HaLeiVi

Patur, from Rashi it seems like something less glamorous. He says it is referring to Sisra’s Mazal. In that case, the inhabitants are the people under that Mazel.

Non Yeshivish.

Are you implying that in Hilchos Brachos he can be ???? ???????? ?????

Syag, what can you see about me?

On the Insert tab, the galleries include items that are designed to coordinate with the overall look of your document. You can use these galleries to insert tables, headers, footers, lists, cover pages, and other document building blocks. When you create pictures, charts, or diagrams, they also coordinate with your current document look. You can easily change the formatting of selected text in the document text by choosing a look for the selected text from the Quick Styles gallery on the Home tab. You can also format text directly by using the other controls on the Home tab.

They see what a Ruach sees. It is not Ruach Hakdoesh. Different Tzaddikim have different types of Ruach Hakodesh. Mainly, it seems to be an aspect of ????? ???? ??? ??????. And as the Medrash says, whoever advises ??? ???? his advice works out, as it says, ??? ??? ??? ????.

Regular people are also Zoche sometimes to ????? ?? ??? ?????. People relate how they don’t even know why something popped out of their mouth, and how well it played out. In the notes of the Tolner Rebbe, the Gerrer Rebbe remarks how he says what “they ” put into his mouth to say. It is almost that he is as much a bystander as his audience, to his own words.

Ivory, are you my Shvigger? l

It is pretty clear from different places in Chazal that a person has point to point choices rather than gradual. We find that a person who became a Tzaddik could have been a Rasha of a certain type, not everywhere in between. There is a Medrash that HKBH shows a person certain spots in Gan Eden or Gehenom that could have been his.

According to the Maharal, and as it seems from Midrashim, the Milchemes Gog and Magogo is a war against Moshiach. Before Moshiach is Chevlei Moshiach. Once he comes it will arouse hate and jealousy and they will gang up against Moshiach. This might be against Moshiach Ben Yosef.

If you go with Rav Kook’s view that the pre-Moshiach idea of Moshiach ben Yosef was actualized with the State of Israel, then perhaps 48, 57, 67, 78 are all part of Milchemes Gog and Magog.

I hope we were Yotze Chevlei Moshiach already.

There’s a famous sport about the Noda Biyehuda that when he first became Rav and had many opponents they kept trying to test him and trip him up. Once, by a Seudas Bris, they made something look like a questionable piece of may and brought it up to him and asked what it’s Din is. He started leaning towards one ruling and they all brought proofs to the contrary. He hard them out and started to agree to them. Then they brought proofs the other way around and he started leaning towards that. That is when he suddenly announced that this case is made up.

They knew he was right but they wondered how he knew. Jew said, when a Shaila comes to a rav he gets Siatta Dishmaya to answer correctly. If I can’t make up my mind then it must not really be a Shaila.

Thanks, but what about HaLeVia?

????? ???, Simchos by all of you.

What exactly fo you mean by “learnt in yeshivos”? They are very nice and useful but it’s not the kind you sit down to learn. I think the idea of solving the Chad Amars is that each piece was taught separately and not necessarily was the Baal Hamaamar aware of the other Gemara which holds the key. Anyhow out is not a definitive statement saying that now the search had ended. It is ?????? ???? ????????.

How do you know what people know or don’t know?

Yekke, I know of someone who got such service from a Baal Ruach Hakodesh. He wrote a letter, changed his mind and put it away. Nobody knew of it, but he got a response. In our generation.

The mod thought it was funny. ?? ???? ????? ???, so probably ?? ????? ???? ???. The mod wanted to add to the conversation to he took away.

The Rav Mibartenura explains the Kal Vachomer that Achisofel was a Rasha. One thing or two doesn’t make a difference Misvara. The point we are learning is that although he is not actually his Rebbe, since he learned a drop from him he called him his Rebbe.

The Maharal explains that they only kept ????? ??? and not ????? ?? ????. But that was about Yaakov. I don’t recall, as of now, a reference to the Shvatim keeping the Mitzvos.

And Reb Moshe was not thick headed when he was young.

Moshe Rabbeinu was born with good Middos.

I, for one, wouldn’t want to take on the Ramban. I do think he was aware of the Gemara in Brachos, especially since he focused on that topic for quite a while in his Shaar Hagemul, and used that explanation given by the Gemara to mean the usual but wouldn’t apply to Iyov. How does Rabbeinu Yona reconcile his statement with that of the Gemara once the Gemara gives an explanation — and as I pointed out, Rebbi Meir only argues that Rasha Vetov Lo can sometimes be undeserved? How does the Moreh Nevuchim reconcile his Pshat on the topic with the explanation given in the Gemara?

If one half gets the joke and the other half complains, is it a half dead frog?

I was answering your Kasha but asking another one. You asked on the Maharitz Chayes why he doesn’t apply to Ben Azzay what he applies other places, that Sod Hashem, although it can’t be a revelation of an Halacha it can be a revelation of a physical fact.

My attempt at answering this is that, although when you know something exists through Ruach Hakodesh you may indeed Pasken based on that, you can’t be Kove’a an Halacha Ledoros through that. This is especially the case over here, being that it is a Machlokes based on how to size up and quantize something.

If everyone was merely relating their own experience, what was Ben Azzai relating?

My own understanding in this matter (and Daas Yochid mentioned this idea in another conversation) would answer his Kasha, but it is not a Kasha on him why he doesn’t say what I like.

Golfer, I don’t know why these days every mention of Tefillah comes with a disclaimer that “no is also an answer.” Obviously, if you ask to become very rich and it is hard-coded against your Mazal it won’t change easily. People all too often refer back to the big requests that they Davened for and reflect how it wasn’t answered.

But I’m sure I’m not the only one who has had my Tefilos answered. It is important to remember when Hashem answered your Tefilos. You have these in mind when you say Baruch Shomea Tefilla.

Before him. The Chidah mentions it as an earlier tradition.

I’ll preempt Sam here by wondering why this is defferent from the Issur of Shoalin Bagoralos. Perhaps, because we are Mispallel that Hashem answer us through this method, and we only follow when it is a clear sign of Hashgacha, whereas Goralos would be deciding based on which side the oil flows.

??? ????? ??? ?????? ????? ?????? ??? ?????

It doesn’t answer the question if you think it is not fair to be punished for the body that your Neshama inhabited some time ago.

Mekubalim explain the answer given that it is aluding to Gilgul. It is not explicit in the Gemara just as all Sod isn’t explicit in the Gemara.