Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
oomis, I don’t agree. I think you have an authority problem
Only if the chosson hasn’t learned it yet.
It means you pretty much act like MO, but you don’t hold of MO hashkafos like zionism and torah u’maddah etc. Some might say, no torah or maddah.
MO machmir means you pretty much act yeshivish, but you DO hold of MO hashkafos like zionism and torah umaddah, etc. They are known for the mitzva of hajj, the annual pilgrimage to the SOY sefarim sale.
Makes no sense. The only problem is on shabbos, and moshiach cannot come on shabbos.
Rather, he holds like the lunatics today who want to rebuild the beis hamikdosh before moshiach.
LF: what do you mean? your username is only a month old!
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/utter-silliness
(click on your username)
Get semicha?
If I knew, I certainly wouldn’t post it online. If she wanted it public, she’d have put it in the book.
Now we can consider the thread closed.
Happy Cranniversary!
yah yah, we think you’re a moron also, and a rasha too!
I agree with syag.
agree with rebyidd.
Sometimes I think rebyidd is the only sane person in the CR
I agree with Rebyidd.
If a rebbe is verbally or otherwise abusing the kids, he is not a rebbe at all, and does not deserve the respect that comes with the position. The kids are entitled to, and should, do and say whatever they feel is necessary to protect themselves–certainly including talking back.
there were other things on my list I won’t mention here
pot
Actually, it would help if you know something about your own.
Randomex is my daughter in law. She can answer any questions about me.
There is a third reason: It is pretty much unheard of for a prosecutor to let a grand jury see any evidence other than what is favorable for an indictment. For whatever reason, that was not what was done here. The grand jury naturally saw the conflicting evidence and declined to indict.
We all know why that was done here. Because the prosecutor didn’t believe there was evidence to convict.
In an ordinary case where the prosecutor doesn’t think there is evidence to convict, they drop the case. But he couldn’t do that here, because public opinion was so strong. So he figured he’d show it all to a grand jury.
In an ordinary usage of the grand jury, the prosecutor has already made the decision to indict, and the grand jury is just confirming it. Here, he was asking the grand jury to make that decision.
This wasn’t the ordinary usage of a grand jury. Hence they didn’t follow the ordinary procedures.
This is all good. Everyone says “a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich,” but we all agree that ham sandwiches should not be indicted. Rather, only people who the prosecutor believes there is evidence beyond reasonable doubt to convict should be indicted.
That is why not everyone in America is on trial–right? If prosecutors were supposed to indict everyone they could, and it is so easy to indict, then all of us should be on trial. But that isn’t how it works, because there is supposed to be someone deciding whether this person actually should be on trial.
Get it? Prosecutor decides who should be on trial, and (in some states) a grand jury then approves the decision based on some minimal standard. In this case, the prosecutor expanded their role to making the decision also.
Not you and ahmadenijad
Please read the quote I left and tell me it’s not disturbing
Oh it’s disturbing.
And it’s totally convinced me that the terrorists are right to be killing us!
LF: what is the source of that hebrew phrase you posted?
u could go on and on but I think you get my point
That you hate Hashem. We get the point. We got it before you started babbling.
Not at all what?
Not all worse than being oiver on the three shevuous? That’s an interesting opinion. Do you have any source that we kill people that are oiver on the three shevuous (besides your support for terrorism, I mean).
Oh, I didn’t realize his house was robbed. But if it was after he sued them to put his kids in the school, so then he’s already a moiser-no?
And being a moiser is certainly much worse than being oiver on the three shevuos. There is no source that we kill someone who is oiver on the three shevuos.
That was ridiculous what they did to him and his family
You mean that they allowed them into the girls school. Yes, they should stop taking government money so they won’t have to do that.
Doing something which Hashem hates is not the same as hating Hashem.
I’m alleging that they hate Hashem, because they hate the Jewish people.
Everything done is mekadesh sheim shmayim
Well, everything eventually leads to kiddush Hashem. In their case, when we are eventually yatzu v’ra’u b’pigrei ha’anoshim haposhim bi, ki solaatom lo samus v’isham lo sichbeh
Well, if they believe they are doing ratzon Hashem, but really they hate Hashem and that is what is driving them, then doesn’t it follow that they’d also be driven to do other things against Hashem?
First step is finding someone to marry.
Really? Tell me how you know that.
Of course my response is applicable here.
It’s one thing to do aveiros because you struggle with a tayva, like most of us. And it’s even one thing to do aveiros because you are a kofer like the choveveiniks.
But these guys do aveiros because they hate Hashem. If you hate Hashem, you’ll try to do bad things whenever you can, just to be moreid.
So, 006, how many pages of the grand jury evidence have you read? 10? 50? 100? 500? All of it?
You’re already holding at anyone disagreeing is “silly,” so I assume you must have read all of it. Is that correct?