Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
popa_bar_abbaParticipant
Mod 80: I didn’t mean to suggest one can exercise and then eat whatever he wants. I was demonstrating that eating unhealthily on an irregular basis is not particularly harmful. For example, eating a whole box of cookies while mommy is on the phone with a potential employer.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantA kid wreaking havoc in a store or terrorizing a classmate is a code red 5 alarm blaze and calls for quick, decisive action.
I would pick up the kid and carry him out of the store.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI can’t believe I posted on the potching thread.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantIs Mommy going to tell the prospective boss to hold on, and then proceed give a long lecture to the child on why too many calories is not good for health, and each cookie has about 25 calories, so it is not advisable to eat so many now?
If I didn’t have time to discipline my kid the way I believed was best, I would just let him eat the cookies. You’ve decided that the job is more important than your kid’s emotional health. Why can’t it just be more important than his physical health (which will really not suffer very much from one cookie gorge. I have eaten 4 large custard donuts for breakfast and 4 slices of pizza for supper on the same day. Yesterday I ran 11 miles. Also which cookie has only 25 calories?)
popa_bar_abbaParticipantseminary, where we were told that lots of singles are still waiting around through their own fault, they say no to a boy for invalid reasons
That is quite horrifying. How is anybody supposed to date if they think every decision is either totally good or bad?
The better view is that there are many people one can marry and it will work reasonably well, if you try to make it work. So if you say no to someone, there will be another. If you marry someone who you are pretty happy with, it will work even if there is a “better” one out there.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantoy vey:
I have some odd minhagim myself (who doesn’t?). When people ask why I do them, I say because my Rebbeim said to. And that is the real answer.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantAnd none of the men would even say “Good Shabbos” to her.
I would never say “good shabbos” to a woman in shul whom I didn’t know on a personal level, although I often will when passing in the street.
This is not odd. I say hello to everyone I pass on the street, while I only greet people I know when in the supermarket.
I suppose if I knew a woman was expecting to be greeted I might throw her a “good shabbos”.
I think that if your wife was insulted, it is because she does not have an understanding of the societal norms in yeshivish shuls. Even if you disagree with the practices of society, you must realize that you cannot be insulted when people act based on them. (unless they are insulting in their nature; for example a black person in the Jim Crow South.)
popa_bar_abbaParticipantAre you kidding? All we are going to talk about is whether you should wear it.
My take: before you start doing anything, look around and see who else is doing it. If most of the Rabbonim and Bnei Torah are, it’s likely a good idea.
August 12, 2010 2:44 pm at 2:44 pm in reply to: Debate via Email with Rabbi A. Kraus of Neturei Karta #693712popa_bar_abbaParticipantWell, I read recently that July 4, 1776 was shiva asar b’tamuz
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI once called a reference who told me piles of terrible things about the girl. She didn’t seem to like her very much so I asked why she had been put as a reference. She told me that they were good friends but had gotten in a big fight.
ok. I made it up.
August 11, 2010 8:26 pm at 8:26 pm in reply to: Debate via Email with Rabbi A. Kraus of Neturei Karta #693706popa_bar_abbaParticipantYoga is not tznius.
(Because it’s something I’m unfamiliar with.)
August 11, 2010 8:16 pm at 8:16 pm in reply to: Debate via Email with Rabbi A. Kraus of Neturei Karta #693704popa_bar_abbaParticipantMay I suggest yoga?
For me or for the potching parents?
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI have a rant about kiddush Hashem.
Kiddush Hashem is when it is evident that following the Torah makes you act in a good way. This brings kavod to Hashem who gave us the Torah.
Often, Rebbeim and teachers of younger students will tell them before going on a trip that they should behave so as to make a kiddush Hashem.
This is absurd. If you act properly in order to make a kiddush Hashem, you are basically saying that it is not following the Torah which makes you act that way. Rather it is your desire to trick people into thinking the Torah is good which causes you to act that way.
Tell the kids they should behave because it is the right thing to do. That will be a kiddush Hashem.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantyes. and because you should be happy with how you look. You wouldn’t get plastic surgery just because you’re a little ugly!
(except girls in shidduchim)
popa_bar_abbaParticipantlets all make new accounts and pretend to be 600 kilo bear.
Personally, I think he lost weight and is now 300 kilo bear.
Popa does not think anyone should lose weight. ( except girls in shidduchim)
August 11, 2010 4:20 pm at 4:20 pm in reply to: Why I'm going to let my kids run around in shul #824446popa_bar_abbaParticipantOK.
Firstly, for purposes of this discussion I will factor out the issue of disturbing other people.
Perhaps I should re-clarify.
While certainly the truth, I do not want to teach my kids that a shul is a mikdash miat and only for davening. I do not think that makes me a kofer as I will explain. (and if you quote just the above line, I will hunt you down and disturb your kids during davening.)
What is ideal changes based on the circumstances. Children are not equipped to only daven in shul. I contend that if one comes to shul and davens to one’s ability, that is a good thing to do. I want to teach my kids to do what is right to the best of their abilities.
I do not want to teach them that if they cannot do it in the best way that it is not worth doing. I do not want to teach them that if they cannot daven the whole time it is not worth coming to shul.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantpopa bar abba was the funniest character in the gemara I could think of at the time.
If I was picking now, I’d be Chanan bisha. He once slapped someone and was told by beis din to pay half of a certain coin. He pulled out a whole coin and asked his victim for change. The victim didn’t have the change, so Chanan bisha hit him again and gave him the whole thing.
I don’t have a gemara in front of me to cite the page.
August 11, 2010 5:09 am at 5:09 am in reply to: Debate via Email with Rabbi A. Kraus of Neturei Karta #693690popa_bar_abbaParticipantI just Googled “TorahTrueJews” and brought up a bunch of web sites that made my blood boil.
Sometimes the YWN coffee room makes my blood boil. Like the potching thread.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantThis reminded me of a rant I recently began proclaiming. I’ll put it in a new thread. You’ll like it.
Also, it’s good to be shushed once in a while. It reminds you how hard it is to be criticized, and helps me remember not to criticize people.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantpashut yid:
Yes. If you travel long distance, there are generally two dates.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantBeis Medrash Govoah. I think it’s in New Jersey somewhere.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantGuy notices that girl seems to be wearing a sheitel.
Girl sees quizzical look and says, “I guess they didn’t tell you I’m divorced.”
“I guess they didn’t tell you I’m a kohen.”
popa_bar_abbaParticipantNo.
(Especially if it is a Beshow.)
popa_bar_abbaParticipantsqueak:
I apologize for coming across harsh. I have a certain style which comes out once I get worked up.
I do not know if you are correct; I was hoping someone was going to quote a written source. I always do appreciate your comments.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI don’t know.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantcorrect. and there are likely halachic ramifications. For example, all the case of the father and daughter or the blind man.
I really was only taking issue with the cavalier attitude some had with inventing halacha. I’m sorry if I sounded harsh.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI am splitting hairs because people on this forum are inventing new issurim. Read the whole thread please.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantYou mean to say because you will see her. I was discussing the claim that there is a separate, additional issur
popa_bar_abbaParticipantso right:
still irrelevant. We are discussing whether there is a separate issur of mixed swimming in addition to the issur of seeing women undressed.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI think that’s hilarious. Get in touch with their suppliers and open a shop.
August 10, 2010 3:57 am at 3:57 am in reply to: Debate via Email with Rabbi A. Kraus of Neturei Karta #693678popa_bar_abbaParticipantyosr:
By discussing zionism with him, you seem to agree that if zionism and the creation and maintenance of the state is wrong, then the NK are correct.
Even if the state is wrong, there is no excuse for the practices of the NK.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantso right:
the kedushas shoshanim was brought to demonstrate that one is not allowed to look at ones wife while undressed. Irrelevant to what I am discussing.
Rav Moshe Feinstien was qualified to extend lo sikrivu to relevant cases. That is quite different from random YWN coffee room members applying it at will.
My reference to touching was in response to people who thought that if swimming together was lo sikrivu, it would be assur for a father and daughter after a certain age, similar to sleeping together. I demonstrated that not every case of lo sikrivu has the same rules. So the comparison is on.
I still contend: baal tosif; a REAL issur d’oraisah
popa_bar_abbaParticipantThis thread is halachic speculation at its worst.
We have one person inventing that swimming together is “lo sikrivu”. Then someone else is making up parameters for this “issur” (comparing it to the dinim of sleeping in same bed). Then we have someone claiming it is kalus rosh.
This is absurd. Lo sikrivu is only what Chazal say is lo sikrivu.
Even if it were to be lo sikrivu, there is no reason to assume it would have the same parameters as sleeping in the same bed. Touching a woman is also lo sikrivu, yet a father is allowed to touch his daughter over their entire lives.
The only issur in this thread is baal tosif.
August 8, 2010 3:44 pm at 3:44 pm in reply to: Debate via Email with Rabbi A. Kraus of Neturei Karta #693671popa_bar_abbaParticipant600 kilo bear:
I originally decided not to respond to this thread hoping it would fade into obscurity.
I’m suspicious of the opening poster. He neglects the real arguments against these lunatics in favor of debating zionism itself. I almost wonder if his intention is to legitimize the neturei karta.
Let’s all let this thread disappear into the archive. Ignoring these people really is the best course.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantMy post was clearly not advocating spousal abuse. There was nothing wrong with it. It was in much better taste than most of the posters on this thread. Read it again.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantThis thread is frightening.
Before you destroy your children, you should seek some real guidance.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantwould one of the people claiming a separate issur of “mixed swimming” please post a source.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantlavdavka;
I believe you that it makes you uncomfortable.
I do not think that is the expected response, though. When I am a guest and people say hello, I appreciate it. I do not know why you are bothered by it.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantA girls camp?
Everything girls do is assur.
source: YWN Coffee room
popa_bar_abbaParticipantMazel Tov. We passed. I’m going on vacation.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantHelp! I can’t find a heter to learn on tisha b’av!
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI’m not taking an opinion on this issue.
But…
This is another reason why you should live out of town. I almost never see girls on the street in my home town. I can confidently state that I have never seen so many girls on one shabbos, as the time I was in Bnei Brak.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantMy rav was matir me to shave for early dates during sefira and the three weeks. I’m not posting his name.
The point is though, why are you sitting and bickering on this thread? If you want to know if poskim are matir, call a few. Most of the American poskim speak English and should be able to communicate with you (if you speak English).
While you’re on the phone with them, ask them if girls are allowed to congregate in the street, why beer doesn’t need a hechsher, if you should get lap-band surgery, what bracha to make on pizza, if fish are muttar, if the internet is muttar, and for a good question to post on my yoreh deah choshen mishpat thread.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantgoodjew: THAT is an excellent question.
Assuming we hold like shach in 118:36
You may cook meat or milk next to pareve. Even if it were to splash, it would not create even potential issur.
If you did it and it splashed:
If it fell on the outside opposite the liquid, even if you would then cook milk in the pot, even within 24 hours, even if there is not 60 times the splatter in the milk, it would not be assur because we assume there is only a small amount of the meat in the walls of the pot. (taz 92:24)
If it fell above the water line and you then cooked milk in it, you would need 60 against the splash.
One could argue, if you always use the pot in a way that it will be batul in 60, you can use it after 24 hours even for milk and certainly for pareve to eat with milk.(99:7 see taz 15). However, I think it will be kovea tashmisho as meat (see shach 94:15). If you sometimes use the pot in a way that is not batul in 60, you should definitely consider the pot meat.
However, if the other pot is a milchig pot, even if you are cooking pareve, you should not do so because it could create issur in your pot.
tzair: thank you, I meant to write the pot would become assur. I was dictating the post on the phone right before shabbos.
abba bar dad bar popa: I’m again sorry, despite my bold name for this thread, I only learned the subjects listed in my first post. In choshen mishpat, that is only eidus and dayanim.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantDave Hirch:
I’m sorry; that is beyond the scope my syllabus.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantGood.jew:
Regarding cooking milk and meat on the same stove-top and in close proximity
See Shach 118:36 One should not do so lest a drop splash from one pot and hit the other pot. However if one did so one does not have to be concerned that drops splashed unless you know that they did. If both pots were covered it would not be a problem at all.
However see Taz 118:12 allows cooking in close proximity.
Popa’s personal advice- this is a very bad idea. If one drop were to splash from one pot onto the outside of the other pot in many cases the food would be assur and in very many cases the food would be assur.
popa_bar_abbaParticipantI must have misread the emphasis. sorry
popa_bar_abbaParticipantwhat should a smoking girl with no arms do?
popa_bar_abbaParticipant“and whoever permitted shaving?”
Why must you accuse people of shaving with no heter?
popa_bar_abbaParticipantThere are two issues.
A. Keeping a beard.
B. Using electric shavers.
There are those who are noheig to keep a beard. I am not aware of anyone who says it is m’dina.
The use of electric shavers is questionable. Some compare it to a razor. Some allow only certain models or types. Some require the blades to be dulled.
Many people in the major yeshivos actually do not shave and will only trim or use powder. (Trimmers are not commonly considered a razor.)
-
AuthorPosts