renters (Joseph)

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: who's a yekke #1012619

    What does Oberlander (or Chasam Sofer) have to do with Yekkes? Their minhagim (including havara) are closer to Chasidim. (Yes, I know they are not Chasidim [or Yekkes.]) Vien [now based in Brooklyn] is probably the largest Oberland kehila.

    Not all of German Jewry were Yekkes (or followed the Yekkesh minhagim.)

    in reply to: How we relate to Chillonim vs Neturei Karta #1012685

    besalel: I agree with your last line. That’s what I’ve been saying.

    jbaldy: I’d be more worried about those that deny Har Sinai.

    Sam: Your underlying point is valid but you’re making a stretch applying it here. Their meeting him doesn’t cause sympathy to jew-hatred. Would you have opposed Rabi Yochonon Ben Zakkai from meeting Vespasian?

    in reply to: How we relate to Chillonim vs Neturei Karta #1012681

    Sam, you’re making way too big of a stretch. Are you saying that the secular left-wing Jews (who the world considers more “mainstream Jews” than Orthodox Jews) that support a boycott against Israel or support Palestinian rights are the cause of Kansas City?

    And if the UN does pass another resolution against Israel (even assuming your stretch as to what causes such resolutions) then Jews die due to the UN resolution?

    in reply to: Ami's coverage of the Lev Tahor group #1012420

    dogo: Those allegations are false. They have not been proven because it doesn’t exist. You are parroting what you heard in the media without any evidence as there isn’t any. Not in court, not anywhere. Children belong with parents not with some other unrelated family. There is no way kidnapping these children and “assigning” them to another family will not cause far far greater damage to the children than leaving them with their own parents. Even if they have fungus on their toenails.

    in reply to: How we relate to Chillonim vs Neturei Karta #1012666

    Sam, how are they endangering any lives by meeting him? They aren’t. They are a bunch of clowns but it is nothing more than getting their faces in the newspapers – which is their goal. They don’t accomplish anything and they don’t hurt anyone. They just make themselves out as foolish people. What they do is dumb but hurts no one.

    The people that get all antsy and uptight and start going bonkers every time these guys do their shtick are essentially helping them accomplish their goal. They just want the attention. Ignore them and don’t worry about them. What they do doesn’t cause people to get killed; that is taking them too seriously.

    in reply to: Ami's coverage of the Lev Tahor group #1012409

    There was also a letter published in Ami signed by the Montreal Dayanim of Satmar, Skvere and another big Rov supporting the group, asking people to help them and to stop accusing them.

    in reply to: Ami's coverage of the Lev Tahor group #1012408

    Ami refuted the accusations point by point. And there has been not a single actual case where it was shown that any 14 year old was married despite claims. (And the claim was that there was once one single case of someone going to some US State that allows it and got married at 15. But none of the accusers seems to know who that supposedly is. Even the welfare department found no evidence of it actually happening.) The entirety of the claims are built on a deck of cards that doesn’t hold up.

    in reply to: Vayse Zukken #1012536

    Is the white to symbolize purity and holiness?

    in reply to: How we relate to Chillonim vs Neturei Karta #1012663

    mw13, beautifully said.

    jbaldy, I think he reversed it. The seculars we know frequently have psul in yichus. They’ve intermarried so long you can often never be sure that there wasn’t a non-Orthodox conversion among some great or grandmother or a remarriage without a valid get or an intermarriage somewhere along the line, etc.

    in reply to: YOU HAVE THE POWER TO STOP CANCER!! #1012504

    Just as the rabbonim attributed the cause of tach v’tat to talking in shul and told us to refrain from that in the future so that we should prevent a recurrence, so to here they can tell us the cause of a tragedy so that we should refrain from repeating that mistake.

    in reply to: Is it only me.. #1012280

    DY: To put it more simply, a website needs to allow (and code their website to display) third-party ads in order for them to appear, otherwise no third-party ads can appear on the site.

    Do you use an adblocker on your browser? That would explain why you didn’t see the ads even if they’re being displayed.

    in reply to: Is it only me.. #1012278

    DY: The site puts the third-party ad generator (something like Google Advertising) on its site allowing that third-party to generate random, supposedly relevant, ads on its site. Without the site putting the third-party ad agent on its site, no third-party ads would appear on the site. Thus the site does bear responsibility for what appears at it has the option to not use a third-party ad service and use only internal, and approved, ads.

    Sam: Short-sleeves is forbidden to look at and thus cannot be used in ads. Irregardless if that supposedly might attract non-frum people to look into frumkeit. You can’t do something that causes frum people to sin because it might make non-frum people frum.

    in reply to: Is it only me.. #1012262

    ????? is doche ???.

    in reply to: What should I do? #1012044

    You have a complete obligation to tell her parents. You should also tell “$”. Anything you can do to break it up you must do. Even if it will cause a breach in your relationship with her.

    in reply to: Engaged on 3rd date #1027022

    He’s Litvish.

    in reply to: Brooklyn Tuition vs. Lakewood Tuition #1022118

    You can become socially adept outside of a school environment.

    in reply to: Brooklyn Tuition vs. Lakewood Tuition #1022115

    VerZogt: Does it happen that new families who moved to Lakewood have their children rejected from all Yeshivos? What do they do – I can’t imagine them sending their children to Lakewood Public School.

    in reply to: Brooklyn Tuition vs. Lakewood Tuition #1022114

    What are prices for homes in Lakewood these days?

    in reply to: Brooklyn Tuition vs. Lakewood Tuition #1022110

    CAD: Which locality? Elementary or High?

    in reply to: Brooklyn Tuition vs. Lakewood Tuition #1022108

    Is there a wide disparity in the tuition paid by different families in Lakewood (or between the different Yeshivas)?

    in reply to: Brooklyn Tuition vs. Lakewood Tuition #1022107

    Wow, $6,400 per child?! Are you comparatively paying on the higher end? That seems to be a lot of money. If someone has six children they’ll be paying over $38,000 a year in tuition??

    in reply to: Engaged on 3rd date #1027017

    No race or prize. I only wondered as a curiosity how many folks did it quicker than that. I just heard a yeshivishe couple that got engaged after their first date.

    in reply to: Frum way to propose #1010361

    The frum way is to do it b’tznius. Nothing loud or unusual. The idea of making a big deal out of it does not stem from Torah culture.

    in reply to: Brooklyn Tuition vs. Lakewood Tuition #1022102

    From asking around what I seem to have gathered is that tuition in Yeshivishe schools are about 4.5K in Bklyn and about 5K in Lakewood. (Chasidish schools are less.) And schools try not to provide discounts for multiple children. Are these ballpark figures about right?

    in reply to: Apartment rental agreement #1010109

    The locality is NYC, for whatever differences that would make.

    If the landlord gives the tenant a choice of the term of the lease, say either 2 years or 4 years, would the tenant benefit from a longer or a shorter term?

    in reply to: Apartment rental agreement #1010106

    jf02/Dash: Wouldn’t the renter benefit from a contract that a) locks in the price preventing an early increase and b) prevents the landlord from forcing him to move prior to the end of the contract? These seem to be common reasons for a rental contract.

    in reply to: Apartment rental agreement #1010102

    popa: Thank you.

    1. Generally speaking, is having a rental agreement something that the landlord would want or something the tenant would want? (The alternative being renting without any agreement.)

    2. If the tenant leaves early does the landlord have any recourse to enforce the term short of suing in court?

    3. How is it relevant what it says? My question was what happens once the agreement term expires – which presumably means there is no more active agreement that would prevent the landlord from raising the rent with any arbitrary amount he desires.

    4. Same as “3”. How can a rental agreement limit the raise after the agreement expiration?

Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)