somejewiknow

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 48 posts - 1 through 48 (of 48 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2341989
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @zsk is there any forum to have an open conversation?

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2341082
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    Again, you claim a shita in Torah that isn’t there.
    As you mentioned, working with the Conservatives doesn’t per se make one a certain kofer, so too working with Tzionim doesn’t per se make you a kofer. That doesn’t mean you support them! And if you, @Chaim87, insist that working with kofrim (like you claim about that evil masis imadiach Sol Liberman) makes one also a kofer, so that is how you are learning out the situation with any of the names you’ve mentioned.
    The point, and I’m sure @Chaim87 will miss it but other readers won’t, is that we have already clear psak from accepted Gedolim that Zionism is kefira. Additionally, there is no counter psak. So, if you demand to box in any Ruv into being a advocate for that kefira, you are simply pasuling him.
    You are puting the cart before the horse if you claim otherwise: Our Torah guides us and defines who is a Gadol in Torah. You don’t say a someone can be a Gadol if he rejects the Torah. And, again, there is no shita in Torah that kashers the trafine kefira of zionism, so it’s one or the other.

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2340639
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @Chaim87 you continue to make a bizuyon of the Torah. I continue to ask you: who and who are these people?

    “stature” is not something to be taken lightly, and it is something obvious.
    When influential Jewish leaders, who we might call gedolim, make a move who do they turn to for Torah guidance, whose teachings do they consider?

    This is not complicated.

    Does the Lubavitcher Rebbe zatzal quote R Techetel or R Friedman and struggle feel obligate to consider their stance, or rather does he turn to the Rambam and Rav Kotler? The answer is the later.

    Did Rav Elyashiv zatzal consider the reactions of the Shevet Halevi or Rav Chaim in giving psak? Did the Shevet HaLevi consider the Satmar Rav reactions? Did the Satmar Rebbe consider the teachings of the Munkatcher Rebbe? All these are answered “yes”, because these were all people of stature.

    Being a Gadol in Torah, someone whose you can claim defined a “shita” in Torah, is a well defined “boys club” of our leaders who peer review each other. Anyone can join if they can master the Torah and yiras shamayim required and seek out that peer review.

    And, beyond that specific question, if there would, chas v’shalom, be a Gadol who tried to defend the kefira of zionism and of @Chaim87, he will still be called out for that clear lie and disgrace of our Torah and be put in cherem. The Torah is a very real and very clear body of thought. Acting like “anything goes” because “there’s two sides” is a fraudulent evil and heresy.

    When there are indeed “two sides” to a sugya, it is not hard at all to point to soild sources and defenders of both sides.

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2340089
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @Chaim87 and @always_ask_questions
    I’m looking for a mehalech in Torah, and I am asking sincerely.
    When chaim points to “how they acted” and tries to prove they supported what is clear kefira, I cannot take it seriously.
    I am happy chaim at least attempted to provide a source, but even that is empty. This is a sefer that is not clear it’s contents, is not available or mainstream, and does not on the surface seem to be a serious Torah work that explains a “shita”.
    Furthermore, the author is not someone of stature that demand anyone taking him seriously. Who acknowledged his supposed zionist shita? who argued with it? What is the the explanation of his understanding? Did he give (or even have the ability to give) psak? Was he put into cherem like kook, or was his stance not full of kefira, and if so how was it distinct?
    I’m sincerely looking for a way to understand, but I sense chaim’s whole stance is both completely dishonest and a mockery of Torah.
    None of the above questions are small, and their answers should (if Chaim was presenting an honest answer) be readily apparent in the Torah world.
    Instead, chaim is grasping at any straw he can find, and then saying “see, great men in Israel also worshiped Baal! There is nothing wrong with this path! join the church of zionism! join the army of death!”

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2339780
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    Chaim87. i know you will continue to fail as you deny the emes.
    If there is a Torah shita that supports zionist kefira (as if), please point to any of these rabbunim’s published Torah works. All you have is meaningless hearsay that you leverage to promote a false Torah against clear published psak from Gedolim.

    You are claiming a fraudulent shita shat doesn’t exist.

    in reply to: Origins of Muslim Anti-Semitism #2339453
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    what fool believes antisemitism is in the hands of the non-jews?
    this is kefira 101.
    The Jewish People believe in schar v’onesh

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2339442
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @Chaim87 you keep promoting kefira, claiming it is kosher with NO SOURCE. please explain your claimed “rizyner” Torah that defends the kefira called “Zionism”. Please send the source for this nonsense.


    @always_ask_questions
    , with due respect, nothing you wrote is relevant to the conversation. There simple isn’t a “Zionist” shita in Torah, and if there is please point me to it. Your “nuance” can be used to defend any kefira like Reform, and I would like you to consider how there is any difference between your attempt to validate Zionism vs validating Reform or Catholicism.

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2339268
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @Chaim87
    I can point to numerous published Torah works from well before Zionism that reject a Jewish state, regardless of it keeping other parts of the Torah.
    The masora is so strong and clear, from Talmud, Midrashim, to Rambam Ramban, Maharal, Aruch Hashulchan, to modern day gedolim like the Satmar Rebbe, Brsker Rav, Chazon Ish.
    One of the Aguda Founders that architected the way they work with the zionist medina wrote a whole sefer, Biyos Hazman, which outlines at lenght the issur of having a state and that hi biggest concern in their new path is that the frim public will misunderstand what Aguda is doing and thing that the mdeina is OK.

    If you want any published sources from the above, I can provide them as clearly forbidding a zionist state.

    On the other side, I ask you to please provide me any ANY Torah defense of the zionist state, published by any of Gadolim you mentioned. You will not find it because it is clear kefira in the Torah.

    Please show me any source, without reverting to hearsay and fabricated stories. If anyone, even a gadol in Torah, would G-d forbid endorse Jews having a state, they would have been immediately put in cherem like kook’s writing were for this reason. For this reason, I know you will not find any source. May be you should publish the first one and either be ignored as a nobody or be put in cherem as a masis imadiach, or worse maybe a “navi sheker” like kook shr”y.

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2339173
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @always_ask_questions while I can’t speak for @HaKatan , it seems the core of his argument is that you can’t escape kefira and try to kasher it with hearsay from Gedolim.
    No Gadol has ever published a defense of the kefira of Kook shr”y.
    So, you can try to figure out all the lose ends, but the starting point is the Torah’s clear rejection of zionism and their state.
    This is not a Satmar idea or Brisker idea or Aguda idea or Neturei Karta idea or Chofetz Chaim idea or Munkatzher idea or Belzer idea.
    This is the ABCs of Torah, and the starting point of a conversation about Kook or Herzl yimach shemo or the evil conscription army of the russians or the zionists or whatever evil group jumps up to destroy yiddishkeit.

    in reply to: Trump’s presidency #2330453
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    if you don’t care what people will say about your publicized opinions, why publicize them?

    in reply to: Imagine if ALL of Klal Yisroel acted this way #2330452
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    can you imagine some Jewish person thinking an election outcome is something they should consider important? can you imagine the crookedness of validating that kefira?

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2324614
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @chaim87
    Rav Shteinaman zatzal was adamant about the evils of the IDF and specifically “Nachal Chareidi”.

    Do you care about the truth? Do you care about Rav Shteinaman really said, or are you just looking for any way to support your idol and send your children off to die for it?

    Rav Shteinaman zatzal said that his only support for Nachal Charedi was for those evil bucherim who were already no longer part of klal yisroel, mechalile shabbos b’farhesia, and his support was simply in order to rescue out Jewish neighborhoods from their bad influence with no better alternative:

    Don Segal sent a letter to R. Aharon Leib Shteinman inquiring about rumors that he supported Nachal Chareidi.
    In response, R. Shteinman wrote back as follows:
    לכ׳ ידידי הגאון והצדיק ר׳ דן סגל הי״ו
    נעימות בימינו נצח.

    היות ששמע קול גדול ולא יסף כאילו אני תומך בענין נחל חרדי, שבחורים שהם חלשים בלמוד התורה או ביראת שמים טוב להם להיות שם וכמובן שדבר זה לא עולה על הדעת כלל. מה שהי׳ מדובר בהתחלה הוא שבחורים שמחללי שבת ועוברים על עוד חייבי כריתות ממש ואביו רוצה להצילו ולהציל את הרחוב מלהזיקם שאין לנו כח למענו, אבל ודאי זה עון לא יכופר אם שמסיר או שמשתדל באיזה צורה שהיא וגורם למי שאינו מחלל שבת ועוד חייבי כריתות להמצא שם.

    ואני נמנע מלהשיב בדרך כלל בענין זה כי דרך חלק מאנשים מאלה הנחשבים לחרדים לדבר השי״ת לפרש כל דבר בכל מיני פשטלך ונהנים לתת דופי באנשים, ה׳ יכפר בעדם כי אולי כונתם לשמים אבל היות שכ״ג שידוע לי שאינו ח״ו מהרוצים ליתן דופי אנו כותב לו. יש לקוות להשי״ת שיתרבו לומדי תורה ועובדי השי״ת אשר בזכותם ירחם ה׳ עמו ויגאלנו גאולת עולמים. ידידו מוקירו כרום ערכו, א.ל. שטיינמאן

    – excerpted from footnotes in “The Empty Wagon” by Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro

    also this

    “The Rosh Yeshiva of Derech HaTorah, went (to R. Shteinman) with a bachur who said he had no taste at all for learning, that he had not been successful in yeshiva, and he wanted to go to the army. “R. Shteinman told him: It is forbidden to go to the army, as they ruin people. The bachur said to him, ‘But today they have a program in the army where you can keep Torah and mitzvos.’ R. Shteinman responded, ‘There is no such thing. People who go to the army always get ruined.’ When the bachur tried to argue with him a bit, R. Shteinman responded forcefully, banged on his table, and said, ‘I guarantee you that if you go to the army, regardless of what program you join, you will return a total goy.’ … The boy recoiled. He gave up his plans and returned to yeshiva.”

    – Yated Neeman, Vayigash, 5766, p. 20 as quoted in the book “The Empty Wagon” by Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro

    Regarding the rest of your disgusting comments about me, I never shammed any yid from trying to do a mitzvah. The nebach innocent followers of the idol of zionism might be the only remaining “tinukos shenishba” today, where we can try to expose them a little bit to the real life of Torah to enable them to cast of that evil kefira and rejoin klal yisroel.

    I know you have no valid argument against the Torah, but please refrain from straw-manning it.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2324342
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    Kook was a gadol before he went off the derech.
    You can see the handwritten letter online by Rav Elchonon Wasserman ztz”l who called him a “rushe gumir”.
    You might be correct that the chofetz chaim might have been able to arouse kook to do tshiva and bring moshiach.
    everything else you have is, as least in the way you frame it, complete garbage and masis umadiach you push the yidden away from Torah and towards the false moshiach of zionism. You distort the actions of Gedolim and promote lies.

    If I am wrong, point to any published work by any Gadol that goes against anything I have written. (And, I don’t mean hearsay stories by balei batim)

    you are the same as a shatz”nik.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2323730
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @gadolhadorah
    the only source for that nonsense is the person who has dedicated his life to pushing jewish into the avoda zureh called “nachal charedi”

    I would be shocked if HaRav Hirsh actually said those things, and if true, G-d forbid, I would be even more shocked if he wouldn’t be put into cherem for such a evil suggestion by the other Gedolim of our generation

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2323731
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @Rocky, a Jewish kofer demands our “tachlis ha sinah”, the utmost hatred. That means it is by definition impossible for an erliche yid to hate an arab terrorist more than that.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2322363
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    the rejection of the ideology called “zionism” is a rejection of the redefintion of judaism from a religion with the single focus being keeping mitzvos into a fake ethnicity or “ethnoreligion” that considers complete kofrim as part of “klal yisroel”. Part of this redefeinition is tied into a fake “nationalistic” identity that gives importance to land and/or government as an important or even key part to that fake Judaism.

    It is true that all Gedolim reject the murderous acts of terrorists, whether zionist terrorist or muslim terrorists. It is also true that all Gedolim reject the idea that there is any intrinc value to the zionist state or the zionist army for a Jewish person.

    As Rav Yosef shlit”a recently said, if the zionists threaten our yiddishkeit we will simply leave to a different galus.

    There is nothin “jewish” about the zionist state. The erliche aguda and erliche shasniks are simply making their best of the evil wars and actions of the erev rav that controls Palestine. That is the only reason any of them vote, as per their own explicit statments. No one wishes the zionist state would countinue as it is the greatest chilul Hashem in Jewish histroy, that a whole “nation” of Jews rose up against Hashem with guns, H”y. And, some are still cheering them on as they sacrifice more jewish boys every day for their evil political wars.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2322162
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @always_ask_questions
    In normal conversation, I would ask you to quote a Gadol who claims that there is some Jewish goal of a political state (chas v’shalom), but my sens is that you will dodge even that simple request because otherwise you could have simply done it in your last response. If I pushed you, you would probably quote the known kofer who “kasherd” the zionist movement that Rav Elchonon Wasserman ztz”l said clearly is a “rasha gamur”.

    You are correct that our Holy Torah is guilty of the “no true scotsman” angle as the Torah is our starting point of what is true. Anything that is not Torah is not true and anyone who breaks away from our mesora is a kofer and certainly not a “Gadol b’Yisroel”.

    Regarding zionism today, nothing has changed. Anyone who hates arab terrorists more than IDF leaders is guilty of the heresy of zionism. The Torah teaches that we must hate rashayim with “tachlis ha’sina”, and this is true for anyone who is mechalel shabbos befarhesiyah including a tinok sh’nishaba. Framing kefira as a “specific strand of a specific ideology” is just another mental trick to join ranks with those who want to rebel against Hashem and His Torah.

    somejewiknow
    Participant

    there’s enough kiruv to be done with the amount of kofrim who call themselves “frum”

    in reply to: Chofetz chaim says to bring Mashiach need to love everyone. #2320784
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @menachem-shmei
    nothing is intrinsically bad
    the only absolute is Hashem who we can only understand as intrinsically Good.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2320763
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    Anyone reading these comments should know that the zionist agenda, especiall the one pushed by so-called dati-leumi, i specifically trying to destroy real Judaism by redefining Jewish identity into a “nation like all the nations”. Zionism is not Torah. IDF is not Torah. Catholocism isn’t Torah.

    Don’t take my word or the word of the honest commentators here. Go and ask our gedolim, look at literally every statment by every gadol, from HaRav Ovadia Yosef, HaRav Elyashiv, Chazon Ish, Chaim Brisker, Steipler Geon, Belzer Rav, Baba Sali, HaRav Shmuel Wosner, Satmar Rebbe, Shomrei Emunim Rebbe, Rav Zonnenfeld, Rav Elchonon Wasserman. Read the holy words of the founders of Agudas Yisroel and the Gedolim that guided it after the evil zionist state was founded in ’48. Read the book “Bayos Hazman” from Harav Reuven Grazovsky, another Aguda leader, in his 1960 book about how strong jews must be in fighting 100% agasint the zionist state.

    The Torah is clear that we Jews should have nothing to do with the zionist state nor with its evil army of death. Ask any gadol.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2320324
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @simcha613
    there is no mitzvah in the evil act of joining the IDF.

    the Torah that kosher Jews learn protects Jews but does not protect rashayim. It certainly doesn’t help the zionist fight their evil wars.

    You seem so desperate to enlist kosher jews into the zionist heresy, may all the haters of Hashem and His people quickly be destroyed.

    in reply to: Chofetz chaim says to bring Mashiach need to love everyone. #2320314
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @menachem-shmei
    just keep the clear halachos. you are the one trying to wield the tool of achzuryous in your love of reshayim, the opposite of “ahaves yisroel”

    it’s crooked hashkafos like what you are pushing, against troas moshe, that destroyed the bais hamikdash and continue to destroy the social fabric of klal yisroel.

    it’s people like you who hate neturei karta in the name of “ahavas yisroel”, because you love the kofrim so much you will shecht kosher yidden.

    in reply to: Chofetz chaim says to bring Mashiach need to love everyone. #2320018
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @menachem-shmei
    ahavas rashayim is achzariyus, an inherently bad middah. it is NOT a chessed.

    in reply to: Chofetz chaim says to bring Mashiach need to love everyone. #2319232
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @menachem-shmei
    one must be equally careful in both directions. remeber, the bais hamikdash was destroyed from sinas chinam, and there is no greater sinas chinam that loving reshayim and showing your baseless hatred of Hashem

    in reply to: Chofetz chaim says to bring Mashiach need to love everyone. #2319231
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @menachem-shmei
    one must be equally careful in both directions. remeber, the bais hamikdash was destroyed from sinas chinam, and there is no greater sinas chinam that loving reshayim and showing your baseless hatred of Hashem

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2319219
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    you seem to completly misunderstand that judaism does not support the zionist military enterpise.

    with the obvious exceptionn of divergents like Kook, mainstream Torah Jews do not go to the IDF because it is forbidden.

    we don’t make calculations, exceptions, or excuses. We have gedolim who have been clears as day that it is better to leave eretz yisroel than join the kofrim in their sins.

    in reply to: Jewish Boy Dies from Bullying #2318911
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    this whole comment is an absurd motzei shem ra on klal yisroel.

    @SQUARE_ROOT
    Shame on you!

    his father said in the name of their doctors said this was a birth defect and not the result of anything that happened to him.

    the father himself describes a whole class of boys rallying aroud trying to help this kid time after time as this poor kid was collapsing into tears for precieved slights.

    I’m sorry the news media is portaying this father as venting his grief by casting blame onto the child’s peers.

    How anyone would read this news story and decide that they should taunt these boys and taunt klal yisroel is beyond me.

    in reply to: Mitzvah of honouring Parents #2318325
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    Non Jews are not allowed to keep Shabbos.
    Moshiach coming depends on Klal Yisroel keeping one (or two) shabbos, not the kofrim and tinukei sh’nishba that are not part of klal yisroel. Of course, we hope they do tshiva, but our work as the Jewish nation is where we are obligated to focus and fix.

    in reply to: Kochi VeOtzem Yadi #2317842
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @always_ask_questions
    the context of the question asked by @menachem-shmei was that we are talking about a rasha who is no longer part of klal yisroel.

    in reply to: Kochi VeOtzem Yadi #2317303
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @simcha613
    it’s a good question, and something dealt with clearly in poskim and sifrei machshava.

    In our exile, we are obligated to submit ourselves to the non-Jewish nations around us, honor their laws and pay their taxes. In a similar vein, we are obligated to both show derech eretz in our interactions and humble ourselves in front of those we need to interact with.

    That means, practically when interacting with such a doctor, one must give appropriate hakaras hatov and praise as is needed. In your heart and when relating it casually to others, it would be forbidden to praise to the person only one must praise Hashem.

    If speaking to a goyishe doctor, you can say “doctor, you saved my life!”. But, you can’t tell your kids that evening “that doctor saved my life!”

    If the doctor is an erliche yid, one can praise him only as much as he is keeping torah and mitzvos. So, you can glowingly relate “I even heard him mumbling a ‘yehi rutzon’ as he was putting on his gloves! such yirash shomayim!”, but you can’t tell your kids that evening “that doctor saved my life!”.


    @menachem-shmei

    How dare you!?

    It’s not me, I’m just teaching what the Torah says.

    Moshe gave hakaras hatov to inanimate objects, yet you are incapable of thanking a Jews who put themselves into danger to protect you!?

    I am capable, but the Torah forbids it. It’s a good question, I could easily speculate answers of the distinction, but I don’t want to add my own thoughts here. For the record, the reason given that even a “tinok sh’nishba” is included in this is that the main concern for praising a rasha is that it will influence you or others to copy their ways.

    A) How do you know that they don’t keep mitzvos?

    I don’t know, however, the halacha establishes the guidelines, and one must judge according to what they see. This has nothing to do with dinai shamayim which has more resources than basar v’dam.

    Do YOU do no aveiros?

    Sure, I do a lot, just privately so no one will copy them. Also, a “rasha” that is not part of klal yisroel is NOT anyone who does an avaira, it’s a specific threshold that must be crossed. I haven’t crossed that line, nor come anywhere close to it.

    Maybe they are more frum than you?

    It could be the imaginary person you are talking about, who is michalel shabbos publicly, is secretly one of the lamed-vavniks. That doesn’t change our obligation to react to their public persona not does it change the halacha.

    B) Even if ch”v they are not שומר תורה ומצוות, we can safely assume that the reason for this is that they didn’t have a proper Torah upbringing, they are like Jewish children who were captured by non-Jews, for whom we should be feeling great mercy and compassion.

    It doesn’t change this halach, as Rav Chaim Brisker said “nebach an apikorus is still an apikorus”

    Do we know how much Hashem values their mitzvos?

    A person who doesn’t believe in Hashem or doesn’t believe in the Torah cannot do a mitzvah. Many many seforim express the horrible ramifications of a rasha doing any mitzvah, and how destructive it is for them, for us, and for the world, r”l. The modern heter for engaging rashayim to do mitzvos for kiruv, is off the understanding that if they indeed do tshuva m’ahava, their sins (including the disastrous fake mitzvas they did on the way) will be converted to real mitzvos and reward for them and the world. There has been some disagreement amongst Gedolim regarding kiruv that involves chilonim doing mitzvos while still kofrim.

    Rambam writes that we have no idea how much Hashem values a mitzvah. It’s possible for a mitzvah to seem insignificant to us, yet be extremely valuable to Hashem.

    He’s not talking about kofrim, obviously, as his psak regarding them is clear in hilchos memarim.

    Maybe Hashem values the one act of this uneducated Jew to protect other Jews more than all the mitzvos that you may have done in a manner of מצוות אנשים מלומדה?

    why speculate when you can learn Torah?

    in reply to: Kochi VeOtzem Yadi #2316709
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    never praise the actions of rashayim, nothing good comes out of their avairas

    in reply to: Chofetz chaim says to bring Mashiach need to love everyone. #2315046
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    loving reshayim is another type of “sinas chinam”. we must hate those who hate Hashem.

    in reply to: Loving Jews #2314545
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @shazsheri

    I don’t see a disagreement between us. The “Karaim” as clearly described by the Gedolim you quoted are a very accurate description of what many call today’s “Modern Orthodox”, laymen that unintentionally misunderstand some fundamentals.

    The clear “honesty, innocence, and deep respect for the real Gedolim” that the Rambam describes those mistaken “karoim” is s stark contrast to the last section of the Rambam you quote about kofrim, apikorsim, that aptly describe nearly all sell-proclaimed “Jewish” michallei shabbos bfarhesya today. That Rambam spell is out clearly, which is why I don’t see where we disagree.

    If your point in bringing that last section is because of his point about “tinok sh’nishba”, I don’t understand why you omitted the last words of that Rambam that says regarding them “בתשובה ולמשכם בדברי שלום עד שיחזרו לאיתן התורה ולאימהר להרגן”. Being a “tinok sh’nishba” doesn’t change much, with many Gedolai poskim clear that a michalel shabbos b’farhesia specifically can never be considered a tinok sh’nishba, because it specifically is always a clear rejection of Yiddishkeit.

    Beyond all there, there is some nuance, as I explicitly said, regarding the psak halacha for many of these practical halachos, like ribis and the like. For example, one contemporary stance in some poskim is that the classic “red line” of shabbos has become so blurred in modern time, R”L, that many Jews thinks breaking shabbos is “perfectly Jewish” because it is so normalized. As such, the psak is to be machmir on both sides.

    However, none of this overrides the fundamental need for the Jewish heart to fully hate anyone who hates Hashem.

    in reply to: Loving Jews #2313909
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    anyone who doesn’t act like a jew, (i.e. believes the 13 ikkarim and keeps shabbos publicly) one is obligated to hate with utmost contempt, in your heart and externally. this has nothing to do with knowing what is in someone’s heart. this is the clear psak of the chofetz chaim. no issur of lashon hara, rather one is obligated to dan l’kaf chov and speak badly on them. there is no din aravus, there is no issur of ribis, they have a din of a goy.

    this is the din of a heretic regardless of them also having the din of a “tinok sh’nishba”. Such a person does not have a portion in the next world.

    there is still an obligation of basic chesed to such a heretic, and a lot of the dinim l’maaseh are questioned for various reasons by gedolai poskim. so, we are generally accustomed to take the chumra both ways, maybe they have the “din of a yid” maybe “din of a goy”. However, the hatred towards anyone who acts like a goy is deeply important. Such a person is not part of “klal yisroel”.

    in reply to: Chofetz chaim says to bring Mashiach need to love everyone. #2310045
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    he was also firm that part of “ahavas yisroel” is hating heretics and mechlile shabbos b;farhesua.
    loving people who don’t act like jews is a type of sinas chinam.

    in reply to: Rabbi Shraga Feivel Mendlowitz vs Satmar Rebbe #2293276
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    is the purpose of this to soften the hearts of jewish hatred towards the zionists and their evil army?

    in reply to: Does the IDF want Charedim? #2290311
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    The beis din of Jerusalem recently rereleased the longstanding psak forbidding the joining IDF for and G-d-fearing Jews, confirming its application in the current situation. Until another beis din of similar stature (that was not put in chrem… kookies) issues challenges it with a different psak (which seems obvious not going to happen, as current ban follows basic longstanding halacha), this whole conversation is a mute point, and it is a shame some many people spread confusion with comments about pikiyach nayfesh and milchemes mitzveh and being “migalei panim l’torah lo k’halucheh”

    in reply to: Praising Soldiers Who Destroy Our Enemies #2286503
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    the rashoyim actively doing the aveira of hisgarus ba’umos shouldn’t be praise for the destruction they bring and the danger they put us in

    in reply to: Is the Zionist Dream Over? #2282749
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @chaim_baruch
    the zionist dream is two part: 1) the heresy of “kochi v’otzem yadi”, the belief that Jews can protect themselves with guns and wars and an army (not with tefila, tzeduka, tshuva), and 2) that Jews have a national identity that is not “those who keep the Torah covenant”, rather it is some other pseudo-ethnic nationality.

    Both those ideas are alive

    somejewiknow
    Participant

    this website is for frum Jews. If we are part of “am yisroel” it is a fundamental belief that moshiach can come any day and that we don’t known when it will happen.

    in reply to: Netura Karta Protesting at College Campuses #2281297
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    The key to stopping anti-semitism is for yidden to stop doing aveiros. Second perhaps to smartphones, the greatest spiritual calamity to masses of yidden today is zionist ideology which has impeded itself into much of the otherwise frum communities worldwide.

    If a Jew thinks that the IDF or the State of Israel has any redeeming qualities (at least any more than the Crusaders or Pharaoh), they are inadvertently causing this war to continue along with the continued terrorist attacks of the past 100 years, Hashem yerachem.

    in reply to: Chofetz Chaim says bless those you don’t love, pray they see moshioch #2248293
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    the chofetz chaim is also clear to exclude anyone who is “mechalel shabbos b’farhesia” from ahavas yisroel, even if they live their irreligious life out of general ignorance.

    in reply to: The Israel Pogram of 2023 Jewish Massacre #2234531
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    @anIsraeliYid , That book has been widely rejected as not consistent with our Mesora. I don’t mean to disparage the intent of the author, however there is a system of halacha and transmission of mesora that has declared that work as wrong. This is similar to the critique of A Y Kook, who was put in cherem for similar views. If I am mistaken about Eim Habunim Smeicha, please tell me which gedolim endorse the sefer and/or his conclusions.

    what are “Chahbonos”?

    in reply to: The Israel Pogram of 2023 Jewish Massacre #2234080
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    First, the Satmar Rebbe ztz”l said, and many gedolim concurred, that Moshiach would have come if not for the Zionist State. Beyond that, the foundation of teshuva is: if not for my aveiros I wouldn’t be suffering. So, there is certainty substance to the idea that if not for the Zionist State there wouldn’t be antisemitism.
    Second, unfortunately many Jews have responded to the recent tragedy with running to join the zionist army and cheer when the zionists attack our enemies with bombs and guns. Honest Yidden will know that the recent events are a call to teshuva tzedakah and tefilla, the only things that can prevent such tragedies.

    in reply to: The Modern Orthodox “Mesorah” #2215618
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    the whole point of “modern orthodox” is specifically to not be 100%. It was considered a compromise to help people stay “in the fold” by some rabanim in the 20th century. It has run its course, as the Jewish community has established itself enough that 100% Yiddishkeit has become a mainstream option.

    in reply to: Problem with Melech HaMashiach from the Dead #2203334
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    “Lake, i suppose opposing tzedukim, karaim, shabsai tzvi, reform, conservative, zionism, and every other bad idea was against the Torahs lesson from korach?”

    Again, if the ideology is indeed “against the Torah”, you would be correct. However, there has been no authority who has made such claim, so at this point it is “sinas chinam” to publicly deride the ideology or its adherents.

    in reply to: Problem with Melech HaMashiach from the Dead #2203243
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    “Why is criticizing an ideology hateful, and if it is, why is it baseless?”
    because the specific ideology you are looking to criticize, is a criticism that has no toeles plus you are doing it very publicly to an audience that it not connected to the proponents of the ideology.

    Your question lacks any sincerity. If you really want to know the answer to your question, for yourself, you would ask your rav to clarify how or if the ideology is tenable. If you personally are not interested in have concluded that the ideology is wrong, yet you want to understand how it is possible for an honest Jew to believe that ideology, you would need to address your question privately to someone who is an adherent of or at least well versed in that ideology. If you don’t know anyone to ask privately in that community, there are very public rabbanim from that community that are not hard to find.

    On top of that, the issue you bring up has been well discussed and debated and you (seemingly) are not bringing anything new to the conversation.

    At best, you are trying to give tochacha to a community you think is wrong, however, no cherem, psak, or announcement has denounced the community or the ideology from any prominent rabanim or bataei dinim. If I am wrong, and such a move has been publicly made, than you wouldn’t need to ask your questions here, you can just reference the authority.

    You are just a bully trying to get people to think bad on other holy Jews. sinas chinam.

    in reply to: Was Albert Einstein a Baal Teshuvah? #2170738
    somejewiknow
    Participant

    all that this means, it that’s he wasn’t a “tinok sh’nishba”, instead a full fledged mumar

Viewing 48 posts - 1 through 48 (of 48 total)