philosopher

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 34 posts - 1,001 through 1,034 (of 1,034 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • philosopher
    Participant

    I don’t think these tests are accurate. Besides for Africans, most people globally are descendents of immigrants and mixed races. How do they have markers to test these “races”? The Sephardi and Ashkenazi groups are only a few hundred years old, how can they test Ashkenazi and Sephardim ancestry (as opposed to Michzrachim that were a distinct group from hundreds of years longer)? Sephardim have lived in Europe, not only in the Middle East and Africa, since the Spanish Inquisition, so how can they tell apart people by their genes when they lived on the same continents and in the same countries? Are minhugim part of their genes?

    Identical twins and triplets who took these DNA tests often had completely different results from one another and regardless of all these “scientific” explanations, I’m not buying it. Siblings, especially if they are identical, should have the same, or very similar, genes makeup.

    in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597864
    philosopher
    Participant
    • Gadolhadorah, I’m not sure what happened while I was wrinting my previous comment, I may have pressed submit and it will show up soon, incompleted.

    I don’t see anything submitted other than this post -33

    I also belive that Joseph will bring more sources supporting his OPINION but since he is denying that there are many great Rabbonim saying the opposite than he is trying to prove, I will therefore not be directly responding to his posts with his “proof” because I can’t argue when someone who is dishonest. I am not claiming that his sources saying a women must obey her husband is incorrect, I am just discussing in which context it means. As we know, this issue is not black and white where one can make a blanket statement that women are subservient to their husbands.

    And pesukim straight out of the Torah, without the meforshim to explain what they mean, in most instances, do not show clear, relevent halacha. That’s how the Karuim ended up completely irrelevant today and they are not considered Jews anymore because they “paskened” halacha from Tanach. We cannot pasken halacha without input and clarity from our great Rabbis.

    Therefore, because of his denying that sources exist that prove and pasken that women are not owned by men and by quoting pesukim from the Torah that don’t prove halacha but can be TEITCHED whichever way he chooses to, at this point I will not address my arguments directly to him.

    in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597715
    philosopher
    Participant

    The Netziv denies that men own their wives, as I assume Joseph is trying to “prove” with his continuously saying men are “masters” over their wives. And which point I refuted by showing that “masters” does not technically mean that others, whether they are wives, students or Yisroeilim are “subjegated” to the whims of their “masters” and obligated to biddings of their supposed their “masters” i.e. husband’s, Rabbis, and Cohanim, indiscriminately…The word “masters” is an English word. The original Loshen Hakodesh words that can translate to word “master” come in many forms, but the point is that these words define a PART of a relationship and doesn’t necessarily mean that the entire relationship revolves around a “master” subjegating his “servants” rather that within certain relationships there are certain rights one has, or certain rules that one must obey, to be able for the relationship to function correctly.

    The Netziv says that proof that the husband does not own the wife is the fact that a husband is obligated to support a wife (Kesubos 58b) however a wife can opt out of this partnership by declaring herself independent (so that her wage will not have to go to her husband) and the husband is not obligated to support her anymore. This is in direct contrast to a slave who has no opt out options of declaring himself financially independent.

    The Netziv says that a husband only owns SPECIFIC rights to his wife, these rights I will not bring up here, one can do their own research if they desire to do so. However, these rights have nothing in common with a women being “subservient” to her husband, as Joseph would like us to believe.

    Many Rishonim state specifically that husband’s do not own their wives, for example see Rashba on kiddushin in 6b.

    I am NOT a Torah scholar, nor do I have the time at this point in time to look up the MANY sources on this issue. However, I am simply bringing these sources now just to show that there are out there.

    If I have more time, I will more research.

    in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597303
    philosopher
    Participant

    Joseph, I use strong words because I strongly suspect that you are mistreating the women in your life. The fact that I’m unwilling to look up the sources in this busy time is totally NOT proof that these verses I spoke about don’t exist in the Torah or Rabbinical writings.

    The FACT is that you are denying that what I wrote exists, just because I haven’t quoted the exact sources (at this point in time, I should add) and you SELECTIVELY choose only those sources that appear as if the Torah says that the husband is master OVER and rules OVER the wife. It is very misleading.

    I have no problem with people having different opinions and I strongly advocate for that (and thanks for saying thanks). BUT that does not mean that the Torah’s sources can be used to advance one’s agenda of mistreating people.

    So just to clear up what may be my misconception regarding your view of the Torah’s view on the relationship between men and women, I ask you the same question as Chabadshlucha asked you. What do you mean by women being subservient to men?

    in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597280
    philosopher
    Participant

    As I said, to quote pesukim and claim that one’s own view of the meaning of the posek translates into “halacha” is a dangerous view. According to the “translation” of masters or rulers in the Torah, a rebbi can be called a master over a student as could a Cohen be a master over a Yisroel. Does this give an halachik right to a rebbi or Cohen to use the student or the Yisroel as a servant ? Is the student or Yisroel a personal servant to their master or masters? It’s such a ridiculous insinuation that it is laughable, just as it is laughable that a husband is master over his wife or rules over his wife in a way that she is a servant to her husband. It’s despicable and ridiculous to think along those lines in terms of supposedly physical power the Torah supposedly gives for the “masters” over the “subservients”. That is not what the Torah means and anyone who has any understanding of Judaism understands the relationship of Rabbis and students and Cohanim and Yisreolim and anyone with a healthy mental capacity also understands that the relationship of a husband and wife in Judasim has no relation to a master and slave type of relationship.

    The fact that it says in Bereishis 3:16 that the husband will rule over the wife is not any indication of any halacha that the wife must do her husband’s bidding discriminately, nor it is not any indication that a husband and wife relationship means that the wife is a servant to her husband. This posek means that women were cursed, after Chava convinced Adam to eat from the eitz hadas, that men will be a stronger force in marriage. Men were cursed as well to toil in the fields for their bread ( i.e. work hard for their parnasoh). It is a curse, not a halacha, that men are masters in marriage.

    Bereishis 18:12 That Sara Imaeinu called her husband “master” is an indication of respect to her husband and not an indication that she was a servant or had a servant/master type of relationship with Abraham Avinu.

    in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597250
    philosopher
    Participant

    Joseph, you are really sick. And that is one reason I don’t bother with bringing sources for people like you. Because it’s a waste of my time and energy. You are denying that these sources which I spoke about, exist. This is a blatant lie. As I said, you are fixated on women being subservient to men.

    Where exactly am I contradicting the Torah? Every question in the Torah has 36 answers, some seemingly contradicting one another. But these seemingly contradicting answers are paradoxes where when you look closely, all these teritzim are correct and do not contradict each other at all, there are just many different facets to one reality. But you are too sick to see these differences in this case ( and I suspect in all of your opinions as well) and see only side: your very own opinion.

    Unlike you who you seem to have plenty of time because you have female subservients serving your every whim ( which according to your distorted view of halacha they are “obligated” to do so) I am very busy cooking for the seudahs and also including after Yom Tov I’m very busy with work. But if I have a little time I will try to bring the sources which EVERY person with a little knowledge of Judaism, knows exists. The reason I will try to quote these sources are for other people, not you, to see they exist. You are too sick to be honest and I try to stay away from arguing with sick people.

    The reason I write women are “superior ” spiritually is because in the Torah and writing of Chazal and meforshim there are an abundance of sources WHY women are not obligated in mitzvos shehazman grama. Every kid knows this besides for you who are fixated on the fact that women are exempt from certain mitzvos only because they are “subservient” to their husbands. They are NOT in any way, shape or form subservient to their husbands. However women are exempt from certain mitzvos because of their role in taking care of the needs of their husbands AND family AND the fact that we are spiritually superior. The role of a women is not to be the husband’s slave which is what you indicate women are when you are so obsessed that in certain places men are called masters over women. As I said, quoting sources out of context as you do presents an incomplete picture. What exactly does “masters” mean? And “master” is an English word, the word you are translating from Loshen Hakodesh can have completely different meaning when in context. If anything, you sound like the Christians taking one word or sentence from the Bible and mistranslating and misconstruing from what the Torah REALLY means. Does the word “masters” which you “translate” from Loshen Hakodesh, that may or may not be the exact and correct and completete translation, mean that women are slaves to their husbands, or that Yisroeilim are slaves to Cohanim and obligated to obey their every whim? Of course not. Let’s see a Yisroel obeying a Cohen’s wishes simply because it is written that Cohanim are “masters” over Yisroeilim. You are simply a very BIG fool to think that that is what the Torah means with the Loshen Hakodesh equivalent of the word/words you translated to “master” .

    in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597214
    philosopher
    Participant

    Chabadshlucha, what you write regarding women in general giving in (and everything else you wrote as well) is so true. Women generally do care more about their relationships. And usually women also care more how things affect the entire family as well and will therefore give in so that the family can function normally instead of being in a state of war or tension. And this is takeh a curse, as you write. There is no halacha stating that women must give in. But at the same time women are givers as Hashem is gives to us (as the Sages teach us this is what the bracha sheusani kirtzono means), so although it is a curse because it is not easy to give in, we still thank Hashem for creating us as givers.

    in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597212
    philosopher
    Participant

    Joseph, my last question addressed to you was missing words so I will repeat the question. Would it make sense for me to quote sources from the Torah and Rabbinical writings stating how women are superior with our binah yeseirah and our higher level of spirituality and that men are supposed to listen to their wives, and then state according to all these sources women are superior and smarter and men are “required” to act according to their wives wishes?

    Quoting a source out of context or without sufficient explanation bought down by the Rabbis does not mean much, or is the very most only part of the picture. Consider the fact that Chava was created out of Adam’s rib and there are meforshim stating that because she was created out of Adam, Adam (i.e. men) is master over Chava. But there are meforshim stating the opposite, that Chava ( i.e. women) is a force that is K’NEGED Adam so she can keep him in check if he strays. In other words, there are meforshim saying men are the masters and there are meforshim saying women have the last word. And they are ALL correct. Different situations call for different applications.

    Don’t be so fixated on men being masters. If you have any women in your life, wife or daughters, they are not subservient to you, period.

    in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597172
    philosopher
    Participant

    Chabadshlucha, I am a woman and am not sufficiently learnt enough to bring down the exact sources that would point to the superiority of women. But as we know, in some places it is bought down that women are on a higher spiritual plane than me and therefore are exempt from many mitzvos because we don’t need these mitzvos to bring us closer to Hashem. But I’m too busy, especially now with cooking for Yom Tov meals, and honestly too lazy as well, to do all the research and post the relevant sources.

    To Joseph I say, if I were to post these sources that state that women are superior and are smarter in certain ways because of our binah yesierah and bring the sources stating that men should listen to their wives and that women are superior spiritually to men, would it not be ridiculous of me to quote these sources and make a blanket statement in general are superior then men?

    According to the Torah AND Rabbinical sources,men have strengths and weaknesses as separate genders AND as individuals. No one is superior or subservient based on their genetics. We build ourselves spiritually through our actions. Therefore, if a man is not acting the way he’s supposed to or making ridiculous and irrational demands of his wife, then a wife listening to such a husband and being subservient to him, then is nothing more than a chossid shoita. No person can be degraded because we are not suberservient to the other gender. We are only suberservient to Hashem!

    in reply to: Explaining to girls that only boys light the Chanukah Menorah #1597019
    philosopher
    Participant

    Joseph, subservience of women toward men is a goyishe cconcept, influenced by medieval Christian and Islamic rreligions. In Judaism men and women have DIFFERENT roles but it doesn’t necessarily make women subservient to men. In fact, in many places in the Torah and and Rabbinical writings men are encouraged to listen to their wives. And wives are told to listen to their husbands…

    Basically in Judaism it is not one gender that is forced to be subservient to the other, rather compromises should be made in marriage and sometimes the woman (or women) should be listened to and sometimes it’s the man ( or men).

    The problem with today’s society is not that women don’t want to be subservient to men ( thank God we outgrew that mentality). The problem is that women don’t respect nor appreciate their roles and constantly feel “deprived ” by their roles and they think they’ll be happier off taking on men’s roles. This is the liberal world today and it has by now gone the opposite way too with men taking on womens’ roles. This crazy mentality has rubbed off on our frum communities where women feel that they need to take on men’s roles. The Torah makes it clear that men and women are different and we need to respect our differences and fulfill our roles.

    in reply to: Kashrus #725875
    philosopher
    Participant

    Daas Yochid:

    I would agree with you if there were no need for updates of what kosher and what’s not. These “updates” are constantly listed in the frum newspapers.

    in reply to: Too many pinocchios (nosy people) #963046
    philosopher
    Participant

    I just want to clear up that I don’t think all frum Jews across the board are nosy. I just feel that Jews in particular are curious by nature-intellectually curious- which as Wolf pointed out, is not a necessarily bad trait. In fact I think it’s a wonderful trait for growth and spiritual developement. However, some frum people, and particularly in some communities, curiosity has led to nosiness and judgement of others.

    in reply to: Too many pinocchios (nosy people) #963038
    philosopher
    Participant

    In some frum communities, unfortunately, minding everyone’s business seems to be a way of life. I think this is because Jews are very curious and also opinionated. So if you combine that you have nosiness, which basically means you stick your nose into people’s lives and then salivate about it, chew it over, talk about it… It’s the Jewish kind of entertainment. If people get hurt in the process, well you only mean their good-they’ve got to hear the truth. The only people who don’t have a problem with this is are those that fit neatly in “THE FRUM BOX”. That’s because there is nothing to talk about them. And then everyone wonders why the frum oilim is basically dancing to the same tune, without independant talk or action (except on the web, of course).

    The only way we need to be carbon copies of each other is in living l’shem shmayim. But as individuals we don’t need to be carbon copies in the way we live our frum lives. But if you move out of line, you’ll be fodder for the Jewish entertainment scene.

    in reply to: Top 5 websites? #726977
    philosopher
    Participant

    umm:

    I’m very dissapointed with Gymboree these days. They used to have such cute, adorable stuff and now I can’t find anything but nebby clothing on that site (or in stores).

    in reply to: Kashrus #725872
    philosopher
    Participant

    Trying my best:

    “If the organization has a gazillion (or whatever number is enough) kashrus inspectors, why not? “

    I don’t believe any kashrus organization that gives hechsheirim on FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND ITEMS has a sufficient amount of mashgichim. Do they have 200,000 mashgichim? No. Even a 100,000 food items is impossible to have a complete chesbon throughout production, packaging and labeling.

    The FACT is foodstuff is constantly being updated regarding kashrus and people may not be aware that what they are eating is mislabeled and TREIF, or they may not become aware of that at all.

    The fact that such such lists of mislabeled products is an accepted as normal is ridiculous.

    Kashrus should not be a massive business with the goal to certify more and more products as “kosher” (I specificly placed the quotation mark by the word “kosher” because the FACT is that some items labeled kosher, are not). Kashrus organizations need to take their kashrus more seriously.

    Food establishments, resturaunts and the like, is in a different category than factory produced items and they are ussually more stringently observed than factories by the mashgichim working under these very same huge kashrus companies. There were of course stories of treif sold in food establishments as well, however, in general there is no hefkeres as there is in the mass labeling of “kosher” food items.

    in reply to: Best Jewish Singer #1218982
    philosopher
    Participant

    MBD and Shwekey

    in reply to: Kashrus #725863
    philosopher
    Participant

    SJS and all those who commented in a similiar vein regarding kulos. That’s beside the point. I’m not talking about kulos or chumras. I’m talking about giving hechsheirim on too many products and it’s virtually IMPOSSIBLE to be on top of them all.

    in reply to: What REALLY happened with those boys that OTD en masse? #704855
    philosopher
    Participant

    Moq, you seem to be a person with a lot of depth.

    in reply to: Your theory what Mosherose true motivation is? #704439
    philosopher
    Participant

    Do people honestly believe that mosherose truly feels, for example, that you are not allowed to look at one’s wife for an entire lifetime or other similiar comments that he made? Sorry, not me. I don’t believe that he is serious.

    in reply to: Are the Reform and Conservative Still Jewish? #755332
    philosopher
    Participant

    Are the Reform and Conservative still Jewish? This needs to be assesed individually, if an individual belonging to this group wants to become a BT.

    Not just Reform and Conservative need to be assesed on a case to case basis, but every person who is not frum and thinks of himself as a Jew, needs to know if they are halachically Jewish or not.

    in reply to: Are the Reform and Conservative Still Jewish? #755244
    philosopher
    Participant

    There have been numerous instances of BT’s or their children finding out problems regarding if they are 100% halachic Jews or not. I have been saying for the longest time that it’s a big mistake to have this massive BT movement in America (as of today, the Israeli scene is totally different and the BT movement there should be encouraged). I say we should work on ourselves to be better Jews and be a light unto the nations through our behavior. Non religious Jews who want to become frum should know clearly how they are truly Jewish, not assume so.

    I am not saying this because I feel callous towards all our Jewish brethren who don’t have the Torah to guide them. I am saying this because I beleive that we CANNOT KNOW, in this 21st generation, who is truly a Jew or not, unless each case is totally investigated and you cannot do that by casting out a net (be it on campus or the streets of Manhattan) and catching every fish that swims through.

    in reply to: Are the Reform and Conservative Still Jewish? #755243
    philosopher
    Participant

    cynical, I’d love to post a very long rebuttal to your comments, however, I don’t have the time. Suffice to say,that NOT ALL the Conservative “Rabbis” or laymen believe that the Torah is divine, that Hashem really gave it to us at Mt. Sinai. Nor do they pratcice true halacha. For example, in case you don’t know yet, a bunch of CONSERVATIVE Rabbis are giving sholom bayis classes for intermarried couples. There are numerous of such instances of blatant disregard for halacha, because as you described that our relationship with Hashem changes, so part of that belief is that some halachas can be disgarded, or changed, as time necessitates, because that is part of that changing relationship.

    Maybe your opinion of the Conservative belief of a changing relationship with Hashem does not mean that we disregard some halachas because the relationship doesn’t necessitate it. If so, then please define what your (your own)Conservative ideoligy belief regarding our relationship with Hashem in todays’ generation. What do you mean with “our relationship keeps on changing”?

    What is your opinion of Mesorah and minhugim? There’s where the slippery slope starts, btw, in case you didn’t realize, as Judaism becomes a PERSONAL interpretation of our own ideoligies and opinions (of course with those ideas changing in every generation).

    And cynical, disagreeing with you is NOT sinas and is NOT keeping Moshiach away.

    in reply to: Your theory what Mosherose true motivation is? #704376
    philosopher
    Participant

    I believe mosherose is having fun posting stuff he does not believe in and seeing the reactions to his comments.

    Whether he is off-the-derech, I can’t tell. I don’t beleive he is. But he is doing a good job as coming accross as genuine.

    in reply to: An important lesson from last weeks parsha for married people #702596
    philosopher
    Participant

    Ben Torah, he’s been posting along these lines for two years?

    Oh my, maybe he is for real!

    in reply to: SIBLING RIVALRY #702757
    philosopher
    Participant

    It’s normal that kids should fight.

    Don’t blame yourself.

    in reply to: An important lesson from last weeks parsha for married people #702594
    philosopher
    Participant

    mosherose is just pulling everyone’s leg. I highly doubt he believes what he writes. I believe he enjoys seeing poeple fall for his comments.

    mosherose, I think you’re hysterical.

    in reply to: Human Evolution #700915
    philosopher
    Participant

    “Basically, evolutionary theory is successful at predictions.”

    Charliehall, evolutionary THEORY is as succesful at predictions as it is unsuccessful. Nobody could PREDICT how things were before recorded history. Scientists can theorize and make assumptions, no matter how intelligent and smart and knowledgeable they are. But that’s where it ends. They do not KNOW what happened. Evolutionists adopted their theory as a scientific” FACT.

    Evolutionary theory is ALL THEORY based on assumptions based on the personal ideoligy of the scientists coming to “scientific conclusions” all “supported” merely on “scientific” assumptions.

    You are right though that believing in the process of slow evolution into what the world is today does not contradict believing in a Creator, or even in the fact that the world “as we know it” is 5771 years old. Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan writes about it in one of his books. I forgot how exactly he comes to his conclusion, (of course his ideas are all supported from accepted and revered sources, which he brings forth). I hope I find that book again, as I read it when I was a teenager and forgot exactly how he comes to the conclusion that evolution fits with the way the Torah states how old the world is.

    Those scientists and people though who beleive that the world was created by itself, will eventually look as foolish as the ancient Egyptians who believed in their gods. For proof of a Creator we don’t need to go further than to acces our common sense. But as I read somewhere, common sense is very uncommon.

    in reply to: Divorce Crisis #697335
    philosopher
    Participant

    popa, Abusive people can be extremely charming when dating and before marriage.

    Divorce will happen less when people will realize that that divorce should only be an option when their spouse is are verbally, emotionally, or physically abusive. Otherwise sorry, life is not a bowl of cherries. Learn to make the most of what gifts you do have. Be thankful of what you do have. Hashem sends a lot of gifts to us whether with our spouse or other gifts.

    Happiness comes from inside of us, not from others, not even from our spouses.

    And most of the time, if we work on becoming better people ourselves, if we work on our own middos, our marriage becomes better.

    in reply to: Divorce Crisis #697327
    philosopher
    Participant

    Dating longer is beneficial to avoiding divorce? Yeah can we surely need to learn something from the non-frum, secular society. Ahem. Sure, just look at the low divorce rates in the non-Jewish world. They are not changing spouses like hats, are they? That’s because they not only date for a very long time, but they also live together before marriage. Can you get to know a person better than that? Clearly the sholom bayis in the secular world is one we can learn from.

    What exactly will you see when you date for longer? No human walking the face of this earth does not posess negative character traits. Which future spouse’s moral failings which you’ll definitely see more of the longer you date, can you live with? And people that seem nice on dates are not necassarily so. Just because a buchor is courteous to a waiter and says thank you is no indication that he will change the dirty daiper of your two year while your feeding your newborn.

    in reply to: A moment of truth- why do we really judge others? #712064
    philosopher
    Participant

    I guess I was judging th OP incorrectly. 🙂

    in reply to: Baby Clothes #696250
    philosopher
    Participant

    Gumboree fan talking here. They have great quality clothing you can pass down for other kids. (Stains come out nicely with Tide booster).

    You can get great prices on Gymboree clothes by signing up online for coupons and working with the gymbucks. Their styles are the cutest ever!

    in reply to: Charades by: Riva Pomerantz #755998
    philosopher
    Participant

    BP Totty, I totaly agree with your post. Everything is blamed ones childhood. Interesting that I turned out different than my parents. That seems to be going against the law of the 21st century psychology.

    Otherwise, I really like the story. It is written exteremely well.

    in reply to: A moment of truth- why do we really judge others? #712062
    philosopher
    Participant

    By the way, this is the old philosopher/clearheaded talking here.

    in reply to: A moment of truth- why do we really judge others? #712061
    philosopher
    Participant

    I judge others and am not jealous nor arrogant. There are many ways to judge. There are postive ways we judge people, such as being dan l’kaf zchus, or we judge unfavorable behaviour so that we do not accept such behaviour. Judging in a negative way as to why people do things that are not our business or is not wrong just different, is bad.

    We judge people in our daily interactions with them, whether we realize it or not. It is simply human behaviour.

Viewing 34 posts - 1,001 through 1,034 (of 1,034 total)