Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 801 through 850 (of 863 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Halachos of 3D Printing #1024404
    Randomex
    Member

    Sorta related: If you search the ‘Net for “Afate Gnikou”, you’ll find him. He built a 3D printer out of parts of junked electronics.

    in reply to: an app to solve the shidduch crisis #1024431
    Randomex
    Member

    Okay, I’ll re-post myself. I’m not about to edit the whole thing to remove all references to speed-dating, though… sorry.

    ______________________________

    So, why can’t we reverse the stages of the shidduch process,

    having people speed-date to select for compatible

    personalities/”chemistry”, and only then doing research to

    decide whether to pursue the shudduch with normal dating,

    rendering the entire shidduch system more efficient?

    Well, here’s why. Now, even if you personally disagree

    with everything in the excerpt below, you must concede that

    this is the accepted hashkafah in the community.

    Excerpted from “The Kuntris” (Torah magazine)

    Volume 1, Issue 13 February/Adar Aleph 2014:

    “The Da’as Torah Files – The Shidduch Disaster”

    (The piece begins on page 40 – excerpt is from pg. 44-45.

    The writer is Nosson Sternbach, but he notes that the ideas

    originate from the Shabbos table of Rabbi Gershon Ribner.)

    A Googling of R’ Gershon revealed that he is a talmid of

    Rav Aaron Shechter of Chaim Berlin, an eidem of Rav

    Schneur Kotler ztz”l, and Rosh Yeshiva of Nesivos

    HaTorah (on Staten Island).

    The premise of the article: A boy arrives for a shidduch,

    and the father realizes that all his information was about

    another boy (with the same name). What should he do?

    Answer: Inform him of the mistake and send him off

    (politely, delicately and with sympathy, of course).

    Short version: It is not tzniusdig

    for a boy and girl to meet without some level of

    expectation that this can lead to marriage.

    Speed-dating will definitely involve meeting

    numerous people of the opposite gender who are not

    compatible with you and is therefore unacceptable.

    Also, a positive first impression may override research

    for those personally involved – the boy and girl.

    “The fundamental difference between dating in the Torah

    community and the rest of the world is our insistence that

    all matches must be set up through a system of referrals,

    aka a shadchan. Secular culture feels that there is nothing

    wrong with a boy and girl meeting on their own to determine

    their compatibility; in fact such intermingling is encouraged.

    Many fences have been built by the Torah world to separate

    us from that depraved culture. One of those fences is the

    absolute insistence on a shadchan.

    [O]ne must understand the Torah’s perspective on dating.

    Any contact with the opposite gender is considered a

    “danger zone.” However, in the context of searching for

    one’s zivug, such meetings are encouraged and considered

    a holy act.

    Note: I think I should “call ‘shortzoah’ ” here.

    This is pretty obviously not found in any classic

    sources, which date from the period – namely, until recent

    times – when young people did not meet to “determine their

    compatibility” for marriage AT ALL. Talk about it later?

    Yet, there is a fine line between “kosher” dating and

    immoral mingling.

    In America we are so immersed in pritzus

    that it is hard to appreciate any form of sensitivity in

    this matter. Our barometer of what is and is not

    tznius is so corrupted that any attempt

    at introducing an element of modesty in our community

    is viewed as extreme and abnormal.

    In the Torah world, boys and girls do not meet haphazardly

    and arbitrarily in the hopes that two people might “click”.

    Rather, we set up a system of referrals to ensure that if two

    people meet, there is a reasonable chance that this shidduch

    is appropriate. Only in such a context do we encourage the

    opposite genders to interact with one another.

    It is a scientifically proven fact that we form most of our

    judgments of a person during the first few interactions

    that we have with them. Somebody with an engaging

    and charming personality can easily distort their date’s

    judgment of them. All later research […] will be swept

    aside and only the positive qualities will be remembered.”

    Note: This is about the scenario of a

    full date with a random person, not a speed-dating

    encounter. That might make a difference.

    __________________

    That’s that. Additionally, I’m sure many would say

    that people would not be given enough of a chance

    by such a system, and would be rejected too quickly.

    Additionally, people would not be motivated to travel

    long distances just to speed-date, so if the entire system

    changed, many shidduchim would be pre-empted.

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ☑️❎🆙 #1212855
    Randomex
    Member

    Testing… Okay.

    You can link in 2 ways. One is by simply entering an address:

    google.com will not work.

    www.||google.com (without the lines) will appear, once posted,as

    http://www.google.com, which itself works.

    The second way is fancier, and allows you to link without using the address – any text (or symbols) will do.

    Here’s the format, with instructions:

    <a href="http://www.xyz.com">desiredappearingtext</a>

    This appears as

    desiredappearingtext

    So this:

    <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a>

    will link to Google. By the way, the quotation marks around the site’s address will be added automatically if you don’t type them.

    Thus Google

    If you don’t type http://www. before the address, it will be automatically prefaced with http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/, resulting in

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/google.com

    for “google.com” in the markup.

    _____

    Let’s break it down further. The standard beginning is:

    <a href=

    The <a is an HTML opening, but note the lack of the usual second bracket > behind the <a.

    This is so that there will be 2 sections in the finished code.

    The href= means that the “h (whatever that stands for)” that you want to “ref”er(ence?), that is, link to, equals (is)… whatever comes next.

    After href= comes the URL/address you want to link to (in quotation marks, but you don’t actually have to type those).

    It must start with http://www. (unlike when posting an address).

    We’ll use “example.com”:

    <a href="http://www.example.com"

    This is followed by a bracket (>) to close this section.

    <a href="http://www.example.com">

    Now comes the text or symbols that you want to be visible in the post – in this case, ExAmplE.

    <a href="http://www.example.com">ExAmplE

    Finally, there’s the standard HTML closing – `</a>:

    <a href="http://www.example.com">ExAmplE</a>

    This appears in the post as

    ExAmplE

    Well, that should be clear enough…

    (P.S. Yes, I wrote this. All of it.)

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ☑️❎🆙 #1212854
    Randomex
    Member

    Can someone put up all the special symbol codes, like &trade for the trademark,

    or a link to a list of them (or directions to one on the Internet, which is allowed)?

    __________________________

    Gamanit: Your link doesn’t work. You put the URL where the appearing text is meant to be (or something). See my “tutorial.”

    ____________________________

    RebYidd23:

    Courtesy of Wiktionary:

    nice (comparative nicer, superlative nicest)

    1 (obsolete) Silly, ignorant; foolish. [14th-17th c.]

    2 (now rare) Particular in one’s conduct; scrupulous,

    painstaking; choosy. [from 14th c.]

    3 (obsolete) Particular as regards rules or qualities; strict. [16th-19th c.]

    4 Showing or requiring great precision or sensitive discernment; subtle. [from 16th c.]

    5 (obsolete) Doubtful, as to the outcome; risky. [16th-19th c.]

    6 Respectable; virtuous. [from 18th c.]

    7 Pleasant, satisfactory. [from 18th c.]

    8 Of a person: friendly, attractive. [from 18th c.]

    So, uh, 1?

    in reply to: Confusing Halacha, Minhag, Chumra, Shtus #1206499
    Randomex
    Member

    DaasYochid: Would those distinctions be about the din if a woman (or women in general) does not usually cover her hair?

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ☑️❎🆙 #1212846
    Randomex
    Member

    Well, it’s been twelve hours since RebYidd’s post, and it hasn’t been edited.

    should it have been?

    Anyway, which kind of “nice” do you mean?

    And can someone tell me if “a” does anything more useful than making words go green when you mouse-over them?

    I think <a> is supposed to create a link, but you didn’t input the link destination.

    in reply to: maybe we all should stop getting drunk on purim #1056691
    Randomex
    Member

    ???? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?? ????

    ????? ????? ????? ?????? ??”? ??? ???? ?? ?? ???? ???? ??? ????? ??????? ?? ??? ??? ???? ?? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ??? ??? ?? ?? ???? ?? ?? ???? ?????? ?????? ???? ???? ?? ??? ???

    (Rema in Machir Yayin)

    Is there any chance this is “Purim Torah”?

    in reply to: an app to solve the shidduch crisis #1024429
    Randomex
    Member

    “popa_bar_abba_:

    It should be an app. Like a guy can drive from lakewood for a date and then he gets to flatbush and doesn’t want to date her. So he loads the app and it shows him other girls in that area, and maybe he wants to date one of them instead, so he messages her through the shadchan part of the app and she says yes and they go out and build a bnbear.

    We’re talking about an app that could save you time expended on a trip to Brooklyn for a “dud date” by providing you with an awesomer pick-up date.

    You seem to have forgotten that people generally do research before dating someone…

    in reply to: No mourning this year? #1024909
    Randomex
    Member

    Honestly, I’ve heard so many stories about gedolim claiming Mashiach will come, and I never had any verification of them – except in once case. The one case was when R’ Elya Svei said that Mashiach would come in 2009. My brother was there and heard him say it in Darchei Torah. Obviously, Mashiach did not come in 2009.

    I hope no one will consider it disrespectful of me to say

    sorry, really not comfortable with that statement. – 29

    By the way, due to the sad situation in Eretz Yisrael’s yeshiva world, don’t believe too quickly any stories about Rav Chaim, Rav Aharon Leib Steinman, or Rav Shmuel Auerbach.

    edited

    in reply to: Tznius Starts at Age 3 or 7? #1024240
    Randomex
    Member

    Hey, mordern, welcome back! Please don’t bump any more old threads.

    in reply to: The correct pronunciation of "Expecto Patronum" #1066769
    Randomex
    Member

    There are times when I feel I’m afraid for the world

    There are times I’m ashamed of us all

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ☑️❎🆙 #1212844
    Randomex
    Member

    So, what does “a” do?

    in reply to: famous misquotes #1024253
    Randomex
    Member

    Veltz Meshugener:

    Alas poor Yorick, I knew him so well.

    The “so” isn’t in the standard misquotation, Horatio.

    Bookworm120:

    “Luke, I am your father!”

    According to TV Tropes:

    [Sometimes] the misquote provides context necessary to recognize or appreciate the reference, as in “Luke, I am your father.”

    On that note:

    “I am your sandwich.” – ?

    in reply to: A cappella concert #1024162
    Randomex
    Member

    (Sorry about the paragraph formatting – I wrote this in Notepad.)

    Mod42:

    Read through the Rambam, Shulchan Aruch, etc.

    Just a little more specific, if you wouldn’t mind. 🙂 Seriously, when people ask for a source, “the Talmud,” etc., is not what they mean.

    (The quote I use below was taken from a sefer that deals

    specifically with the Three Weeks. I wasn’t trolling when I asked.)

    Also, why have concerts been attacked more than the general Jewish music industry?

    As for gedolim not speaking out, I’ll answer myself with “gezeira she’ain rov ha’tzibbur yecholin

    la’amod bo,” or at least “k’shem she’hu mitzvah lomar devarim she’nishmain…”

    RebYidd23:

    A concert is less problematic than recorded a capella.

    Sam2:

    Pashtus is that RebYidd is correct, at least according to the Shevet HaLevi.

    I found this interesting.

    Rav Wosner (translation mine) [Chelek 8, Siman 127, Se’if Katan 2 ]:

    I have already clarified that a tape is a musical instrument, […] and my opinion is that

    even if the tape was made with oral song it becomes instrumental music [lit. a musical

    instrument].

    Presumably we must interpret “tape” [tes-ayin-yud-peh] as “speakers” (medium-specificity

    is certainly not intended, and a tape is incapable of independently producing sound).

    But then, shouldn’t anything that comes out of speakers ([or off a tape]) be considered

    music, seeing as it is being produced by a musical instrument? One would have to argue

    that non-musical sounds can also be produced by instruments, e.g. by banging on a violin,

    playing a single extended note with one, or playing ten piano keys at random time intervals.

    Still, would this mean that any sound pleasant to the ear, such as some speaking voices,

    would be music? One must come up with criteria by which to declare something “music”.

    in reply to: Is there less CR activity than there used to be? #1024176
    Randomex
    Member

    Dash:

    Get the timeline straight. The Big Event was cancelled in February of 2008 but the coffeeroom only opened in June of 2008.

    LOL. I meant the Citi Field asifa. (I guess capitalizing “Big Event” was a misstep.) Still, it is hard to see why anyone would think I thought a cancelled concert might mean less Internet use. And were there “follow-up events” to that? I don’t know.

    “hashem_echad”

    This thread belongs to the many bored and sickly around here that only feel that can be expressed under a hidden name.

    I take it yours is your actual name?

    in reply to: Famous Mosquitoes #1023899
    Randomex
    Member

    The 6th Google result for >beam me up scotty< will get you an extensive list of misquotations.

    (And this post is my test of whether mods will allow directions

    to an external site, even in a case where they do not allow the link itself. I wonder if this entire thread would’ve been allowed by current standards…)

    in reply to: Popa's Retardedly Retarded Mad Libs Thread #1200585
    Randomex
    Member

    (I know this is not how it works, but…)

    Popa and DaasYochid were enjoying pizza in Boro Park’s Infernal Cafe (666 13th Avenue), posting on the Coffee Room all the while on their retardedly overpriced smartphones.

    “I smoked and drank coffee as a child and it never retarded my growth,” wrote Popa, on a thread about child development. A mod saw, and laughed. “It does seem to have left you retarded,” someone shot back.

    The mod deleted it three minutes later.

    Daas’s pizza was spiced appropriately to the establishment’s name.

    Blazes! I’m infernally thirsty!, he thought, and grabbed the arm of a passing waiter. “Water!”, he gasped. “People generally prefer when others get their attention verbally, you know,” scolded the waiter, but he returned with the water momentarily, seeming to understand Daas’s predicament.

    in reply to: Straw Hats #1023871
    Randomex
    Member

    IIRC, Kelmers used to wear straw hats.

    in reply to: A cappella concert #1024157
    Randomex
    Member

    This was trolling (please don’t ban me). There will, of course, be no a cappella concerts during the 3 Weeks).

    Mod-42, where’s the law that prohibits concerts, etc.? And how is it that the gedolim don’t speak out against the concerts that happen every Chol haMoed (or are they not a problem on Chol haMoed), and the singing performances by women/girls whenever?

    in reply to: the shidduch system #1203026
    Randomex
    Member

    The ratio of guys who openly tell me what physical characteristics they like, to those who don’t tell me what physical characteristics they like, are 95:1.

    “That’s it, man. Game over, man! Game over!”

    Unless, of course, popa_bar_abba is right and “all of them are just saying one thing. Thin.”

    in reply to: Linked usernames! #1155592
    Randomex
    Member

    Thanks, streekgeek. I found another one in that thread:

    OURTorah – Links to:

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/will-i-get-a-shidduch

    in reply to: Confusing Halacha, Minhag, Chumra, Shtus #1206494
    Randomex
    Member

    “So does an Etzba Ketana”[have the same halachos as an erva].

    You refer, no doubt, to the ma’amar that if one gazes at the etzba ketana of a woman, it is as he if he has gazed bimkom hateiruf.

    But that is not a halacha of an erva. I am referring to such halachos as a man not being allowed to say devorim shebikdusha

    if he can see it, and a woman not being allowed to go out with it exposed – none of which apply to an etzba ketana.

    A married woman’s hair, however, does have these halachos, just as does, say, a woman’s arm from the elbow up.

    in reply to: Famous Mosquitoes #1023897
    Randomex
    Member

    Blast you, ubiquitin! I was going to post the Armstrong example.

    BTW, this past Friday was the 45th anniversary of the landing.

    Okay! Super-famous Jewish misquotation:

    “Rosho, lomoh sakeh es reiacho?” – Moshe Rabbeinu

    But this was never spoken. The posuk begins “Vayomer lorosho.”

    in reply to: the shidduch system #1202993
    Randomex
    Member

    I think he might have been trolling. Certainly, I don’t think shadchanim who “spend every night” on shidduchim “average only a few shidduchim a year”, IF they are successful ones.

    And all that nonsense about wealtyh people being too busy enjoying their wealth…

    As far as needing more shadchanim, this has been mentioned as a problem in the public sphere. Hasn’t everyone seen the calls for everyone to spend an hour on shidduchim a week, or something like that?

    in reply to: Toll Road #1023645
    Randomex
    Member

    G’neivas da’as applies when, for example, you ask a storekeeper for the price of an item, leading him to believe you are interested in it, when you have no intention of purchasing it regardless of the price.

    You do not mislead anyone by entering a toll road.

    in reply to: A Monkey with a Typewriter #1023801
    Randomex
    Member

    When I saw the title of the thread, I knew what I wanted to post, but… you beat me, SIDI. Indeed, you did it.

    in reply to: Who was A 600 Kilo Bear? #1023630
    Randomex
    Member

    Thanks, 100.

    You’re welcome. 🙂

    in reply to: Linked usernames! #1155588
    Randomex
    Member

    DaasYochid – links to

    kosherhaircut.com

    in reply to: Confusing Halacha, Minhag, Chumra, Shtus #1206492
    Randomex
    Member

    HaLeiVi – It has the same halachos as any erva, which seems a little strong for the reason you mention.

    in reply to: Reminder: Gedolim had personalities #1038541
    Randomex
    Member

    On the subject, gedolim also do things we might not think of them doing. The Ramchal is renowned to the outside world as a poet and playwright. Wikipedia:

    Luzzatto also wrote poetry and drama, most of it seeming secular on the surface, but many scholars have identified mystical undertones in this body of work as well).

    Many others wrote poetry as well, e.g. R’ Yehuda haLevi (Kuzari) and “Solomon ibn Gabirol” (I don’t know how to say that in heimish).

    in reply to: Alternative versions of songs #1023640
    Randomex
    Member

    sm29 – Techno+/trance+/club-type music doesn’t sound like old video games.

    Bookworm120 – Yep. VSQ is pretty obviously the inspiration here.

    crisisoftheweek – No (never heard of ’em). Actually, about all I’ve heard in 8-bit has been “Dr. Horrible’s…” and a version of a Nightwish song (track 1 on Wishmaster), but I like the sound, which I know from playing games back in the day. I tend to know more about the existence and sound of genres than to have extensive listening experience.

    Hey, if you want Od Yishoma, you could probably contact an 8-bit musician – it doesn’t seem to me like most of them are too busy touring the world to do a song for a fee.

    ____

    Recently discovered a duo who arrange songs for harp duets – I think they’ve also got time on their hands if anyone wants to commission. Just Google the Harp Twins (with images turned off, as they’re female).

    in reply to: Seminary 2015 #1043329
    Randomex
    Member

    So, did you have a different username before this one? Are you going to change it again now (twice)?

    in reply to: Versace tie deal on KollelBudget #1023616
    Randomex
    Member

    dafbiyun wrote:

    it is not clear to me that Versace ties , which feature a face of Medusa, (which also includes a full face of the sun sun[sic])may be worn.

    Medusa is not an avoda zarah – she is a mythological monster. No one ever worshipped her (AFAIK).

    As for the sun, do designs on cloth count for avoda zara? Are all images of things which are or were avoda zara still a problem?

    in reply to: Confusing Halacha, Minhag, Chumra, Shtus #1206490
    Randomex
    Member

    (Okay, that stayed up. Now let’s try this.)

    YW Moderator-42 wrote:

    I have a question about the idea of covering hair:

    Why is there a difference between a married and single woman? By every other erva, it either is or isn’t and doesn’t matter what the woman’s marital status is.

    I read in a Jewish source (I don’t remember where, but it might

    have been one of Gila Manolson’s books) that a woman becomes more aware of herself as a woman with marriage, and her hair reflects this, and it becomes more attractive to men as a result.

    in reply to: the shidduch system #1202979
    Randomex
    Member

    So, why can’t we reverse the stages of the shidduch process,

    having people speed-date to select for compatible

    personalities/”chemistry”, and only then doing research to

    decide whether to pursue the shudduch with normal dating,

    rendering the entire shidduch system more efficient?

    Well, here’s why. Now, even if you personally disagree

    with everything in the excerpt below, you must concede that

    this is the accepted hashkafah in the community.

    Excerpted from “The Kuntris” (Torah magazine)

    Volume 1, Issue 13 February/Adar Aleph 2014:

    “The Da’as Torah Files – The Shidduch Disaster”

    (The piece begins on page 40 – excerpt is from pg. 44-45.

    The writer is Nosson Sternbach, but he notes that the ideas

    originate from the Shabbos table of Rabbi Gershon Ribner.)

    A Googling of R’ Gershon revealed that he is a talmid of

    Rav Aaron Shechter of Chaim Berlin, an eidem of Rav

    Schneur Kotler ztz”l, and Rosh Yeshiva of Nesivos

    HaTorah (on Staten Island).

    The premise of the article: A boy arrives for a shidduch,

    and the father realizes that all his information was about

    another boy (with the same name). What should he do?

    Answer: Inform him of the mistake and send him off

    (politely, delicately and with sympathy, of course).

    Short version: It is not tzniusdig

    for a boy and girl to meet without some level of

    expectation that this can lead to marriage.

    Speed-dating will definitely involve meeting

    numerous people of the opposite gender who are not

    compatible with you and is therefore unacceptable.

    Also, a positive first impression may override research

    for those personally involved - the boy and girl.

    “The fundamental difference between dating in the Torah

    community and the rest of the world is our insistence that

    all matches must be set up through a system of referrals,

    aka a shadchan. Secular culture feels that there is nothing

    wrong with a boy and girl meeting on their own to determine

    their compatibility; in fact such intermingling is encouraged.

    Many fences have been built by the Torah world to separate

    us from that depraved culture. One of those fences is the

    absolute insistence on a shadchan.

    [O]ne must understand the Torah’s perspective on dating.

    Any contact with the opposite gender is considered a

    “danger zone.” However, in the context of searching for

    one’s zivug, such meetings are encouraged and considered

    a holy act.

    Note: I think I should "call 'shortzoah' " here.

    This is pretty obviously not found in any classic

    sources, which date from the period - namely, until recent

    times - when young people did not meet to "determine their

    compatibility" for marriage AT ALL. Talk about it later?

    Yet, there is a fine line between “kosher” dating and

    immoral mingling.

    In America we are so immersed in pritzus

    that it is hard to appreciate any form of sensitivity in

    this matter. Our barometer of what is and is not

    tznius is so corrupted that any attempt

    at introducing an element of modesty in our community

    is viewed as extreme and abnormal.

    In the Torah world, boys and girls do not meet haphazardly

    and arbitrarily in the hopes that two people might “click”.

    Rather, we set up a system of referrals to ensure that if two

    people meet, there is a reasonable chance that this shidduch

    is appropriate. Only in such a context do we encourage the

    opposite genders to interact with one another.

    It is a scientifically proven fact that we form most of our

    judgments of a person during the first few interactions

    that we have with them. Somebody with an engaging

    and charming personality can easily distort their date’s

    judgment of them. All later research […] will be swept

    aside and only the positive qualities will be remembered.”

    Note: This is about the scenario of a

    full date with a random person, not a speed-dating

    encounter. That might make a difference.

    __________________

    That’s that. Additionally, I’m sure many would say

    that people would not be given enough of a chance

    by such a system, and would be rejected too quickly.

    Additionally, people would not be motivated to travel

    long distances just to speed-date, so if the entire system

    changed, many shidduchim would be pre-empted.

    in reply to: the shidduch system #1202978
    Randomex
    Member

    Being Real:

    It sounds like your primary issue is the amount of time and

    effort the system requires you to put in just to be able to find

    out – within a few minutes of meeting the girl – that you’re

    definitely not interested in her. Also, time and effort is being

    expended by others to research and set up these shidduchim.

    Speed-dating sessions, you presumably argue, would allow you

    (and, of course, everyone else in shidduchim)

    to eliminate such “mismatches” and avoid the time spent on

    them, thus rendering the entire system more efficient.

    It bears thinking about. I’m sure many would say that people

    would not be given enough of a chance by such a system,

    being rejected too quickly (and, by extension, that you

    are deciding too quickly when you reject your shidduchim).

    (This has been argued even about full-length dates:

    "Never go out once / it's a basic rule

    Zain tatteh hut gelt / gai arois noch a mool

    Vus vet zain oib di vilst nisht gain?

    Di vest blaiben gantze leben alain

    Gai shoin shnell / ich gai dir geiben a brucha

    Chasunah hobben / mach a groise mishpucha

    This is the point we're tryin'a tell you

    That making a shidduch is a hard thing to do"

    "Shidduch Date" - Black Hattitude :)

    Wow, it's been nearly 20 years since that album's release.)

    More seriously, though, I’m sure many girls and boys would

    not be comfortable with the idea of such a situation, or in it.

    Additionally, people would not be motivated to travel

    long distances just to speed-date, so if the entire system

    changed, many shidduchim would be pre-empted.

    Also see the magazine article excerpt in my next post.

    Side note: Maybe you could request shorter dates,

    if the long (first?) dates annoy you even when you

    don’t decide after 5 minutes that she’s not for you.

    in reply to: Chizuk with music videos #1023594
    Randomex
    Member

    I recommend Ari Lesser’s “Innocent Blood” (featuring his father) –

    after the 3 Weeks are over, that is.

    in reply to: Who was A 600 Kilo Bear? #1023629
    Randomex
    Member

    He’s still all over Google. Morbid.

    Hey, is there any way to delete your own posts or threads?

    If you have to contact mods for that (or anything else), how do you contact them?

    You can begin a post with, “FOR MOD READ ONLY”, and we will see the post and delete it. -100

    in reply to: Reminder: Gedolim had personalities #1038528
    Randomex
    Member
      The Alter of Slabodka had eim’sa d’tzibbura (Reb Yaakov, ArtScroll).

    So, Veltz, why did we need to be reminded of this?

    By the way, did you know that you apparently don’t have a profile?

    Or did you disable public view of it? If so, how is that done?

    in reply to: Le Chocolate in woodbourne #1023648
    Randomex
    Member

    Zombies!

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ☑️❎🆙 #1212837
    Randomex
    Member

    How I did what? Here’s the deal: Below the area where you type your posts, you’ll see a list of “Allowed markup”.

    Put any of those things, for example blockquote, into this format:

    <markup>desired text</markup> to use a certain effect with it. That is to say: the markup inside triangle brackets <> will start the effect, and the same thing, but with a backslash in front of the markup </> stops the effect. Those things inside the brackets will

    not show in the post.

    (Looking at this http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/moderation-memos-posting-tips-and-important-links again, I got it. “code” allows you to type HTML markup and not have it activate, useful for demonstrating how to use the things.)

    I still don’t know what they all do, but here’s what I’ve found out:

    “a” is meant to link (I think). I don’t know how you tell it where to link to. Well, at least it makes things red, and they go green when you put your cursor over them.

    EDIT: “a” is apparently not for linking, as at least links to YWN pages are linked automatically.

    “blockquote” gives a quotation effect.

    Like so.

    “code” causes whatever effects you type inside the “code” brackets not to be used, instead appearing as you typed it. It uses a different font, which is also useful for making a visual distinction between things. You can also use these ` (the key above Tab) for this effect (one before and one after the desired text).

    “em” is for <em>italics</em>.

    “strong” is for <strong>bold</strong>.

    “ul” and “ol” both appear to indent. That’s probably not exactly

    what they’re meant for.

    “li” cause whatever you put into it to go underneath the bar where

    your name and subtitle usually go. Search this page with Ctrl-F for falafel if you don’t see it. I think it may cause problems, though; look at the distance betweeen my second and third posts (but not between my first and second… I guess it’s complicated),

    and how the reply text is smaller on this page than it normally is. Well, happy fancy posting!

    <li>falafel</li>

    in reply to: Out of print #1023587
    Randomex
    Member

    You can try public libraries for books. This probably works best if you live in New York, or a similarly large city, as interlibrary loans tend to take very, very long.

    in reply to: Confusing Halacha, Minhag, Chumra, Shtus #1206488
    Randomex
    Member

    YW Moderator-42 wrote:

    We find in this week’s parsha, that the kohen uncovers the hair of the sota. If hair is a true erva, then wouldn’t this be a problem? Especially to then say hashem’s name in her presence.

    The Mishna states (Sotah 1:4) that the Kohen also uncovers the woman’s upper body, which is certainly a “true erva”.

    How he can then say the Shem Hashem in front of her is a good question.

    We can say that he is commanded specifically by the Torah to do so, just as usually one would not be allowed to uncover erva.

    in reply to: the shidduch system #1202977
    Randomex
    Member

    I have an instructive article from the Kuntris magazine on the subject of shidduchim, and will b’li neder type some of it up for the olam soon.

    in reply to: the shidduch system #1202976
    Randomex
    Member

    Baruch10901 wrote:

    My daughter was redt to a young man who we were told stutters. He only wanted to meet initially on face time & she was agreeable. The encounter was done in the privacy of her room. Well guess what- she wants to have a real date with him. I am concerned and frightened. What if they fall in very deep like and where does that leave my younger daugters?

    Pardon me, but what.

    The only way this makes any sense is if your daughter FaceTimed

    with the boy without you having looked into him and decided that the shidduch was worth pursuing. Was that the case?

    Or are you just trolling…?

    He is trolling -100

    TRUEBT wrote:

    If you talk to people at Aish, they will tell you that they no longer think speed dating is a good idea.

    However, the article linked to was about dating more than one person at a time, that is, normal dates with each one.

    Speed-dating is not “dating” at all in that sense – it is meant to lead to such dating.

    in reply to: Weirdness Factor in books #1023583
    Randomex
    Member

    “Weirdness is fantastical [sic]” – Says the man with 2 references to the series “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” in his name and subtitle. (Did he give CR member “149” the subtitle “-107”? We may never know.)

    Mechezi:

    Weirdness cannot be said to be ossur.

    Weirdness might possibly be considered goyish. Whether it is goyish and whether the appraised level of goyishness is inappropriate is subjective (I assume).

    There is this quote from “Reb Yaakov” (the ArtScroll bio):

    “Even the talking lampposts on a Torah tape for children, Reb Yaakov felt,lessened a child’s sense of the distinction between truth and falsehood.”So, are these weird books for your children? However…

    We cannot be sure if he meant l’maaseh to discourage that sort of thing,and I don’t think anyone actually takes any notice of this consideration.

    Conclusion: Go ahead! Read stuff that can be filed under

    “Makes Just as Much Sense in Context” and

    “What Do You Mean, It Wasn’t Made on Drugs?”

    (Man, do I need to find a better use of my time.)

    in reply to: Alternative versions of songs #1023636
    Randomex
    Member

    sm29:

    8-bit (or chiptune) is specifically synthesized electronic music produced (or emulated) by the sound chips of vintage computers, video game consoles, and arcade machines, as well as with other methods such as emulation (thanks, Wikipedia).

    I doubt DJ Raidz sounds anything like it.

    in reply to: Out of print #1023586
    Randomex
    Member

    Buy secondhand. Sources include stores, flea markets, and web sites.

    It can be difficult to find some things…

    If it’s a sefer, I heard about a place in Yerushalayim where they’ll print and staple together for you any sefer in the Otzar HaChochmah (the library hard drive), and I’d assume there’s such a place in Boro Park too.

    in reply to: Another Reason Not to go to Law School #1023505
    Randomex
    Member

    Shmuel Kunda reference FTW! (That’s “for the win”, for those of you who don’t speak Internet-ese. “for the win”, that means… ah, forget it.)

    in reply to: Things that are avoda zara #1094559
    Randomex
    Member

    Stars, rocks, and rock stars.

Viewing 50 posts - 801 through 850 (of 863 total)