Richmond Braun

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bli Neder no music until all hostages are free #2300900
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Very chashuv. Maybe some should adopt no music till all jewish sick are healed. Untill all non frum jews do tshuva.

    in reply to: Killing lice on shabbos #2300898
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    The main problem is that because some of us, especially in the charedi community are taught to assume that Chazal knew everything, therefore if we seem to find something unknown to them that might deter some people. But we must realize that just like a rav today works with his knowledge if a given issue, say, electricity and cannot base halachic ruling based on info to be discovered thereabout in 50 years from now, so too did chazal pasken according to the science of the day. There is nothing belittling about that. We find explicit passages where a chacham paskened a certain way and was then rebutted based on info reported by doctors of the day (see Niddah daf …). I believe this approach is one of the valid ones out there. See also Rabbi Meiselman’s Book: Torah Chazal & Science for a comprehensive study of these issues.

    in reply to: Why does Yiddish butcher Hebrew #2300897
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    The truth is that so called modern “Hebrew” butchers the real Hebrew much more than Yiddish. In fact, someone like myself who only began reading modern hebrew as an adult can barely swallow the utter twisted and distorted Hebrew used today even in Yeshivishe Sforim and kol shekain in more coarse usage. Very unpalatable. Just one example: it’s mostly twisted to fit the English grammar.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2198675
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Neville,
    “Sadly, this discussion transcends the YWN coffeeroom. There is this whole website dedicated to making exactly the types of arguments we’re seeing here that I came across. There is a major constituency of people who want to argue all eruvin are inherently kosher and twist Reb Moshe’s words to sound like even he would agree. Rest assured, you haven’t gone insane; all the things you are saying are the normative shittah.”

    (cont. from my last post)
    We were only dealing with certain cities such as Brooklyn in particular.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2198674
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Neville,
    “Sadly, this discussion transcends the YWN coffeeroom. There is this whole website dedicated to making exactly the types of arguments we’re seeing here that I came across. There is a major constituency of people who want to argue all eruvin are inherently kosher and twist Reb Moshe’s words to sound like even he would agree. Rest assured, you haven’t gone insane; all the things you are saying are the normative shittah.”

    Sorry, but no one argued that all eruvin are inherently kosher. Each city or neighborhood has to be paskened on seperately, based on its unique properties.

    In fact, take rabbi hershel shachter of the OU, he holds that Manhattan is NOT a reshus harrabim while his summer town, Tannersville, NY IS a reshus harabim (assuming we don’t go by the 600,000 criterion).

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2198673
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Neville,
    “Ah, ok. So, it’s just that you guys feel qualified to “correct” the posek hador. ”

    Please re-read my post: I am not correcting the posek hador, rather the information he was fed by people who had sinas eruvin. To the contrary, according to the facts Rav Moshe presents in his teshuvah, he is of course one hundred percent right. The problem is that those facts don’t represent reality.
    I’m actually wondering whether you ever read the teshuvos inside?
    Apparently not. It’s for free on HebrewBooks, so why do I have to write them out to you. Go ahead and learn them.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2198141
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    youdontsay,
    Thank you.
    As for #6, I meant it for good measure.
    Especially since Ocean County has more than 600,000 and who knows how RMB would reckon Lakewood limits? He might have said that since one can continue through streets from Lakewood to Howell and so on perhaps throughout the whole county then it’s all one. Besides, being that Rt 9 runs through the city, and it surely “services” 600000, he might deem all streets mfulashim to rt 9 from one side and to some other highway from the other and all become public domain. However, all I wrote about RMB is my own surmising as I have not studied his shitah properly as of late. So if I’m wrong than I repent.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2198121
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Neville,
    ” if there was a change in metzius between Reb Moshe’s psak and now, tell us what it was”
    Well, there actually wasn’t. It’s just that the metzius was actually kosher to begin with but Rav Moshe worked with a superimposed one.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2198111
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Neville,
    Since you do seem to be clear yourself about Rav Moshe’s shittah, let me ask you a few questions or riddles and we’ll see if you can answer them without looking them up first (we’ll take your word for that):
    1) Which Volume and Siman is the teshuva about Flatbush and which about Boro Park?
    2) What are the facts and statistics that Rav Moshe states and upon which he bases his prohibition?
    3) What did Rav Dovid ben Rav Moshe pasken regarding West Rogers Park (I wonder if you know where that is without searching)?
    4) In what respect is West Rogers Park equal or different than Brooklyn?
    5) In what respect is Kew Gardens Hills equal or different than Brooklyn?
    6) How can there be even the neighborhood eruvin in Lakewood today, if according to Rav Aharon (as well as Rav Moshe Weissman, Rav Bick, Rav Soloveitchik x2, and on and on) most of them are reshus harabim?
    7) How can some chasidim who emigrated from Boro Park (where they don’t use the eruv) to Linden and its environs suddenly be able to establish an eruv which wouldn’t work according to all the poskim in question 6?
    8) Why are people when they’re in Flatbush they wouldn’t use the eruv yet when they’re, say, in Baltimore they’re happy to use one – being that practically the only posek that would distinguish between them is Rav Moshe?

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2197802
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    TunaFish
    Would you please elaborate on your story? I mean, what do you mean he was used to carry; to carry where? In CH? After they made an eruv? So there is an eruv. Or is he used to it from elsewhere? Anyway I’m not sure what you’re trying to get across.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2197716
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    youdontsay,
    I found an old post of yours which states:
    “You see an oral explanation cannot be in direct contradiction to a written teshuvah. The fact is Rav Moshe maintained that an eruv cannot be erected in any part of an area of 12 mil by 12 mil containing a population of approximately 3 million. Therefore, it is irrelevant (based on Rav Moshe’s teshuvos) if an area encompassing such a population consisted of individual neighborhoods, since an eruv cannot be erected in any part of this area. Sorry, Rav Moshe could not have made such a distinction.”

    Now, when you say that one can make in a subsection of Brooklyn, does that mean A) even when Brooklyn would meet the 12×12 mil criterion, or B) only when it would not (which you state it doesn’t – just like KGH doesn’t). If you’ll say A) then you’re contradicting what you wrote in the old post I referenced.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2196928
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    n0mesorah,
    Yes, I happen to have an inkling of what its about. Therefore I state what I state.
    I’m actually wondering whether you do.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195672
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    I would like to share a discussion I had on another site.
    Someone said his rav suggests he doesn’t visit BP on Shabbos so not to witness chilul shabbos by frum people i.e. carrying with their eruv.
    To which I replied:
    Well, according to this silliness, perhaps you shouldn’t visit Chicago or Cincinatti, Detroit or Denver, Toronto or Montreal, LA or Lakewood, NJ. as most of them are RESHUS HARRABIM D’ORAYSA ACCORDING TO RAV AHARON KOTLER, RAV AHARON SOLOVEITCHIK, HIS BROTHER RAV YOSHE BER, RAV YAAKOV KAMENETZKY, RAV MOSHE WEISMAN OF YETZIOS HASHABOS, RAV MOSHE BICK, THE MISHKENOS YAAKOV (forgive my order not according to proper kavod) and others. Ella mai, they have their poskim? Well Boro Park also has its poskim whom they follow and they have no obligation to follow even Rav Moshe who purportedly assers. Especially when they feel that it does satisfy Rav Moshe’s criteria.
    I don’t recall anywhere that if Bais Shammai married off a tzaras habas to a yavam, that Bais Hillel wouldn’t attend, saying: “how can we attend a chasuna of chiyuv kares?!”
    ודי בזה לחכימא ברמיזא ובזה אחתום ושלום יהי’ לנו ולכל ישראל עד העולם אמן

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195671
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Neville,
    As I wrote in an earlier post. If you want to know the basis of the GBE why not reach out to them, they’d be glad to explain it to you.
    Anyway, if you ever learned the pertinent halachos, you’d realize that the halachic mechanism used is not involving any mekil shitos. It’s just as good, and perhaps better, than many out of town eruvs you’re used to.
    And no, nobody is following them blindly. One either has a rav to ask his shaila, and if not, and he chooses to rely on the rabbanim behind this eruv then he is in pretty good stead, better than anybody opening seltzer bottle caps on Shabbos, even plastic ones for which The heter isn’t nearly as clear in the gedolei haposkim as is the eruv. (Although it is perfectly fine if one follows the matirim for the bottle caps.)

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195530
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Avira,
    Fact is MOST chasidishe poskim DID approve. Even those who didn’t are mostly for political reasons vd”l. The reason you got the impression you did is because of propaganda of the anti camp.

    Edited
    The simple proof is that most of them have or had house or block eruvs which wouldn’t work according to the litvishe who really hold against. Then when it became a normal city eruv with a good hechsher suddenly they oppose. Politics. Period. There’s much more to say. Do your homework.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195513
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    I will (hopefully…) end off my contribution to this thread that it’s not that I, personally, actually believe in any city eruv in principle. My thesis is just that if Klal Yisroel, (including at least many of those who have a hard time with Brooklyn eruvs) accepts the city eruv as a concept in general, then they shouldn’t make a fuss about Brooklyn eruvs either. For that city has just as much heter to rely on an any other city (according to 99% of Poskim, and I mean poskim – not lamdanim or baalebatim).
    Even if most litvishe can’t get through their heads that Brooklyn MAY be accommodated according to Rav Moshe, they must realize that we had great poskim both before and after him who do not agree with him.
    Hashem oz l’amo yiten Hashem yevarech as amo vashalom. Amen.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195511
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Neville,
    You’re right, i might have meant other commenters while replying to you.
    Anyway, if one reads the teshuvos they can see the mechanism rav moshe works with and the factors he bases his issur or heter on. Therefore, if one sees a certain situation matches any given factors they can issue a ruling on that basis. It doesn’t make a difference what Rav Moshe paskened then assur for such and such city, if the factors known to us match KGH. People just can’t seem to get this through their head.
    Just as a possible example: (please don’t focus on the details of this case, just the concept i’m trying to share) say, a woman asks a rav about a chicken and he paskens trayf. Now, say this chicken falls into a pot that has shishim, and her husband tells her, okay, we can now consume the whole pot. So she insists, what do you mean?! The rav clearly said its trayf! What’s the difference WHERE it fell in! Well, anyone can see that it’s stupid to say such a thing, for the rav only paskened based on the factors he knew, namely, that the chicken is standing alone. However, after it gets mixed into taaruves, if she would ask him, he may be matir based on the current factors.
    Same for Brooklyn eruv and Rav Moshe.
    If anybody out there still can’t wrap their heads around this then it’s just too bad.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195353
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Neville,
    The problem with your approach is that you make Rav Moshe as a gzeiras hakasuv, or, if you will, as a chasidic Rebbe who issues statements that don’t require rationale. Well, I believe they do require as such – and they’re right there to whoever wants to learns his teshuvos objectively. I believe his heter would apply to sections of Brooklyn just as to KGH.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195355
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Neville,
    As for the second part of your post, the point is that if you hold that Brooklln and Manhattan have issue even according to Rashi’s opinion (due to 600,000 inhabitants), then you’ve got the same issue in Baltimore and Chicago and others. Rav Moshe would actually be a yechida’ah opinion then by being mekil for those cities. However, if we assume like most poskim that Rashi’s shitah WOULD work for Chicago and Boston (because we need 600,000 traversing on at least a single street) then it works equally for Brooklyn & Manhattan.
    Anyway, there are other factors to be lenient besides for Rashi. Do you homework.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195206
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    I also don’t understand the fuss with kavod for rav moshe. didn’t many chasidishe shuls and houses have smaller block or front-of-the-house-eruvs all over the place in Bp and Willimsburg for decades? Why is that any more kosher/kavod’ig to rav moshe (to one who learnt the subject)?

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195208
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Thanx, Neville,
    There was and is no “minhag” in this issue. Why didn’t this “minhag” disrupt the KGH eruv? The Chicago one? The Boston one? Each of which had people who disliked it.

    The “minhag” in Europe was always to make. The minhag in America was that many rabbanim over the past seven decades tried to make. Some succeeded. Some didn’t.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195207
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Dear sir, did you bother to reach out to them? I’m sure that if you speak sincerely that they’ll gladly explain to you. Besides, most of the issues and what they hold was already rehashed during the controversies of 5760 and 5765 respectively. The material is available largely online, too.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195202
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Thanks, Neville.
    By the way, please check your history. Both the Flatbush and the BP eruv (in its first gilgul) were established while Rav Moshe was alive and well. Additionally, what’s this fabricated “waiting till the gadol dies” which you repeat (but didn’t invent), if Rav Moshe states clearly black on white numerous times in plain lashon kodesh, both in his manhattan and brooklyn teshuvos, that the rabbanim have a right to pasken and make an eruv and do not have to follow his psak, then why are people frummer than him and condemning those who don’t follow him? Additionally, why, for heaven’s sake, must one follow his fellow’s rav if he has his own?

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195205
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    I really don’t follow this “respect for rav moshe” concept. Didn’t Rav Yaakov Kamenetzky object to a monsey eruv? Why aren’t we instructed not to carry “out of respect for Rav Yaakov? Same for any city. As there are almost always (great) rabbis who object.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195180
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Sorry, but please make a list of poskim (and I mean poskim, not Roshei Yeshiva who never issued a halachic ruling) first and we’ll see who is majority. Besides who says one must follow majority in this issue? Especially since Rav Moshe is against most gedolei acharonim, POSKIM, of the past few generations. Even more, being that Rav Moshe stated clearly his shitah, and if somebody feels he fits Rav Moshe’s shitah then he is not going against him.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2195186
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    “communal norm”??
    Well who was the first to actually have an eruv in the Brooklyn Queens area if not Rav Moshe with the KGH eruv. So please don’t create norms out of whole cloth. Besides, there were eruvs in nyc over 100 years ago, so regardless of how many people did or did not rely on it the “norm” was already established. How about the Baltimore eruv which Rav Moshe supported (according to RAv Heineman shlita), where it was also against the “communal norm” of that city where jews resided already for 100 years by then.

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2194695
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Thanx. I have no patience to write here the nitty gritty but but R’ Moshe aside, according to the others quoted to asser, namely Rabbis Bick Belsky Kotler zatzal and more, according to all of them what I wrote is correct. Even if it would work according to Rav Moshe, where did the d’oraysa disappear to if it is one according to the rabbis I mentioned? Oh, because you rely on Rav Moshe? Well those Brooklyn have many great rabbanim of this generation to rely on, as well as many gedolei acharonim of yesteryear.
    As for RAv Moshe Feinstein, I implore you to learn his own words and tell me a coherent heter for Queens. In short, did anyone ever sit down with a map and city records as to whether KGH isn’t part of a 12×12 mil area of 3,000,000?

    in reply to: New Brooklyn Eruv: Time to Accept? #2194224
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Hatzad Hashava of these zealots here, especialy AviraDeaarah, is that they NEVER learnt Rav Moshe’s teshuvos, let alone the other gedolei acharonim. They don’t even know the metzius. They don’t even realize that according to their arguments it would be equally unacceptable to make in any (large) city say for example chicago. Yet, reb david finestine allowed it. Hence, don’t open your mouth on others especially when there are great talmidei chachamim and experts in the issue who’s ankles you don’t even reach.

    in reply to: What happened to Jewish Radio In Flabush?? #1824947
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    Well I’d like to share some terrific real warm, Jewish “Radio” telephone numbers; they outdo traditional radio by far…
    Songs:
    Kol Dodi: 718-989-6844 x 17
    Talkline: 712-432-3483
    Sklen songs: 718-751-9744
    Shendishov songs: 718-838-1599 x7
    Jroot: 712-432-2846
    Kol Chasidus: 7187357333 and follow the prompts
    Bobov songs (must try em) 718 305 6300 x7
    MISC.
    vaarious: 641-715-3800;
    access code:
    for kol yoetz: 54345 then 5511 and on
    for kol yisrael chaverim: 836899 then 1001 and on
    for important safety info for parents: 811504
    Torah anytime: 7182982077
    kol halashon7189066400

    in reply to: Teenagers and technology #1824931
    Richmond Braun
    Participant

    “There are perhaps a billion parents in the world with the same question.”
    And there are thousands of parents who happily do not have it as they never let these devices into their home. Practically, however, not everyone is on that level but one can affix a certain two hours to use it and the rest of the time it must be shut off. You might implement sort of a reward system for her cooperation.

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 30 total)