simcha613

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 643 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Milchemet Mitzvah article by Rabbi Dr. Ari Z. Zivotofsky #2342997
    simcha613
    Participant

    Haimy- Really? You want a unit that only answers to the Gedolei Torah? After stressing how are Gedolim need to be kulo Torah with very little experience with the outside world, you would consult them on military matters with them having very little experience with the military matters, political matters, or foreign policy? Obviously, poskim need to be consulted on Halachic issues that come up in the army, just like poskim need to be consulted when halachic issues come up in medical or financial matters… but ultimately, you’re not asking a Gadol to make the final medical decision of a hospital or for medical treatment. You leave that to the doctors, and even when they are atheists! Why shouldn’t a military unit be under the jurisdiction of military experts and generals just because they aren’t frum?

    in reply to: Milchemet Mitzvah article by Rabbi Dr. Ari Z. Zivotofsky #2341869
    simcha613
    Participant

    Who cares if it\s technically a Milchemes Mitzvah or not? Yes, there are speicifc rules of obligations when it comes to a Milchemes Mitzvah. but it also teaches us an attitude on what our colelctive responsibility should be when our enemies attacks us who want to exterminate ALL of us and take our land. Does a Milchemes Mitzvah need a king and a Sanhedrin? Maybe. But just because we lack one doesn’t mean that we can’t take the lessons of Milchemes Mitzvah and apply it to the current tragic reality. This is not a chok like an Esrog where if it’s missing a small component then we dump the whole thing. A lemon that looks like an esrog is not an esrog. This is much deeper then that. These are our lives. These are our children. This is our land. And this is our future. What’s our responsibility to each other? What does Milchemes Mitzvah teach us? That we only have a responsibility to stand up for each other against our common enemy when we have 71 Sages sitting at the Lishkas HaGazis? What a tragic way to turn off our brains and throw our brothers into the fire while we pretend nothing can hurt is. What selfishness.

    in reply to: What if it was the other way around? #2341550
    simcha613
    Participant

    I still don’t understand why the concept of nosei ol bechavero doesn’t apply to our soldiers. The soldeirs are not just fellow Jews who are suffering (And even then nosei ol would apply), they are suffering on our behalf! They are protecting us from our enemies! If their burden is so great that their families are suffering, their parnassah is suffering, their mental and physical health are suffering, their Torah is suffering… what’s the rationale to ignore that? To not do something tangible to help? Whether that’s actually joining the army so that the burden is spread over more people and less overwhelming for each individual person, whether that’s helping them with their business, whether that’s helping with their families, and even being mevaker cholel and menachem avel… why are there are only righteous individuals doing these things? Where is the Charedi tzibur?

    in reply to: What if it was the other way around? #2340343
    simcha613
    Participant

    Menachem shmei- interesting, I wasn’t aware of that Rashi. Though I don’t think that supports the Charedi system of avoiding army service.

    Even if you argue that this Gemara supports the need for people dedicated solely to Talmud Torah and Tefilah to spiritually support the physical army like Dovid HaMelech did (according to Rashi), this was already when Dovid HaMelech was older. In his youth, it was clear that he was a warrior and a general. The population st aside for our spiritual needs doesn’t have to be military age youths that could be used on the front. Older individuals who wouldn’t be serving anyways in that capacity could fill that role, as we see from Dovid HaMelech.

    in reply to: What if it was the other way around? #2339689
    simcha613
    Participant

    “Let’s say Israel was a chareidi state. The IDF would be defending Israel in one way only: Through sitting and learning Torah, thus drawing Hashem’s protection on the Jewish people.”

    At what point in history was a standing army replaced by Kollel? In the Torah, in the midbar, an army fought the wars. So did Yehishua in conquering Eretz Yisroel. So did the shoftime and Malchus Beis Dovid and the Chashmonaim. Where in the world do you get the idea that a Halachic state will require no army and no natural hishtadlus for protection from enemies?

    And even the Gemara that you quote doesn’t seem to support your case. Yes, Dovid HaMelech’a Torah gave the zechusim for the army to succeed… But Dovid HaMelech wasn’t in Kollel 24/7. He was a warrior! A general! A king! This doesn’t support that we need Torah learners in Kollel while the army fights. This supports that we need Torah learners bringing their zechusim to the front lines! We need Torah with our soldiers!

    in reply to: One more cheeseburger, and we have J.D.Vance as president #2332723
    simcha613
    Participant

    I liked Vance until he ran with the immigrants eating pets lie. When someone in power is willing to take an unsubstantiated rumor and present it as fact which is embraced by their base, it reminds me of similar things rulers and politicians said about our people throughout history with disastrous results. They happen to be on our side now bH, but if that were to change…

    in reply to: President-Elect Donald J. Trump #2331527
    simcha613
    Participant

    I’m happy he won in the sense that he was better than the alternative which was seemingly very scary. But I can’t in good conscious celebrate his victory knowing the kind of financial and assault crimes that he has allegedly committed (and some even convicted of!) He has possibly done some very very bad things and it makes me sad that in order to ensure that our interests our met, we have to prop up and praise and elect this kind of person. This seems like borderline chanifa.

    in reply to: 0 vs 612 #2321262
    simcha613
    Participant

    It’s important to note how serious hatred is. The big 3 averios were responsible for destroying the first Beis HaMikdash while sinas chinam alone was responsible for the second- a galus that we’re still in. Chilonim may violate aveiros (and presumably not the big 3), but their dedication to sacrifice everything they hold dear to stand in between us and our enemies is the exact opposite of sinas chinam and probably a greater zechus then you give credit for. Neturei Karta may be fulfilling every other mitzvah, and they may even have good intentions for the things they do wrong, but aligning themselves with genocidal terrorists who want to massacre and destroy is is the greatest show of sinas chinam then I can think of. It’s the most destructive thing a Jew can do and I can think of no greater Chilul Hashem. Hopfully the zechusim of holy soldiers, both Dati and Chiloni, will be able to outweigh the terrible damage that Neturei Karta does to our people. May we all have a year of safety, security, health, happiness, Ahavas Yisroel and Avodas HaShem.

    in reply to: Sharing the burden of Torah #2321102
    simcha613
    Participant

    Ujm- your points were the opposite of substantive. They were your opinions and assumptions being presented as facts.

    And even if your baseless assumptions are correct, that every single person learning adds to the protection of Klal Yisroel and any one of them standing a post would actually harm our nation’s security, it doesn’t explain why non learning Charedim don’t serve.

    As I explained before, the lack of soldiers aren’t necessarily harming our security, but they are putting an incredible burden on those serving. They are exhausted, they are weak, they are sacrificing parnassah, they are away from their families, and the Hesder talmidim are out of the Beis Medrash.

    Will there be challenges for a non learning Charedi in the army? Of course! Will they come out the same Ehrlich Yid? That is certainly a realistic risk. But using those as reasons not to help our brothers bear the burden of defense is nothing less then selfishness. It’s also dangerous to leave the Beis Medrash to go Wall Street or Tel Aviv to work. But when your family needs parnassah, sometimes you have to put them first… Even ahead of your optimal ruchniyis situation. And now Klal Yisroel needs them. The burden is too much, the sacrifice is too hard… If all you’re doing is thinking about yourself and using that as excuse, then that’s selfishness… Even if it’s for ruchniyus reasons.

    in reply to: Sharing the burden of Torah #2320410
    simcha613
    Participant

    Akuperma- your understanding of Zionism is old and outdate. The hardcore anti-religious Zionist is a minority now. Most secular Israelis are not anti-religion and neither is the IDF, and obviously the Dati LeUmi group is growing by the day?

    And sovergnty in Eretz Yisroel is not compatible with frumkeit? I guess that means the Tanach and Hilchos Melachim aren’t compatible with frumkeit either.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2320104
    simcha613
    Participant

    Sam Klien- “You asked what the chareidim are doing to help with the army if they can’t join the army, did I read that correctly?

    Don’t you know that they are spending their time learning Torah and don’t you know how powerful it is and how much of a merit it is to help the Israeli army in this war?”

    Do you know how powerful of a merit is is?

    The protection that comes from limud Torah is lema’alah min hateva… it is supernatural and impossible to gauge the correlation between Talmud Torah and military success. That doesn’t mean it’s not true… it is part of our Mesorah.

    But stop pretending that you know exactly how it works! Is it how you assume one to one? That every single person learning adds to the security even if it is at the expense of our natural hishtadlus of serving in the army? Or maybe it’s we have to have certain people learning and the rest serving on the front lines? Or maybe it’s that we need the zechus of Talmud Torah in our soldiers! That davka the talmidei chachamim should be serving and bring their zechsuim to the battle fields! (Evidence of that is how Moshe told Yehoshua to take the tzadikim to fight Amalek, Gidon in Sefer Shoftim davka took the best for his army against Midian, and the Gemara that says that Yoav had success in battle because of Dovid HaMelech’s Torah when we know from Tanach that Dovid HaMelech was ALSO a military warrior!)

    in reply to: Sharing the burden of Torah #2320103
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM- The logic fails because the protection that comes from limud Torah is lema’alah min hateva… it is supernatural and impossible to gauge the correlation between Talmud Torah and military success. That doesn’t mean it’s not true… it is part of our Mesorah.

    But stop pretending that you know exactly how it works! Is it how you assume one to one? That every single person learning adds to the security even if it is at the expense of our natural hishtadlus of serving in the army? Or maybe it’s we have to have certain people learning and the rest serving on the front lines? Or maybe it’s that we need the zechus of Talmud Torah in our soldiers! That davka the talmidei chachamim should be serving and bring their zechsuim to the battle fields! (Evidence of that is how Moshe told Yehoshua to take the tzadikim to fight Amalek, Gidon in Sefer Shoftim davka took the best for his army against Midian, and the Gemara that says that Yoav had success in battle because of Dovid HaMelech’s Torah when we know from Tanach that Dovid HaMelech was ALSO a military warrior!)

    Additionally, your above comments (while based on very little substance) does not explain why non-learning Charedim shouldn’t be serving. I would be very happy to see that those who aren’t suited for the Beis Medrash or Kollel to stand a post.

    I’m also not suggesting that I know how it works. I don’t know if more soldiers will aid in our protection. I’m not saying Charedim should join because we need the security help. That’s in the hands of the Ribono shel olam. I am not arrogant to think that more soldiers will necessarily put us in a better position to win, or that more kollel yungerleit will necessarily put us in a position to win. But what I do know is that more soldiers will relieve the burden of those fighting. Will enable older soldiers in miluim to return more to their families and their businesses. Will allow hesder bochurim to return to the Beis Medrash (they shouldn’t be the only ones sacrificing their Torah to fight). And will just give people a break from a year of gehenom, on the front, fighting our collective enemies. They need help and more Charedim joining will help them immeasurably. It won’t necessarily help us win… but it will help each other out, and I think that’s more important then you give credit for.

    Also, I was quoting a story I heard… my daughter isn’t in the army (she’s not even bas mitzvah yet), so I think you should pause before hurling accusations.

    in reply to: Kochi VeOtzem Yadi #2316894
    simcha613
    Participant

    Somejew- while I agree with Menachem that your position is very problematic… I’m curious how far you would take your own idea. If HKBH gave the koach to a chiloni or a Christian surgeon to save your life or the life of your child, would you be equally insistent not to give them any praise or hakaras hatov?

    in reply to: A Moment of Unity: YU & Telshe #2314836
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM- I wouldn’t compare the Yeshivish velt making shalom with YU (or even Dati LeUmi) to making shalom between the Orthodox and Conservative/Reform. I would compare it to making shalom between the Misnagdim and the Chasidim.

    in reply to: Zionism #2313995
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM- ” Zionism and the State of Israel have been devastating to Klal Yisroel” Every generation there was anti-semitism, and absolutely violent and destructive anti semitism at that. In each generation it takes a different shape and form. From the religious persecution of the crusades and the Inquisition, to the race and nationalist persecution of the Nazis in Germany. Nowadays, Eisav Sonei es Yaakov takes the shape of Arab violence and anti-semitism. It’s easy to use that as a cheap shot against the state and argue that it’s the cause of the violence, but anyone who knows Jewish history knows that’s not true. If there was no State, if Zionism had died, do you really think this would be the generation that the violence and the anti-semitism died and we would finally live in peace with the Goyim around us? Of course not… it would just take some other form. The only difference between the violent anti-semitism nowadays and of years passed is that finally God gave us the means to defend ourselves.

    In addition, I would like to argue that spiritually, the State has been magnificent for Klal Yisroel. Yes, I know that Zionisism was born out of a nationalisitc and anti-religious fervor… and many Zionists are still not just non-religious but anti-religious. The State is far from being majority dati (whether Charedi or Dati Leumi) and there is much work to be done. But unlike other spiritual challenges to our people, from the haskalah in Europe, to Communism in the Soviet Union, to the non-religious in the USA… the non-religious’ connection to Klal Yisroel as a nation is also weakend and we see so many marrying out and dropping out from our people. The non religious in Israel still maintain a fierce connection to Eretz Yisroel and to Klal Yisroel as a nation (even though not as a religion) and still maintain fidelity to not only our land, but a far higher percentage stay married in than their golus counterparts. This also keeps their pintele Yid alive, always leaving the chance for them to indeed get close to the religion. Without the connection to Zionism, the State, and Eretz Yisroel, they would be drowning in the secular world of Europe and the USA and many would be gone forever.

    Thank you HaShem for the wonderful gift of the Medina. Klal Yisroel is better off for it.

    in reply to: Zionism #2309766
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM- “The Zionist State has been the largest cause of anti-Semitic violence, terrorism, war and deaths r”l against the Jewish People ever since the rasha Theodore Herzl announced the Zionist goals and especially every since the rasha David Ben-Gurion and his henchmen established the Zionist Entity.”

    I think the physical destruction of the Holocaust and the Soviet Union are miles ahead… as well as the spiritual destruction of Western Europe and the US (in terms of intermarriage).

    in reply to: Biggest supporter of Torah in the world #2300140
    simcha613
    Participant

    Hakatan- can you clarify which Jews were against the Zionists “invading?” Jews were returning to Eretz Yisroel in droves pre WWII which is our God given right. We knew that as long as EY was in control of someone else, that our right to return would be limited… And that came true when the British issued the White Papers preventing the escapees and survivors of the Holocaust to come home. Other than hardcore 3 Shvuah-nicks who thinks establishing a state is the fourth yeihareg veal yaavor, who at the time was against us establishing a state, even via war, to ensure that all Jews worldwide would have our home available and accessible to return to?

    And I’m also not sure it was an invasion. The World gave us a state when the British left and then the new state was invaded by the Arabs.

    in reply to: Does the IDF want Charedim? #2298055
    simcha613
    Participant

    I saw a great quote on Cross Currents-

    “Pointing a finger at the left and its machinations does not change the fact that the country is fed up with a population that, in their eyes, sees itself as a group apart from the rest of the nation. Especially in the Dati Leumi community that has suffered a disproportionate number of soldier fatalities, the rage is palpable. Why should their husbands and sons go off to battle, often not to return, while tens of thousands of charedim stand off to the sides? Why should their men be pulled from the beis medrash, so that charedim can remain in theirs? Why should their women have to sustain their households alone while their spouses serve for months (and whose term of service is now being lengthened) so that charedim should not have to take any chances of compromising their life style of insisting on lechatchila choices? Dying on the front is also not a lechatchila! Telling charedim about a war against Torah frees them from having to confront these questions. If there is a war against Torah, there can only be one response. Resist!”

    in reply to: Rabbi Shraga Feivel Mendlowitz vs Satmar Rebbe #2293419
    simcha613
    Participant

    HaKatan- I mean, I think it’s clear that the Medina is bringing the geulah. The fact is, part of the geulah is kibbutz galuyos. And whatever the strength and weaknesses of the medina are, it’s is clear that they are facilitating a return to Eretz Yisroel to the point where almost half of world Jewry is now in Israel. That’s what kibbutz galuyos is. While it’s unclear from the sources whether Kibutz Galuyos has to be through miraculous means or teva, ultimately, kibbutz galuyos means a return of the Jewish people to Israel which is undeniably happening and facilitated by the Medina and its right of return. I can see no greater evidence of Atchalta LeGeulasa then that.

    in reply to: Does the IDF want Charedim? #2291949
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM- It is not mutually beneficial because it forces the IDF to lean on existing soldiers… putting more lives in danger, keeping people away from their families for longer amount of time, destroying parnassah and businesses, and destroying morale. This is not just a relationship in a vacuum between the IDF and the Charedim… it’s negatively affecting everyone else. This is a cause that’s just as important to the Charedim as anyone else, their lives are just as much at risks from our genocidal enemies surrounding us… yet they are content on letting others carry their share of the burden (which is becoming more and more insurmountable).

    in reply to: Does the IDF want Charedim? #2290724
    simcha613
    Participant

    Ujm- I’m not sure I agree that Londei Torah should qualify for that exemption. Not because I don’t value the role of Torah in our protection, but because of the amount of people who are using that exemption (in addition to those who take advantage of the exemption by forcing themselves to stay in learning when they wouldn’t otherwise, guys who fake it, and all the Charedim who arent learning but are somehow still exempt).

    The amount of people who are using this exemption is hurting the morale of soldiers and the nation as a whole, as well creating such a terrible burden on the soldiers as described. If it was a smaller amount of people using that exemption, or if it was only for a limited amount of time (like a deferral instead of exemption) I think it would be a different conversation. But the sheer numbers should prevent a blanket indefinite exemption for the class of Londei Torah, and they can’t be compared to the other example of exempt classes.

    in reply to: Does the IDF want Charedim? #2290350
    simcha613
    Participant

    Somejewiknow- there are Gedolim and poskim on both sides of the issue. The Charedi Rabbonim do not have a monopoly o. Psak. And just like in the Gemara where an Amora can challenge a Tanna if there is a Tanna to support him, we do not need to turn off our brains just because some poskim ruled one way. As long as there are Gedolim and poskim on both sides, and there are, then we can think critically about the issue.

    Ultimately, the way the Charedim are treating our soldiers is not the way they would want to be treated.

    אמר ליה: דעלך סני, לחברך לא תעביד, ואידך – פירושא הוא; זיל גמור!

    This is a fundamental principle in Torah. We cannot take advantage of our soldiers, religious or secular, by forcing them to make sacrifices that we refuse to make in an effort to protect us all. Businesses are failing, families are straining, injuries are piling up, family members are being buried… How can we in good conscious watch our soldiers do that and not ease their burden? It’s not just a basic moral idea… As Hillel said, it is the entire Torah.

    in reply to: Does the IDF want Charedim? #2290227
    simcha613
    Participant

    Ujm- you seem to be missing the point. The IDF may be able to rely on the reservists, but the reservists are suffering because of the extra burden they now need to bear. That alone is a reason the Charedim should join the army and ease the burden of their brothers. “Don’t do to other what you don’t what others to do to you”… No person, including Charedim, would be ok with bearing such a great burden and making all those sacrifices when that burden could be eased by greater participation. Defense against our genocidal enemies serves the entire nation, and it is unacceptable that a whole segment of our people refuses to ease the burden of others engaged in that crucial endeavor

    in reply to: Does the IDF want Charedim? #2289852
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM- the army does not need more soldiers because it can rely on the existing soldiers to bear the burden. It’s the soldiers who need more soldiers as this extra burden is causing them to sacrifice more of their health, well being, family, parnassah, and Torah then they would have to otherwise.

    in reply to: The Gaza War of 2023-2024 #2288071
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM- it’s a decision I think we should all be torn about. Even ignoring the intense international pressure, a ceasefire will bring our soldiers and the hostages home. Will hopefully allow displaced families go home. And it’s not like Hamas hasn’t been weakened significantly… so many have them been killed and infrastructure destroyed. It set them back significantly. Was Israel ever going to destroy them 100%? Does Israel really have a plan for Gaza if they somehow do pull it off? I don’t think it’s so obvious that this deal is the wrong decision.

    in reply to: Are we praising the same people we are shocked by? #2286340
    simcha613
    Participant

    The fear was that Hezbollah could take advantage of the mass gathering and shoot rockets toward Meron, something they have done before. If that were to happen, the consequences could’ve been devastating, causing massive deaths and injuries.
    It is undoubtedly sad to see an elderly person so bloodied. But that doesn’t obscure the fact that were something to happen, he would have had far more blood on his hands than the amount of blood he lost because of the scar on his forehead.
    An elderly man like him makes an impression on others, causing them to imitate him and follow in his footsteps. If any of those who were inspired by him to break the law and go to Meron were to be killed or hurt by Hezbollah rockets, he would have been complicit in their deaths.
    So, the scarred forehead is sad, but the bloody recklessness is outrages.

    in reply to: Cancel Bein HaZemanim #2277486
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM- I’m not necessarily suggesting more time. But rescheduling it. And again… if that’s your response, then you missed my point. You can’t compare asking the secular to do something that they don’t believe in with asking Bnei Yeshiva to do something they do believe in.

    in reply to: Going to the zoo on pesach #2277449
    simcha613
    Participant

    CA- Another reason to make aliyah. Chol HaMoed zoo day!

    in reply to: Cancel Bein HaZemanim #2277338
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM- Because you can’t force Talmud Torah. Unfortunately, the secular soldiers aren’t ma’aminim, they don’t believe in the protective value of Talmud Torah. That can’t be forced upon them. What their role is, is to serve in our physical protection. And one day, hopefully they will acknowledge the truth and join us in the Beis Midrash.

    But the Charedi world do value Talmud Torah not only as an individual mitzvah, but as a zechus for the nation. And when our nation needs protection, we should have round-the-clock protection- both from those on the front lines, and those in the Beis Midrash. Additionally, unlike our secular brothers, the Charedim also see the value in having an army, of needing regular hishtadlus through teva. So those who aren’t learning should certainly serve with the rest of Klal Yisroel. Just like the Dati Leumi soldiers who value both- they spend years in yeshiva and years in the army… they invest in both modes of protection that they acknowledge are necessary. It gives me such chizuk seeing the pictures of soldiers sitting in Khan Yunis and other places in Gaza with a sefer learning, or making in minyanim. This is what Tzivos HaShem looks like.

    in reply to: Cancel Bein HaZemanim #2277033
    simcha613
    Participant

    @pekak

    I am not that poster.

    Do I think what is the best thing for them? Cancelling Bein HaZemanim? I did not mean to suggest that they shouldn’t have a break… we are human. But the Lomdei Torah are a part of our protection just like our soldiers. Can all the soldiers take a break at the same time? Can we leave our nation defenseless? When they need a break, it’s staggered… there’s always the majority of the soldiers on duty. If the reason the Lomdei Torah don’t serve is because they are also in the crosshairs serving as our defense, then shouldn’t their defensive contribution be around the clock? Different yeshivos taking their breaks at different times so there are always Lomdei Torah serving in our defense?

    in reply to: Cancel Bein HaZemanim #2276400
    simcha613
    Participant

    Avira and sensible- I agree that they need a break. Even the soldiers can’t do what they do 24/7. But maybe in these times we need to stagger bein hazemanim. Just like you can’t have all the soldiers taking off at the same time which would leave the nation defenseless… Having all the yeshivos on break the same time leaves a huge hole.

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2273646
    simcha613
    Participant

    It just makes me sad to see messages like this:

    Because of the war, the the second year talmidim
    Yeshivat Har Etzion are drafting 5 months early
    Today was their last day in yeshiva..
    After ma’ariv we sang for them- שומרים הפקד !!

    The Talmud Torah of one sector should not be more important than the Talmud Torah of another sector. If the army is so understaffed that Dati Leumi talmidim in Mechina and Hesder are being pulled out early… I don’t know, it just makes me sad.

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2273460
    simcha613
    Participant

    Avira- would it make a difference if the girl lives at home? And also, it seems that there’s nothing wrong with a girl who wants to do sherut leumi. So, even if we paskin like the Chazon Ish that the state can’t require sherut leumi, there doesn’t seem to be a reason to stop a girl from wanting to spend a year doing chesed as part of service to the nation.

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2273360
    simcha613
    Participant

    Avira- I’m not sure that I understand. Why is doing a year of chessed any different then doing a year of seminary? Why is one giluy arayos and one not? And who says that sherut Leumi the girls can’t live at home? I’m not well versed in the law, but are they required to live outside their fathers home? And even if so, not sure why that would be different than a seminary dorm?

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2273298
    simcha613
    Participant

    I do wonder, based on all this, what the logic is to exempt Charedi girls from sherut leumi (national service). They obviously don’t have the ptur of Talmid Chacham, and it is m understanding that there are options to do chesed and national service where they won’t be exposed… like helping out in schools or caring for the elderly.

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2272261
    simcha613
    Participant

    Yankel- I guess I don’t have your pessimism that after 15-20 years of Talmud Torah, their emunah is so fragile that they will throw it all away when they encounter other people. And if you’re right, then maybe there is a serious problem with the education system as a whole. And while I agree that I propbably don’t meet your criteria of Talmid Chacham, Yarei Shamayim, and Pikeach… the assumption that no one who possesses those ma’alos thinks that Charedim should join the army is incorrect.

    With regard to your [sal that you quote, I think it’s a big stretch to say that the ptur of a Talmid Chacham extends to the hamon am who choose to learn. It certainly wouldn’t apply to the Charedim who aren’t sitting in learning. It seems to be referring to the yechideo segula, to special individuals of a town… not to a majority of it. It’s also talking about paying tax seemingly during peacetime… not sure if that can be extended to serving in the army in the time of war when there is a tangible danger from the enemy facing all Jews.

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2271920
    simcha613
    Participant

    Doom- what does Dr. Friedman mean by “ending support to the Haredi way of life”? If you read on, he seems to specifically refer to the prevalent reality among many Charedim who don’t serve, don’t work, and rely on governmental support. Now, you can have a problem with that assessment of Charedi society, but don’t take his words out of context. He doesn’t mean he wants to erase Charedim…. he just wants to try and fix three specific potential problems. And by enabling them to serve, not only will they obviously serve the people in the armed forces, but it will also remove many of the barriers for Charedim to find honest work and enable them to support their families without relying on support of others.

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2271822
    simcha613
    Participant

    Doom- I appreciate your post and I would like to counter with a few points. I don’t want to debate so much on the facts as you present them, but just to say that my impression was quite different than yours. I know many many people… friends, neighbors, family, who served and I only know of one person who I suspect went off the derech R”L. So, while your experience may be different, I don’t know if the numbers are really that high. In terms of a commander giving anti-halacha orders, I don’t know how often that happens. The kol ishah case was a big deal, but that was years ago. The army has a rabbanut that I do believe protects the rights of religious soldiers… and there also may be a different level of psak when we’re dealing with war, not everything that would be a violation of halacha for civilians in peacetime would apply to soldiers in war. I’m also not sure if your description of the lack of need for soldiers is accurate, or how ineffective Charedi soldiers would be after their basic training.

    That being said, I would like to counter with two of your other points-

    1) “Sharing the burden may be a good midah in general, but every middah should be evaluated. Charity is also an important middah” I think the comparison to charity highlights a big issue with how many Charedim view the army, and the concept of sharing the burden. Tzedakah is when we share the burden of others. You may not be suffering financially, but your friend is, and charity is supposed to be you bearing HIS burden and helping him out. But the army is not someone else’s burden… it’s ALL of our burdens. The genocidal maniacs want to kill all of us, not just the secular and Dati LeUmi. We all benefit from the protection of the army and we all expect the army to protect all of us. The Torah teaches us that it is unacceptable for one who’s load fell to expect someone else to help him if he himself doesn’t join in. All the more so when we are dealing with stakes as high as pikuach nefesh and hatzalas Yisroel. Sharing the burden is not about sharing in the burden of others… Sharing the burden is about participating in our own burden, and not expect others to do the dirty work for us while we benefit from their sacrifice and sit back and watch.

    2) Is the army dangerous? Of course it is! War is dangerous not only spiritually, but physically. That’s a reality of war. Even though it’s not one of the “big three” averios, we are still expected to risk our lives for both a Milchemes Reshus and a Milchemes Mitzvah… and despite not having a Sanhedrin, the current war may indeed be considered a Milchemes Mitzvah as it’s for Hatzalas Yisroel. The risks do not outweigh the rewards… Hatzalas Yisroel is one of the most important things we can do. If a person is needed for Pidyon Shevuyim would you accept his arguments that he’s not responsible because he’s afraid of the spitirual challenegs involved in traveling to who knows where to save Jews? Defending our people is not just “good midos”. It’s an essential part of being part of the Klal. Despite the risks. And maybe, the more yeshivos that prepare their talmidim to serve, and the more Yirei Shamayim who join the ranks, would also inspire change in the army itself.

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2271486
    simcha613
    Participant

    Hakatan- so it would be okay from a frum Jew to sit on the board of a Catholic church? The Zionism is idolatry argument is dead. Charedim sit in the Knesset with the guidance of Gedoli. They are obviously not Zionists in the classical sense but it reveals that your comparison of Zionism to Catholicism is your digging down in your sheker and Motzei shem ra because you realize how ridiculous your position is. Whatever problems there are with the Medina, they are enabling Yishuv Eretz Yisroel, Kibutz Galuyos, and Toras Eretz Yisroel. Tzahal is protesting all Jews from the genocidal maniacs that surround us… Secular, Dati Leumi, and Charedi alike. This is a burden that protects all of us and should be borne by all of us. Stop twisting your thumbs into some twisted philosophical position to defend your denial of these basic Torah truths

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2271180
    simcha613
    Participant

    Katan- I think you’re confusing two issues. Are the challenges with being religious in the army? Of course there are, as there is with anything in life. I think that 30% number is a gross exaggeration thougb.

    But does that mean it’s shmad? That’s one of the most ridiculous jumps I heard. The army is not trying to destroy religion. In fact, over the past few decades, the army has become more and more Torah friendly. I believe they make sure to have minyanim available for soldiers who want it (at least in the more religious units). They have a mehadrin level of kashrus (as opposed to regular rabanut). In fact, the rule in the ENTIRE army (not just the regular units) is that dairy is not allowed to be served so that they don’t accidentally come to a basar vechalav situation! It’s all pareve or besari.

    The army and the state is not trying to destroy Torah. Those accusations are sheker and Motzei sbem ra. But deep down you know why you still spout them… Because the other reasons why Charedim don’t join together in the defense of our people don’t really cut it. So you need to make things up.

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2271108
    simcha613
    Participant

    Avira- that’s an example of the sheker that is used to defend the policy of not serving in our defense. I can’t speak for early secular Zionists, but nowadays the State of Israel is not an enemy of Torah nor does the government or army want anyone to not keep Torah. The burden is the burden of both the secular and Torah community in EY as Hamas and our other enemies want to destroy all of us, and the burden of standing in between blood thirsty terrorists and our people should not be a burden that’s borne only by the secular and Dati Leumi communities.

    in reply to: Gedolei Torah and Municipal Elections #2263778
    simcha613
    Participant

    Avira- I think I downplayed the role of Yiras Shanayin to make a point… That Yiras Shanayin is not the only criteria that makes one a good politician or mayor. And that’s besides the point that it is impossible to really know which politician is more of a yirash Shanayin than the others.

    in reply to: Gedolei Torah and Municipal Elections #2263779
    simcha613
    Participant

    In these elections, no one is frei. Three are Charedi and one is Dati Leumi.

    in reply to: Gedolei Torah and Municipal Elections #2263657
    simcha613
    Participant

    Avira- as far as I can tell, the Gedolim have not personally met the candidates. So it’s hard to imagine that they can conclude that one candidate is better than another without meeting the candidates, learning about the issues, and making an informed decision. It’s possible the Gedolim have met with all the candidates, but I have a feeling it would have been publicized and as far as I know, not a single person is making that claim.

    in reply to: Gedolei Torah and Municipal Elections #2263650
    simcha613
    Participant

    UJM- First of all, Charedi doesn’t necessarily mean Yirei Shamayim, and non-Charedi doesn’t mean not a Yirei Shamayim. Secondly, that’s not even true… is a Yirei Shamayim who didn’t go to medical school a better doctor than a non-Yirei Shamayim medical professional? Would you go to your Yirei Shamayim neighbor for legal advice because the local lawyer is not one? Politics is also a combination of skill, experience, and talent. Sure, Yiras Shamayim adds to a candidate, just like it can add to any field, but it is not the only qualification, and probably not even one of the most important ones.

    in reply to: what’s the yichus of yichus? #2249277
    simcha613
    Participant

    As my rebbe says- yichus is like a bunch of zeros. If you’re also a zero, then you just have a string of zeros. But if you’re a 1, and you put that in front of your string of yichus zeros, then you’re ten, or a hundred, or a thousand. Yichus enhances a tzadik, but it doesn’t create one.

    in reply to: Why isn’t Everyone a Gaon? #2235632
    simcha613
    Participant

    Whenever there is kedushah, there is tumah to balance it out. Nevuah came with a ta’avah for avodah zarah. The plethora of Torah comes with additional distractions and worse of the internet. Becoming a Gaon is still a challenge, to access the good while weeding out the bad… it will never be easy to be gaon, even if the challenges of today differ significantly from the challenges of yesteryear.

    in reply to: You who vote Democrat #2230112
    simcha613
    Participant

    Lakewhut- I’m no Democrat but stop making this political. We have enemies on both sides of the aisle. Both parties have good players and bad players. Both parties have policies that are in line with Torah and out of line with Torah. The Torah does not dictate one or the other. Our enemy is Hamas. Our enemy is those who want to kill us and destroy our land. It’s not the Republicans, it’s not the Democrats, and it’s certainly not fellow Jews who don’t see eye to eye with you on politics. We are one people with many different opinions but let’s remember that we ALL stand together.

    in reply to: Daas Torah for Gashmius #2214306
    simcha613
    Participant

    I understand Da’as Torah a bit differently and I think there are two related points when seeking Torah advice for non halachic issues:

    1- the Torah can give a perspective on all areas of life, not just halacha and psak. Hafoch bah vehafoch bah dekula bah. However, that assumes that the Da’as Torah giving advice is also knowledgeable in that area. Da’as Torah is like a calculator- it will give you the right answer but only if you input the right information. If the Rav does not understand financial matters (for example), then his Torah perspective on the subject will be flawed because the “input” is incorrect.

    2- I think there are two aspects of Avodas Hashem- objective and subjective. Objective is halacha- we have to follow halacha and we have to follow the psak of our Rabbonim. But so many aspects of our life are not directly and explicitly dictated by halacha- that doesn’t mean we are exempt from trying to do ratzon Hashem in those areas as well. But what ratzon Hashem is in those areas are affected by each person- his personality, situation in life, challenges, family, etc… Two people can be engaged in the same situation, and the Ratzon Hashem will be different. Getting a Torah perspective from Da’as Torah in these areas is crucial, but the Da’as Torah is still lacking the personal subjective side that only each individual person knows. Ultimately, even after getting a Torah perspective, the decision rests on the individual himself how to apply that to his situation and ensure he is doing Ratzon Hashem. No Rav can tell him that.

    As an addendum to number 2- I think there is a great risk to relying on Da’as Torah blindly without factoring in our individuality. Oftentimes, when someone who doesn’t consult Rabbonim on serious, complex, and controversial issues… that person will make whatever decision he feels is best, but will usually feel some sort of guilt as there will be consequences to that decision. Nothing is ever black and white, and they will accept accountability for their decision. But I find that oftentimes, when someone blindly follows Daas Torah, they will view every situation as black and white, and they will ignore the repercussions of their decision. Even correct decisions come with consequences, and part of healthy growth is accepting responsibility and accountability for those decisions. I sometimes feel that relying on Daas Torah is a crutch for many people to dump the accountability to the Rav who is advising them, so they can mentally ignore any adverse consequences to their decision.

    simcha613
    Participant

    Avira- I agree with you that the Torah is teaching us that tragedies happen for a reason, and that we have to do the cheshbon hanefesh to correct ourselves in wake of these tragedies. I just find that more often than not, people use that argument as a way to blame others for the tragedy without looking inward. The anti-Zionists blame the Holocaust on the embrace of other Jews to secular nationalism, while the Zionists blame the Holocaust on those who were blind to the national return to our homeland. Each side conviniently washing away blame from themselves.

    Seems like that’s what’s happening here too…you and UJM subscribe to a more anti-philosophical hashkafa and surprise! it’s those other pro-philosophy Jews who are to blame for the expulsion. Of course a cheshbon hanefesh has to be done in wake of a tragedy… the Torah says so! But that’s for those other Jews who are actually to blame, right?

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 643 total)