Sam2

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 351 through 400 (of 7,493 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: being Niftar Al Kiddush Hashem #1180773
    Sam2
    Participant

    We are a religion of life, not death. Being Niftar Al Kiddush HaShem is not a goal or a dream or something we should find ways to do. There is only one way for it to happen. And if HKBH decides that that is the way for one of us to go, we should be Mekabel it B’Ahavah. But there is no “test” to figure out ways to do it.

    in reply to: El Al Has Flights On Shavuos! #1151679
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: The reason for the Issur is that Devarim Shenahagu Bahem Issur Ee Atah Rashai Lehatiram Bifneihem (I might be a word or two off in that phrase). Since Yom Tov Sheni is a Minhag Bechul Tefutzos Klal Yisrael (outside of E”Y), the Shulchan Aruch rules that it is Assur to do Melacha anywhere within a Techum that Jews live. It seems Pashut that non-Frum Jews don’t count here, because they are not Noheg Issur on Yom Tov Sheni. This isn’t about Maris Ayin or Chashad. The point is that it’s Assur to be Noheg Heter in front of someone who is Noheg Issur. It’s not a Din in “Parhesia” like other things are.

    Now, your Ta’ana about people knowing the schedule is a pretty good one, but I don’t think it counts. Everyone knows that people in E”Y are Noheg Heter. That doesn’t count as being Noheg Heter in front of someone who is Noheg Issur. I hear a small Chiluk, but the point is the same. We know that our relatives/friends/whoever staying in a hotel outside of town aren’t keeping Yom Tov Sheni also, but that doesn’t count as being Meshaneh from the Minhag either. I don’t think it’s about knowledge. It’s about Mamash doing something in front of them.

    Again, your Ta’ana about El Al employees is a good one. I don’t know if that’s the airline’s issue or not. I hear both Tzdadim. But unless you want to Ta’ana that a flight attendant creates a problem of Ma’aseh Yom Tov (assuming you hold of such a thing, I think it’s a Machlokes Rishonim IIRC), then there is no issue for the passenger (if the pilot was a non-Frum Jew who lives in CHU”L, then it might be a problem).

    Pinchas: To answer your problem, look up if there is a hotel right by the airport that is not within (or near) the edge of the Five Towns. If there is, take a cab from the airport to there. There is no problem with that whatsoever (as long as you don’t have to go through the 5T to get to the hotel). Just pay for a room for 1 day and chill there until Yom Tov ends and you can enter the city.

    in reply to: El Al Has Flights On Shavuos! #1151670
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: ROB is quite right. JFK is, to quote the Shulchan Aruch, Michutz Latchum.

    in reply to: When Minhag Trumps Halacha #1180442
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: Yes, I meant for applause.

    in reply to: my daven for me partners engaged! #1150323
    Sam2
    Participant

    Feivel: I don’t think that your Pshat in the word Tzarich works with the way Rashi quotes it by VaHashem Pakad Es Sarah.

    in reply to: When Minhag Trumps Halacha #1180432
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: Of course. But it’s self-contradictory to not clap. That was his point.

    in reply to: my daven for me partners engaged! #1150302
    Sam2
    Participant

    MA: Logically, that cannot be true. Let’s say two people are Davening for each other to get engaged. Can neither therefore ever get engaged because that would mean that one is getting engaged first.

    The Midrash you are referring to is a tremendous lesson in humility and selflessness that cannot be undervalued, but presenting it as it is literally said is just foolish.

    in reply to: What if I don't want to buy back the chometz from the goy? #1150358
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: He doesn’t purchase it back. That’s not how it works. The analogy to a mortgage on a house is accurate. If you default, the bank takes the house back. All the bank can tell you is “pay up or give back the house”. They can’t force you to keep the house and pay for it. The same thing is here. It’s the Goy’s Chametz and he owes you money. You can’t force him to pay that money. What you can do, though, which is what we all do, is to tell him “either pay full price or give back the Chametz”.

    in reply to: When Minhag Trumps Halacha #1180422
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY and Benig: The concept of ???? ???? ???? actually made sense in the times of the Geonim when there were still some more or less oral traditions from the time of the Amoraim. Maybe this barely continued into the early Rishonim. Nowadays, though, the phrase really makes no sense.

    in reply to: Mezumin for girls #1150168
    Sam2
    Participant

    Shopping: Look up the Halachos of a Mezuman. It’s OC 192 in Shulchan Aruch and somewhere in the 40s in the Kitzur, I think. There are some relatively strong rules, but much of it is kinda subjective as to how to define “eating together”.

    in reply to: Mezumin for girls #1150166
    Sam2
    Participant

    Shopping: The same way it works for guys. Three eat bread and Bench together. See the Shulchan Oruch OC 192(ish).

    in reply to: Sefira – Singing and Playing Music #1150142
    Sam2
    Participant

    shmelkee: R’ Moshe famously is Mattir it in OC 1:167 (give or take). Others argue.

    in reply to: When Minhag Trumps Halacha #1180415
    Sam2
    Participant

    mik5: The Rema says (implies) that you can make the Brachos even if you didn’t sleep.

    in reply to: guest for yom tov brings chametzdik cake, puts it on the table #1150055
    Sam2
    Participant

    sy: Coke is Kitniyos. Bedieved, it’s Battel B’rov.

    in reply to: Mezumin for girls #1150164
    Sam2
    Participant

    Shopping: Women need 3. 10 women do not say Elokeinu. See what DY quoted from the Shulchan Aruch above.

    in reply to: Artscroll gemara now coming onto technology #1149517
    Sam2
    Participant

    AY: I wonder who you asked. I got that same answer from a major Posek. I also got the exact opposite answer from R’ Elyashiv (well, not me; a Posek who I was standing next to when he asked R’ Elyashiv). R’ Elyashiv said that a computer screen constitutes writing and is Assur on Chol HaMoed (and that learning Torah on a screen is really bad because it’s an Issur D’Oraisa of Lo Sa’asun Kein when you close/change the screen).

    in reply to: guest for yom tov brings chametzdik cake, puts it on the table #1150049
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: It’s a B’feirush Gemara. The cake is Muktzeh so you have to cover it with a Kli until after Yom Tov and you burn it immediately when Yom Tov ends.

    in reply to: computers on chol hamoed #1149636
    Sam2
    Participant

    Lichora whether we hold Chol Hamoed is D’Oraisa or D’Rabannan would matter here. If you hold it’s D’Rabannan, then Chazal were never Gozer typing. If it’s D’Oraisa, then I could still hear both sides.

    in reply to: Artscroll gemara now coming onto technology #1149512
    Sam2
    Participant

    MA: You clearly didn’t read my post.

    in reply to: What's with the left wing and kitniyos #1149193
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: I think that Minhagim are very strong. I’m saying Kitniyos is Assur MiTa’am Minhag, not a real D’Rabannan. It makes perfect sense to use the word “Assur” in that context, but it is not a real “Isser” per se. Does that make sense?

    And there are some real Nafka Minos here. For example, I know of major Poskim who are Mattir Kitniyos for those with (real) gluten allergies/celiac disease, because limiting them to only potatoes (and now quinoa) all of Pesach is just too much. That would never happen with something we treat as a D’Rabannan, but by a Minhag there is a tiny bit more wiggle room.

    in reply to: Artscroll gemara now coming onto technology #1149508
    Sam2
    Participant

    Comlink: Why does that matter? The Divrei Torah are what give Kedushah to the Sefer, not vice versa. Something does not need to have Kedushah to have Divrei Torah. Divrei Torah are what cause Kedushah. And in this case, according to most Poskim, the manner in which the Divrei Torah are manifested does not cause Kedushah to the device.

    in reply to: What's with the left wing and kitniyos #1149190
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: I said the strength of a Minhag was considerable. It’s not quite a real Lo Sasur (which is reserved for Issurei D’Rabannan), so I would assume that that line was Derech Melitzah.

    mw: Yom Tov Sheni is a Din D’Rabannan, even if the origin was a “Minhag”.

    in reply to: What's with the left wing and kitniyos #1149185
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: I wouldn’t say that. I would call it a Minhag not to eat it. It has the strength of any and every Minhag. Which is quite considerable.

    in reply to: Can't Eat By In-Laws Who Eat Gebrochts on Pesach #1149851
    Sam2
    Participant

    NCB: It’s a Gemara in Yevamos by doing Chalitzah with a Sandal, and the same should apply here. Once something is Nahug, not even Eliyahu can be Mevatel it.

    in reply to: Can't Eat By In-Laws Who Eat Gebrochts on Pesach #1149835
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: Why is eating off the Keilim anyway not a real solution? If it’s Muttar, then it’s the perfect solution. I’m not so familiar with different Chassidish Hanhagos, so maybe they’re more Machmir on Gebrochts than other Ashkenazim are on Kitniyos, but Kitniyos Keilim isn’t an issue. It’s an explicit Rama (Darchei Moshe) and is quoted by many Poskim, especially contemporary ones (as this problem is now much more widespread with the intermingling of Ashkenazim and Sefardim in E”Y nowadays.

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149813
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: We have somehow found a way to pay people for learning Torah, more than the Gemara seemingly allows. The Poskim discuss it and fight Heterim. But if what Health claimed isn’t a violation of Af Atem B’chinam, then nothing is.

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149811
    Sam2
    Participant

    Health: “If you want the exact Daf, go ask your Rabbi in YU, or pay me to tell you.” Sounds a lot like you’re not charging for time. You’re on the site anyway. You just want money to tell me the source. That sounds like a violation of Mah Ani B’chinam to me. Also, see Avi K’s post.

    You did not tell me where it is. You gave me a Masechta. (Actually, you gave me one of two Masechtos.) I even looked. It’s not in either of them.

    in reply to: Can't Eat By In-Laws Who Eat Gebrochts on Pesach #1149826
    Sam2
    Participant

    Both are Minhagim. Shalom Bayis probably trumps (relatively) late Minhagim. And even if it doesn’t (and I understand completely why it doesn’t), it would seem too much of a stretch to extend it to Blios in the Keilim (especially when it’s explicit in Poskim that we’re not Choshesh for Blios of Kitniyos).

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149806
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: Because he explains it in the context of the whole world attacking Eretz Yisrael then E”Y winning. (I could be wrong, I skimmed it quickly; but isn’t that what he says?)

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149804
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: So it’s not a Gemara, and he seems to say it as Eretz Yisrael will conquer the whole world, not that the whole world magically becomes part of Eretz Yisrael. (To be fair, though, I don’t think Health’s claim went contrary to that.)

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149802
    Sam2
    Participant

    DY: Can you back me up here, maybe? Does his nonexistent Gemara exist?

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149800
    Sam2
    Participant

    Health: Pay you to tell me? If you knew Gemara you’d know that it’s Assur to take money for teaching Divrei Torah like that.

    But I’m only being arrogant if I’m wrong. I’m still pretty sure I’m not wrong. There is no such Gemara. If you want to claim that there is, Alecha Lehavi Ra’aya. Quote the Gemara.

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149797
    Sam2
    Participant

    Health: How old I am isn’t relevant. I can guarantee, though, that there is no Gemara in Pesachim that says that Eretz Yisrael will be the whole world and I am pretty sure (can’t quite guarantee it, though) that there is no such Gemara in Sotah.

    It’s not about being haughty or arrogant. You claimed a Gemara existed. You didn’t provide a citation or a Daf. There is no way to prove a negative other than showing you the entire Masechta and showing that no such Gemara exists. It is unfortunate, but there is really no way to call you out for citing a fake Gemara without seeming a little bit arrogant. There is just no way to do it.

    in reply to: Do sefardim have Sushi at their pesach seder? #1149692
    Sam2
    Participant

    I believe La Choy soy sauce is completely gluten free and tastes completely normal.

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149791
    Sam2
    Participant

    Health: I do know (some) Gemara. I can’t 100% guarantee it, but I would be willing to strongly wager (yes, yes, Sanhedrin 23b and Rosh Hashana 22(ish), etc.) that there is no such Gemara anywhere in Talmud Bavli.

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149786
    Sam2
    Participant

    Health: Then what is the Zionist propaganda that you are decrying?

    “When Moshiach comes, we will have the whole world.”

    Where do you get that from? Eretz Yisrael won’t be the whole world.

    in reply to: To Mish or Not to Mish #1148765
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: One probably qualifies as “MO”. Two definitely don’t. And I once heard a major “MO” Posek defend the Minhag. So I don’t think it splits among those lines.

    in reply to: Is Zionism the Yetzer Hora? #1148743
    Sam2
    Participant

    yekke: R’ J. David/R’ Dovid Bleich was one of the major Talmidim of both R’ Moshe and R’ Soloveitchik and is a Posek and tremendous Talmid Chacham in Manhattan, and is respected by the entire world as such. (Although he is not a major Posek, and does not want to be, because he acknowledges that he has some… unique Shittos.)

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149781
    Sam2
    Participant

    Health: The Minchas Chinuch was fueled by Zionist propaganda?

    in reply to: To Mish or Not to Mish #1148763
    Sam2
    Participant

    nisht: I have heard major Talmidei Chachamim/Poskim say that the “no mishing” idea is a very inappropriate Chumra.

    in reply to: Is anti-Zionism the sin of the spies? #1149772
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: One does not have to compare Bibi and Yehoshua to point out that there can be a lesson learned (and argued upon) that Yishuv Eretz Yisrael is Doche Pikuach Nefesh. (Or, as the Minchas Chinuch would formulate it, Pikuach Nefesh was never said B’makom this Mitzvah.)

    Joseph: I believe R’ Ovadia’s sons have gone on record that he was Chozer on “land for peace”. I’ll try to find a source.

    (Derech Agav: I think everyone agrees that if giving away land would guarantee peace, then we should give away land. The only Machloksim by land for peace were whether it is Muttar to do so given that it wouldn’t work because the Arabs would still want to kill us. It’s a machlokes in “Metzius”, i.e. the sociological Metzius of the Arab communities. So when R’ Ovadia was Chozer, it wasn’t a change in Shittah, just in what he expected from the Arabs.)

    in reply to: To Mish or Not to Mish #1148752
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: All of Klal Yisrael is Raui to share one Korban Pesach. Veshachatu Oso Kol K’hal Adas Yisrael. We are not Karaites who take the simple reading of Pesukim instead of Torah Sheba’al Peh.

    (Although, just to remove a possible Stirah, it probably is Davka by Pesach Mitzrayim that you needed a Seh LaBayis because it was Assur to leave your house on Leil Pesach to eat at someone else. In fact, this answer is too good and simple that is has to be a Gemara or Chazal somewhere. Anyone help?)

    in reply to: Is Zionism the Yetzer Hora? #1148738
    Sam2
    Participant

    yekke: Yes. These are B’feirush Mishnayos in Shevi’is. Ayein Sham.

    in reply to: talmud yerushalmi #1148396
    Sam2
    Participant

    The problem with the Mizmor L’David’s explanation is that you have to be above the arctic circle to get to a point where the day is that short even at the winter solstice, and there were no Jewish communities that far north at a time when the Minhag already existed (we have no idea how old the minhag is, but it is at least 700 years old).

    The Mizmor L’David brings us to a far more important point, one which my Rebbe won’t let me be Machmir on (and certainly not Meikel, because he says such a Chumra is so not accepted so it has to be wrong), namely that the 6 hours between meat and milk should be Shaos Zmanios.

    in reply to: Is Zionism the Yetzer Hora? #1148735
    Sam2
    Participant

    Selling items that can be used B’heter is explicitly Muttar. These are Mishnayos in the 6th (7th?) Perek of Shevi’is.

    in reply to: source for double covering for a sefer #1148340
    Sam2
    Participant

    3rd Perek of Brachos. And at least one of those covers cannot be Meyuchad for the Sefer.

    in reply to: How will we know… #1149095
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: 3 days? The Gemara says the day of.

    in reply to: talmud yerushalmi #1148387
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: Yes, they start eating dairy either 5.5 hours after or a little over 5 hours after. I have seen this Minhag lots of places, including among some in Chareidi communities in Eretz Yisrael.

    in reply to: Is Zionism the Yetzer Hora? #1148716
    Sam2
    Participant

    “I’m pretty sure Jews are treated better there than in Israel!”

    Actually, Jews are currently strongly warned to avoid entering Turkey because it would be unsafe for them.

    in reply to: talmud yerushalmi #1148385
    Sam2
    Participant

    Joseph: What do you mean, “how does it work”? I don’t know where they came from, and I haven’t seen it mentioned in old Seforim, but the Minhagim are at least (from thirdhand testimony) well over 100 years old, for whatever that’s worth.

Viewing 50 posts - 351 through 400 (of 7,493 total)