🍫Syag Lchochma

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,351 through 2,400 (of 7,736 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1829200
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “since there is a bening way to view his comment, she should have done so ”

    because you think there is an alternate way to view his comment I should have decided to view it that way? tell me youre joking

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1829032
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    I know you think im wrong, and you were able to to reach far to get there. But that wasn’t the case ar hand. According ro someone familiar with halacha i was correct.

    in reply to: Agudah Supports Palestinian Statehood #1829013
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    If I cough near you and you think I spit at you but I didn’t and you insist I did what would that make you?

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1829009
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    umm, I don’t think we have clarity. im not sure where you came up with the beginning of your post, about motzei shem rah. I said I was talking about expecting bad things from a group of frum jews who have not done anything yet. joseph said (and I believe I am paraphrasing without altering it) that some frum yidden will now come forward and say bad things that are knegged halacha (rationalizations about the superbowl).

    THIS is jumping to a conclusion, regardless how sure you are, that yidden will sin. he judged them infavorably, accusing them (although we don’t know specifically which ones, but Yidden nonetheless) of being sinners without a limud zchus that this year they might be different. there is no room to say he was standing up for Halacha in the face of evil, no evil had been done except in his negative expectation of members of klal Yisroel.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828992
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Briefly –
    My comment was this:
    “even you must admit that your advance condemning and expectations of horrible behavior is wrong al pi halacha”

    in response to his saying this, BEFORE any comments were made:
    “so expect a litany of excuses here why this aveira is okay and why this aveira (pritzus and whole list of worse things) “really” isn’t such an aveira. Or that one day a year is okay to take a break from not doing aveiros.”

    I have been taught that expecting bad things from yidden in advance is halachically wrong. Until you had a problem with it it never occurred to me there was a differing opinion. Hope that answers your question.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828978
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    seriously tho, although I have no interest or desire to partake in contentious conversations, if everyone has shifted back to neutral, and you sincerely have a question, I am happy to answer it.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828975
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    oh wow, thank you so much for having my best interest at heart. It sounded more like a knee jerk defensive response than a plan to help me grow but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt 😘

    in reply to: No more shopping bags! #1828849
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    We have a store here that started distributing those heavy reusable ones. I don’t remember which law sparked it tho. I was thinking the bag tax but they are across the street from Chicago (their side is a suburb) so the tax didn’t apply. We also have a store within the Chicago borders that puts a stash of plastic bags on a hook on the outside of their building with a sign that people are welcome to take them if they need them for any reason.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828777
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    nothing proves sincerity like a personal insult.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828748
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Again, if I was wrong about your intent, I apologize

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828747
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    zdad – that is one of the lamest rationalizations so far. Seriously.
    I can’t be Einstein so why take physics. And as long as I’m not taking chemistry either, why not mix dangerous chemicals since I’m not a chemist anyway.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828741
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “Maybe you should be dan me likaf zechus that I am honestly interested in a real exchange of ideas.”

    If that was the case you would have stated, not spewed. and you would have stuck to the facts. But if I am wrong, then stating that would be sufficient. Assuming I responded because you were defending Josef is just dumb. and implies you aren’t commenting on the topic at hand at all. I have defended Josef’s views when appropriate and agreed with him when appropriate. Again, if you were commenting on the facts presented, you would have responded differently if you were actually interested as opposed to jumping in on a “joseph situation”. If I judged you wrong, thank you for letting me know. I make a tremendous effort to look at lots of sides before I say anything both here and in real life. When they are not putting down Torah values, the frum community or making a chilul Hashem I will go out of my way to find any idea that will judge them favorably.
    There is a list a million miles long of things I don’t do or don’t do well but giving a limud zchus is something I work very hard on and don’t take lightly.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828713
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    kluger – IF you actually read the post you would have your answers.
    IF I was defending the superbowl watchers you would be correct.
    IF anything Joseph said applied to me you can rant about defensiveness.
    Assuming you are here for the drama, perhaps I can interest you in an additional set of cotton balls.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828703
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    kluger- thank you so much for your diatribe. I do have a personal shitta not to respond to people who aren’t listening and I KNOW I am going to be sorry for making this exception.
    I didn’t defend any of those people.
    I didn’t tell him to be dan lkaf zchus the people who turned off the commercials.
    If you wipe your drool and read back you will see that I commented on expecting the worst from klal Yisroel BEFORE they open their mouths.
    You do understand the concept of before and after, right?
    Move on.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828663
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    speaking of ballyhooing – you obviously haven’t caught yourself up on the halacha, or more likely you didn’t bother checking what was going on in the thread to see if your sermon applies.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828518
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    A non Jewish female coworker told me this morning that the half time show was so offensive and nothing short of pornography. She was horrified that the performers allowed their own children to watch, let alone the public. She said it was unprecedented.
    When I think of any of you boys, men here, or any others I cross paths with, seeing such a thing turns my stomach and breaks my heart. Sincerely and honestly.

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828516
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    lakwdstrng and Eli – Good for you that you found a way to gain some ground against your yetzer hora. I would feel even better if I heard you say that you hope to do better next year, that you realize there is still danger in waiting to see if there are still uncovered women on the screen before resuming watch. Maybe watch with someone else who can safely man the dial? and ultimately, May Hashem grant you the strength one day soon to find no draw in things like this!

    in reply to: Hashkafah on watching the Super Bowl #1828302
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Joseph – It breaks my heart when super bowl sunday comes around and I hear people talk about getting together to watch it. and if there is any influence to be had on the decisions of those who go, then great. but I am always amazed at the free pass you give yourself to talk this way about klal Yisroel. You have a torah obligation to be dan lkaf zchus at least as much as your thrill to denigrate. If you want to be honest, even you must admit that your advance condemning and expectations of horrible behavior is wrong al pi halacha. Please don’t allow yourself the same sweeping rationalizations you accuse them of making.

    there are people who genuinely care about what klal Yisroel spends their time on , instead of just condemning them. Those people have set up different options of watching the superbowl without commercials and half time shows, or incentives to be doing something better instead. I thank those people from the bottom of my heart for not sitting back and cursing klal Yisroel, but for taking action instead. May Hashem reward them with only good.

    in reply to: Agudah Supports Palestinian Statehood #1828234
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “The Aguda can claim whatever they like but their public statement clearly endorses the two state solution and there is no rational person who would read it any other way”

    You are welcome to your version of things but no need to be rude. I felt exactly that way (but without the insult) when i saw this thread, wondering how someone could think the way you do. And i am not alone
    .

    in reply to: returning to amazon #1827337
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Ubiq – you’re right but you’re wrong. You are arguing that a return is a return and if aseller doesn’t want returns he shouldn’t take them. The “other side” is saying that the returns are in place to encourage sales for people who made a purchase that didnt work out. And *additionally* if they knew people were using the return policy as a way to AVOID a sale they wouldn’t approve. So you disagree saying you’ve had that conversation with sellers and further, even without they’re consent you disagree anyway.
    Im not sure how yoy can think sellers would agree with you, but that’s besides the point. I was just trying to unkink the argument. To you a return is a return. Not everyone sees it that way. So the seller “taking returns” is not a given that they want tho take areturn you made to avoid a sale.

    in reply to: frum exercise #1825226
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    What was the op before? (Sam’s is somewhat obvious)

    in reply to: How should trump respond #1824117
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “It is time for him and his despicable fractured family to pack up and leave the country”

    haha, looky there! CTLawyer has started advocating for deporting immigrants!!!

    in reply to: donating a kidney #1822904
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Ubiq- thanks, you beat me to it. I was just going to say that he is giving more restrictions than the transplant team gives. But I would guess by the wording he took it from a website.

    in reply to: Non-Jewish books #1822567
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    I think you are ignoring the context. He is trying to say (without having actually read the books) that people doing bad things are portrayed in a positive light, giving credence to them and their actions. I was rebutting that they are portrayed negatively, not as heros, and the fact that their doings may bear fruit, they are not porrrayed as successful. This is actually a good lesson for all thise who think they are seeing such things in real life where we are without the benefit of narration.

    in reply to: Non-Jewish books #1822550
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “That means that for most of the book your reader is reading about a non role model being successful.”

    Not true. I have not sern that type of portrayal in any of those types of books. The :successful non role model is not lauded or praised for his behaviors, ethics or line of thinking despite his success.

    in reply to: Where Was Rechnitz At The Siyum Hashas? #1818181
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    This looked like a levaya from the first minute of Rabbi Mandel crying and ending with Helfgot crying.

    one of the dumbest/most disrespectful comments yet

    in reply to: With Trump through thick and thin? #1818145
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    millhouse – love that post. Well said.

    in reply to: shalom mordechai is OUT…..BARUCH HASHEM! Its Zos Chanukah #1818024
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Deflect? You have the chutzpah to single me out with such sina and accuse me of not properly welcoming moshiach? Who do you think you are? A sick and hateful man. Your rebbe would be embarrassed.

    in reply to: shalom mordechai is OUT…..BARUCH HASHEM! Its Zos Chanukah #1817351
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Eli, you are one sick dude

    in reply to: shalom mordechai is OUT…..BARUCH HASHEM! Its Zos Chanukah #1815930
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “Why do you think some Jews did not feel it? Would the same Jews lack joy in Moshiach?”

    😳

    in reply to: 20 Kislev in Chabad #1815616
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Yup, nu nu

    in reply to: 20 Kislev in Chabad #1815444
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    5ish- and i hope you can clearly see the difference between your narrative and their narratives above, which i believe reflects the difference between the authenticity of your commitment to Torah and the unfortunate cultism that allows people to absorb, accepr and retell stories as if it was a superhero fandom.

    in reply to: Non-Jewish books #1814653
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    You don’t read that junk than you have no business calling it that. And your relative obviously never read it either because i have, and that description does not fit. That life is not glorified. Not everyone becomes frum at the ends of every book, but the emptiness in their lives is definitely stated.

    in reply to: With Trump through thick and thin? #1814512
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Trump was an adulterer and Clinton was an addict. Both are disgusting but one puts the public more in danger.
    I won’t support that behavior in either of them because I WON’T lower the bar. But all of you seem to be giving Clinton a pass for this (and Obama for the 40 trillion) etc etc so who is really lowering the bar?

    in reply to: President Donald Trump, Oheiv Yisroel Par Excellence #1814503
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    you can’t call someone who supports jews an anti semite just because he supports their causes as well. It makes no sense. He doesn’t have to be a jew lover to the exclusion of all else, he has done things that support us and our causes, while also doing so for other groups. And why shouldn’t he?
    You ask a good question tho about why he doesn’t defend himself or care how he appears. I think it’s because he is a baal gaiva of sorts who “knows” he’s right and doesn’t care what other’s say.

    in reply to: With Trump through thick and thin? #1814483
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    klugeryid – you ask a rational question to an irrational post? Good luck.

    in reply to: President Donald Trump, Oheiv Yisroel Par Excellence #1814383
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    and tangentially the atmosphere of violence belongs to the democrats. Think of all the violence of the anti trumpers that first year. And ask anyone (myself included) if they feel threatened (physically or otherwise) to support trump in a workplace that is strongly liberal. It’s a real problem, hating people and threatening them and berating them for supporting trump is something I dealt with for a year and my brother lives with and friends have complained about. I have NEVER heard of such a thing in the reverse or in a different time. Dont’ pretend acting out aggressively toward people you hate is something trump brought to the arena.

    in reply to: President Donald Trump, Oheiv Yisroel Par Excellence #1814379
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    ok. now I KNOW you are dreaming. If you think that Obama refusing to speak out against terrorists, let alone FUNDING them, and shunning Netanyahu didn’t open that door than you are sorely mistaken. Add to that the reality of when the rising began….during the Obama presidency.

    in reply to: President Donald Trump, Oheiv Yisroel Par Excellence #1814363
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    if you knew anything about narcissism you would see that Clinton fulfills the DSM criteria much better than trump who is a baal gaivah par excellance (not a compliment, in case you assume it is)
    Sorry to disappoint.

    in reply to: President Donald Trump, Oheiv Yisroel Par Excellence #1814356
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    he doesn’t have to be against anyone to be for anyone. He supports causes, and if the white nationalists are in agreement with that cause, so be it. It doesn’t mean he supports them, it never did. That’s called serving a country. If you support coal miners, you are going against the environmentalists. That doesn’t mean you are against them, it means you are supporting the cause of the coal miners. You can’t support ANYONE or ANYTHING without having someone on the other side. Wanting to keep out illegal aliens (as opposed to aliens) is something the kkk supports, although for different reasons. That doesn’t put him on that side of the fence. And pretending it does it hogwash. And if you want to pretend that he is NOT an ohaiv Yisroel (although I don’t agree with Josephs version of him) than explain the things he did for Jews. No real white supremisist could even hand a tissue to a jew with a runny nose let alone free one from jail.

    in reply to: President Donald Trump, Oheiv Yisroel Par Excellence #1814348
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Reb E – if you were really honest and interest in emes you would hate Clinton (and possibly Obama) for the same reason. If you can support Clinton, then you are really aren’t hating him for this.

    (I say Obama cuz he was an arrogant, socialist, jew hater/devoted muslim, not the narcissist the Clintons are)

    in reply to: Non-Jewish books #1814256
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “unfortunately, the lyrics of most rock music are indecipherable anyway so unlikely to cause anyon to go OTD”

    You do know that’s rubbish, don’t you? It’s not indecipherable to teenagers who listen to it. That’s either a rationalization or sarcasm.

    in reply to: I’m engaged! ✨🥂💕 #1814126
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Or maybe just a brother

    in reply to: With Trump through thick and thin? #1814112
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    CTL – where in my post do you get the impression i was talking to though? I was answering a dumb question, knowing full well how blind otherwise honest people are. Never paid you a thought, sorry .

    in reply to: With Trump through thick and thin? #1814008
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Who i pick for president depends on who is running. I dont think there has bern a “clean” president and i wouldn’t expect to find one. Most trump supporters are willing to admit trump is a jerk while supporting his accomplishments. It is the clinton obama supporters who pretend their gods were above board and even proof in marquee lights wouldn’t change that. Find me one anti trumper willing to admit out loud that biden obama and friends were guilty of meddling in an election and abuse of power.
    Why survey the more honest trumpers when you could have more fun fielding the denial of the see-no-evil dems.

    in reply to: Imp”eeeeeeeee”achment #1813624
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    “thereby endangering our national security and not for corruption”

    Except you are relying on propaganda to back that. It just proves that if they say something enough times people believe it to be true.

    in reply to: 20 Kislev in Chabad #1813426
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Not at all. As i said before, i don’t believe it happened that way because a gadol yisroel would not have said it. I changed nothing, i just commented on the CR poster version of a story many decades old that you are calling nice when it in fact is not. In that way it is you who is speaking badly of a gadol.

    in reply to: 20 Kislev in Chabad #1813414
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    That is something of a chutzpah, you know. Saying it was for shalom that he was quiet when he came out of the house and bad mouthed him and all misnagdim in an extreme way.
    Fairy tale sounds more like it. The fact so many people are quick to accept it as loving is so unfortunate

    in reply to: 20 Kislev in Chabad #1813398
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Sorry, it was 5ish, not milhouse.

    in reply to: 20 Kislev in Chabad #1813397
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    Knaidlach – that’s just silly. I dont go telling people the small child was worse than russian anti semites.

    CS and milhouse – when a misnaged berates a lifestyle that is believed to be a threat on kovod hatorah, it isn’t worse than evil tortures. And if he served him tea, he obviously was speaking as a caring jew. To slander misnagdim and call it a holiday is degrading and hateful.

Viewing 50 posts - 2,351 through 2,400 (of 7,736 total)