Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
som1Participant
burnt stake-” Replace the words Democrats with Jews.”
are you suggesting that jews are being systematically discriminated against , and i agree with that ? because thats total stupidity there is no systematic discrimination against any group in this country EXCEPT against republicans! (not that im complaining about)som1Participantsnitchel B-“Really? If you were to go to a job interview and get the feeling afterward that they are not interested in you because you’re frum, is there any way you can sue the person? Of course not. If a Black person knows that his resume is much less likely to get a call back, there’s no legal remedy for that but it’s still systemic racism.”
that case you just described above is an individual case of an employer being racist/antisemitic not of
systematic racism! and in the scenario above you could sue them if you have evidence, but to suggest that there is systematic racism because some employer might be racist is and not hire someone absurd , because that could happen to any group so you have to then say that america is systematically racist against each and every group that exist!!( white/black/Asian/Mexican/Muslim/jews/Christians/European/……………som1Participantreb eliezer- “I am a liberal because I want protection for the Jews as for others”
voting in anti Semitic oboma’s vice isn’t going to accomplish that goal of yours! in fact quite the opposite
I don’t want an interpretation that Congress did not intend as I wrote before.”
you side with the conservatives on that!!som1Participantcommonsaychel my point is that the supreme court ruled falsely!!
so its not a moot point !som1Participantcommonsaychel-“does the sex discrimination part of the Civil Right Act of 1964 including bases on orientation or just gender? and the Court ruled it to be broadly defined.”
the problem is that the 1964 Civil rights act obviously wasn’t 1) talking about gay/lesbian, and 2) obviously doesn’t include gay/lesbian
1) because there a number of times were congress tried to pass legislation against workplace gay/lesbian discrimination since the 1964 act , so it obviously wasn’t included in the 1964 civil rights act
2) because in a case were someone hired a man and 3 months in finds out hes gay and fires him, its obviously not because the workers a man that he was fired, because he knew to begin with he was a man, so the same is when he knows to begin with hes gay and doesn’t hire him, its not because hes a man!som1Participantshulchan aruch yid- “Trump was what I call “The Great White Hope”…….except his “Mushy” plan to strangle Israel is a slow way to choke the Jews out of their home and make way for a terrorist state……exactly what the Middle East needs to bring more peace……It is scary hiw they try to cover over the facts in their simplicity…..”
i dont know if you read the shulchan aruch but it says in it NOT TO LIE
som1Participantyehuda-“I agree that outdoor mass gatherings are not a good idea, even with masks. It remains to be seen how many people become infected as a result of attending BLM rallies”
with deblasio saying that people who test positive should not be asked if they went to blm protests we wont find outsom1Participant“I’ve worked with gay people for years. Never once has this been a problem for me or for them.”
but when it comes to religious private schools/institution they dont want to hire a man wearing a dress as a teacher if it goes against their religion!! you tell the kids our religion says it forbidden to be trans/gay/etc and then your forced to give them a teacher whos trans because you dont want to be sued!!AND it doesn’t matter whether the supreme court thinks its fair and is the morally correct thing to protect gays/trans, thats not their job to legislate! congress and the house is for that! their just supposed to interpret the law , and any sane person can realize that the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. … L. 88-352) , as amended, as it appears in volume 42 of the United States Code, beginning at section 2000e. Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin, does not refer to lgbtq
som1Participantnomesorah-” CJ Roberts is setting up a legal basis for people to be obligated to a human standard, no matter how they self identify.”
thats not the supreme courts job their not legislators!! their job is to interpret the law and any reasonable person knows that the 1964 federal law banning employment discrimination based on race/color/religion/gender does not refer to lgbtq
gorsuch is a traitor!!som1Participantreb eliezer-“Your conservative judge Gorsuch interpreted it giving rights to toiva.”
exactly he betrayed the conservatives and sided with the leftist liberals! but you should be happy because your a leftist and he sided with you!!som1Participantcharliehal-” We aren’t being discriminated against here.” he kicks jewish kids out of parks yet cuomo defends protesters saying “I stand with the protesters and I think all well-meaning Americans stand with the protesters.”
“My message to the Jewish community, and all communities, is this simple: the time for warnings has passed. I have instructed the NYPD to proceed immediately to summons or even arrest those who gather in large groups. This is about stopping this disease and saving lives. Period.” tweeted deblasio on April 28th, specifically singling out jews!!(just imagine the outrage from the left if he switched the word jews to Muslims, blacks, Chinese, etc.)
coumo and deblasio are a anti Semites!!
June 14, 2020 7:48 pm at 7:48 pm in reply to: Are Law abiding minorities affected by police racism? #1872329som1Participantall that came up was a 500 page racial profiling investigation. you dont want to name the policy since it doesn’t exist anywhere in the USA,!
the investigation was on individual cases of racial profiling not on a policy!!June 14, 2020 3:04 pm at 3:04 pm in reply to: Are Law abiding minorities affected by police racism? #1872277som1Participantcatch yourself – yeh i do!!
what percentage of Americans do you think are racist??June 14, 2020 3:04 pm at 3:04 pm in reply to: Are Law abiding minorities affected by police racism? #1872278som1Participantjoseph- i know! thats why im telling ct lawyer to name a so called racist policy!
and he cant cause there is noneJune 14, 2020 11:27 am at 11:27 am in reply to: Are Law abiding minorities affected by police racism? #1871991som1Participantct lawyer your not naming any policy.
and the argument that blacks are arrested 4-5 times more then whites percentage wise, isn’t saying anything because they also commit 4-5 times more crimes then whites!!June 14, 2020 2:20 am at 2:20 am in reply to: Are Law abiding minorities affected by police racism? #1871784som1Participantctlawyer name the policy.
June 12, 2020 7:55 pm at 7:55 pm in reply to: Are Law abiding minorities affected by police racism? #1871413som1Participantct lawyer: it has to do with the thread because its about minority suffering racism .
and im raising awareness of lawyer brutality,
we should not have any more lawyers
#defund the lawyersJune 12, 2020 7:55 pm at 7:55 pm in reply to: Are Law abiding minorities affected by police racism? #1871414som1Participantharvard call a rav if you cant get through to haimy
som1Participantthe difference is Hitler specifically stands for Nazism, George Washington and Robert E LEE don’t specifically stand for slavery, in fact Robert E Lee was against slaves, he fought for the south because he felt patriotic to them.
som1Participantjackk: you are a racist
som1Participantakuperma
if biden sweeps the next election, america turns into Venezuelasom1Participantubiquitin:
“I don’t understand how anyone can oppose removing confederate statues. and spare me absurd arguments about “erasing history” ”
i appose it for the same reason i appose people who want to destroy Auschwitz, because if we erase history we are likely to repeat it!!June 12, 2020 1:53 pm at 1:53 pm in reply to: Are Law abiding minorities affected by police racism? #1871213som1Participantct lawyer: minorities are affected by racist lawyers, because were i live there are racist lawyers that don’t take clients that are black or Hispanic, and if they are prosecutors they will specifically take cases against blacks or Hispanic
June 12, 2020 12:45 pm at 12:45 pm in reply to: Are Law abiding minorities affected by police racism? #1871184som1Participantof course there is going to be a few racist cops, just like there are a small percentage of racist civilians. but in general minorities are not affected by racism, either from citizens or from police!
som1Participantjust at the expanse of peoples lives
som1Participanthealth: of course i dont agree with her. i was pointing out the stupid things she said to nomasorah
som1ParticipantWhite privilege is a myth!!!!!!!!!!!!
if you are white and think your privileged because you are white the you are a white supremacist!!
if you are black and believe in i am privileged because im white then your racist!!!som1Participantagreed
som1Participantnomesorah:
Ilahn omar- “The Minneapolis Police Department is rotten to the root and so when we dismantle it, we get rid of that cancer and we allow for something beautiful to rise.”
som1Participantthe fact that there are 5 times more black people arrested then white means nothing because there are also 5 times more crimes by blacks then whites!!
IN FACT study’s that show that an unarmed white man is twice as likely to be shot then an unarmed black man
som1Participantthe police cant do anything to the looters because of their stupid liberal governors its not the polices fault!!
# police lives matter
som1ParticipantReb Eliezer : in that peaceful protest they burnt down a church!
And the police were ordered to push back the protesters in the morning, but for some reason they didn’t, and it was only realized when trump was going out to visit the church! So unless their prophets it wasn’t because of Trump’s photo shoot
som1Participantyehudayona
I was unaware of that alsosom1Participantn0mesorah
1)i was responding but the moderator didnt let it through until now
2)YOU NEVER RESPONDED TO WHAT I SAID, you just started saying how trump isnt a leader and some other unintelligible thingssom1Participantreb eliezer: hes saying that even if we had few cases, we really have a lot but are not testing, THE FACT THAT WE HAVE A LOT OF CASES IS GOOD BECAUSE THAT MEANS WE ARE TESTING! To argue with that is “OSTRICH POLITICS”, saying its better not to test because then there will be less cases! so your being hypocritical
som1ParticipantMODERATOR LET IT THROUGH THIS TIME
Talk like a mensch and it will go through. That should be obvious by now
som1Participant“Trump not doing anything but dismissing the virus until the middle of April killed people.”
this is what your NATIONAL SOCIALIST state run media had to say when trump made a China travel ban due to covid 19 in january
cnn -Experts say travel restrictions the Trump administration put in place to stop the novel coronavirus from spreading could have unintended consequences that undermine that effort….
“All of the evidence we have indicates that travel restrictions and quarantines directed at individual countries are unlikely to keep the virus out of our borders,”ps moderator please let this through
When your post is appropriate, it goes through. Requests are meaningless.
som1Participantrebeliezer: your title should be THE STUPID Coumo AND FELLOW DEMOCRATS,
cuomo forced all nursing homes to accept patients of covid 19, which is crazy considering that the elderly have a 15% death rate, AND THEN THE nursing homes ask for protective equipment HE TELLS THEM ITS NOT HIS PROBLEM
ps moderator please let my comments through you didnt let the other ones through
som1Participantreb eliezer you havent said anything that supports your claim in the title of this topic
som1ParticipantYOUR STUPID IF YOU THINK its illogical/crazy to suggest some chemicals from a disinfectant can help cure a disease!!
som1Participantdoing my best: im not sure whats so crazy about suggesting that possibly a chemical from a disinfectant can help cure covid 19??? makes sense to me, please tell me why it doesnt make sense to you !
and to huju: if trump never got more then a 4th grade education then he must be a genius, because unless your a genius you cant become a billionaire business man , especially if you dont have an education!!!
#vote4trump2020 KEEP AMERICA GREAT
som1Participanti see this thread
som1Participantdoing my best: here is what he said, and i let you judge if he encouraged people to drink bleach or other disinfectants like the democrat fake news media wants you to believe!!!
“Question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So supposing we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light. And I think you said that hasn’t been checked but you’re going to test it,” Trump said, looking over to Bryan.
“And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you’re gonna test that, too. Sounds interesting, right?”
He continued: “And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or, or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets on the lungs and it does a tremendous number, so it will be interesting to check that. So that you’re going to have to use medical doctors. But it sounds, it sounds interesting to me. So we’ll see.
“But the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute, that’s, that’s pretty powerful.”
som1ParticipantJoseph and millhouse you are completely right yasher koach!!!
those stupid people believe the democrat media, their brainwashed, good job trying to knock some sense in their heads !!!!
Please watch you language
som1Participantmatisyuhu its not that he didnt say it intentionally, its that the democrap anti semetic and anti trump media is twisting and intentionally misinterpreting what he said
som1Participantits NOT a zchus for the niftar to make a minyan and endanger peoples life!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
som1Participantno chymee you DONT make sense, why is it inappropriate for a president to tweet?????????????
som1Participantabbas : after the partisan impeachment scam by the house, the republicans have a guarantee of winning back the house
som1Participantwhy the hell do you care what trump tweets?? should i start complaining publicly about everyone who tweets a lot?? plus a lot of his tweets are good because they inform us on whats going on since if you go by the media it will be totally bias, AND SOME OF HIS TWEETS ON NORTH KOREA WERE THREATENING AND IT WAS GOOD FOR FOREIGN POLICY (as it scared kim jung un for a little and he came begging for a summit with Trump)
som1Participantchyme i have something to answer and that is: trump will win SO STOP FANTASIZING
-
AuthorPosts