Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sam2Participant
It’s under the Cherem of Rabbeinu Gershom, as well as an Issur D’Oraisa, probably several.
Sam2ParticipantMsseeker, I hope you were being facetious. If you weren’t, I refer you to the Shulchan Aruch I quoted above (Orach Chayim 53:18).
November 24, 2011 6:14 pm at 6:14 pm in reply to: Eating at peoples houses with teenage daughters? #984033Sam2ParticipantDo married couples never see each other in the Chassidish world (honest question)? Still, I think there’s a difference between making some type of Eitza Tovah and actually making a Takanah against something.
November 24, 2011 6:36 am at 6:36 am in reply to: What is the hashkafa at Rabbi Chate's Yeshiva? #841139Sam2ParticipantThey are pure Maimonedians. From the Yad to the Moreh.
November 24, 2011 1:16 am at 1:16 am in reply to: Eating at peoples houses with teenage daughters? #984012Sam2ParticipantThat is absolutely ridiculous. Someone should be happy with their spouse and know that they have different Yisronos and different Chesronos than everyone else. Let’s Assur ever being nice to each other because we can come up with some ridiculous problem that could come out of that. Let’s Assur all human interaction. No Arayos, no Lashon Hara, no problems.
Sam2ParticipantOnce again, Hashem Paskening something is different than a historical proof as to what the Sanhedrin Hagadol Paskened. Eilu V’eilu applies to Hashem too. Even though He has His P’sak He gave us the Reshus to overrule Him because of Lo Bashamayim Hi. We don’t have the Reshus to overrule the Sanhedrin Hagadol and Chazal. If we could know, with certainty, what they Paskened then we would have to follow them.
November 23, 2011 7:28 pm at 7:28 pm in reply to: Eating at peoples houses with teenage daughters? #983992Sam2ParticipantI have never heard of such a thing, though I guess I should have. It felt ridiculous at first, but if you avoid teenagers ever seeing someone of the opposite gender (especially when they’re too young to date) I see no reason why a Shabbos meal would be different. Still, I can’t see how this wouldn’t destroy communities if no families would ever eat with each other once they have kids of the opposite gender.
Sam2ParticipantRav Schachter quotes that story. The Gemara brings that story as proof for what the Tzitz looks like and it seemed like the Maskana is like the Rabbi who says he saw it. The question everyone asks on the Rambam is why he Paskens against that opinion. Rav Schachter said that the Rambam would answer that how did he know he saw the real Tzitz in Rome? Maybe the Tzitz that they have in their storehouses was a fake or maybe those in charge at the end of Bayis Sheni (who were at times Tzeddukim) made the Tzitz incorrectly. (Actually, IMO it would make sense that a Tzedduki Tzitz would be in one line like a Pashut reading of the Passuk, right?)
Sam2ParticipantRav Schachter also agrees that it has to be definitive (real definitive) proof. As long as you can make a Ta’ana on it then it’s not historical enough. I don’t see what Paskening against Hashem has to do with historical proofs though.
Sam2ParticipantJothar: Can/do they answer the Ray’ah from Bava Basra?
Sam2ParticipantMoi Aussi: Can you provide a source for these “most Poskim”? We do the right side first for everything (except for tying shoes and removing clothes), so why should this be different? Maybe they say it’s similar to removing clothes, but there’s no way the reason is that “we should always move to the right”.
Sam2ParticipantIt depends on what you mean. If someone is learning science to help their Talmud Torah and to understand Hashem’s world, then it’s Muttar (see Rama YD 245, I believe). If someone’s learning Mada to get a job, that’s also fine. If someone’s learning science to attack Judaism or to try and make Judaism fit in with the scientific world, that’s bad.
Sam2ParticipantOomis: I don’t think we hold like that. In fact, two words in the Tochacha would seem to hold against that.
Sam2ParticipantShulchan Aruch Orach Chayim 53:18. That is all I have to say on this issue.
Sam2ParticipantBy the way, Rav Moshe Paskens that since everyone means “God” when they say “Hashem” that if you say “Hashem” in the context of a Bracha it’s like you said Shem Shamayim. This is against a very large number of the earlier Poskim though (he acknowledges that; he’s disagreeing with an Eitzah to say “Hashem” instead of AD– in a case of Safek Brachos).
I find it very hard to believe that someone said to say it in Hebrew without understanding rather than English and understand it. We Pasken that a little bit with Kavanah is better than a lot without.
Sam2ParticipantRav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach says that this Halacha does not apply if the person is Davening in a place where he knows that people will have to walk within 4 Amos of him (e.g. most places in a Beis Midrash, anywhere near the aisle).
Rav Shlomo Zalman supposedly used to say that if someone is blocking the aisle by Davening Shmoneh Esrei you can physically move him.
I was also once told a story by someone who was once Davening in an aisle and someone behind him started, very loudly, to say “nu, nu”. After 3 or 4 times the guy couldn’t take it anymore and turned around to shush the person who was disturbing his Shmoneh Esrei. He was mortified to find that the person he was about to shush was Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach!
Sam2ParticipantThanks. I wish I remembered if it was Rav Schachter’s or my own though. I’m pretty sure it’s his but I’m not positive. I’ve been trying to remember which Shiur he said the idea in so I can listen to it again and figure it out.
Sam2ParticipantRav Schachter says that such an idea is ridiculous. He says that whenever we can prove something (really prove it) based on history that we have to adjust accordingly. His proof (I think he said the proof; if he didn’t it’s a great proof for the concept anyway) is the Gemara in Bava Basra where one of the Amoraim saw the Meisei Midbar and the other Amoraim called him a fool for not checking to see if their Tzitzis were like Beis Hillel or Beis Shammai. Even though the Mesorah was that the Halacha is like Beis Hillel against Beis Shammai (Beis Shammai B’makom Beis Hillel Aina Mishnah) they would have changed the Mekubal Halacha based on real historical proof.
Sam2ParticipantYou should ask a Rabbi, but I would assume that it’s not proper to say a Brachah half in one language and half in another.
Sam2ParticipantFine n dandy: That’s ridiculous. We do everything from the right first. That’s the Halacha. You’re really going to let politically-associated terms from the French Revolution determine Halacha for us?
Sam2ParticipantMik5: You’re not wrong. Many people (it is most, flushing is the same as throwing out, not as burning) are Noheg something which would apparently indicate that they don’t hold that will happen.
Sam2ParticipantBTGuy: Kadosh things happen in Lakewood. Eretz Yisrael has Kedusha.
Yitay: That’s not a fair comparison. The completely not-frum guy living in Tel Aviv is still Yotzai the Mitzvah of living in Eretz Yisrael. The biggest Talmid Chacham in all of Lakewood (or anywhere else in CHU”L) is not.
Sam2ParticipantDo not check your Tefillin. That is a bad idea unless you have some reason to think they might be Passul. You are allowed to rely on the Chazakah that your Tefillin are Kosher for you entire life. If you actually check and find out they are Passul then you are in trouble. Once again, your Tefillin are Halachically Kosher even if some time over the last 50 years the Klaf inside deteriorated. If you check and find out that they have, you will be Megaleh Lemafrea that your Tefillin have not been Kosher for who-knows-how-long.
Sam2Participant“God” is a much better word. Also, it’s probably best not to Daven in two languages in one sentence, so saying everything in English and only Hashem’s name in Hebrew is probably not the best.
Sam2ParticipantReal-brikser: Calling Lakewood Hashem’s land is absurd. It denies any inherent Kedusha in any places in the world and implies that “Hashem’s land” is where Jews do Mitzvos.
BTGuy: There are Mishnayos that discuss the Kedusha of different places. Lakewood isn’t one of them. (I’m not saying it’s not a great place to live or anything, just denying this absurd concept that it has any inherent holiness.)
Sam2ParticipantBefore everyone keeps misquoting it, what the Gemara actually says (Bava Basra 11a or 10a, somewhere around there I believe) is “those who are above (in this world) are below (there) and those who are below (in this world) are above (there).” Everyone has a different P’shat as to what that Aggadta means. You can’t quote someone else’s P’shat and say that any given P’shat is wrong.
Sam2ParticipantClever: It is both. There are times to Daven like a servant before a king and times like a child before a father. Neither one is ever wrong. Just like there are things you would only ask of a king so too there are things you would only ask of a father. You wouldn’t ask the king for a lollipop, but you would always ask a father for one.
Sam2ParticipantClever: Not at all. It doesn’t cheapen it when a kid asks their father for both an XBOX and a lollipop. HKBH can give us anything, no requests are harder for Him than others. We should ask Him for everything. He loves to hear from us, whether we’re asking for an XBOX or a lollipop.
Sam2ParticipantReal-brisker: Are you comparing Lakewood to Eretz Yisroel? I advise you to look up the Meshech Chochmah about what the Jews said about Germany.
November 22, 2011 3:51 pm at 3:51 pm in reply to: H-a-s-h-e-m H-e-l-p M-e F-i-n-d A S-h-i-d-d-u-c-h-!-! #888438Sam2ParticipantI find that very hard to believe as we do not make personal Bakashos on Shabbos.
Sam2ParticipantThe Poskim don’t really discuss the concept of destroying things that you cut off your body. They only mention throwing away your nails because the Gemara says it can cause a woman to lose her baby. This is a Kaballah issue which most people are not concerned about. As was mentioned, do you burn the hair you cut off?
Sam2ParticipantMDD: “Do not judge” is not a Jewish principle because Judaism never had to deal with a mass of people who weren’t frum and didn’t completely leave Jewish society at the same time (we had similar cases in Bayis Sheini, but there the non-Mesora Jews were actively trying to sway the Frum Jews, which is no longer the case nowadays). Nowadays we have to deal with an issue that we’ve never dealt with before. If we still has Misos Beis Din these non-Frum Jews would be in trouble. How to deal with them would be up to a Sanhedrin. For us, we just need to live our own lives and let the Kiruv professionals and their Poskim decide the best way to help the most Jews do the most Mitzvos possible.
Sam2ParticipantI meant HKBK, by the way. That’s probably a bad typo.
Sam2ParticipantThrowing them in a garbage where they will never be stepped on by people is perfectly fine. (And no, don’t tell me that the Gemara is against me. “Zorkan” there literally means to throw them out in public where people will walk, not in a location designated for trash where no one will ever go.)
Sam2ParticipantKBHK understands everything.
Sam2ParticipantWe assume that Nivul Peh includes 4-letter words, but the Gemara (Shabbos 33a) might seem to imply that it only includes talking about inappropriate (Arayos) things.
Sam2ParticipantWhy would it be Assur? You can Daven for anything you want and Hashem always listens. Of course, you’re probably competing against many other people Davening (for both teams) and affecting the game probably comes to Bechirah Chofshis issues (for the players), so it’s probably unlikely that the outcome of the game will be affected by your Teffilos. But the Tefillos never go to waste and HKBH keeps them somewhere for a time when they are needed.
As an aside, I once heard someone joke that the reason the Yankees are historically so good is because they always have the most Jewish and Frum fans so they have a stronger Koack Hat’fillah than any other team.
Sam2ParticipantWhat’s the difference between Modern Hebrew and Biblical Hebrew? A few words were dropped and new words (mostly based off Tanach) were added in for modern inventions. They’re basically the same language, with a few tiny differences in details.
Sam2ParticipantMDD: That is true in theory. In reality, if you would force that on every Ba’al T’shuvah then we would have no one ever be Chozer Bis’shuvah. That’s why we let the Kiruv professionals help each person determine what they are willing to accept and when.
Sam2ParticipantBy the way, the last Perek (second to last?) in Sotah should answer all of these questions.
Sam2ParticipantAl Pi Kaballah some say to burn everything that was once a part of your body- scabs, nails, hair, etc.
Sam2ParticipantHow can you have Kavanah if you don’t even understand what the words mean? People who understand Hebrew at least know the basic meaning of the words. If you actually don’t know what the words mean then of course it’s better to Daven in English.
Sam2ParticipantI never cut them on Motzai Shabbos because I feel like it’s rude towards Shabbos but there is no Halachic source for that.
The Gemara says that a pregnant woman who walks over clippings can lose her baby. We assume that this is for mystical reasons, but I was once given an excellent practical Pshat. Someone pointed out to me that it was entirely possible that a pregnant woman who stepped on a nail felt like she had just been bitten by a scorpion and lost her baby due to the trauma/fear.
November 21, 2011 3:48 pm at 3:48 pm in reply to: Any good segulah for helping the childless? #829306Sam2ParticipantThe two most effective Segulos are Davening and seeing a fertility doctor.
Sam2ParticipantIt’s Thursday because then it begins growing back on Shabbos. They begin growing back in earnest, Al Pi Kaballah, on the third day. And don’t use the word “Assur”. Many might be Noheg not to do it, but there are many Poskim who don’t hold of the whole Halacha. In fact, it’s brought down that because you shouldn’t cut them both on the same day (and that Halacha trumps the 3rd day before Shabbos one) that you should cut your toenails on Thursday and your fingernails on Friday Lekavod Shabbos.
Sam2ParticipantIt’s not that she’s allowed. A woman is obligated to cut both her toenails and fingernails before she goes to the Mikvah.
Sam2ParticipantM22: Gathering them up is very important. But you don’t have to catch them in a tissue. Often the most effective way is to cut them right above the toilet and just flush them afterwards.
Sam2ParticipantBrotherofurs: I have never seen that but it would make sense based on a Rama in another place.
Sam2ParticipantLashon Hakodesh is Hebrew, I’m not sure what he meant. Yes, you can daven in English. You can even say Shema in English (in theory), but it has to be a precise translation which is very hard for us to make.
November 21, 2011 12:14 am at 12:14 am in reply to: Who, alive today, can answer questions like R Aryeh Kaplan? #828752Sam2ParticipantIt is silly to say that “all the Gedolim” say that he borders on heresy. Many do, but he does have the support of a number of Gedolim as well.
-
AuthorPosts