Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
squeakParticipantsqueakParticipant
Well, well. Only 2 “Josephs” are perfect?
I’ll get back off my high horse now. Sorry to offend you again mod.
squeakParticipantMaybe that is the source of the horrible rep?
squeakParticipantIf they really want to crack down without causing any collateral damage they should just contract my consultancy services. As you and I both know, Joey, I’ve never been wrong.
squeakParticipantI don’t see existentialism, but I do see a Schroedinger’s Cat analogy. Before you look at the bite you took (measurement), you have eaten and not eaten a worm. Paradoxical.
But Mod 80 is right, if when you look at the apple you don’t see a remnant of a worm then you most likely did not eat a worm.
SJS- as I’m sure you know, the successive halves do sum to 1.
January 16, 2011 11:33 pm at 11:33 pm in reply to: Good Movie Idea Inspired by the coffeeroom #729909squeakParticipantNot still around.
squeakParticipant(No, I didn’t get engaged, if I’m single.)
and
engaged to twins
Let’s use symbolic logic here.
S=Single
E=Got Engaged
Statement 1: S–>~E
Statement 2: E
ergo (Modus tollens) ~S.
You’re married, and now you’re engaged to twins. I find this disturbing.
squeakParticipantHow about “Joseph” under Gabboim
squeakParticipantWe already answered that.
squeakParticipantSqueak in the supporting role (where has she been lately?)
She?!
Never mind that I have fallen so out of favor as to not even garner a nomination here (funniest poster popa indeed, harumph; most informed poster Wolf, charlie – bah), no- now I must be subjected to accusations of effeminacy too.
I’m fine, thanks for askin’. Now excuse me while I go have a good cry.
squeakParticipantI would undo the time that I responded to the mod’s request to “check your email”
squeakParticipantNot every comment has underlying implications.
squeakParticipantapushteayid,
Seforim are pretty clear on the matter. But regardless of what fulfillment he may have had, I doubt all of his 1,000 wives had what you could call fulfilling marriage.
Cargo ships indeed 🙂
squeakParticipantCould it be 3 Teves?
squeakParticipantblueberry, don’t worry.
I just hope that the place where charlie and I finally meet will be the place of the future beis hamikdosh and not of the Knesset.
squeakParticipantGood one 🙂
squeakParticipanteclipse,
link please? or repost?
squeakParticipantI’m not very into music. I found out about this yesterday, at my Chanuka party (see the jokes thread), when one of the young ‘uns started singing it.
The best comment on the song came from a 3 year old who exclaimed, “That’s a goyishe song!”.
“Why is it goyish?” (the 3 year old has certainly not ever heard the original)
He replied, “Because we don’t flip latkes in the air, it’s food!”
squeakParticipantWelcome to the coffeeroom.
1) If we forced this thread to stay on topic, it would be the only one of its kind
2) It is a joke
squeakParticipantcharlie-
Landfills may become a very significant source of natural gas in the next 20-30 years. Waste management is pretty sophisticated these days.
Care to weigh in on whether these man made natural gas deposits will outweigh the amount of oil we’d save by reducing our consumption of plastics?
squeakParticipantTechnology is what you should be thinking of when you want to innovate. If you want a suggestion, you can work on wireless neurotransmitters that transfer learning to the human brain. If you can perfect it, kids around the world will drink to your name for saving them from 12-30 years of school.
squeakParticipantIf I got any of these gifts, I would have to hide my tears.
squeakParticipantapushetayid,
Another great example. Because Shlomo Hamelech had such great, fulfilling marriages, right?
squeakParticipantWhat a difference. I’ve got to say, for my part, the new and improved AZ is much more welcome here.
squeakParticipantcharlie-
We will have two agree to disagree on two points in your post:
1) The definition of “nice people”
2) Your assertion that I have “grown up since then”
squeakParticipantHashem’s son-
Think of it, it’s not apples-to-apples.
squeakParticipanthow did you know
I know what I know. After all this time, are you still surprised that I know a thing or two?
squeakParticipantWho said anything about math? I’m not a math guy either.
All I said was that I have demonstrated my original point. You persist in comparing a wife to a house, which proves you don’t have one.
Never say again that you never implied on way or the other 😉
squeakParticipantWhy would you think that? Have I ever been known to play tricks on nice people?
squeakParticipantIt’s OK blinky. Remember that there is always a silent contingent who gets it.
squeakParticipantYou must be new to the CR. We knew Wolfish Musings to be a smart fellow from the get-go.
squeakParticipantNot so, I just called and she has no idea about it. Not to worry, I am making a party tonight in a local restaurant in my town (you know where) and you are cordially invited, should you find yourself with no other party to attend.
squeakParticipantpopa-
I never heard a field object to being called an ox, but if you try your half of the saying in real life you get a rolling pin to the head. QED.
squeakParticipantWolf,
That is a totally X-ian concept. They are the ones who took a plus sign and made something else out of it. Do you want to start a new religion based on a new use for a minus sign, CH”V?
(in case anyone notices, it was intentional)
squeakParticipantIsn’t 10 – Luchos = 0?
What does your user name mean? I’m sure you are not a zero. Unless we’re talking sizes, which I never do.
squeakParticipantOK that’s the second time you’ve said “monis”. What does it mean?
squeakParticipantDo the mods plan to do anything about it long term? I’d be interested to know, because it has bothered me for a very long time.
squeakParticipantSeriously, man, we can all tell how single you are.
What married man compared his wife to a HOUSE? Sheesh. You’re not even supposed to tell her she could stand to lose 5 pounds, let alone that she’s as big as a house.
Any married man who makes a comment like yours would undergo a change in status 🙂
squeakParticipantWolf-
Is it statistically safer than having a professional driver chauffeur you from place to place? I don’t mean a taxi, of course. Technically speaking, it’s not fair to compare air travel to other forms of transportation because air travel is predominantly commercial and piloted by highly skilled professionals.
Now if we started allowing every 17 year old to take a 747 to the mall every week and to 7-11, then we could compare.
December 8, 2010 7:41 pm at 7:41 pm in reply to: Kosher Activities For Teenage Girls On Motzei Shabbos #885587squeakParticipantDepends on whether anyone needs an explanation for my cryptic remark or not.
squeakParticipantThere is another way also, but I’ve been sworn to secrecy.
squeakParticipantYou mean there are flavors for this too? What a world! First you shocked me with the ice cream thread, and now this. Don’t tell me there’s a Max and Mindy’s gum shop too- any cholent gum?
squeakParticipantaries-
Don’t let it bother you if Helpful didn’t pay attention to his own rejoinder on losing a chelek in olam habo for judging you like this. I, for one, am not willing to judge you based on just his claim.
squeakParticipantIs there a need for me to apologize? If there is, I do so sincerely.
It seems that the only serious posts I ever make in the CR are apologies, but apparently not everyone realizes this.
squeakParticipanthey long lost cousin blueberry! there will be a family chanuka party for all descendants of the original Mr. Brown tomorrow night.
Personally, I wasn’t aware that this poster was part of our family. But then, you weren’t aware of some of my family members either. LINK What kind of brothers are we if we don’t even know the same relatives? And how comoe I wasn’t invited to the party? I assume it’s tonight- I’ll be there.
squeak,
and now the mystery is how you know what the dybbuk told Rav Censored. hmm, could you be he?
No mystery there. It was all on Youtube.
December 8, 2010 4:01 pm at 4:01 pm in reply to: Kosher Activities For Teenage Girls On Motzei Shabbos #885584squeakParticipantHow ironic to suggest Kafka to BY girls. It invites a whole new literary analysis of The Metamorphosis.
squeakParticipantPropofol
December 8, 2010 3:56 pm at 3:56 pm in reply to: Shaitle Fraud Chillul Hashem Video: Sha'ar haTumah haChamishim #717906squeakParticipantHe means not giving the couple the “benefit of the doubt”. If there is doubt, that is.
squeakParticipantpopa, you were just told that you’d make a wonderful wife. Aren’t you going to say “thank you” to new2thescene?
December 7, 2010 7:13 pm at 7:13 pm in reply to: Shaitle Fraud Chillul Hashem Video: Sha'ar haTumah haChamishim #717824squeakParticipantI guess it was implied, but it’s been so long that I needed to hear it explicitly 🙂
-
AuthorPosts