Punk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 90 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Maasar sheini today #2331448
    Punk
    Participant

    What a bunch of arrogant lazy brains in this coffee room. Should have known coming in.

    in reply to: Maasar sheini today #2330546
    Punk
    Participant

    @Yaakov Yosef A
    A and B is good.

    I am curious regaridng the application of the drash of lo sonu. If a Jew transfered hisbhekdesh’s worth during the beis hamikdash, is he liable on a ‘aseh’ or just a drabbanan?

    How can we say it’s a drabanan if the Torah itself provides a set price for certain transfers in hekdesh?!

    Is the application of the drabbanan in temple times a knas in addition to an aseh? If he is not liable on an עשה then has the Torah spoken for naught when setting specific amounts in weight and silver coins for specific types of Hekdesh?

    If he is liable on an עשה then how can we transfer maaser sheni produce for less than it’s worth? The Torah is clear regarding the worth of a fifth of the produce.

    in reply to: Maasar sheini today #2330545
    Punk
    Participant

    @Rosen please provide a source that the reason maaser sheini is still applicable is because the sanctity of yerushalayim is forever. Nevertheless, flowing with this logic- on the contrary! Let it be eaten in Yerushalayim! And if it is compared to korbanos to not be eaten there, then it’s a huge dochak to use Yerushalayim as a source for its application today!

    in reply to: Maasar sheini today #2330542
    Punk
    Participant

    @richashu
    “Read this” as a stand-alone is not a legitimate answer to a specific question.

    One of the differences between Judaism and l’havdil Christianity is that Judaism’s theology can be explained rather simply and quickly, while a Christain will tell you to read a whole bunch of books written by PHDs to try to make sense of their theology.

    in reply to: Adopt a dog. It’s a chesed. #2330397
    Punk
    Participant

    Dogs are let through into the coffee room, but not updated torah questions and threads. Interesting.

    in reply to: Maasar sheini today #2330363
    Punk
    Participant

    @yudathemaccabi is there a source for that reason? Levitcus 27 says to add a fifth, seemingly that should render moot that logic as well as o’naah not applying to maaser sheni.

    The drash of ‘lo sonu ish es achiv’ should seemingly apply to other matters of hekdesh.

    in reply to: Maasar sheini today #2330006
    Punk
    Participant

    Hekdesh is like margolis and sefer torah. Any specific amount is a drabbanan, and any amount said in Torah, like by redeeming a bechor Adam with five silver coins or by a neder is a chok.

    in reply to: Maasar sheini today #2329656
    Punk
    Participant

    Thanks for the explanations and sources.

    in reply to: Who will be Moshiach? #1512325
    Punk
    Participant

    As far as I know, there is no halachik criteria for moshiach been yosef, so we have no exact definitive definition of who he will be . The Rambam lays out clear Halachik criteria how to identify Moshiach ben Dovid. Whoever fullfils those criteria will have the Halachik status of moshiach. As far as I am concerned Moshiach could be someone like Rabbi Amnon Yitzchok, although I hope not 😊. In any case, as long as he comes soon.

    in reply to: Chabad Minhag #1503154
    Punk
    Participant

    See Hayom Yom for Tes Teves.

    in reply to: Pratim of Ad Delo Yoda #1479670
    Punk
    Participant

    There is an obligation to get drunk until your connection to Hashem is higher than a connection of “Yoda”= knowledge and seichel. So go get yourself completely smashed. But bear in mind that pikuach nefesh is doicheh kol hatorah kulah, so know your limits and make sure you are safe.

    in reply to: Gog umagog #1443751
    Punk
    Participant

    Maybe I should start a new thread on whether attacking someone for attacking someone is a viable strategy or not. On the one hand we see that Moshe Rabeinu killed the mitzri attacker and he also reproached the Jew the Jew merely lifted his hand. On the other hand there is a sevara to say that the coffee room rules get to be set by the mods….

    Maybe you have too much time on your hands 😊

    in reply to: Gog umagog #1442161
    Punk
    Participant

    I got 20 people to keep shabbos by threatening them about another Holocaust. NOT!

    in reply to: Heter Mayah Rabbonim #1441506
    Punk
    Participant

    Can anyone reference me a shiur about the rules of Dina dmalchusa dina? Because something tells me that that people quote this Halacha to an extreme. It’s become almost like the Joker card. Permitted according to Torah? That’s irrelevant, because dina dmalchusa dina.

    in reply to: Gog umagog #1441492
    Punk
    Participant

    Gog and magog could be whatever war is happening at any given time. Moshiach could come every day. Achakloi bchol Yom sheyovoi.On election day I voted for Moshiach because he’s good for the Jews. How about this, instead of people Hocking a tchynik about goig and magoig, we should be focused on our machshavah dibbur and maaseh.

    in reply to: Why Would a Girl Even Want to Learn Talmud? #1441340
    Punk
    Participant

    @chabadshlucha. Who was the famous chabad rebetzin that would learn gemara? I think she is mentioned in the previous rebbes memoirs.

    in reply to: Who is the new leader of Klal Yisrael? #1439219
    Punk
    Participant

    A source for a fact that everyone already knows, is the Rambam in his Hakdamah to the Mishneh Torah where he says that there has not been a central authority since the compilation of the Gemara. He says that every Chochom in each respective city has the authority to pasken according to the Gemara as he deems proper.

    in reply to: PSA About the Use of the Phrase “Trolling” 📢 #1439216
    Punk
    Participant

    One of the definitions of troll on Google is a “person who deliberately makes a provocative or inflammatory post online”. It has nothing to do with if you believe in the content of your post or not.

    in reply to: Who is the new leader of Klal Yisrael? #1439042
    Punk
    Participant

    I voted for Grand Rabbi Zalman Leib of Satmar.

    in reply to: Nittel #1437060
    Punk
    Participant

    I didn’t go through all the posts so I don’t know if it was mentioned that it is known that the Maharsha would refrain from learning on nittel.

    in reply to: Nittel #1437046
    Punk
    Participant

    Some Jews realized that nittel was an opportune time to cut up toilet paper for all the shabosos of the year.

    in reply to: Nittel #1437034
    Punk
    Participant

    I recently came across the following witticism. A Chassidic Rabbi was once requested to eulogize Harav Theodore Hershel. The Rabbi eulogized the koifer that he never spoke while wearing Tefillin, he never thought Torah in the bathroom and he never studied Torah on nittel.

    in reply to: If Donald Trump were to מְגַיֵּר and become Jewish… #1436446
    Punk
    Participant

    He’s definitely a secret chossid of Breslev.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1429390
    Punk
    Participant

    @daasyochid. See the note at the most bottom left of the page.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1429229
    Punk
    Participant

    Also, make yourself a coffee (after you finished your cup of tea), take a chelek chof aleph of likkutei sichos and study the third sicha of prashas Terumah as Sechel hayashar suggested before. You don’t even need to learn the whole sicha, just from page168 until the end. You might even enjoy it. Yes, it is a chabad source, but it’s also Torah😏😏

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1429185
    Punk
    Participant

    Save the anti chabad vitriol for a different thread. Calm down, take a chill and have a tea. All I am saying is that according to Rambam (and as explained by his son R Avrohom) and most probably according to Rashi, arguably the two greatest Rishonim, the menorah from Torah was diagonal. And therefore there is an insistence by lubavitcher Chassidim to portray it as such. You have a different opinion on the matter? That’s okay with me and also okay to the lubavitchers that I know.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1429076
    Punk
    Participant

    “some other shitos”. namely Rashi and Rambam. You want to decide according to archeological suggestion? Alright. But one thing is definitive. The menorah that we know from Torah was diagonal. Anything else is speculative.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428475
    Punk
    Participant

    And there is nothing wrong with saying that Titus’s menorah was incorrect,Haha.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428403
    Punk
    Participant

    @litvishechossid. If you didn’t get it, I said you should pick on the untucked shirts and straggly beards in a sarcastic manner.And no, it’s not a coded term for meshichistim.lol.😇

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428293
    Punk
    Participant

    😏

    in reply to: Old Earth #1428270
    Punk
    Participant

    I am sorry for so rudely invading your thread and pointing out a fallacy in your post.😊

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428261
    Punk
    Participant

    I need to respond to a few accusations that were made against me. I am definitely not brainwashed. I have never ever made fun of another minhog yisroel. I don’t ever recall blaming the meshichistim for anything on this forum.The only brainwashing that I have detected so far on this thread is senseless hate.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428263
    Punk
    Participant

    And as far as I recall, Rashi, Rambam and Moshe Rabeinu lived before the Bal Hatanya, so I have to admit that there is Torah outside of Chabad.😊

    in reply to: Old Earth #1428248
    Punk
    Participant

    I was just giving you an eitzah tovah not to mention lack of advancement of technology if you ever get into a discussion with a semi educated non affiliated Jew. That’s all.

    in reply to: Old Earth #1428246
    Punk
    Participant

    @litvishechossid. I was responding to a poster who said that Rabbonim need to reconcile Torah with science. It wasn’t originally meant as a response to your starting post. And once again, I reiterate that advancement of technology or the lack thereof displays no indication with regards to the age of the earth. Educated people have different methods of measuring the age of the earth.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428222
    Punk
    Participant

    @litvishechossid. I read the article. I’m not sure what your point is. The truth is, you probably don’t have a cogent point to make, so your digging up an article from a few years ago that you found on col. And see Likkutei Amarim chapter 28, 2nd page, the line that starts “zarah”. Have a good night.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428223
    Punk
    Participant

    There needs to be the word “should” before “pick on the untucked shirts” in my previous post. GN.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428215
    Punk
    Participant

    @litvichechossid. Let’s stay on the topic. I am saying that according to Rambam and most probably according to Rashi, the branches were diagonal. Also, the popularity of round branches is largely due to the arch of Titus. That’s all. Have a Freilichen Chanukah.

    in reply to: Old Earth #1428207
    Punk
    Participant

    @apukerma. The definition of time is a different discussion. Everyone knows what a day is and knows how to mark the end of a year. I think everyone can agree that time started in it’s complete expression when Adam was created. The question is how was time experienced in the five days before that. But the time as we know it is 5778 years old. It’s not a random guy that got “hung up” on it. It’s the calculation of the Torah.

    in reply to: Old Earth #1428196
    Punk
    Participant

    @litvishechossid. I don’t think anyone here is interested in advocating for the theory of evolution. If you want to understand their point of view, i suggest you ask a scientist that believes in evolution. I just wanted to point out that technology or the lack of it is no indication of a young or old earth. Scientists have totally different methods(and rightly so) in measuring the age of the earth. That’s it.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428191
    Punk
    Participant

    And I don’t know any lubavitchers that a wage a “fierce holy war” as you describe with regards to this issue. I think you pick on the untucked shirts and straggly beards instead. And perhaps the apikorsus in doing mitzvohs for the sake of bringing moshiach closer.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428190
    Punk
    Participant

    @litvishechossid. Plz read my posts.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428174
    Punk
    Participant

    And one of the reasons the Rebbe felt that is was important that the menorahs be depicted correctly is because it is depicted round- incorrectly on the arch of Titus. A depiction that had an image of a snake and images of avoida Zara.

    in reply to: Chanuka Menorah #1428170
    Punk
    Participant

    Rashi says “b’alochson”, diagonal. If you want to convince yourself that it could mean diagonally round- then knock yourself out. As a matter of fact, one of the indications that the Rambam held that the branches were round was that he did not say b’alochson in describing the menorah as Rashi did. But then his manuscript and drawing were publicized. Additionally, R Avraham Ben Harambam says that the branches came out of the center B’yosher-straight explaining that it is based on the drawing of his father. It is possible that the additional menorahs that Shlomo Hamelech built were round. But the Menorahs that the koihen gadol fulfilled the mitzvah with were diagonally straight.

    in reply to: Old Earth #1428161
    Punk
    Participant

    Two simple points. Torah deals with ABSOLUTE truths. Conversely, science is the endless study of the universe that is always progressing from one layer of knowledge to the next, hence nothing absolute can be derived about phenomena that happened thousands of years ago. Second, Just as Adam Harishon was created mature it’s very possible that the the universe was created mature. I don’t think technological advancement or the lack of it provides any indication into the age of the world for obvious reasons.

    in reply to: Spiritual Significance of Jerusalem and embassy announcement #1424275
    Punk
    Participant

    @chabadshlucha if you want to teach chassidus then start a class in Tanya or the like. What your doing is almost exclusively extracting the kabbalastic concepts from chassidus, and no one has a clue what your talking about. Your probably better off teaching raya meheimna and tikkunei Zohar in the coffee room. Seriously.

    in reply to: Spiritual Significance of Jerusalem and embassy announcement #1423877
    Punk
    Participant

    And I want to make a new faction in Judaism. It’s called NETUREI CHABAD. We could even get achmadinijad to pay for a free trip and tour of Iran. Before we come back, we’ll have a lchaim with the Ayatollah and have the zchus to kiss his toes and wish him a long life. And who cares if Bibi the Tziyoini gets mad. Tziyoinimm zaynin nisht yidden! There. I’m done. Good night.

    in reply to: Spiritual Significance of Jerusalem and embassy announcement #1423876
    Punk
    Participant

    And the lubavitcher rebbe crying against giving away an inch of Land? It seems that we would have the confidence to lecture HIM on the REAL chabad shitah. It’s a shame that I wasn’t the Chabad Rebbe instead!

    in reply to: Spiritual Significance of Jerusalem and embassy announcement #1423868
    Punk
    Participant

    And the arabs? We should show that we don’t agree with trump by evacuating all the Jews from Jerusalem because the Rashab Satmar Rav and almost all the Gedolei Yisroel were against the zionists y’mach shmom. And the Jerusalem announcement was just another Zionist ploy.

    in reply to: Spiritual Significance of Jerusalem and embassy announcement #1423867
    Punk
    Participant

    But anyhow, what’s my opinion worth? Everyone here is probably right that Trump did an aveirah by declaring Jerusalem the capital of the Jews.

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 90 total)