Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
ZD, no, but if it’s never happened, that might be because it’s very much s last resort.
A judge can order both parties to sign Sworn Statement of Removal of Barriers to Remarriage (Form UD-4), and if one does’t, he can throw him in jail (I believe for contempt of court).
In addition, she will have to pay the Kesubah if she acts under the NY law.
Do you mean forego the kesuva?
Finally, having the courts enforce a Get brings serious questions of Get Meusah, as the court is unable (legally) to enforce the actions of a Bais Din to provide a religious document.
It does. Some rabbonim go with the sevara that once a psak of chayav l’garshah is given, any type of k’fiyah is considered his ratzon, but it is very controversial.
DY, the NY law only requires judges to take into consideration barriers to remarriage when dividing marital assets.
Under certain circumstances it also allows the judge to imprison the recalcitrant husband as well. It might be a get me’useh, and might not. It depends who you ask.
Oh, no, not again…
Bump
So, whichever moderator is empowered to unblock my regular account, I ask you to please do so, with the understanding that I meant no harm, but apologize for what I did and assure you that it won’t happen again. And, BTW, thanks for leaving this account open and allowing me to post with it.
Unblocked. You will be held to this pledge. We are aware of the weaknesses in the software, and exploiting them is not ok.
Real-brisker, deiyezooger, crazybrit, and yochid of many ( 😛 ) ,thanks for the support. However, I do not feel that I am being mistreated.
As I’ve pointed out in the past, and I know you remember it, r-b, the way the site is programmed leaves the possibility of malicious copying of user names. While I know that I had no such intent, and I strongly hinted that I was not the real pba in my offending post, (I mentioned that I’m not mildly retarded, referring to the fact that under the name popa_bar_abba it said “member” as opposed to his subtitle), I may not have been 100% clear. I have no problem with the moderator taking the safe route.
The Aruch Hashulchan said you can in certain instances.
He gave two conditions, neither of which apply here. We have no right to assume that they’re not l’ikuva.
Rav Moshe is a Chiddush regarding cooking in a microwave -you have no proof to apply this elsewhere.
I don’t need proof, the reasoning applies perfectly here as well.
Your argument with hello99 is against the Shmiras Shabbos K’hilchoso.
I still haven’t heard how you understand this Shach.
He’s saying why a mashuch b’orloso doesn’t make yayin nesech, not addressing why a mechalel Shabbos does. That could just as well be because of a “lo plug” (or knas) as a chashash nisuch.
What do you say about my reasoning to be matir the mB”D cholent which was placed on another fire by an aku”m (without a tzivui from the Yid)?
The Rishon who this comes from is not Mechalek
We don’t pasken like him.
Also, the Jew helped by making the Chulent and putting it in the crockpot.
That’s not one of the actions which prevents it from being called bishul aku”m.
Please don’t bring Rayos from other things. It (crock pot) might be similar to a hot plate, but in No way is it similar to a microwave.
Let me clarify what I was addressing. Aside from the issur of havarah in turning on the crockpot, there’s also the issur of bishul – cooking the raw cholent. Even if the crockpot were not considered aish, it would be bishul.
Now, one might argue that if the crockpot were not aish (it is; I’m going l’shitoscho), there would be no bishul D’oraiso, similar to cooking in the sun (which is entirely mutar), or something heated by the sun (toldas hachamah which is assur m’d’rabanon). For this, I brought R’ Moshe’s teshuvah that cooking with a microwave is a D’oraiso, and so would be cooking in a crockpot, even if there were no aish.
Yes I’m impersonating myself (whatever that means).
Can I join the petition?
Thanks, r-b.
CHA = Cheerful Helpful Available (among others, it depends on the context).
I did it again today, when pba brought up that link when he did it.
Sorry, R’ Popa, I didn’t c”v mean to demean you.
If someone did it with malicious intent, it would be a valid reason to be blocked. (I didn’t, and I wasn’t trying to fool anyone, but hey, it’s not my site.)
Sam2,
Thanks for the compliment. I’ll try working on the rough edges part.
I wasn’t trying to fool anyone – I even pointed out that the subtitle was different.
Sushe,
I didn’t mean it should be assur, I’m just not sure it’s yashrus.
R-b,
I opened a new user account and nicknamed it “popa-bar-abba”, and posted a compliment to the real pba for the way he manage to post on that thread with the esrog throwing while he was blocked. I think that’s why I was blocked.
It was an attempt at humor; I pointed out that I didn’t have pba’s subtitle. I guess the moderator didn’t find it funny.