wants to be a WIY

IF YOU CANNOT SAY FROM ???? ??? BEFORE AMIDA FORGET ????? ??????

here is something to ask your posek.

The Chayeh Adom in Klal 24 seif 31 brings an abridged emergency Amida. Is this universally accepted normative halacha? So far I havent any one else suggest it except for Sekana Shulcha Aruch 104 1 ?? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ???? ????? ???? ????

So Wolf did you accept my appology/expalnation?

Still not satisfied that I did not intend “back-of-the-hand type insults”?

---

Original Message

---

From : Rabbi Leiby Burnham[mailto:[email protected]]

Sent : 10/13/2010 5:44:24 PM

To : b*****@koshernet.com

Cc :

Subject : FW: Re: Help with a pen pal

Hi Reb Ben *****,

That is an excellent question. The problem is a significant one. The gemara records a few times in history that all the chachamim were killed except for one (Shimon Ben Shetach in Yanai’s time, Kiddushin 65A, Bava Ben Buta in the times of Herod, BB 3b) then there is also a number of times in the gemara where we have the ????? ????? ?????? such as the Osios sofios (Shabbas 104A), the shiurim for onshim (Yuma 80A), mitzvas arava (Succha 44A), and Targum (Megilla 3A) (which by the way really Onkelos’ Rebbes’ were the ones who brought it back, as seen in the gemara ????? ?? ???? ? ??????? ??? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?????.

This means that huge amounts of Torah was forgotten entirely, and brought back, and the ENTIRE oral Torah was brought back by single people twice in history. How can we be so certain that it was brought back with exactitude. Normally we support the accuracy of the Torah sh’be’al peh with the concept of rigorous debate and pilpul chaverim keeping it the way it was meant to be, but here we don’t have that!!

I will try to look into this a bit further before responding to you!

As far as the last two questions, I think the idea is as follows. Everything was shown to Moshe but not transmitted. Moshe saw that R’ Meir would later argue a certain point based on the interpretation he received from his Rabbeim all the way back to Moshe and Rav Yehuda would argue it the other way based on the interpretation he understood from his Rabbeim all the way back. (The larger question here is how do we understand machlokes if everything goes back to Moshe…)

I hope the last part is helpful and look forward to getting back to you with more about the first question! Kol Tuv, Leiby

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Mr. Ben***** ***** <b*****@koshernet.com> wrote:

??”?

The following is a synopsis of an exchange with a semi torah literate pen pal. Can you give me a brief and succinct reply?

The Gemara re the Targum says it was forgotten and Onkeles restored it. Does that apply to everything else as well? For example, were R. Tarphon’s opinions in the Mishna forgotten until he “restored” them? Or were they transmitted down throughout the generations and then when young Tarphon was learning in Bais Midrash he must have said to himself “Oh, I guess I’ll have to hold like this when I get older…?”

Does ?? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???? ????? mean that it was transmitted by Moshe Rabeinu at the time?

Granted, it’s a possibility that Tannatic opinions were given to Moshe and NOT transmitted down. But, for all practical purposes, there is no difference between Moshe receiving them and never transmitting it and the Tannaim coming up with it on their own. If you maintain that it was transmitted, then you have the paradoxical situation I described above (of young R. Tarphon finding his future opinion in the Mishna). If you maintain that it was not transmitted, then you can’t say the Tanna’s opinion is something he received from his rebbe, from his rebbe, from his rebbe… from Sinai.

???? ????

****

—

R’ Leiby Burnham

Director of Outreach

Partners In Torah

248.JUDAISM

[email protected]

A close friend who never buys lottery tickets filled his gas tank at a station in the middle of nowhere in the middle of the night.

The attendant was short $1 for change, & pushed a lottery ticket on him He won 250,000. My son’s reaction to this????? ?????

Me too! I was standing at the corner of — &— a busy intersection for 1/2 hour & ????? no one passed that was going my way

Wolf Shver? I have a son Zev but not a SIL

I aint gonna bother answering. With my typing and writing u aint gonna get anywhere.

Why dont you follow my lead and ask asktherabbi.org a preject of Gateways a major major Kiruv outfit with articulate scholars on board, http://www.rabbiullman.com/ask.htm, http://www.chabad.org/asktherabbi/default_cdo/jewish/Ask-the-Rabbi.htm, and let us know.

smiles66 ?????? ????? was the battle cry of a segement of a certain strife ridden community. I believe that now that the 2 factions are now established in their own Mosods & Kehilos that term belongs in oblivion,

here is SaygecAroszBacsi’s profile & you csn see how relevant remarks are

SaygecAroszBacsi

Member Since

October 13, 2010 (8 hours)

Location

Budapest

Occupation

Kokosh Cake Recycler

User Activity

Recent Replies

1.Common Hungarian Words User last replied: 8 hours ago. Most recent reply: 7 hours ago

Topics Started

No more topics posted.

?? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???? ?????

Do is it have to mean that it was transmitted by Moshe Rabeinu at the time? Were the tilei tilei of halachos learned from the tagim

shel halachos which were expounded by R Akiva & Revealed to Moshe Rabeinu transmitted?

More excerpts from revach.net

Shevet HaKehosi: Can You Erase Hashem’s Name If It Is Written As A Single Letter Daled or Hey?

The Rema paskens (YD 276:10) in the name of the Terumas HaDeshen that one can only erase Shem Hashem written (usually in Siddurim) as two letter “Yud”s if really necessary. The Shevet HaKehosi (4:256b) says that if the letters Dalet or Hey are used to indicate Hashem’s name, you are permitted to erase it. He brings a “Raya” from the Tosfos in Shevuos that says although the gemara says that every time it says the name “Shlomo” in Shir HaShirim it refers to Hashem nevertheless you are permitted to erase it.

If so what is special about two yud’s that you are only allowed to erase it “L’tzorech Gadol”? The Terumas HaDeshen says (2:171) that Tosfos says in the name of R. Chananel that you cannot erase the name of “Havaya” or of “Adnus” even if only the first two letters are written (i.e. Alef Dalet or Yud and Hey). Therefore says the Terumas HaDeshen that when there is two Yuds since the Yud is the first letter of Hashem’s name it is better not to erase. But it is permissible “L’Tzorech” because it is only one letter of Hashem’s name (not two) and it is followed by another Yud that is not part of Hashem’s name

Rav Moshe Feinstein: Throwing Out Transliterated Brachos

If a bracha is written in its proper Nusach with the Shem Hashem in Lashon Kodesh using English letters, does it have Kedusha or may you throw it out without worry? This question was posed to Rav Moshe Feinstein (Igros Moshe OC 2 55) regarding a fundraising campaign where they sent out Hadlakas Neiros with the Bracha to people who could not read Lashon Kodesh. The concern however was, that these people may throw it in the garbage.

Rav Moshe answered that the Shem Hashem written in English has no Kedusha whatsoever and can be thrown out. A transliterated Shem Hashem is not Hashem’s name but rather a cue to the reader to say Hashem’s name. Rav Moshe distinguishes this from two letters Yud written in a siddur, where the Rema (YD 276:10) says can be only erased L’Tzorech, in a time of need. There, says Rav Moshe, the two Yuds aside from telling us that we need to say Shem Hashem, also have significance in their own right, as the letter Yud is the first letter in Hashem’s name.

Rav Moshe however raises a different issue with regard to sending out transliterated Brachos. His concern was that the people who receive it will read it and say a Brachos Livatala. A solution for that could be to print a warning on it not to say unless you are actually lighting candles. However says Rav Moshe it is better to find a different way to raise funds.

Rav Moshe Feinstein: Happy Chanukah From Yeshiva…

Jewish institutions have a practice of sending their patrons religious gifts. Rav Moshe was asked (Igros Moshe OC 2:55) if it was permissible to send something that had transliterated Bracha on it (such as the bracha on the Chanukah candles), since it may very well be erased or burned. The issue arises if it contains Hashem’s name, but it was written in English letters. Is this considered Shem Hashem with regard to the issur of erasing?

Rav Moshe answered that if the name of Hashem is written in English as it is pronounced in Lashon Kodesh, it does not have the Din of Shem Hashem and can be erased. The reason is that it is not itself the name of Hashem since English letters have no significance other than to guide a person as to how to pronounce a word. Whereas the Aleph Bais has inherent meaning.

He differentiates this from the way Hashem’s name is written in Siddurim with two consecutive letters “Yud”, where the Rema paskens (YD 276:10) that it may only be erased for an important reason. There also, the letters are not Hashem’s name and only are used a reminder that you must say Hashem’s name at that point. However since the letter Yud is the first letter of the Shem Hashem, the Vilna Gaon says it may be assur to erase.

Nevertheless Rav Moshe recommends not to do this because people may inadvertently read it when they do not need to and it will cause a Bracha L’vatala. At the very least it should come with cautionary note, not to say the bracha unnecessarily.

Important Note: We try to convey the Tshuva to the best of our ability. We admit that our understanding may not be accurate. Please also understand that this Tshuva may not be the final word on this topic. One should consult a Rav before drawing any conclusions.

Bein Hasdorim You are right ??????? is what you suggest

didn’t hold of this gemara didn’t hold of this gemara le’maaseh. I aint jumpin’ but the Baal Hatanya MB &Aruch HaShulchan(???????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???????, ???? ?????? ???? ???, ??????? ???? ????? ?????. ??? ??? ?? ?? ???? ????? ) bring it. Even though the Mecahber dosent even though he quotes it in Bais Yosef.

If you can stomach redaing something in a periodical published by ????? ?????? a Dati Leumi there is a fascinating article @ shaalvim.co.il/torah/maayan-article.asp?id=150

I am not Shloimie but his Shver

Wolf ! To give a full picture of the transmision of Torah shBaal Pes (the Oral Tradition) “forgotten” and “restored” is far beyond the scope of an online forum. Sorry but since I am a FFB and did all my learning in the orgoanl tetx and Yiddish, my library and knowledge of English torah litreature is practically nil. Perhaps some other members of the CR can direct you.

Hasenplatz is a atreet in 71083 Herrenberg, Deutschland

try google for Hasenplatz

Answer

Aramaic became the primary language of the Jews of Babylon and Persian, much like Yiddish was the primary language of the Eastern European Jews. Of course, they used Hebrew in prayer, but they basically adopted, and adapted Aramaic as a Jewish language. See Maimonides in the MIshneh Torah, Laws of Prayer 1:4 who states that the beginning of the decline of pure Hebrew was the Babylonian Exile

Scholar Rabbi Mordechai Becher

Date Answered October 11, 2010 12:00AM

Wolf why dont you just go down to the nearest Bais Midrosh that has set of The Art Scroll shas and do a little research. Out of you realm? Then wait until I post the answe I hope to get from

ASktherabbi.org to the below Question. Hopefully it would shed some light.

What is a causality paradox?

3340 Babylonian Exile, Daniel. Aramaic becomes Jewish language. Academies of Torah study flourish in Babylon. Autonomy of internal affairs granted to Jewish community. asktherabbi.org/DisplayQuestion.asp?ID=199

Why did SBH had to find a Yerushalmi. I guess he is not a Chabadnik he does his Chumash & Rashi on Shabbos.

here is Q I posted onasktherabbi.org a Gateways project

3340 Babylonian Exile, Daniel. Aramaic becomes Jewish language. Academies of Torah study flourish in Babylon. Autonomy of internal affairs granted to Jewish community. asktherabbi.org/DisplayQuestion.asp?ID=199

I will post the answer when I get it

New2thescene offered ” If you would like, I can gladly call him and let him know that I have referred you to him as you have a family halachik situation and that you will be calling”

and growinggirlresponded “And new2thescene I think I want to take you up on your offer”

May I suggest a more direct approach

Growinggirl, you seem to be pretty good in organizing her thoughts in writing. Here is the contact info for The Star-K Institute for Halacha. Star-K is under the aegis of rabbi Heineman a senior posek in Baltimore, who has undoudbtedly dealt with such cases.

Here is another email address [email protected]. Even though the Mchon Lchoshen Mishpat’s mission is “Monetary Halacha”

you can ask the administrator to pass on your message to Horav Chaim Cohen dayan @ KAJ a world class Posek.

In closing. Just take up the courage and contact any of the Rabbonim mentioned thus far. There is nothing like personal communication