Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sam2Participant
We say rummy-cube
Sam2ParticipantDY: I apologize for messing up your Brachah count.
22
Sam2Participantadocs: You didn’t see? The Iranian government explained exactly how Israel was actually behind it.
June 2, 2016 3:05 am at 3:05 am in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154323Sam2Participantnewbee: Nah, that’s just who Popa is.
Sam2Participantcharlie: The Tzomet system is the water one.
June 2, 2016 2:06 am at 2:06 am in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154320Sam2ParticipantPBA: Yes, that’s what I was going for. So hunting for fun is a bad thing and should be avoided, even if not prohibited.
Sam2ParticipantMy point was a protest, not to get the last word in. I’m sorry if that wasn’t clear.
As I had mentioned, it was clear. Some have a tendency to mock or twist words when their points are questioned. -29
Sam2Participantca: You can’t imagine Nazis asking Jews to bake swastika-shaped cakes for fun? I definitely can.
Sam2ParticipantMoshe S: There is currently one Shul in the country that identifies as Orthodox with a woman Rabbi (and their website explicitly calls them “Open Orthodox”). As far as I know, they don’t have a microphone. Even if they did, though, the RCA already said (3 times) that they’re not Orthodox.
Joseph: If I call myself Chinese and then shoot someone and claim that it’s okay because I’m Chinese, does that make all Chinese people murderers/condoners thereof? Of course not. I don’t care if someone calls themselves “Modern Orthodox” and uses that to mean “Orthodox Lite”. They’re wrong. And them being wrong doesn’t make those actually Frum people who also call themselves “Modern Orthodox” less Frum.
There are two microphone systems that some claim can be used on Shabbos. One is for sure Muttar as it doesn’t involve anything at all. It actually just uses well-placed water systems to amplify sound. There should be nothing wrong with that. The other uses a Grama and isn’t really used by any Orthodox Shul (but is used in some Orthodox old age homes, last I heard).
June 1, 2016 12:10 pm at 12:10 pm in reply to: Why the lack of Tznius on Internet Simcha sites?! #1153696Sam2Participantshopping: Because we’re human beings. We don’t see souls. Random names of people we don’t know aren’t particularly meaningful. Pictures are, because it lets us understand the people better. That’s just how we work.
Also, I find it very ironic that your choice of “cutting corners” is “not wearing socks”.
June 1, 2016 4:06 am at 4:06 am in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154276Sam2ParticipantPBA: You are assuming that Halacha=morality and that any claim otherwise is Apikorsus. I think R’ Aharon Lichtenstein disagrees with you on both counts. Read his famous article. I could easily hear the argument that we, as human beings, are meant to outlaw immoral things Mishum “V’asisa HaYashar VeHaTov”.
June 1, 2016 2:21 am at 2:21 am in reply to: Why the lack of Tznius on Internet Simcha sites?! #1153692Sam2ParticipantShopping: If you want to claim something is improper, the onus is on you. I would answer your question by saying that sometimes pictures of people help situations. It’s much easier to feel the Simcha of an engagement if you see a smiling and happy Chassan and Kallah than if it’s just names on a page. Just like a picture adds more to an obituary than the words ever would. Why do newspapers put pictures of relevant people on a story? They don’t just put pretty women to be stared at. They put people who are relevant and add to the ethos of the story (e.g. a mugshot of a criminal or a sad picture of a kid who R”L was in a tragedy and such). Putting up a picture for the purpose of being stared at does not seem like a good thing at all. Putting up a picture of a smiling Kallah so that you can feel extra happiness at her engagement does sound like a good thing to me, though.
June 1, 2016 2:16 am at 2:16 am in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154268Sam2ParticipantMW13: I never said it was Assur to hunt. Just that it’s a bad thing to do (for both Goyim and Jews). Whether we should legally mandate Middos is a fascinating tangential discussion and my long answer boils down to “sort of”.
Sam2ParticipantJoseph: Haven’t I been saying since the day I got here that it’s unfair to call them “MO” and that you slander the Halacha-observant “MO” when you mix them together? I have been arguing that since Day 1. You have been fighting my claim forever. Your last post was a vile bit of sophistry that you should retract.
Sam2ParticipantWe play that you can reorganize however you want, but to change what the Joker is you need to have the identical piece to what the Joker is currently representing. (e.g. If it’s a green 4 you can do whatever you want with it as long as it stays a green 4. If you want to change it to something else you must replace it with a green 4 from your own rack.)
May 31, 2016 5:26 pm at 5:26 pm in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154245Sam2ParticipantPBA: What can I say? I (sort of) disagree with your contention that the 613 are inculcating Middos Tovos. They are because HKBH commanded us to, and whatever Middos Tovos come out of those are tangential. If one does Shiluach HaKen without learning Rachmanus, he has not missed the point. (This is by Adam L’Makoms. It’s a Machlokes whether the same principle holds for Adam L’Chaveiros.) Mah She’ein Kein by a Goy. For a Goy, it’s only having the Middos that matter. If he can learn it without doing any of the Mitzvos he is not obligated in, great. Because all he has to do is be a good person. But practicing Achzariyus is still bad for him and will not help him get to that point of being a good person. It might not be Assur. But it’s just not a good idea. Same with the Jew practicing non-Assur ways of Achzariyus.
Sam2ParticipantAY: Relatives and such will say Kaddish on the Yahrtzeit, as is customary. This Kaddish is a national Kaddish for everyone?
Why do you assume that the Zechus is any different on a Yahrtzeit than any other day, by the way?
Sam2ParticipantFrom independendentpoliticalreport. com
“During the first hour of the Libertarian Party presidential forum that aired Friday night on the Fox Business Network, leading Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson admitted that in his view, Jewish bakers should be forced by government to bake wedding cakes for Nazis.
The second hour of the forum will air next week on the Fox Business Network.”
May 31, 2016 3:40 pm at 3:40 pm in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154239Sam2ParticipantPBA: Fakhert. If it’s a Mitzvah, it’s something Meyuchad to us that may or may not have an attached message. If it’s just about Middos Tovos, then it should be universal. Again, why should Goyim not have good Middos also?
May 31, 2016 6:01 am at 6:01 am in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154236Sam2ParticipantPopa: Why is it any less improper for Goyim to train themselves to be Achzarim than it is for Jews? Neither is Assur. Both are bad.
Sam2ParticipantTo answer the questions, because the two countries treat the day differently. In America, it’s a vacation day where, maybe, you read an article about a veteran in the newspaper/online or give a small donation to the VA/other veteran services.
In Israel, it’s kinda a huge deal so the people make it a huge deal.
Sam2ParticipantJoseph: Charlie’s point is pretty fair here. Most Frum self-identifying “MO”s do agree on certain issues, that’s why they identify as MO and not something else. Rabbi Gordimer has publicly (and strongly) stated that some of those things are completely beyond the pale, such as Yoatzot Halachah. He is certainly right on Chovevei and PORAT and other such things, but it might be untrue and unfair to call him “Modern Orthodox”. He’s somewhere between “MO” and Yeshivish.
May 30, 2016 5:19 pm at 5:19 pm in reply to: Stealing permitted in order to save ones life? #1153446Sam2ParticipantBy us Rabbonim, Gedolei Torah are held in the highest esteem, their word is the word of G-D.
I don’t know how far “Daas Torah” (I find it weird that a fundamental of faith is found nowhere in Shas) is supposed to extend, but I do know that it’s not this far. This is actual borderline Avodah Zarah. I have always wondered why R’ Shimon HaAmsuni never Darshened “Es” Lerabos Talmidei Chachamim. He was probably worried that some would take it as far as you did.
I love that Little Froggie from the Heilege Coffee Room gets to determine who has Daas Torah or not, though. How do you have a right to say who doesn’t have Daas Torah. I know there are Gedolim who would not agree with your definition. So who makes you the arbiter?
DY: It’s a Machlokes Acharonim when saying Eilu V’Eilu ends. But it clearly only goes to the point where a Sevara is necessarily correct. So it definitely goes up to Stimas HaShas (though I would venture that the statements that are called “Badusa/Barusa” might not be included because the Gemara tells us they’re objectively wrong). After that will be a a matter of debate, but it depends until when you’re allowed to hold someone is wrong. Either way, though, it’s only relevant to Torah statements.
May 30, 2016 3:07 pm at 3:07 pm in reply to: Stealing permitted in order to save ones life? #1153435Sam2ParticipantDY: Yes, that’s also a Chelek of Torah Sheba’al Peh.
May 30, 2016 2:06 pm at 2:06 pm in reply to: Stealing permitted in order to save ones life? #1153430Sam2ParticipantDY: I’m pretty sure that when the phrase is used in the Gemara, it refers to something that is a Chelek of Torah Sheba’al Peh. Unless you want to tell me that HKBH told Moshe about the Holocaust at Har Sinai (and with the intention of that information being passed down), then it’s not Divrei Elokim Chaim. (Right, that’s the point. Torah Sheba’al Peh is straight from HKBH, and both Drashos/possibilities/etc. were given at Sinai. It’s not Stam a statement by human beings.)
Sam2Participantmw13: Frum MO have always acknowledged dangers. No one wants their kids to live on a college campus (with a few exceptions). Everyone filters what television and movies and books and such that kids can read/watch. It has never been totally Hefker. With a few exceptions, most are realizing that kids living on college campuses is a bad idea.
Sam2ParticipantHealth and ubiq: This is silly. You’re both right. You’re both wrong. There are legal analysts who say both ways because it’s not explicit and it’s never gone before the Supreme Court. Most conventional legal analysts say like ubiq, but there are also those who say like Health.
May 30, 2016 12:55 pm at 12:55 pm in reply to: Stealing permitted in order to save ones life? #1153428Sam2ParticipantThe words of Gedolim are Divrei Elokim Chaim? I… I don’t even know what that means. Gedolim are Elohim Chaim? That sounds like Avodah Zarah. They’re Nevi’im? That’s just not true (and against a Gemara). If you have a point to make here, LF (I think you do, even if I strongly disagree), but I think you overreached with that line.
May 30, 2016 3:17 am at 3:17 am in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154204Sam2ParticipantPeople are crazy. The internet lets all of the crazies gather. The vast majority realize that the killing of the gorilla was unfortunate, but necessary.
May 27, 2016 7:04 pm at 7:04 pm in reply to: Stealing permitted in order to save ones life? #1153409Sam2ParticipantSee Rashi Bava Kama 60b and the Achronim there about stealing to save one’s life.
No one ever has said that it’s Muttar to steal in order to learn.
May 27, 2016 7:01 pm at 7:01 pm in reply to: Why the lack of Tznius on Internet Simcha sites?! #1153673Sam2Participantnisht: Maybe 5th, maybe 7th. Somewhere in the 11-13 years old range.
Sam2ParticipantThere is a You Tube video that he admits that Joe is right!
I just watched it!
You found a YouTube video? It must be true!
I guess 9/11 was done by the American government. Or Israel. Or Al Gore. I can find videos proving all three of those on Youtube.
Sam2Participantcharlie: Don’t you agree with hugely slashing the military budget?
May 27, 2016 4:26 am at 4:26 am in reply to: Zionist Rabbi: Hareidi Cities should Guard Themselves #1153064Sam2Participantnisht: Oh, he was certainly wrong too. I just think you went too far in your response.
Sam2Participantmw13: It might be true. It’s still a very rude thing to say. But mik5 has no way to know it’s true. Fires happen. They exist. Sometimes accidents happen. But it’s not always due to Chillul Shabbos.
I was once at a funeral R”L of a 12-year-old who got hit by a car. Some retarded Menachem Avel, who thought it would make the bereaved father feel better to know that his child was perfect, said (I remember this close to verbatim), “Don’t think that your son did anything wrong, CH”V. The Gemara says that when a child under Bar Mitzvah dies, it’s only because of the Aveiros of the parent.” Needless to say, the Avel was not very comforted. Now, the statement might also be true, but in context it is a disgusting and retarded thing to say.
May 26, 2016 6:46 pm at 6:46 pm in reply to: Zionist Rabbi: Hareidi Cities should Guard Themselves #1153056Sam2Participantnisht: For the most part, Gedolim don’t release statement. Many times (not always, maybe not even often, but it certainly happens) someone will want a certain statement and craft a question in order to get the answer they want. I’ve seen it happen. Or, sometimes, people will just outright lie about what a Gadol said because they trust that no one will check it.
May 26, 2016 1:39 am at 1:39 am in reply to: Zionist Rabbi: Hareidi Cities should Guard Themselves #1153040Sam2ParticipantDY: That is an absurd statement. There is no quota for Talmud Torah. Hakadosh Baruch Hu expects the best of our abilities, nothing more and nothing less. There is no “burden” of Torah study in the same sense as the army. It’s not like HKBH expects X Blatt per day or X hours per day and if He gets less then He punishes us. This kind of assumption is a gross violation of several basic principles, most notably Echad HaMarbeh… There are excellent reasons to say that Chareidim shouldn’t join the army. What you said isn’t one of them. What you said was a level of silliness and Amaratzus that I have learned not to expect from you.
Sam2Participantfeivel: I think you’re just imagining it. 🙂 I respond to threads when I think I have something relevant to say, but only when I don’t not want to get involved in a discussion. That’s why both my posts in this thread have been tangential. I don’t want to get involved, really, but those two were easy points to make without making a commitment to the conversation.
Oh, and Poe’s Law to adocs’ satirical post.
Sam2ParticipantI am seriously, seriously considering it.
Sam2Participantfeivel: If *xe wants to be
Sam2Participant51 minutes ago, DY’s subtitle read “Joseph?”
Joseph: Well done.
May 25, 2016 4:08 am at 4:08 am in reply to: Why the lack of Tznius on Internet Simcha sites?! #1153657Sam2Participantnisht: I wouldn’t believe the story myself but I was there. I was shocked and, like I said, I have no idea what his Cheshbon was. I won’t name him, but I still don’t get it.
Franco: I’m not saying it’s okay. Chas Veshalom.
As to the Taana that people might see this and think it’s okay, I don’t really hear it. Anyone with any modicum of Halachic knowledge knows it’s not okay. The fact that people are dishonestly Moreh Heter with themselves doesn’t change that.
Sam2ParticipantWhat? Who in their right mind thinks that DY is Joseph? Where on Earth did that come from?
Sam2Participantfeivel: His question pre-supposed that listening to music while going to sleep was Assur. If that’s the assumption, then he’s clearly not utilizing a psychological necessity Heter. Otherwise, the point of discussion would not be a capella.
Sam2Participantfeivel: If that’s not exactly what the Rama was Assering, I don’t know what is. Either way, that’s not a Heter based on the Shaila, that’s a side-Heter that might trump any music Issur in the first place.
May 24, 2016 9:17 pm at 9:17 pm in reply to: Why the lack of Tznius on Internet Simcha sites?! #1153649Sam2ParticipantDY and feivel: I won’t go into detail, but I think a fair Chiluk is whether the picture can in any way be considered provocative (mods, if you want to replace that word with another one by all means feel free; I just can’t think of a better one for this situation). Without giving examples to the other side, I think it would be fair to publish the hand-holding pictures or where there is slight touching because those are not pictures that would cause Hirhurim in people who view it. If there were pictures that would, then obviously they should not be published.
and feivel, a Chareidi Rabbi told someone I know in 6th grade that being Shomer Negiyah was just a Chumra. I don’t know what his Cheshbon was in saying that or whether he was just an extreme Am Ha’aretz, but to this day I have not forgiven him for letting that girl’s entire class think that it wasn’t really a thing.
Sam2Participantfeivel: While I appreciate your zealousness in pointing out when other posters say ridiculous things, you happen to be wrong in this case.
From Wikipedia about Measles:
“In 1980, the disease is estimated to have caused 2.6 million deaths per year.[4] Before immunization in the United States between three and four million cases occurred each year.[6] Most of those who are infected and who die are less than five years old.[4]”
You are correct in pointing out that Mumps was very rarely fatal.
Sam2ParticipantSoT: It’s a Rama, not R’ Moshe. According to that, a capella should be Muttar because we define it as “not music”. (That is leaving aside those Poskim who hold that a capella that is made to sound professional does count as music. According to them, it would be Assur.)
May 24, 2016 3:18 pm at 3:18 pm in reply to: Why the lack of Tznius on Internet Simcha sites?! #1153621Sam2ParticipantFranco: I have wondered about that myself. I think it is both sad and nice (don’t lose me, I’ll explain) at the same time. It is certainly sad that we have so many people like that. And we should work so that our communities care more about it. But at the same time, people are engaged and it’s a Simcha and it’s nice that we are willing to celebrate with them and post whatever pictures they send in, even if it’s not a picture we would ever take ourselves (within reason, obviously). Can you imagine how hurt a couple would be if the sites refused to post their picture because they were touching each other?
Sam2ParticipantI’m really bad at this game. I don’t get how it works.
13
-
AuthorPosts