rabbiofberlin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 951 through 1,000 (of 1,897 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Shlomo Carelbach #895766
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    feif un- Before passing judgment on what is an unbelievable davening, please attend the selichos and you may realize that ourv prayers to HKBH don’t necessarily need crying and you can reach a much higher “madreigah” when singing than crying. BTW- thsiis why chassidim sing in large parts of the davening.

    in reply to: Rav Aharon Leib Shteinman tells Yidden to shun secular education #895830
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    shein- I have a great affinity with chassidim and I admire their enterprise and their joy of living. They are plumbers, builders, electricians, caterers, camera dealers and much more. The problem is that most of the non-chassidische world does not do these jobs (I am not here to criticize their choices) so when the non- chassidim want to work, study of some secular studies is imperative. This is why Touro College and other programs are so succesful. The point is that ,if you need secular studies to get a job as lawyer, doctor, accountant, actuary and others, you just have to study these subjects.That is, of course, if you accept the fact of work !

    in reply to: Rav Aharon Leib Shteinman tells Yidden to shun secular education #895822
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    vochindik : Lo sossur only applies to halachos, not to “milei d’alma”. Ironically, the halocho is contrary to what you are porposing. If you want to say that the gedolim you mention are now contradicting the halochos and we should follow them because of “lo sossur’, then say so.

    On the other point, the discussion here was not about college- we can argue about this. The argument here is whether to ‘just learn Torah and always Torah” and do nothing else. On that, quite clearly, the many halochos from the gemoro onwards weigh prepodantly on the side of having a job and working.

    May I point out that the chassidische rebbes, by and large, counsel their chassidim to have a job.

    in reply to: Rav Aharon Leib Shteinman tells Yidden to shun secular education #895807
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    I am not going to add much to the posters like mdd and others who defend the “old’ shittah.

    I have all the respect for Rav Shteineman shelita (contrary to what you may think, harotze…) but ,for the life of me, I don’t know where this “new’ shitta comes from. Until the second world war, kollels were rare- for the best of the best only-and most people worked,even in the heart of Lithuania!. As it was for three thousand years. What happened in the past fifty years to changed this?? Did maaseh bereishis suddenly change?? On another post some time ago, I divulged that I have two sons in kollel, but they are not there forever (one has already taken a post) and if they would not be suitable for some kind of ‘klai kodesh’,of course, they would go to work , like other people.

    By asserting (as mdd said) that EVERYONE has to be in kollel forever, you actually diminish the importance of kollel and you are not able to feed those who really should be there adequately.

    Lastly, it may very well be that Rav Shteineman shelita is being misquoted by the original poster (OP) and all he said that we must learn more Torah and may not have said anything about not engaging in work.

    in reply to: Rav Aharon Leib Shteinman tells Yidden to shun secular education #895795
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    Harotze…..

    It is useless to enter into a discussion with the attitude that you have, thast one can never question any word from a Godol. Sure, Rav Shteineman shelita knows the gemoro- sure he knows the mishne in kiddshin. Hoewever,has he- or any other Godol that espouses his views- give an adequate answer to the gemoro’s point?

    Has anyone that you know explain where the chiyuv of teaching one’s son a profession disappear? (The shittah of Rav nehoroi is daas jochid and surely not lehalocho). Has anyone ever give you a good answer how you can avoid the obligations of the kessuboh?

    What has changed that suddenly, in the last fifty years, we ignore everything that was halocho till now. Do you have any reasonable answer?

    in reply to: Rabbinical authority nowadays #895009
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    In the times of president Andrew Jackson, the Supreme Court issued a ruling contrary to his views. Jackson said ‘let the Supreme Court enforce it”

    Same for the question of takonos: Rabbonim can issue all the takonos they wish- if the people don’t follow them,they are useless.

    in reply to: Rav Aharon Leib Shteinman tells Yidden to shun secular education #895791
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    It gets very tiresome to continue hearing the protests of those who want to justify every single word of a Godol. At the risk of being called an ‘apikores” ( I can already hear toi…), the gemoro in berachos makes it very clear that to rely only upon learning Torah DOES NOT WORK! Add to that the words of the mishneh in kiddushin and you have an ironclad instruction by our chachomim that one must work in one’s life. Only people like R’ Shimon ben Yochai (berachos 35B)and R’Nehoroi(kiddushin) can do it but normal people – all us basically- should not rely on other people’s Tseddakah. All the achromin mentioned by Harotzeh…., the Bais Josef and others , allowed us to make our living as klai kodesh but a living one must make.

    Today- if one must have secular education for working (and virtually all work today requires that) one cannot just say-don’t study it – because in such a way you condemn people to a life of poverty and living off tsedakkah.

    in reply to: Eid passuled because of Iphone #895179
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    Well, elijahu hanovi must be on his way “veheishiv lev ovos al bonim” and by extension, melech hamoshiach is soon here ! Imagine- HaKatan and I agree on something !! “Mi keamcho Yisroel”!

    in reply to: Eid passuled because of Iphone #895167
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    shein- please,please check the gemoro berachos-currently the daf limmud- about someone whom you think made a sin in the day…you must accept that he made teshuvo- but you- not only don’t you accept that he may have made teshuvo- you imply falsely that he may have made a sin…this is outrageous and you should never think thast way again!what the messader kidusshin did was disgusting.

    in reply to: Rav Aharon Leib Shteinman tells Yidden to shun secular education #895772
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    and you’ll be dependent on tsedakkah the rest of your life…I suggest we review the daf coming up- berachos 35B- thast speaks exactly to that and concludes that we should work…because we are human beings…

    in reply to: Fresh Broccoli #897530
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    sam2-did the tanaim and amoroim have glasses??? At best, they were very expensive and unreliable, at worst no one had them. So, why do we insist that we use a microscope to see bugs? You do know that there are millions of bacteria eveywhere, on our skin, in our beds, on our food and those are visible with a nuclear microscope and yet we don’t think to go that far. where is the limit??

    in reply to: Fresh Broccoli #897521
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    curiosity;your point is well taken. In reality bugs would only be ossur if you can see them with the naked eye. Using any artificial means (even glasses) really do not make them “ossur’ because, very simply, if you use artificial means- “ein ledovor sof”. Why stop at glasses, magnifying glasses, microscopes up to the most sophisticated magnifying microscopes.

    Nonetheless, a “ruach’ of “chumros’ has taken root in recent years and so, you have all these convoluting means to ‘clean’ vegetables.

    In practice, I do the normal thing like soaking in salt water, rinsing the vegetables carefully and if you so require-repeat.

    You cannot require the masses to go to abnormal length as we are not angels.

    in reply to: Who was your favorite speaker at the RNC? #894728
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    paul ryan hands down….

    in reply to: Zionism argument #894184
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    sam2-Thanks for your comments. Although personally I am a Zionist (I can hear the teeth grinding of health and HaKatan), I have consistently argued in many columns here that the old arguments are totally irrelevant. The medinah is here to stay and it is the duty of all Jews-certainly the frum ones- to make it better.

    in reply to: Zionism argument #894179
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    JewsagainstZionism.com ? Are they also the ones who give hand to our enemies the Palestinians and the Iranians? And therefore are actually under the heading of “rodef’

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    First question are “health” and “HaKatan” the same person? (erstwhile Joseph?)

    Second question: do they have a mirror in the house? (Maybe they “pasken’ like the Remo,sserting it is lo silbash)Otherwise, it might be useful to look into that mirror and see who is the bigger slanderer of Jews.

    in reply to: Zionism argument #894174
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    yenne2- how is israel-only getting more terrible ?please elucidate….

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    sam2- I have come to the conlcusion that “health’ and “hakatan’ are crypto arabs and have been sent to this website to spread the evil lies of the anti-semites.

    in reply to: ??? ???? ?? ???? #945294
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    shmoel- wow! I knew that thet sefardim practiced yibum until fairly recently but are they still doing it??

    in reply to: wording to decline a hand shake? #894038
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    on the ball- I have briefly reviewed the meforshim on this possuk. Clearly, the Rambam considers this possuk (ISH,ISH, lo sikrevu) as a “lav” on just “Chibbuk venishuk” (hugging.etc)and the chinuch follows his way. However, other Poskim do not consider this a lav on just “negiah”. The Ramban clearly considers this a ‘derabbonom”(see his perush on chumash and the Chinuch) The Ibn Ezra clearly interprets this possuk as relevant only to a real relationship. SO, you do have a good source for equating women to men in this matter but it is not as one sided as you think.

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    mogold- thanks for your posting. I agree with you that jews of Hungarian descent have accepted the Chassam Sofer zz’l as their final halacha (many would not even walk into a shul with the bima at the front). My point was that when he said “chodosh ossur min hatorah” , it was a “horo-as sho-oh” because of the success of the Reform movement in those days. That was my point in mentioning the psak of R’moshe zz’l.You are certainly welcome to follow his Piskei halacha but the whole world is not Hungarian…

    And yet, we do not know his views on a medinah.

    As far as Rav Teichtal HY’D, I only pointed out that even amongst the Rabbonim who followed the Chassam sofer’s derech, there were those who embraced the medinah. Not Zionism- mind you, but certaily the hope and the fact of a medinah.

    in reply to: Are you a Zionist? #893400
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    health- my response to your “other’ topic may surprise you. I did not mind that the National anthem was not sung at the syium or that the Hatikvah (certainly did not expect that!) was ignored. As a matter of fact, I don’t think that ani maamim should have been sung either. This was a syium and singing a national anthem did not have to be part of the program. If it would have been some official meeting (say political), it might be different.

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    vochindik-you must have this sermonette ready for writing- as you posted it seconds after my posting! I am not going to enter into an argument about the validity of different seforim (Vajoel Moshe is a halocho sefer???) but I will take issue with your assertion about the persecution of jews in previous centuries and your blind belief that one Godol(the Munkatcher) was right and others were wrong.

    If you cannot see that the Holocaust was a game changer in everything,then there is no point in continuing the discussion. In the past two millenia, there was no other corresponding catastrophe since the churban habayis. Even the expulsion from Spain was on another level. If you do not accept this, then there is no point in a discussion.

    As far as the Minchas Elazar, you can follow him,if you wish. I (and many others) do not. I can readily accept Rav Teichtal HY”D and his argument about the coming of Moshiach. As a matter of fact , his explanation is very logical!

    in reply to: AFTER MOSHIACH COMES: Will people die? #893600
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    sam2= thanks for the prompt reply. Can you pinpoint where the Rambam says that? (surely not in the jad)

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    HaKatan- I am not about to rehash the arguments on the Holocaust. I have said multiple times on this forum that there is no answer to this event and that no one- except the Nazis- are guilty.

    As far as the medinah and Zionism, I am in good company with Rav Teichtal zz’l, the gerrer rebbe zz’l and many others.

    in reply to: wording to decline a hand shake? #894036
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    sam2 (and on the ball): I checked the Sefer Hachinuch today and indeed, towards the end of his peirush on the mitzvah -that deals with kirva-he writes ; “this mitzvah applies all the time, everywhere and for men and women. ” He conitnues to expound upon it. So, clearly, he believes that this “lav’ of “kirva” applies to all.However, he also brings dowm the Ramban who maintains that the “issur’ of “kirvah” is only miderabbonon and it is a gezeirah, so as to avoid more stringent aveiras.

    on the ball- thanks for pointing out the Rashi (it is from medrash Toras Kohanim). However, from that rashi, it is not evident that “kirvah’ is what is meant. Rashi says that because we need a “lav” for any of the “ervas” for a woman. Remember “ein onshim elo im keim mazhirim” you cannot punish unless you have forewarned someone. And, as in Kedsohim, it is clear that women are punished for “gilui aroyos”, the Toras Kohanim has to find the “lav’ for women. It is not clear that it applies to “kirva’ by itself.

    in reply to: AFTER MOSHIACH COMES: Will people die? #893598
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    yekke- just to remind you of what was said earlier- “jemos hamoshiach” (the days of Moshaich) are NOT the same as the days of ‘techyas hameissim”. The gemoro and the Rambam both say that the world will continue normally in “jemos hamoshiach”

    sam2- your words are astounding. techyas hameissim only for a few select people? cannot be !

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    mogold- well, I did start the ‘ad hominem’ attacks, accusing you of denigrating previous gedolim, so , from now onwards, I will refrain from ‘ad hominem’ attacks. You can do whatever you want, but your aspersions on me and my thoughts (you don’t even know me) are out of bounds. No matter,let’s stick to the issues. The Chassam Sofer zz’l died in 1839, so his views on Zionism, the return to Eretz Yisroel ,the medinah are impossible to know. THAT was my point. (Actually, you can extrapolate them, if you look in the kesovim of R” Zvi Hirsch Kalisher, a talmid of R”Akiva Eiger and a correspondent of the Chassam Sofer and they are very sympathetic to the return to Eretz Ysroel) .

    On your main point of “chodosh ossur min hatorah”- which is what you are leaning on, actually it was a “horo’as sho-oh” because Reform was getting stronger and the Chassam Sofer intended to stop it. Many of the Chassam Sofer’s “issurim’ are not necessarily halocho (see R”Moshe Feinstein on the bimah in the middle, for example) but a response to the conditions of the day.

    Hence, my point about not being able to lean on the Chassam Sofer’s words in regard to the medinah or anything in today’s world. One of the great Hungarian rabbonim , surely a follower of the Chassam Sofer, Rav Teichtal HY”D, changed his mind on the medinah and wrote the seminal sefer “Eim habonim Semeicha”,so you see that even talmidim of the Chassam Sofer could support a return to Eretz Ysroel.

    As far as Greenbaum remarks, indeed ,he said something similar and he was roundly criticized for it- as you see, people still remember that odious remark seventy years later. However, it has nothing to do with Eretz Yisorel and the medinah.

    in reply to: ??? ???? ?? ???? #945288
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    shmel(and popa)-yibum has priority over chalitza although obviously today we only do chalitzah .Amongst the sefardim , yibum was practiced until very recently-so the time machie may not have to go far….

    in reply to: ??? ???? ?? ???? #945285
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    nechoma- if I remember correctly, you start with the oldest brother and yo ugo down the line- in other words, of one brother declined ,the othets CAN make yivum. However, if one brother jumps in and gives chalitza, she is free.

    in reply to: wording to decline a hand shake? #894030
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    on the ball- what you write is not correct. The Torah specifically includes men AND women in the sin of “ervah” (see kedoshim ,vayikro 20)but there is no mention of “kirvah’ in that chapter. As a matter of fact, that chapter is explicit in dealing with actual forbidden relationships only.

    in reply to: wording to decline a hand shake? #894028
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    shmoel- if you are replying to my question- yo did not answer it. where is the source for “lo sikrevu’ for a woman?

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    shmoel- You are right and I apologize to R’Moshe Blau zz’l. I confused him with R”Amram Blau zz’l.

    vochindik- your logic is convoluted but let’s assume you are right. So, you admit that medinas yisroel is here to stay and that it is our duty now to improve it. How is this view different from the Agudah? And indeed, from the mizrachi?

    in reply to: wording to decline a hand shake? #894026
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    I have a question for all posters.Clearly “negiah” would be ossur for a man- “lo sikrevu legalos ervah” (see psukim in Vayikro 18 -including 18-19, for a niddah)but why would it be ossur for a woman to shake another man’s hands?? there is no issur of “negiah’ on her. Please elucidate because I don’t see a source for a woman having an issur “kirvah”.(see Rambam Hilchos issurei biah, perek 21,mishne 1)

    in reply to: Shave head #1099030
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    just a few observations: as “mammele’ writes, the hungarian minhag -al pi chassam sofer- was to shave the woman’s head because they were worried that ,during tevilah, a hair or two would float above the water (especially when they are long)and so the tevilah would not be good.

    there is also a “zohar’ (mdd was kind enough to show us a mareh mokom) that equates hair as coming from the “sitra achara” -the evil side and because of that men also shave their head-apart from the peyos. Incidentally, this does not apply to the beard-obviously!

    Notwithstanding this late hungarian minhag, it is clear from tenach and gemoro and rishonim that women never shaved their head prior to the nineteenth century.”lulei demistafina” – if I would not be scared on saying this, I would venture to say that this minhag originated in the eighteenth century when all kind of people- including gentiles- shaved their heads for hygienic reasons- and the Jews followed suit- with an assist from a specific chumro.

    in reply to: Are you a Zionist? #893396
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    healh:other topic???

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    Allow me to deal first with the truly insulting comments by mogold that the gedolim , who included virtually all of the chassidische rebbes and most of the litvishe roshei yeshiva in eretz yisroel, succumbed to the lure of money. This is insulting and , in this month of elul, you should ask mechila from the imrei emes zz’l ,the ponevitzher rosh yeshiva zz’l, the vishnitser rebbe zz’l , the klausenburger rebbe zz’l and many others.

    BTW- the chassam sofer zz’l died in 1839, so let’s not include his shittah-that has nothing to do with zionism or eretz yisroel- in this debate.

    As far as BIRUR’s explanation, it is indeed conspicuous that he is not able to comment on the second letter, and can only say “that we can get a fuller understanding if we study his words”. HOW?

    As far as the story he tells about telshe in the earlier days- let me point out that it was fritten by R’Moshe Blau zz’l , a wonderful person but he was a member of Neturei Karta, which makes him a “nogea bedovor”.

    And again, even if we accept his words, the stories happened way back in the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, when zionism was indeed a party of haskoloh and incurred the wrath of many orthodox Gedolim.

    It is incontrovertible that the Holocaust and the establishment of Medinat Israel were game changers. R”Itche Meir Levin- the gerrer rebbe’s brother-in-law, – signed the declaration of independence of israel! The Vishnizter rebbe zz’l (R’Chaim Meir) built his shikkun in Bnai brak- the Klausenburger rebbe zz’l left the United States and built his kirya in natanyah (Kiryat Zanz). Many other chareidi gedolim recognized this and, although they did not agree with the government in its appraoch to secularity, they realized that the medinah is here to stay and one should work within it to improve it.

    in reply to: daf yomi #893128
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    May I ask why moderators inject their opinions on this website? (see Motis shem tov’s comments)

    Why shouldn’t we? Don’t we have opinions?

    And if you are afraid that it biases us, wouldn’t you rather know what our biases are than be blind to them?

    Besides, it was a compromise for the fact that I bent the rules and approved the link.

    in reply to: AFTER MOSHIACH COMES: Will people die? #893594
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    rebbi1- your quote from the ramchal is confusing, I interpret it to say that people will live normally “bi-jemei hamoshiach” but when the time will come for “techiyas hameissim’ even those living then will die for one hour to qualify for “techyas hameissim” I will try to fidn the actual quoye in the sefer.

    in reply to: AFTER MOSHIACH COMES: Will people die? #893591
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    vchindik- I am refraining from saying what I think of your remark. Just note there is gemoro , there is a Rambam and neither of these have anything to do with “techyias hamessim”. Please look at the thirteen “ani ma-amin”s ,generally considered the basis of our “emunah” and you will see that there are TWO

    ani ma-amin”s -one for “Bias Hamoshiach”, one for “Techyias hameessim”.

    in reply to: AFTER MOSHIACH COMES: Will people die? #893589
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    Rambam, hilchos melochim (note , this is part of the jad hachazokoh, a halacha sefer): perek 12 mishne 1 : “Do not think that there will be anything different in the “jemos hamoshiach”, or whether there will be any difference in the the “ways of the world’ (ma-ase bereishis), but the world will continue as always:” See rest of the mishne and the clear indication that the only difference in “jemos hamoshiach” will be in the fact that the Jewish people will be free of the rule of the gemtiles. This view is based on the words of Shmuel in Sanhedrin 91, who said “the only difference in “jemos hamoshiach’ will be “shibud malchyios”- the yoke of the gentiles”.

    in reply to: Are you a Zionist? #893394
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    health- I have not stopped laughing this morning since reading your posting. You have not stopped accusing millions of Jews of being pagans, kofrim, you have denigrated tens ofv thousands of jews who gave their time ,and some their life,to protect their brotehrs and sisters, not to mention the phantasmagoric ideas you carry around about Eretz Yisroel , and you call ME uncivil???

    in reply to: Shlomo Carelbach #895762
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    nechomah- shlomo gave ALL his money away to needy people- every cent of it! Show me any other people who have done that??

    in reply to: Are you a Zionist? #893390
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    curiosity- don’t worry, nobody is paying attention at that gasbag…

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    BIRUR: Did you look at the dates of the two lettes we are discussing?? The letter that you rely upon (a private one, by the way) was written in 5703 -that is 1943 !! The horrors of the Holocaust were not well known yet and ,obviously, the medinah was not established yet.

    The second letter (mentioned by yoshchayal and a public one) was written in 5714 -that is 1954 !!! ten years afetr the catastrophe of the Holocaust was discovered and after the medinah was established.

    Whatever was motivating Rabbonim and Gedolim before the Holocaust and certainyl before the establishment of the medinah changed drastically after these events. As in Sifrei teshuvos with regard to teshubos, I take the later letter as the autoritative one.

    in reply to: Shlomo Carelbach #895760
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    mammele= i guarantee you one thing: shlomo z’l did not get ANY schar in his wrold ! he died peniless, having given away all his money to poor people.

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    shmoel- first of all, your statement that “living in eretz yisroel everyone holds of” is incorrect. The satmarer rebbe zz’l told his chassidim to leave eretz yisroel and did not believe that it was a mitzvah to libe in eretz yisroel (see some of the comments here of health and vochindik).

    Secondly, the belzer rebbe, the vishnitzer rebbe, the gerrer rebbe, the klausenburger rebbe and many others all came to eretz yisroel when the medinah was being established and all of them came after the Holocaust. If they believed ni the satmarer shittah ,they could have gone elsewhere (where the satmarer himself went). They chose to go to eretz yisroel and accept the medinah wholeheartedly. I do not say that they accepted its philosophy or the state of yiddshkeit but they clearly accepted the medinah and still,today, participate in voting and other aspects of israeli life.

    Yes, some of the old yishuv were against the medinah but they are very few today.

    in reply to: Shlomo Carelbach #895758
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    wow- health and I are having a civilized conversation…there is still hope for klal yisroel ! I am into his nussach and music but you are entitled to your liks and dislikes…

    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    shmoel: please inform em where the belzer rebbe shelita lives and where his “chotzer’ is…..also, please tell me where the wishnitzer rebbe shelita lives and where his “kiryah’ is…..

    in reply to: Shlomo Carelbach #895756
    rabbiofberlin
    Participant

    so, health, do you like R’Shlomo Carlebach or not?

Viewing 50 posts - 951 through 1,000 (of 1,897 total)