Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
rabbiofberlinParticipant
kanoi next door- you live in the 1950’s. The aid that the US gives israel is a very small part of the annual budget (about 2 %) and the total cut of american aid would barely be noitced by israel. In addition, as apukerma says (I can’t believe Ii agree with him!), israel was prevented fro mdeveloping its own weapons under pressure fro mthe US. if they would be on their own, they would prosper nd thrive!
rabbiofberlinParticipantbenignuman- yup= this is exactly how the Rambam interprets the halocho (see his loshon). It is also evident from the story of Hilell that this is exactly what happend – although it is not clear whether the gentlie became a ger right away.
YYTZ- i reraize that covering one’s hair (for a woman) may be a d’oraisa (there are conflicting views on that) but ,as you write, it would be very unusual to maintasin that this is what one has to accept to become a ger.
rabbiofberlinParticipantnathan a: thank you ! Tosfos writes “ubesefer hamaimoni”- in the book of the “maimoni” (rambam).
rabbiofberlinParticipantkanoi next door: i agree with you and i think that rav druckman shelita and his bet din did everything they could to have the gerim accept the mitzvos. I bet you that a large part of their gerim are still religious!
rabbiofberlinParticipantbenignuman: you encapsulated exactly what i wrote and I think you are right. The problem does not arise with the piskei halocho about gerus but with the (virtual) sickness of making chumros with everything. For ex.- I heard (true,only a shmuah with no actual knowledge) that a certain european bes din asks whether the woman candidate for gerus will “oover her hair” when she converts. Now, that is a wonderful way of living as a jew, but what does it have to do with “kabbolos ol mitzvos”? does the ger have to accept every chumro ? from the story of hillel, we clarly see that this is not the case.Every story about gerim in the torah or gemoro does not insist that the ger has to accept doing every mitzah with every chumro. He/she has to accept the “ol”- the burden, of mitzvos, the rest, he wil learn! ( see the actual language of the rambam)
rabbiofberlinParticipantmdd- how is it obvious? short of the prospective ger coming to the bet din with a ham sandwich in his/her hands, how would you know that he/she does not accept the torah? even if he/she afterwards weakens and does not keep most of the halochos, what doeas it prove? maybe he/she is doing it ‘leteovon” but still accept the mitzvas!kabblos mitzvahs does not mean keeping them- just accepting them!
rabbiofberlinParticipantbenigmuman has the last word on all this: you cannot retroactively cancel geirus. That, for sure, is the halacha and is supported by the vast majority of teshovus (R”Moshe’s teshuvo nothwithstanding). Regardless whether the ger- at that time- lied- as long as he went through the actual process (milah utevilah) he is a ger. even About Time accetps this!
rabbiofberlinParticipantI have to add my two-cents to this conversation,even though herring is a lot more expensive now. herring is the gift of the sea to all jews! try it as shmalz herring, try it as pickled herring, try it in sour creram…wonderful food ! the best with a shot of whidky and an egg kuchel!
rabbiofberlinParticipantWIY- secular Zionism had a hand in the founding of all the yeshivos in israel….
About Time- I don’t believe the story.
rabbiofberlinParticipanthealth- as I said, I am reluctant to regurgitate old controversies, as people will keep to their views.
second, my comments never spew hatred against anti-zionists. I sure disagree with their views but I live amongst them and have very cordial relationships with all.
As far as your concern with present day Eretz Yisroel, please excuse my stupidity, but isn’t this exactly what “sharing the burden” means? The ones who espouse this view see their hardearned moeny being drained for -what they thinkj- people who don’t participate in the general welfare of the land. They are all concerned about their money, security, the sacrifices that they make and that they- in their views- others don’t share. so, your concerns about the chareidim sufferning- well, the other side that they suffer plenty with their sacrifices of money and casualties.
rabbiofberlinParticipanthealth and all the other anti-israel posters: first of all, I have no hatred against anyone-yes, even against the anti-zionists ,as long as they don’t conspire wth our enemies like Iran.I live amongst the anti-zionists. They have their views, I have mine.
Asv far as the medinah, I said a long time ago that history will determine the winner. The Sadducees, the Karaim and others disappeared and it was rabbinic Judaism that survived. Same today. Orthodox Judaims has survived many centuries and continues to rebound. None of us will be here in a hundred years time- those living then will determine who is the winner.
jechi hamelech hamoshiach leolom vo-ed!
rabbiofberlinParticipantto about time: your stories about Rav Wolbe zz’l are interesting and fascinating. However, I do not , for one moment, believe that the story you tell about a miklat during the six day war and Rav Wolbe saying that Zionism was chilul hashem, This story is pure invention and plays to a certain agenda.
rabbiofberlinParticipanthealth- you are just proving what i said.You live in an imaginary world that looks at anything beyond your “arba amos’ as ‘treif”.
It is too tiresome to regurgitate the old argument about zionism ,the medinah, the second world war…etc…I look at facts- and all within the confines of a halachic/jewish society. The image that you are painting about eretz Yisroel is far off the truth and anyone having lived there knows it. Sure, there are chilonim and sure, there are those who want to repudiate any religious influence- but look at what the medinah really is: a thriving jewish society, with -at least- one quarter shomrei shabbos and growing, and probably 80% having some reasonable jewish life. Contrast that to the US= you have scarcely 10% shomrei shabbos and probably 80% who do NOT know what their jewish roots are. I am much more optimistic about the continuation of jewish life in eretz yisroel than anywhere in the world,nothwithstanding your jeremiads about how bad the medinah is. jechi hamelech hamoshiach leolom vo-ed!
rabbiofberlinParticipantgavra at work: thank the good Lord forsome humor!! sorely needed on this site! actually I meant popa, toi, daniela and all the other moon worshippers (figure that one out). I don’t see oomis11o5 here either= she must have felt the same as I did. I wish some of the posters (young ones, for sure) should look at the real world sometimes..not the fictitious one they imagine to exist..
rabbiofberlinParticipantI used to be a regular poster on this site but the coffee room has been taken over by extremist posters, who are more in tune with Iran than with the Jewish people and who have all the time in the world (they don’t work either, obviously). I am not going to stoop to argue senseless arguments…all I will say is to look what is happening in Eretz Ysroel and its many successes, truly a real jewish state. it is enough to give violent nightmares to ” Health,gavra at work, the (whatever) bear,and all the other loons on this site!
jechi hamelech hamoshiach leolom voed!
December 21, 2012 5:47 pm at 5:47 pm in reply to: Olmert Signals Concessions in Yerushalayim #914649rabbiofberlinParticipantthis report is four-repeat- four years old. can “only i try’ explain what relevance it has to today? BTW-regev is now a prominent likud knesset member and rather right wing.
rabbiofberlinParticipantOne major point of correction: The Chief Rabbi of the UK does not represent all jews in Engalnd. He only represents the United Synagogue. The liberal and reform congregations do not accept him a their representatives.
rabbiofberlinParticipantIt is a sad indictment of our generation that we ascribe papal infallibilty to our gedolim. It was never like that. Emunas chachomim has nothing to do with believing blindly in every saying of a godol. Can they give berochos? Absolutely. Can you tell us about very unusual stories of gedolim? certainly. but this does not mean that every word, every utterance should be followed. That is idolatry.
rabbiofberlinParticipantI stopped reading the NY Times years ago and so, have no answer for you. Most of what is written in that left wing rag is, in an ycase, biased!
rabbiofberlinParticipantA couple of comments: to ‘ferd” i checked “wikipedia (quickest info) and Bibi actually opposed the gaza withdrawal- he asked for a public referendum-did not get it. he did vote for it but immedietsly resigned. So, you are technically correct in sayuing that he voted for the disengagement but certaingly worng in saying that he supported it. He did not.
to “zed’: your comments defy rationality.Are you seriously saying we should just sit with folded arms an do nothign to proetect ourselves? Do you have ANY source for this irraitonal behavior?
to “takahmamash”(and computer777): I wrote “maybe they will be crushed’-obviously they did not but this doesn’t mean that the govt. took the wrong decision. The only other option was to invade and re-occupy gaza. This will not happen. Whatwill happen is “cutting the grass ” every few years. We will have to continue to bomb them from time to time for a very long time. The basic fact is -as zed surprisinlgy writes- that the Jews in Israel have prospered for many years-Boruch Hashem- and will continue to do so while the enemeies wallow in poverty,
rabbiofberlinParticipantSome of the posters are totally misinformed. Bibi actually voted against the gaza withdrawal-it was Sahron who engineered it. Secondly, how about waiting to see what transpires in tghe next few days? maybe Hamas will be crubed- for now, and that might be a victory. so, patience is a virtue we should all exercise.
rabbiofberlinParticipantsushee (and some others): I have not posted on this website often recently and only because the headline (quoting Rabbi Pruzansky) caught my eye did I comment. To Sushee: as you saw from others, this mysterious study does not exist. It was a sad mistake for rabbi Pruzansky to use this because it was “an oral report”, more like loshon horah, actually.
It is a preposterous opinion and the fact is that- on the contrary- many.many more students who are not frum become frum when going to a jewish (even MO) school.Look around you and you will see hundreds-thousands-of baalei teshuva who were influenced by MO teachers and even leaders of a different kind – like R”Shlomo Carlebach zz’l whose yahrzeit is tomorrow night. May he continue being a meilitz josher for all of us.
rabbiofberlinParticipantI know Rabbi Pruzansky’ community pretty well and what happens there is totally at odds with what he said. A simple challenge: where is that study? where are those numbers? can you back up what you are saying? i don’t believe him.
rabbiofberlinParticipantR’Moshe Ernster is a son-in-law of R”chaim Meir Hager zz’l , and a brother-in-law of R’Moshele hager zz’l , recently nifta, both Vishnitzer rebbes. Hence, he is the uncle of the present Vishnitzer rebbe, R’yisroel Hager shelita.
His son does lead the bais hamedrash in jerushulaim, which is ,of course, on the vishnitzer derech.
rabbiofberlinParticipantactually, after seeing the postings, it would be useful to see the so-called study that rabbi Pruzansky is referring to. I do not believe that it is true. Not by a long shot.To quote an anonymous, mysterious and unkonwn study is the height of hypocrisy.As in everything, show the study! Till then, I don’t believe it.
rabbiofberlinParticipantzahavsdad and litvishe; You are probably talking about “ateres charna”- a popular hall on the main road but not in the middle of New Square. I think it is owned by New Square and the income goes to the village. The “smorgashboard’ certainly is mixed. (I have been there numerous times). The hall is mainly used by non-skverer chassidim. The seating is separate snd a mechitza (of course) for dancing.
rabbiofberlinParticipantyitai- the MOST contested opinion by the Nodah bejehudah? you took a poll? Incidentally, the nodah bejehudah wrote ttwo teshuvos on this subject, if memory serves me right.
rabbiofberlinParticipantsam2- gemoro berachos 44A- “the chachomim looked from surah to neherdoah and found only (two) pairs, the daughters of rav chisdah who were married to rumi bar chumo and mar ukva bar chumo.” QED.
rabbiofberlinParticipantI don’tw where the poster got his information. I admit i never read the whole “tazvuoh” but I know personally families whre two brothers married two sisters. so I don’t see the problem. The only corrolary in this whole matter is a distant one- If -G-d forbid- one husband dies suddenly without children, then the wife would not be eligible for “yivum’ by the other brother. she becomes a “tzoroh”, which is not eligible for yivum.
September 25, 2012 4:39 am at 4:39 am in reply to: NYC Board of Health Votes to Regulate Bris Milah #1096349rabbiofberlinParticipantgavra at work- you are misquoting the Supreme Court decision. The case you are quoting deals with a situation if someone uses religious beliefs as a pretext to avoid a law. Read the whole deision. Quite different from the case here.
rabbiofberlinParticipantsbeph- do you have to have ten people listening to the whole beracha or only at thend for the “omen”?
as gar as choviv- when the tsibbur sings along, why isn’t it clearly choviv? and you want to hear the origianl chazan?
rabbiofberlinParticipantWIY- source please ??
As far as the singing with the chazan- first of all, if you concentrate, then “trei kolai lo mishtame’ does not apply (see Hilchos shofar). Then, as today we are all “bekiim” we don’t have to be “jotzeh’ with the ball tefillah’s “chazarah”, so we can join and sing!
September 20, 2012 6:55 pm at 6:55 pm in reply to: NYC Board of Health Votes to Regulate Bris Milah #1096270rabbiofberlinParticipanticed-I checked wikipedia and two other websites and ,indeed, the Ari’s father was an ashkenazi (luria was the family name- one website even asserts that his ancestors came from brisk- russia)although his mother was sefardit.
He grew up in egypt when his father died as he was very young- and hence, the common assumption (at least by me) that he was a sefardi. Still, I’d like to know what minhagim he followed, the Rosh (ashkenazi) or the Rambam (sefardi)
September 20, 2012 6:48 pm at 6:48 pm in reply to: NYC Board of Health Votes to Regulate Bris Milah #1096269rabbiofberlinParticipantHaleivi- In today’s Hebrew, indeed, ‘motzetz’ means sucking and usually it means by mouth. However, did it mean the same in the gemoro’s time?
Iced- that the teimanim and sefardim to ‘metzitzah be’peh’ TODAY does not prove that they did it always.
As far as the ARi goes- you surprised me with your mention that his father was an Ashkenazi. In egypt?? and what do you mean that he ‘was an ashkenazi”. I’d be very surprised to hear that he followed the Rosh and the Tur, rather than the Rif and the Rambam. Or that he followed the remo, rather than the Bais josef.
September 20, 2012 4:11 am at 4:11 am in reply to: NYC Board of Health Votes to Regulate Bris Milah #1096260rabbiofberlinParticipantSam2- As this is a hot topic now- especially because a Rabbi in Monsey was quoted in the Journal news (see news section) , so I did some research. The gemoro and the Rambam (quoted in this thread) talk about “metzitzah’ but do not add the word “be-peh’The Hebrew word “metzitza” seesm to indicate by mouth, although this is not conclusive. From a quick web search I found a site that deals with this and there, it claims that the first time “metzitza be’peh’ is mentioned’ is by the Remo and subsequently by the Kabbalists. That makes it fifteenth/sixteenth century onwards.
The most intruiguing aspect on that site is the claim that the Syrian, Yemenite and other Sefardi jes do NOT practice “metzitzah be-peh”. That would make it a European minhag, almost exclusively (yes- I know the Ari was a sefardi). If any psoters know anything asbout this, please inform us!
rabbiofberlinParticipant“old man” thanks for your information! How does one get hold of this book (sefer) ?
BY THE WAY- just to show that Rashi was quite familiar with books who were NOT gemoro or halachic- he mentions “sefer josef ben gurion” on daf 43A in berochos (see Rashi “shemen artzeinu”). for those who are unfamiliar with “josef ben gurion”, he is Josephus and this is based on his book.
rabbiofberlinParticipantI think that many of the posters have no clue what it meant to travel in those days and the difficulties it entailed. Allow me first to correct some factual mistakes.
yichusdik: Rashi did NOT live in the places that you mention. He lived most of his life in Troyes-which is in the middle of France. He learned in the area you are quoting (worms, actually) so, at best, he knew some german and, of course, Old French.
Also, the Plantagenets did NOT rule that part of france- as a matter of fact, Rashi died in 1105 ,when the Plantagent dynasty had not started yet.
Arabic was unknown to Rashi- he never traveled to Spain and, probably, castilian Spanish was also unknown to him.
To WIY- again, you elevate Rashi to be a Novih. Rashi was the greatest “meforosh”on shas- and one of the greatest Jews that lived but this doesn’t make him infallible nor does it make his words always correct (there are plenty of “kashas” from his own grandchildren, the baalei tosefos).
In any case, this is not even an opinion by Rashi ,it is just a description of an item and it is ludicrous to say that Rashi did not make a mistake in namimg the wrong item.
rabbiofberlinParticipantMORIS’ s comments show the preposterous place we have arrived at: “apikorsous” for what? because Sam2 commented on a rashi ??? this is so over the top-now we can’t even make an innocuous comment? preposterous!
September 12, 2012 7:42 pm at 7:42 pm in reply to: Will Mitt Romney Win the Presidential Election? #896385rabbiofberlinParticipantzahavasdad- you are just regurgitating information from CNN or The Huffington Post. There are eight weeks to go and polls are meaningless now.
September 12, 2012 3:45 am at 3:45 am in reply to: Did Neil Armstrong really land on the moon?? #896880rabbiofberlinParticipantdaasyochid- i cannotvouch for what R’Yaakov zz,; said. But i do know that the Rambam you are referring to- 2-3- clearly writes that the heavenly bodies (olam hagalgalim) are physical and exist in full reality. Check the words “megushem” -measning earthly and real.
rabbiofberlinParticipantThe most ridiculous comment comes from “gavra at work” .A “psak Din” to vote for Obama????? Are you hallucinating?? Plus, Romney never said he would cut all program-another lie by the democrats.
September 11, 2012 9:34 pm at 9:34 pm in reply to: Did Neil Armstrong really land on the moon?? #896872rabbiofberlinParticipantcoming from “the gatesheader’. it indeed was a a surprising answer but don’t worry- you are no a heretic at all. The chazal themsleves realized that their knowledge of science is not perfect nor final. see Pesaschim about the earth and the sun, where the chazal say that the view of the gentiles is more logical.
rabbiofberlinParticipantcherrybim- this, again ,is a minhag and i think that Satmsr and some other Hungarian groups are makpid on that. the rest of the world is not.
September 11, 2012 5:36 pm at 5:36 pm in reply to: Did Neil Armstrong really land on the moon?? #896853rabbiofberlinParticipantdaasyochid- NOPE ! You are misquoting the Rambam and, dare I say, misrepresenting what R’ Yaakov MAY have said. The Rambam- in the halocho that you mention- does NOT speak about the moon (or other heavenly bodies) at all. He speaks about “malochim”- angels. Please check again.
And,actually ,in the mishne before that (3), he specifically addresses the heavenly bodies and says that THEY ARE PHYSICAL- just the opposite that you said. What he says is that that world- “olam hagalgalim”- is fixed and never changes- in contrast to the living world (us) that changes all the time (birth, growth, death).
I don’t know what R’Yaakov zz’l said but ,based on this Rambam, he clearly did not say anything that is being quoted.
September 10, 2012 10:35 pm at 10:35 pm in reply to: simple question: who decides when to close a thread? #896424rabbiofberlinParticipantTo answer most of the above posters, clearly, if the comments contain unacceptable material, such as obscenities and (on this website) an open challenge to halocho (such as saying , for example, that we don’t need a mechitzah in a shul) it can be suppressed. My question is about comments that do not ,under any circumstances, contain something as objectionable as the above but only contain people’s own impressions and,often, specific valid halachic opinuions, what posesses a moderator to close it?
For example, we had a very long and very heated discussions ome time ago about ther satmarer shittah and zionism- the comments kept on coming (often rather heated) yet the thread was never closed. Just a day ago, a poster commented on the selichos by jehuda green this past motzei shabbos and it was almost summarily closed. Why?
September 10, 2012 8:21 pm at 8:21 pm in reply to: simple question: who decides when to close a thread? #896419rabbiofberlinParticipantchoc- well, then let’s amend the comment to say that -IF one posts, one is AT THE MERCY of the moderators.
I found the closing of some threads (most recently about selichos by jehuda green in manhattan) rather strange.
rabbiofberlinParticipantmythoughts- very funny !
On a more serious note, this must be a very new “minhag’ because the vast majority of Botei chayim in the world do not discriminate.
September 10, 2012 5:42 am at 5:42 am in reply to: Much of Brooklyn was at the amazing Yehuda Green/Carlebach Slichos 'til 3:30 AM! #896027rabbiofberlinParticipantI’l leave to others to debate what selichos are for, how they should be said and what one should feel. I do, however, want to rebut a true slander -motzi shem ra-by WIY, when he says that
1)there was no mechitza in that shul- absolutely not true -this is an orthodox shul and men and women were separated during the tefillos with the appropriate mechitza. (You may want to pray in a shul where the women are cooped up in a different room but R”moshe zz’l already took care of that).
2) Secondly – to assert that there was “taaruvos’- how ? Certainly, during the selichos there was no taaruvos.
3) “none of they guys and girls looked at each other and had bad thoughts”. Now you can read minds? Only one being in the world can see in our hearts and minds and that is HKBH. For everyone else , it is “motzi shem ra”.
So,please, you are welcome to run your life as you wish but allow everyone to find his/her derech to HKBH in his/her way.
September 9, 2012 8:02 pm at 8:02 pm in reply to: Much of Brooklyn was at the amazing Yehuda Green/Carlebach Slichos 'til 3:30 AM! #896012rabbiofberlinParticipantWIY- i am not going to debate what selichos is all about but I am going to tell you that “achdus” is indeed a most important thing in Klal Yisroel. You will find many instances where achdus was the reason for sucees . See matan torah (Vajichan ho-om tachas ho-hor) and, lo aleinu, the opposite too (dor haflogoh). The point is that to bring Jews together in a mitzvah (you are not seriously going to say that the selichos were not a mitzvah?) is in itself a major reason to do it. So, regardless of your thoughts on selichos, the achdus aspect was very important.
September 9, 2012 4:41 pm at 4:41 pm in reply to: Much of Brooklyn was at the amazing Yehuda Green/Carlebach Slichos 'til 3:30 AM! #896008rabbiofberlinParticipantAZOI.IS- you are so right !!
And to “toi” please look at tenach and the story of dovid hamelech and his wife michal….”vedovid hojo mekarker…” ‘Vedai lechakima beremiza!”
-
AuthorPosts