spot on

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 33 posts - 1 through 33 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Biggest supporter of Torah in the world #2301555
    spot on
    Participant

    @rocky, coffee, always
    I didn’t mean that the only taxes they pay is sales tax; they also pay income, property (arnona)… It was just a means of demonstrating the numbers. As far as your legitimate points of roads, sewage, etc. You’re absolutely right. If the numbers don’t add up, revert to OP. If they do, this Israeli is correct. I don’t know the numbers. Rocky and Always, let’s hear them.

    in reply to: Why does Yiddish butcher Hebrew #2301552
    spot on
    Participant

    “spot on: The ק״ג /aw/ vowel and חולם /oʊ/ diphthong are two distinct sounds.”

    Naturally. And aw is closer to a cholam than uh. And uh is closer to a patach than aw.

    in reply to: Biggest supporter of Torah in the world #2300866
    spot on
    Participant

    I asked this question to an Israeli yeshivaman. He told me “מה פתאם? We pay taxes [which he told me is not required under Dina Demalchusa, according to the Chazon Ish]. We’re just getting OUR money back.”
    I countered that the state gives way more than the chareidi population’s taxes.
    But he told me: $500 million a year [to yeshivos], divided by a million chareidim. [his numbers, I din’t fact check.] $500 a chareidi per year. The sales tax is 17%. Every chareidi pays that amount in sales tax alone.

    So even if he’s wrong about Dina Demalchusa , if he’s right with the numbers:
    Israel taxpayers fund Bar Ilan and Hebrew University and Chaim Weizmn University.
    They fund gas and electricity for Gazans [for the past 20 years]
    They fund Netanyahu’s trips to America

    Are they not entitled to a drop back for their yeshivos?

    in reply to: Killing lice on shabbos #2300865
    spot on
    Participant

    @kuvult/skripka
    To me, that answer is the worst. The absolute worst. If you ask any rav a sh’ailah, they’ll tell you “according to my research…” “According to Dr. …. the way it works is….” They will NOT pasken absolutely on something they don’t know. They’ll make sure to say “If, indeed, that’s how the fuse works, then on Shabbos…”
    And Chazal who came to be koveia halachos for dorei doros–who filled the capacity of the Lishkas Hagaziz (R’ Elchanan)–would have be severly irresponsible if they didn’t make sure to condition their p’sak on the veracity of whichever scientist they were basing it on.

    in reply to: Why does Yiddish butcher Hebrew #2300864
    spot on
    Participant

    “Why do most people pronounce the first two words of the Kaddish as יִתְגַּדַּל וְיִתְקַדַּשׁ when the גר”א demonstrated that those two specific words are not Judeo-Aramaic but לשון הקדש and should thus be pronounced יִתְגַּדֵּל וְיִתְקַדֵּשׁ? (See ס’ מעשה רב.)

    Why do most people say כִרְעוּתֵהּ when, as the גר”א demonstrates, the כ”ף should have a דגש? (The word should be כִּרְעוּתֵהּ. Again, see ס’ מעשה רב.)”

    Because there are those who are choleik on the gr”a. (I think the yaaveitz, but am not sure.)
    Interestingly, the mishna berura writes like the gr”a regarding your 1st paragraph, but not the 2nd.

    in reply to: Why does Yiddish butcher Hebrew #2300862
    spot on
    Participant

    “Why do most people pronounce the קמ”ץ קטן like a קמ”ץ גדול? And why do most people mispronounce the קמ”ץ גדול as a פת”ח when the pronunciation “aw” traditional to the Ashkenazic and Yeminite Jews is the correct one?

    And why do the Sephardim traditionally pronounce the קמ”ץ preceding a חטף קמ”ץ as a short ō, making the sound of words like צָהֳרַיִם “Tza-Ho-Ra’im”? After all, the word is the dual form of צֹֽהַר (“window,” “aperture”). Is it correct to transmute the חוֹלָם to a קמ”ץ גדול?”

    While I can’t understand your 2nd paragraph, it seems your complaint is in direct contrast to a years-long complaint of mine. You opt for the Askenaz/Yemenite version of “aw” for the ק״ג as opposed to the s’fardim who use “aw”, or similar, for the ק״ק. And yet, the ק״ק of the ספרדים makes much more sense. The ק״ק is a derivative of a חולם and hence מסתבר that it’s close to a חולם than the ק״ג. This is implied by the גר״א as well, who says a ק״ג is a hybrid of קמץ and פתח.
    ותיתי לי that I adopted the ק״ק of the ספרדים. (But say “uh” for ק״ג.)

    in reply to: fatigue or laziness? #2215480
    spot on
    Participant

    *lazy?

    in reply to: fatigue or laziness? #2215479
    spot on
    Participant

    Why are babies and children never layy?

    in reply to: questions about the yeshivish world #2212436
    spot on
    Participant

    @neville, what are you talking about? “Keser” is mentioned in rishonim. Putting baruch sheamar in the middle [of shabbos psukei dezimra] is brought down in the Tur.

    in reply to: Dreaming About Listening to Music During the Three Weeks #2208765
    spot on
    Participant

    @cs
    a prime example of why not to entangle ourselves with ta’ama dekra, and just suffice with “kach tzivani haborei.”

    in reply to: Mattos – 12 to 12 1/2 #2207604
    spot on
    Participant

    Don’t make such jokes.

    The girl is a few pesukim worth. The actual question as to why the whole parsha of nedarim is so long, baalei mussar say to expound on the holiness of speech. (“Lo yacheil devaro”)

    spot on
    Participant

    re
    my questions:

    What is tzara deshchina and how can we feel it?

    in reply to: Why did the Brisker Rav zt”l call giving brachos “shtusim”? #2176584
    spot on
    Participant

    And according to Ashkenazic tradition, the plural is “shtuyos”.

    in reply to: Shtultz #2170114
    spot on
    Participant

    Great question.
    Answer: it’s a community of very similar, judgemental people , who therefore become very guarded and –shall we say,–insecure.

    in reply to: climbing is not immature #2170113
    spot on
    Participant

    Why would you write something so patently false?

    in reply to: climbing and jumping #2170112
    spot on
    Participant

    cute.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2170109
    spot on
    Participant

    “The vast majority of Chareidim will never accept any candidate for the Melech HaMashiach who is …a Baal Teshuvah…even though there is no Halachic reason why those people should be automatically disqualified…”
    i think the rambam says that moshiach will be muchzak bechassidus from a young age. But I might be mistaken.

    in reply to: Derech Emuna settlement #2119201
    spot on
    Participant

    יפה הקשתי ונדחפתי בקש.
    what’s the difference between reishis tzmichas geuloseinu and aschalta degeula?

    @always
    was that a reply to me? You’re proving my point. There are many avenues Hashem may take for the Geulah. It need not come about through the state. What makes the state aschalta degeula?

    in reply to: Derech Emuna settlement #2118667
    spot on
    Participant

    Now on to the spin off:
    “rashis tzmichas geulosienu,” which someone here said even R’ Isser Zalman and R’ TPF used, shocks me. Because if you delve into it, what they’re saying is that the geulah will come THROUGH the state of Israel. Which means that the State will be the impetus for kibbutz goliyos, and then Moshiach will come.
    But that’s a direct contradiction to “achakeh low bchol yom sheyavoi ” because if it comes THROUGH the state, then naturally it won’t happen in one second. It will take years until a state builds up. But if we’re waiting for any day, then the kibbutz goliuyos could happen in one second, al kanfei nesharim, and will have nothing to do with the state.

    in reply to: Derech Emuna settlement #2118666
    spot on
    Participant

    back to the topic, they should have called the settlement קרית מלך.

    spot on
    Participant

    “We must daven for the galus hashechina to be revealed again. We don’t understand the tzaar of Hashem.”
    So if we don’t understand it how are we expected to feel it?

    spot on
    Participant

    what does the tzaar of the shchina mean? The shchina is the presence of Hashem. Wouldn’t it make more sense to say Hashem’s tzaar? And all midos of Hashem are actually hanhagos, so the shchina is not actually betzaar.

    in reply to: Youthful Misconceptions #2081597
    spot on
    Participant

    Myth 1: I thought that Hashem loved everyone, including reshaim.
    Fact: He doesn’t. [There are several sources for this, the pasuk “Hashem oheiv tzadikim” being a good start.]

    Myth 2: Judaism is male chauvinistic.
    Fact: Judaism is female chauvinistic.

    Myth 3: You can’t play Monopoly on Shabbos.
    Fact: If you may play Monopoly ever, then Shabbos is no different.

    Myth 4: Earth revolves around the sun.
    Fact: There is insufficient evidence whether Earth is geocentric or heliocentric.

    in reply to: Denigrating Gedolim #2081600
    spot on
    Participant

    wow mesivta world!

    Just my 2 cents. [not “my”, as in original, “my” as in “parroted”)

    Avira quotes an unnamed RY that R’ Aharon held R YB to be an apikores…..yet he invited him to speak at the chinuch atzmai event. Tiyuvta.

    in reply to: Experience with Reb Chaim kanievsky. #2070898
    spot on
    Participant

    I was once in his house and a woman was in his kitchen, or side room, maybe (sometimes the gabbaim allowed women in, i don’t know what it depended on, I had heard this woman asking before I went in; apparently ,permission was granted). It was the end of the night, R’ Chaim looked very worn out, anyway, he looked up a bit (seemed to me the way I might stretch my back, like being a bit worn out. I might be wrong about the exact psychology behind his looking up and slightly to the side. Anyway,) he saw her, and instantly, as though his eyes had been burnt, looked back down.

    (One last parentheses: I don’t think the woman was supposed to have made herself visible to R’ Chaim.)

    in reply to: attention #2023819
    spot on
    Participant

    “maybe people realize that sometimes giving attention to those who crave it may create a pattern of emotional dependency where they keep coming back to you for more in desperation”

    I would hear that but it doesn’t make sense that people tell others “shh. he’s just doing it for attention.” Are they that considered about others being the attention-seeker’s desperation korban?
    Also, they’ll say things like “Don’t do xyzzy, if u want attention, say “I want attention.” That sounds like their just being balei gavia like user176 said, that they have to prove they know the motive behind everyone’s actions.

    “Like that friend that always makes the joke and immediately looks at you to see your reaction. Not everyone enjoys that”
    Spot on! But i feel ppl are more likely to give a chesed laugh to a stupid joke than give attention to someone seeking it. And i never heard someone say, “don’t laugh at his stupid joke.” if they don’t want to laugh, fine, they’re not stopping anyone else from it.

    in reply to: attention #2023283
    spot on
    Participant

    i just posted two things but my internet s not really working well. if it didn’t work I’ll have to do write it again.

    in reply to: attention #2023280
    spot on
    Participant

    “people crave attention”
    Why is that?

    “a few times a week that somebody wants to show me some clip on their phone or demands that a listen to some song (isn’t it great?). this is beyond all pale of normalcy and must be purged from our society asap.”
    What’s the matter? Technology? or it’s too often?

    in reply to: attention #2022229
    spot on
    Participant

    good, coffeaddict,, your catching on.

    in reply to: attention #2021579
    spot on
    Participant

    Huh participant? Is that sarcasm or what? I can’t figure t out.

    But u asked a good question. let me explain. the root of attention might be immaturity (n, immature= adj) but so what? IF someone does something normal because of immaturity u don’t have to call him out on it. Bad stuff because of immaturity does have to be stopped. So jumping on a chair and screaming in class, don’t encourage that immaturity. But something else, who cares?
    For example , I remember someone eating a lemon. I guess that he did it for attention, because I can’t think of any other reason someone would do it. Maybe I’m right, maybe not, but the point is let’s assume it was for attention. Is there any reason I have to ignore him because he’s “just doing it for attention?” Who cares?

    If someone asks you to borrow money so he can buy candy, do you purposely not lend him so he’ll grow up?

    in reply to: attention #2019240
    spot on
    Participant

    “Everyone wants attention”
    Why is that?

    “eople who brush others off as “wanting attention” are just proud of themselves that they know how to read people. If they really cared they would simply give the person the attention they thought he was seeking.”
    The point I was making. Plus they’re often wrong.
    I just don’t know why attention was the thing so zoiche to this.

    in reply to: attention #2019241
    spot on
    Participant

    coffeddict, not what I said at all. The math class was an example of not seeking attention. Even people doing mature things if perceived by the attention police as sn attention seeking effort then they will make sure not to respond.

    I understand not encouraging immaturity. That’s not the issue here.

    in reply to: attention #2018690
    spot on
    Participant

    First of all, why’s it immature, second of all, let’s say it is. You can’t humor the immature?

Viewing 33 posts - 1 through 33 (of 33 total)