rose and was on the rise.
This Rasha decided to use an easy target to sit on and rise politically using his target as a cherry picker. Hayu Tzareha Larosh — not anything new.
He started with the army then went to economics and moved on to private buses. Oh, it has nothing at all to do with waging a war, although it was actually explicitly stated that the intention here is to ‘normalize’ the Chareidim. I guess, something like how Russia ‘normalized’ us.
HaLeiViParticipantLakewood Fellow, the difference is a macro one. Changes within the system are part of the system. A change beyond the system is out of the question and has never been observed.
A computer can host a program and even change it, but it will never download a new computer.
HaLeiViParticipantSam, the Medrash says that until the Cheit of Adam Harishon, the planets went much faster. That would suggest that time advanced at a different speed. Long day.
You also mentioned the concept of Bitzivyonam Nivra’u, that everything was created mature. I’ve heard people mocking this approach as intellectually dishonest, since why would Hashem deliberately create a circumstance just for the sake of tricking people. However, they are missing one point. The world is one big interdependent cycle. The plants need the healthy topsoil, which is created by microorganisms, which feed on other decaying matter, which come from dead plants and animals. Rivers are formed by the slow process of erosion. Large animals eat smaller animals who eat bugs that feed on bacteria. Hashem created decaying matter and everything else in all stages of the cycle.
HaLeiViParticipantWhat about the famous Rabbeinu Peretz that you are Mechuyav to stand on your head before saying Mode Ani? Who are you to even think otherwise, when I invoked a Rishon!? A Rishon!
WIY, if something sounds stupid, a Rishon didn’t say it.
HaLeiViParticipantMaybe when it says Akum Sheshavas it literally means an Oved Avoda Zara. In that case he is not being Shoves to show that Hashem created the world and it might even be an extension to his own Avoda Zara.
Another possibility is the opposite of what you quoted earlier. He is Mechuyav to rest enough to show a Shvisa, that Lechvod Shamayim he is not working. But this has nothing to do with the 39 Melachos necessarily.
This can actually answer Tosafos’ Kasha in that it is an Assay and not like the rest of the 7 Mitzvos Bnei Noach.
HaLeiViParticipantRabbiYoni, you probably mean the Loitzker Rebbe Shlita.
HaLeiViParticipantI guess trying to play Chopin’s piano music on a flute could be quite complicated, but the Jewish piano that I’ve seen didn’t really have much piano going on. Usually it just has the simple chords written out for the left hand.
HaLeiViParticipantWIY, I wasn’t trying to complain. I was using the un-like button, as Oh Shreck! suggested.
HaLeiViParticipantBut it wasn’t nice.
HaLeiViParticipantHavara has nothing to do with Chassidus or style. The current Pinsker Rebbe is a son of the previous, and first, Pinsker Rebbe.
HaLeiViParticipant-1
HaLeiViParticipantOk. It would resemble the old Yishuv.
-
AuthorPosts