Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Avi K, you too compare guns to cars? The car menace is destroying our cities.
Even if guns are more dangerous than bears, we should not allow a single person to be attacked by a bear.
If guns were regulated like cars, they would be harder to get, but a significant number of places would be unarmed-free zones.
In Obergefell, the Supreme Court twisted the Constitution and interpreted it as stating something that was never written or intended. It has nothing to do with interpreting the Second Amendment as written.
Ubiquitin, you must then be either a very strong, fast walker, or someone who has all the time in the world to get from one place to another.
Ubiquitin, you sound like someone who lives near a shul.
Ubiquitin, people who carry guns may increase the risks of gun deaths, but when they carry the gun properly, nobody gets hurt. People who drive cars take up space on the road that cannot be used by anyone else. In addition to increasing risk of car deaths, they make it impossible for people to get around without a car by having exclusive use of the roads.
Good guys with guns don’t hurt anybody. “Good guys” with cars make it virtually impossible to get around without a car.
Ubiquitin, you compared cars to guns. But guns are nothing like cars, because someone else’s right to own a gun does not in any way impact your right not to own one.
Ubiquitin, cars should be banned. Why should poor people have to cede the road to wealthy car owners?
The problem is obviously the glass slipper.
Joseph, that would be like showing up to a wedding in a business suit.
What is the value of those lives that you are supposedly saving if you are willing to take away all of those people’s rights?
Everyone understands that “free” education isn’t really free. So what? In the past, when a college degree wasn’t considered part of a basic education, a basic education was provided by the public schools. Proponents of “free” education argue that college is the new high school and should be treated as such.
The myth wasn’t that heroin isn’t safe, it was that the other opioids are.
Anti-frum people love seeing frum people being held accountable for crimes they committed. That doesn’t mean frum people shouldn’t be held accountable.
Certain risks are acceptable, and others are not. For example, cliff diving is an activity that poses certain risks, and people should have the freedom to make that choice. Jumping off the Brooklyn Bridge, while similar, is not acceptable.
I didn’t say that band aids are not necessary.
Takanos are a band aid. Why do people respect conspicious consumption in the first place? Why not be proud of what you can do without?
Owners of certain kinds of guns should be required to wear pink tutus at all times.
Ubiquitin, it’s not comparable because there is no acceptable use for heroin, whereas a lot of gun owners really like shooting them at inanimate objects.
There should just be a five year application process including mandated community service for the more serious guns.
Our current society has a big problem. Everyone feel pressured to live above their means in order to feel normal.
Once you are married, you can’t act like you think you get a second chance at finding “the one”.
Gowns are not the problem, single-use gowns are the problem. Just don’t insist on a new coordinated gown for every wedding.
Men agree with negative male stereotypes because it gives them permission to conform to them.
The unemployment rate includes couples looking for a second income in order to upgrade their lifestyle.
A person who quits his job to look for a new one is unemployed, even if he only quit because he expects to have enough money to last until he finds his next job.
Slavery can lead to 0% unemployment.
Ben Levi, those differences have very little to do with the concept of a price floor. They have more to do with bread being what it is. You brought up bread specifically, which is different from labor.
The only way to achieve a 0% unemployment rate is with bad employment.