Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
squeakParticipant
Everything bagel with a normal amount of lox, not sockeye (vile), and coarse salt on the bagel. But is it your favorite? No (your favorite would be a double pastrami burger with chili), but you like it. Zehu.
squeakParticipantIt looks like my informant was correct. It’s a Friday thing- and it’s across from apple bank
squeakParticipantHemophobia is a condition, and not something to be embarrassed about.
squeakParticipantMod, sashimi has no seaweed.
You can also request sushi without seaweed (though that may cause a paradox that could threaten the very existence of language) because it can be a choking hazard for children. Use a high squeaky voice so they don’t realize your real age.
squeakParticipantSorry you fellows had a bad experience with the cuisine. Sushi rice should be warm or room temperature, not cold.
Also, sushi does not need to have raw fish. One can put almost* anything into a roll of rice and seaweed and call it sushi (kind of like mehshi).
Sashimi is always raw fish (on a bed of rice).
* I say almost, because the mod is certain to ask if you can put a leather boot into the roll, and the answer would be no.
November 5, 2010 1:37 am at 1:37 am in reply to: Whats your typical menu Shabbos night and day? #933565squeakParticipantkapusta?
Help me out here, are you referring to an old post or do you know something…..
November 5, 2010 1:34 am at 1:34 am in reply to: Whats The Craziest Thing That Happened To You? #1011025squeakParticipantBen Turah- nischt geshtoigen, nischt gefloigen.
squeakParticipantI’m waiting for Wolfish to drop in and say the moon.
squeakParticipantWow, I can’t remember a discussion about li’l ole me! in the CR for a while! chuckling….
SJS- I remember, you mentioned him a ways back. Still not me, but I’d love to meet him. Invite us both!
Dr. Pepper- not offended. I had you pegged for early to mid thirties (based on the Doctorate and number of kids) but you could be younger. I figure you were teaching for a while and then switch careers, but I didn’t realize until your last post to me (on page 2) how recently you switched.
I solved the monkey riddle by brute force, using a program I wrote in Basic. No, not Visual Basic (didn’t exist then) or Q Basic (ditto), or C Basic (ditto). On sharetime, I might add, so the efficiency of your solution might have been nice, but alas- I am no mathematician.
smartcookie, if you were a statistician, you’d be absolutely right. But let’s not forgot the famous phrase, “Probability does not exist” (I know, it’s supposed to be all capitalized). I ain’t never been nobody’s li’l girl.
Ben Turah- nischt geshtoigen, nischt gefloiggen.
squeakParticipantThe idea of frum guys and girls taking on academic pursuits sounds wonderful to me. However, I have yet to see it happen in significant numbers. What you are talking about here is specializing in a single field of knowledge. That’s hardly “over educated”. More like, they are only interested in learning what they need for their career, and therefore learn as much about it as they can.
Doesn’t make for interesting conversation though, outside of shop-talk.
squeakParticipantcharlie-
You’re sorry?! I’m offended that you apologized. But I see you haven’t lost your touch as the official CR ego booster 🙂
As far as the wagon goes, I’m kind of enjoying how much of a mystery its become. Funny, because I didn’t intend it to be. However, I found out a tidbit about the wagon that makes me think I might see it again tomorrow. I’ll let everyone know….
squeakParticipantron-
I read about that. I’m so relieved to hear it wasn’t your house (you said you didn’t have faith in the contractors).
squeakParticipantoomis-
I am not stating that I do not think second-hand smoke is deadly- I most definitely do. But the studies have not proved that yet, so it is not incontrovertible.
squeakParticipantDr. Pepper-
Good luck with that, hopefully soon. I know a little about how difficult that is. I don’t know why you assume I’m your mother’s age, but based on my guess of your age I might be old enough to be her mother.
squeakParticipantYou continue to quote from Gedolim of the past who were opposed to Zionism and the establishment of the State
Does he? If so, there are plenty to quote from. But I only noticed him referring to Hirsch, who did not oppose them in the manner RSRH is representing.
squeakParticipantThank you charlie brown. I’m glad you can tell when I’m being serious, too.
squeakParticipantFor anyone who likes to point out that their parent who smokes is a tzaddik in all other ways, and I totally believe you, substitute alchohol for the smoking addiction. No matter how wonderful that parent may have been all your life, would you defend alcoholism the same way?
But oomis, in all fairness- smoking is not mind-altering. Alcoholism is. An alcoholic parent is impaired in a way that a smoking parent is not.
squeakParticipantUnexplainable is a word
It is, but not the right word in this case. Irrational fear is probably the best word to use, but inexplicable is next best. If the fear was unexplanable (i.e. has an explanation but we just don’t know it), it wouldn’t take therapy to get past it. If it is irrational, it has no explanation (except that portions of the human mind are irrational), hence it is inexplicable.
squeakParticipantI’m taught not to condem, but to empathize
Care to practice that here, too?
squeakParticipantDr. Pepper, I can’t assure you that we don’t know each other, because I have not been able to figure out who you are.
I do think that I know which building you are in, but since your directory is not public (as opposed to the directory of the “other” society which is public) I can’t try to look you up.
squeakParticipantDr. Pepper is the closest a person here has come to outing me so far. If he had only figured out the wagon in time….
😉
squeakParticipantI think we can agree that the idea of the mishebeirach is universally palatable, and the problem is with the language. That is why I have the idea in mind in my shemona esrai, as I mentioned earlier.
Quite possibly even the mishebeirach for the Medina would be OK (at the very least for those living in EY) if not for certain language it contains, e.g. “Reishit Tz’michat Geulateinu”, which is clearly not a belief shared by most right wing Orthodox.
squeakParticipantI don’t know what you are talking about. All that was removed was a short reference to another poster as googling all his information.
My apologies. I was mistaken, as the reference I mentioned was indeed not edited.
squeakParticipantI think the general anger is something created by the media. Smokers are portrayed in the media as the second greatest evil (Republicans are the first, terrorism is third). They kill innocent people with second-hand smoke (inconclusive evidence of that), they drive up medical costs and redirect heathcare resources (probably mostly true), they pollute the environment and the ecology (maybe), etc.
This is separate from the individual anger that is natural when the guy next to you in the restaurant lights up, or the guy ahead of you on the street.
People can’t help regurgitating what they are fed, and falling into step with the crowd in hating a “public enemy”.
squeakParticipantMine is that people will make up a substitute word when they can’t think of “inexplicable”.
squeakParticipantHowever, I cant see how you get around the facts that (1) Austritt dictates severing all ties with institutions that are un-Jewish; (2) An institution is un-Jewish if it is subject to Torah law but does not recognize such law as validly binding on it; (3) The State of Israel, as it is run by and established by Jews is subject to Torah law.
No. You are applying the term with too broad a brush. Hirsch opposed making concessions to the Reform, and insisted on a complete separation from them. I do not find any instance of his (or of his prominent followers) doing the same for Zionists in the Gemeinde. Believe me, if he had intended austritt from Zionism, he would have openly declared it.
It is not for you to declare austritt.
Your sincerity is admirable.
squeakParticipantMod, I am not sure I understand why the point about the kibbutzim was edited. I can name at least 2 and give citations to verify their existence.
I don’t know what you are talking about. All that was removed was a short reference to another poster as googling all his information.
squeakParticipantI am pleased to hear you say that the 19 letters is a very limited understanding of Hirsch- it is. It was only from reading your posts that I was led into think that perhaps that was as much as you may have read. If you have delved into the more academic writings and understood them, I hold you in high esteem.
Please go back and read what you wrote and what I called you out on. I did not say that Zionism is an ideal of the Hirschian philosophy, I only warned you not to bandy about the term austritt.
If you read what I replied to Ben Turah, you will find agreement in the “light unto the nations” ideal that is fulfilled through living in exile.
squeakParticipantBen Turah,
Hirsch was not in favor of establishing a Jewish State. On the contrary, he may have believed that living in exile was beneficial to the goals of fulfilling Torah as a member of “this world”. My point was that in no way is that austritt.
Also, I doubt that one such as yourself (not well versed in the Hirschian philosophy) would be able to discern the finer points to be found in his writings. If you want to study his writings and get back to me, I’d be happy to discuss them with you.
EDITED
squeakParticipantFat people are bad, but that doesn’t make smokers good. Bad smokers, bad fat people.
It’s not jealousy, it’s impinging on others’ rights that creates the anger. When I’m walking down a street and the guy in front of me is smoking (causing me to breathe in his smoke), I’m angry. When I’m on an airplane or bus and a fat guy sits down next to me, I’m angry that his bulbous thighs are resting on my lap.
The amount that your badness affects me is directly proportional to the anger it causes.
squeakParticipantI think you (RSRH) need to delve a bit more deeply into the writings of your leader and his prominent followers. Zionismus would be an easy place to start researching Hirsch’s feelings on the subject. Also, one of the 19 letters is on the subject. Certainly at no point did he or his followers declare austritt against the Zionists; the battle against the Zionists was entirely different from the battle against Reform.
The Zionist movement was (and is) ideologically indifferent to religion, as opposed to the Reform movement which is a religious movement. The animosity of Zionists against the Jewish religion stems from the disagreement that religion has anything to do with being a Jew. To Zionists, a Jew is only from a nationalistic or racial point of view. Consequentially, the religious Jews who oppose this belief are in turn scorned for undermining the Zionists.
As many have called them, the German Orthodox Jews are zionists against Zionism. There were even religious kibbutzim from Germany.
Exercise restraint in applying the austritt philosophy.
squeakParticipantRSRH- perhaps you think Rabbiner Hirsch was not aware of Zionism?
He was. Did he declare austritt?
squeakParticipantRSRH- please refer us to where Rabbiner Hirsch declared austritt on Zionists.
squeakParticipantBPTotty- eh, you’re barking up the wrong tree. You should be asking, “Are you a ba’al kriah” instead.
squeakParticipantSmoking is different from drinking (alcohol) and eating fatty foods in that the latter 2 can be consumed in moderation with no ill effect. But with smoking there is no “golden mean” for two reasons- it is not a controllable habit (i.e. no one is able to smoke only 1 or 2 cigarette a day after a while) and also because even moderate smoking poses severe health risks.
If someone needs to smoke, at least switch to a pipe or cigar. No tar and no deep inhaling, it’s not good but it’s better.
November 3, 2010 3:40 pm at 3:40 pm in reply to: Rav Moshe Feinstein: Sitting next to women on buses #706415squeakParticipantMoq- I can vouch for many people who do not use timers (myself not included).
Anyway, I think that central a/c is different, and many people have that now instead of wall units.
November 3, 2010 3:38 pm at 3:38 pm in reply to: What to do about windows that seem to be letting in a draft? #706107squeakParticipantPoster, use double sided tape and stick it on the vinyl window, not the wall. Then, use a warm iron over the plastic (make sure it’s the thick kind, not the cheap kind) to smooth out creases. It may take practice.
Getting Federal tax credits this time of year is a good idea, because you can get the rebate pretty soon after you’ve spent the money (as opposed to doing something in January and waiting a year). Just make sure it’s a refundable credit- I have no idea.
squeakParticipantA+
squeakParticipantWhat boggles my mind is why people here are planting suspicion into this aishes chayil’s head. I really don’t know any proper way to express my reaction to you, you home wreckers. You are responsible for creating a serious problem that probably does not exist.
squeakParticipantThanks, twisted, ronrsr, and rescue37 for all the interesting info.
squeakParticipantoomis, are you suggesting that squeezing a rubber ducky can help adults learn how to swim? Or was that the same typo (capital s) 3 times in a row?
squeakParticipantOh, and anecdotally, by the time WWII was ending, my system had reached it’s 25th birthday. ‘Course, it was coal powered in its younger years.
squeakParticipantrescue37 & ronsr,
Thank you. I can see how the advantages depend on your situation. For example, a person who is not used to the noises might consider steam a big disadvantage. Or someone with children might appreciate having lower temperature heat source.
My comments on steam are also anecdotal and not scientific- but my entire Methuselain life I have had steam.
– Why do you say steam needs two pipes? There is only ONE connection to the radiator, as opposed to hot water radiators which require 2.
– New steam boilers have automatic refill technology, so no need to refill manually.
– How in the world does hot water travel to the 2nd or 3rd floor without a pump? I never knew this was possible.
The noise doesn’t bother me, I find it welcome. And I’ve been told that steam can be cheaper than hot water, so it seems like the answer is different depending on who you ask (and what he is trying to sell :))
squeakParticipantbrace yourself
squeakParticipantrescue37-
Can you say why you are recommending pressurized hot water system over steam?
My perspective is that steam is
1) safer- the heat rises naturally, and not by means of a pump. Returns to the boiler naturally as well (gravity). The pump is an added component and a potentially volatile one at that.
2) easier to maintain- no need to bleed the system and each radiator
3) uses less water- a couple of gallons total
4) at least as efficient (cost wise)
Now if you were talking about a water system without radiators, i.e. radiant floor heating then I’d agree that a water system has advantages. Specifically, that since the water in the pipes is heated to a lower temperature (100-105 degrees instead of 160-180 for water radiator), it can be modified to use geothermals. But the cost of laying radiant floor tubing is enormous.
squeakParticipantpopa-
Oh, I’ve seen “deal with it” on that thread, but in an entirely different context. Believe me, there are plenty of vociferous individuals who would love to “deal with it”.
squeakParticipantpopa-
I see what you mean about being serious more often than most people would give you credit for.
squeakParticipantExactly. Did anyone ever see R’ Moshe Feinstein bowl? Or R’ Yaacov? Or the Steipler. QED
squeakParticipant200 hours billable is probably a lot more than 200 hours total. Otherwise, I’d agree that 200 hours OT is not much – only 10% more than a 9-5 job.
squeakParticipantYeah, that’s what prompted my kvetch 🙂
-
AuthorPosts