philosopher

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 901 through 950 (of 1,053 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1773247
    philosopher
    Participant

    Daas Yochid, sorry, I made a mistake. Indeed nd”k does dictate some halachos regarding yichud, shechting and perhaps other halachas I don’t know of.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1773128
    philosopher
    Participant

    Non Political, But why would we argue what ndk means for all women halachically or even only as a Chazal’s description of us if we are talking about an agadata that never has a practical application? As far as I know, agadatas never dictate halacha or define a reality.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1773213
    philosopher
    Participant

    Syag, I sincerely believe it was not with intent to denigrate our Chachomim, c”v but with amateur translation of each of every word with the intent on context it could happen by mistake, not with bad intent. But I may even be wrong and the words could be very accurately be translated, I’m not sure myself. I highly doubt that when learning every word is translated accurately with much thought though and for posting maybe 2-3 words, not even sentences could’ve been changed. But maybe not, it depends if it was extremely accurately or loosely translated…

    That is not why you should make it seem as if the Bruriah’s post is so bad that it’s not worth reading…the words of the Mishna is more accurate with her post than other homemade peshutim that people are cooking up.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1773199
    philosopher
    Participant

    Klugeryid, as I have repeatedly said, it’s not the Chazal or the Ramban he quoted but the intent behind it. When a person is obsessed with finding verses and quoting it out of context so that it loses it’s original meaning, or neglecting meforshim that explain the meaning, or simply quoting verses without knowing the meaning but just trying to continuously to prove a point that other people are inferior THAT is the problem. If a person tries to understand a Chazal or a verse or a meforesh that seems to put down women or men or whatever and he posts that so that people can share their thoughts on the matter then that’s fine. But to do that over and over again against specific individuals is a mean obsession.

    I have said mine and that’s that. I hope you understand and if not it’s also nisht geferlich but I won’t try to explain again.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1773179
    philosopher
    Participant

    Syag, please enlighten me what Bruriah said that you object to. She posted entire agadates of Mishna within context and bought legitimate sources of whatever she posted so besides for a 2-3 sentences that could’ve used more revered language towards our holy Sages (but I’m sure there was no bad intent), I fail to see what bothers you about her post.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1773118
    philosopher
    Participant

    klugeryid, I’m trying not to get into the personal attack mentality but I could see why I become like that with certain people…You cannot quote out of context Torah verses to prove your own points to denigrate others. It’s against the Torah, it’s a transgression of numerous halachos of adam lachveiro and it’s sheker. If you cannot understand this simple concept then your posting name is your own opinion and not a fact.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1773115
    philosopher
    Participant

    Well, one reason people are lost in this thread is because we were supposed to be arguing what Chazal meant with nd”k that was supposed to “prove” that women are inferior, but no one, including the men here who I expected more from, realized that we are talking about a verse that is an agadata and that was quoted out of context and not a something leading to halacha. But thanks to Bruriah for pointing us in the right direction…and this whole argument collapsed like a burst bubble.

    Except for my original teina of people that have nothing better to do than find verses and quote them out of context trying to prove the inferiority of women, not once and not twice and not for weeks but at least for months, and maybe years. Why does it other me? 1. I’m an honest person and I hate when people spread lies or try to show how their krume views are supposedly dass Torah. That is sheker and I abhor that 2. Women deserve respect and not constant put-downs. I have been on a professional forum where people constantly spouted anti-Semitic views and I always stuck up for us Jews even though I could’ve said “who cares what these idiots think about us?” 3. It is my belief, and I have seen it in real life, that people’s opinions and beliefs influence how they act. And the opinions and beliefs that people hold of other people influence their behavior towards them.

    And so, I protest the continous quoting out of context verses that supposedly show that Judaism holds women to be inferior.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1773019
    philosopher
    Participant

    klugeryid, you are not sure what his point was but i an others as well are not stupid. His comments don’t bother you because they are not directed at you and don’t try to prove a point about you. Would it be about you you wouldn’t be so passive about Joseph’s commentS.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1773018
    philosopher
    Participant

    Whatsaktome, you are right about the way it is written and I’m sure Bruriah didn’t mean it in a disrespectful way either.

    in reply to: Do you jump to conclusions in real life too? #1772813
    philosopher
    Participant

    Mod-29 did you just jump to a conclusion? 😉
    I was thinking he meant a different inane opening post.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772724
    philosopher
    Participant

    * Sorry, I meant to write aggadeta, not aggadah…

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772788
    philosopher
    Participant

    Klugeryid, b’kitzer you sided with Joseph even when you had no clue as to the source and context of this particular Chazal but you agreed with his opinion just so that “these liberal women can be put in place…”

    It’s becoming increasingly clear to me that the men supporting Joseph don’t always know the source and certainly not the context of his assertions. It’s just easier to say that women protesting this constant put-down are liberals. How convenient.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772786
    philosopher
    Participant

    yeshivaguy, what?! I’m genuinely puzzled which subject we are changing?

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772728
    philosopher
    Participant

    CA, ok, but what do you want to prove, that because the nevius were women they were not tzeddeikas on very high spritiual levels?

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772708
    philosopher
    Participant

    Bruriah, what was disrespectful is bringing sources from the Mishna, Rashi, and R’ Elyyashiv that don’t make women appear inferior but present aggadeta that makes men appear in a worse light than women. That is unforgivable. 😉

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772700
    philosopher
    Participant

    Wow, Bruriah, amazing thanks for clearing that up!

    And thanks for proving my point that there’s so much in the Torah and Torah sources proving the weakness of men and were anyone to keep harping on this issue just to try to “prove” that men are inferior it would freak anyone out- why is it ok to do so to women on a continuous basis noch dertzi when we don’t learn Gemorah and other Rabbinical sources so we don’t even have the proper answers?

    in reply to: Elon Musk’s Shabbos Car #1772687
    philosopher
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah, I believe, as akuperma has mentioned as well, that a car will not be able to be simply programmed and set before Shabbos as it will have many factors to consider and react outside of what is able to be pre-programmed.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772684
    philosopher
    Participant

    klugeryid, I didn’t want to go into it as I did ask mechila from Joseph for going at him personally, but I want to point out that if you want to put on your blinders- that’s your decision. We will not be attacked continously about our supposed “inferiority” . If there would be a woman on this thread continously harping for years, hiding behind Torah sources of course, on the inferiority of men, there would also be a time where people would say enough. Opening a thread with the very words “I’m not sure why this makes people uncomfortable…” when Chazal’s words makes no frum person uncomfortable so why would he say that except to deliver his next punch of the Rambam on our “inferiority”. Enough is enough. You wouldn’t want me combing through Torah sources for months and years finding sources on the weakness of men. There is a minimum of respect and decency required – topics can be discussed with intellectual honest and not with an agenda behind it.

    I’m not upset at myself for attacking his sick position only it bothers me that I projected two sentences about my opinion of his personal life. Otherwise I have no charata on what I said.

    in reply to: Elon Musk’s Shabbos Car #1772678
    philosopher
    Participant

    akuperma, thanks for the explanation regarding a self-driving car. I assumed that there’s too many reactive factors involved that the car would have to consider and react accordingly to the circumstances, like traffic speeds for example, so I didn’t ask that in my question to you. I asked why you consider an elevator to be different than a light set with a timer as an elevator is programmed before Shabbos at a predertimined speed and stops?

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772662
    philosopher
    Participant

    Joseph, I missed your post and only realized it today, where you say you didn’t post about women and bears… sorry I forgot your exact comment, but you posted that “Women are easily frightened…” in the news article about the black bear in Forshay… as if men would stand around waiting to greet a black bear…what was your point?

    Now you bought a Rambam that women can’t learn effectively. There are many rerferences in the Torah, in the Talmud, meforshim and seforim about men in a negative sense as well. I don’t see the point in combing through myriads of sources to bring up what they say about men…

    Nd”k in my opinion,( and there are many meanings including the one Bruriah talked about, as everything in the Torah has many facets) means that since women are more emotional than men, feeling more empathy with others as opposed to men who are not so emotionally involved with other people, it may have an influence on halachik outcomes so women should not be poskim and dayanim.

    Nobody feels uncomfortable with this Chazal as your first comment stated- we feel uncomfortable with what you are trying to imply.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772649
    philosopher
    Participant

    Non Political, there is no problem with simply pointing out the high medreiges women can arrive at. There’s nothing here in of itself, even without comparing these great women to Deborah Hanavia, that contradicts Chazal in any case…

    in reply to: Elon Musk’s Shabbos Car #1772635
    philosopher
    Participant

    akuperma, I’m not saying I would ever use a Shabbos elevator, but I fail to understand the difference between that and a lighting fixture set on with Shabbos clock, a refrigerator set to Shabbos mode, and an oven set to Shabbos mode with food taken out during Shabbos…The electricity on and off in all of these cases are set before Shabbos…

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772614
    philosopher
    Participant

    Klugeryid, If you read my earlier posts you would understand why we are upset with Joseph specifically, however I take the blame for making it into a personal fight with him. Regardless of his personal opinions, I shouldn’t of attacked him personally. Syag did not fight with Joseph at all, she only pointed out why he bought up the topic specifically now in the 9 days because it can cause strife- and it did, but is was not over the Chazal specifically…

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772550
    philosopher
    Participant

    I mistakenly pressed a button on my phone while typing my previous message which cleared the message box so I hope my unfinished comment wasn’t submitted by mistake. If it was then this message may be a repeat of my previous one…

    Although it feels like personal attacks against me and noshem tzedkunius in general especially because it is so often that we are tried to be proven inferior and I see these comments almost every time I read the threads in the coffee room and sometimes in the news as well, I shouldn’t have taken Joseph’s comments so personally and I feel bad that I attacked him in a personal manner.

    Joseph, I hope you will forgive my personal attacks on you (and I also hope you will try to not “prove” constantly that women are inferior…)

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772532
    philosopher
    Participant

    DY, Is Sara Schnirer and her students who built bais Yaacovs and saved the Jewish nation from disintegration included in the “exceptions”? And which Chazal rule are you talking about?

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772530
    philosopher
    Participant

    Non Political, your comments are well said and emes.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772509
    philosopher
    Participant

    CA, ok, it’s an interesting point that you are making regarding women having lower spiritual end points but you don’t quote a source so until I see a source I’ll take it as your opinion.

    In any case, I don’t think a woman being a nevuah is such a low spiritual point… And people’s highest spiritual point is set high enough for both men and women – our spiritual potential is immensely great and not in any way “low” for women as you claim it is. I’d be overjoyed if I reach my spiritual potential at 120, even if I don’t end up being a tzaddik gemor…as will most men be happy to reach their potential even if most of them WOULD NOT end up tzakkikim gemirim even if they would fulfill their spiritual potential.

    As Reb Zusya of Hanipoli said he will be asked in the next world why he’s did not rise to the level of Rav Zusya, not why he wasn’t a Moshe Rabbeinu.

    So as far as I’m concerned, we each have our own spiritual destiny, capabilities and potential that doesn’t hinge only on being male or female but on many other factors.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772468
    philosopher
    Participant

    CA, So Shloime Hemelech found one only good man out of 1,000?! That doesn’t show us that men are generally better than women…If Shloime Hamelech thought women were so bad he wouldn’t have 700 wives and 300 concubines.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772461
    philosopher
    Participant

    CA, I’m not sure what your last two paragraphs are about… What does kinetic energy of male and female have to do with spiritual greatness? Am I missing some deep kabbalistic knowledge here? And I’m not sure about the students you are talking about. Seems to me you know who said women are on a higher spiritual plane as they spoke about that in the Mishpacha article and likely named the person who said it. If so, kindly enlighten us who it was.

    A man can, in general, go further spiritually than a women because of the limud haTorah that men study while women are generally busy with the household and children. With that being said, one gender is not automatically greater than the other. Again, it depends on what one acheives as an individual.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772447
    philosopher
    Participant

    Coffee addict, I don’t remember where I’ve read it, but this is attributed to a tzaddik whom I’ve forgotten his name, who said that women have less mitzvos because they are on a higher spiritual plane.

    Regardless where that comes from, I have never read or heard ANY frum person saying that women are better than men, it is just an explanation why women have less mitzvos.

    I’m not sure about the Mishpacha article as I’ve not read it, but I highly doubt that they insinuated that women are better than men.

    As individuals, male or female , and as a people, we all have strengths and weakness and we were all created with those characteristics so that we can fulfill our potential. We are not better one over the other except for what we make of ourselves. Tzaddikim are higher than simple people because of what they have acheived. That has no bearing to the fact that men are not greater than women or vice versa.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772401
    philosopher
    Participant

    Joseph, nobody claims there’s no difference in female vs male daas. However we can argue with your interpretation of daas into the English words “intelligence or cognizance”. Intelligence in my opinion, is individual, not specifically devided by gender. However, even if we are to argue that intelligence, as defined in the English language, is different in men and women because it is processed differently in male and female brain, nobody, including us women, argued otherwise…

    Remember women were taught halacha before men after the giving of the Torah….We are not less intelligent, we have different daas and nobody said otherwise.

    As I’ve said before, the problem many of us are having is not with Chazal as you are trying to insinuate, in fact, this topic is a fascinating one and it could make for a rather interesting discussion. The problem we have is that you are trying to prove for months, perhaps even years, or for as long as I’ve been on here, is that women are inferior to men. That is a dangerous notion and not based in Judasim at all. We have specific duties as men and women and despite the fact that men are more dominant IN SPECIFIC AREAS according to halacha, it does not indicate superiority or that women are in servitude of men as we have argued previously. That is a dangerous notion to have. It is more in line with Islam…and that’s why their women are more often than not mistreated.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772327
    philosopher
    Participant

    Nobody has a problem with people digging up interesting or relevant old threads. It’s when digging up old threads in addition to bringing up topics continously for years to try to prove the inferiority of a large segment of klal Yisreol and even if it would be only one frum Jew… kol shekein the mothers of our entire nation! A little respect is in order but trying constantly to prove our inferiority through Tanach, Gemara, meforshim, is absolutely disgusting and nausciating.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772282
    philosopher
    Participant

    Honestly, I have not read any of your posts, if there are any, on the opinion of what nd”k means. Just the mere fact, that I have not been on YWN for a while and come back and what do I see? Joseph posting a comment of only women being scared of bears and bringing up a thread from 2011 about women…again. This is when I have had continuous arguments with you on different threads that supposedly “prove” that men can subjegate their wives, before I took a break from YWN. I would be very surprised that in the interim there were no threads by you “proving” how inferior we are. These are personal attacks from you against women.

    As I’ve said before, I, and other women who have chimed in, have no problem with any Chazal, despite your arguing otherwise. This is another attack you make against us women- that since we don’t agree with your and your intentions, we supposedly c”v don’t agree with Chazal.

    Please explain to us what your intention is when the vast majority of your threads and comments is about “proving”, according to YOUR VERSION of Yiddishkeit, that women are inferior to men.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772242
    philosopher
    Participant

    Joseph, we like every single Chazal. We frum women are not trying to become dayanim and poskim, we are happy the way we are, with the daas we we’re created with and for the purpose we were created for. What we don’t like is YOUR continuous interpretations of Chazal and other Torah sources that denigrate women. For me personally, as someone who has suffered from controlling individuals, this type of weird obsession of yours of how superior men are to women shows something much deeper – it shows that you disrespect and try to cheapen women. It is worrisome if you have a wife or daughters. Some have pointed out that it is doubtful that there exists women in your life…
    Either way, continuously talking in a denigrating way regarding women ( like only women are scared of bears…remember this recent moiredige comment of yours?) is senseless sinas chinum that serves no purpose. Today is the day to remember that the Bais Hamikdosh was destroyed because of sinas chinum and by you trying to hide your sinas chinum behind Torah sources is particularly offensive. Sinas chinum’s only purpose is for individuals to feel superior that they are more chushev than “inferior” individuals. And usually this krum mentality involves mental, physical and/or emotional abuse of others when it is within the power of the superior feeling individual to do so.

    This topic of what “daton kalos” means and what the halachic ramications are is actually an interesting one. Since it’s Tisha BaAv I won’t go into the topic itself. The only bothersome thing with topics like these is when one has an agenda behind these threads. There are people who ask “where is Hashem?” And there are people who ask “where is Hashem?” People can have the same questions but what their intentions are behind the questions and behind bringing up topics can be very different.

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772150
    philosopher
    Participant

    Syag, thanks. Some individuals are so offensive, they can make the most frum women sound liberal when we stick up for ourselves …

    in reply to: Nashim Da'atan Kalos and Women Today #1772088
    philosopher
    Participant

    Bruriah, don’t take Joseph, or anyone attacking your response to Joseph, too seriously. Halachic discussion, my foot. Joseph loves “proving” how inferior women are. Do you know anyone searching very old threads and bringing them back to life? Only someone obsessed with a topic can do that. And answering someone with passion will make you as a woman, a “weak emotional woman” but many men can argue pretty passionately and immaturely, but that’s ok since they are men…

    Anyway, whatever. It doesn’t matter, one can argue and bring proofs of what “kalos” means, but I take the way Hashem created me with utmost happiness, with the good and the bad, and wouldn’t want to be a male. Thank you Hashem for creating me according to your will!

    in reply to: Time to go troll #1673272
    philosopher
    Participant

    Well, I’d say it could be true because the name yankelehcohen with the Sephardi sounding title with the word “tniut” didn’t make sense. As far as I know “yankele” or “yanky” is only used by Ashkenazim.
    Also “yankelecohen” never chimed in after his first post, unless I missed a comment of his.

    in reply to: Why Won’t My Mother Let Me Get A Shidduch? #1673274
    philosopher
    Participant

    .ammeleh, is the song a joke perhaps? Some issues that people think kids have are non-issues, today everything is exaggerated. But real issues become bigger after marriage. Marriage is not a fix for those who have major issues.

    in reply to: Why Won’t My Mother Let Me Get A Shidduch? #1673244
    philosopher
    Participant

    Joseph, that is not accurate. Most Chasidim do not go out at 17 years of age ( actually most Chassidim do not go out at all- we have beshows). We started listening to shidduchim for my son when he was 19 and he got married by 20. My 19 year old daughter just started shidduchim, most of the boy’s that are read are alproximately 20 years of age. We are a regular Chassidishe family listening to regular Chassidishe boys. My daughter has only 4 engaged girls out of her class of 30. She attended a very Chassidishe school.

    Even Satmer boys who get engaged young are generally at least 18 years of age while there could be kallahs 17 years of age but they wait until they are 18 to get married and they are a minority. Most boys and girls in the very frum Chassidishe crowd are at least 18 when they start listening. I do know of a Rebbishe girl who got engaged at 16 and married at 17. But even for Rebbishe, it is very young. My friend has an 18 year old son in Satmer yeshiva and none of his classmates are engaged yet.

    The trend is certainly not 17 years of age. In Israel 17 years of age is also not the norm. Maybe by the Meah Shaerim Chassidishe like Reb Aharon’s Chassidim, maybe they go at that age. I’m not familiar with that shidduchim scene.

    in reply to: Recent Ben Shapiro Controversy #1673225
    philosopher
    Participant

    Neville your response would have been the right one. Ben is very good with debating but he’s human too and he made a mistake this time falling into the trap.

    in reply to: Recent Ben Shapiro Controversy #1673099
    philosopher
    Participant

    Well, how would Been Shapiro know that baby Adolf y”s would be a killer?

    If Ben Shapiro thinks German-Austrian volk were Amelek should he have killed them all? As crazy as Adolf was, he could only thrive and carry out his deeds because the Germans and all of the Europeans who helped him, enabled him to so. So why is the question only regarding Hitler y”s? In any case, the Amaleik question was not what the media had an in mind.

    The question is not relevant. We don’t know how anyone will turn out to be. If we would know he would be a killer we would also know those who actually did the killing and those who put him in power and enable him to carry out his gruesome deeds. That would mean hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of abortions. Which I can tell you all of a sudden these abortion butchers would not want to carry out, only those whom the mother deems unworthy of living because she has no PATIENCE to take care of the baby or because the baby is disabled. But if the baby would grow up killer of Jews, then we can’t kill these innocent babies, can we?

    Anyway, again it’s irrelevant because we have no clue what kind of person a baby will be when they grow up.

    in reply to: Torah in the 5 towns #1673052
    philosopher
    Participant

    Coffee addict, I was just exaggerating a bit but still not everyone, even upstate New Yorkers, know where the 5 Towns is. But thanks for educating me on the general area of 5 Towns 🙂

    JustaJew39, we don’t hate each other at all! Kol Yisroel areivim zeh lzeh. Still this is an important topic. Women who are not b’tznius are nichshal others and there’s nothing wrong with discussing this vital topic.

    in reply to: Tzniut Problems In The 5 Towns #1673027
    philosopher
    Participant

    Yisro, I’m not violating halacha by saying more money and kochos should be put into making sure frum people know and keep basic halacha than all money and effort going into trying to make baalie teshuvas. This is my opinion. I couldn’t care less if you think I’m out of my mind and I won’t change my mind just because you say so. I’m not saying a Baal Teshuva cannot be on a higher spiritual level than a FFB, or more chushav in Hashem’s eyes. Don’t fardrey what I’m saying. What I do see is a constant lowering of standards in music, dress, action to gefel and look cool and normal to those people many are trying to attract to Yiddishkeit whether they are not frum Jews or OTDs. And I firmly believe that before people start trying to make Baal teshuvas they need to keep basic halachas. Besides the secular world, especially in the US, is getting more and more dangerous. Soon you will not know if you are dealing with a man or woman. I think people like you are very naive. First a Jewish home has to be kodosh. That is the number one priority.

    in reply to: Tzniut Problems In The 5 Towns #1672985
    philosopher
    Participant

    Modesty, the reason that dressing modest is so hard for some women is because this yetzer hora has grown out of control in some women. Tznius becomes second nature after a bit of taiming the yetzer hora.

    If a Jew has been eating treif it’s much harder for them to stop eating it than someone who has never eaten trief. But after a while of not eating trief one doesn’t have to keep themselves back from eating treif- it becomes second nature.

    It’s a real shame that in some frum communities the basic mitzva of tznius has become such a big effort to keep because they have become lax in them. I think that the trying to make baalie teshuvas out of non-frum Yidden should take backstage to making sure we frum Yidden are strong in keeping basic halacha.

    in reply to: Torah in the 5 towns #1672971
    philosopher
    Participant

    Mod-29 I’m glad to have made your day 🙂

    in reply to: Torah in the 5 towns #1672947
    philosopher
    Participant

    It’s not a problem because apparently only Jews living in the 5 Towns know where the 5 Towns is. Everyone else thinks it’s in Brooklyn.

    🤣😂 Thank you for this post, made my day -29

    in reply to: Tzniut Problems In The 5 Towns #1672892
    philosopher
    Participant

    LLW, you mean we should just be good Jews at heart and dress however we want? We just need to act nice to goyim and all is right ? Absolutely not. That is not what Yiddishkeit is all about. That is why women dress so pritzusdig these days because they are given the green light to do so.

    We are supposed to dress and act b’tznius because this is what Hashem asks of us, not according to how goyim percieve us. Btw, dressing goyish and pritzusdig causes Hashem’s anger and He withholds his protection from goyim’s hatred. I see a correlation between the recent upscale in anti-Semitic incidents in the US and the way frum women AND men dress, trying to blend in with the goyim by hiding their Jewishness. If we don’t shape up it will spin out of control. The Holocaust started in Germany because so many sought to “show the goyim” that they are proper German citizens and it blew up in their faces. We don’t have to “show” anyone anything. We need to live as Jews and be tzniusdig with our dress and actions.

    in reply to: Tzniut Problems In The 5 Towns #1672876
    philosopher
    Participant

    Modesty, why is it so difficult to dress tzniusdig? A woman can be well dressed and a tznia at the same time.

    in reply to: Tzniut Problems In The 5 Towns #1672871
    philosopher
    Participant

    Syag Lchochma, please explain why it’s a dumb post to judge women who don’t dress b’tznius in public and negatively effect others. This is not only between Hashem and an individual, this effects men in general, besides that it also effects these women’s children in a negative way. It also effects women who think it’s ok to dress this way with the mentality of “if she dresses this way, then ok for me too” …

    Judaism places a big emphasis on tznius because this is a yesod of Yiddishkeit!

    in reply to: Tzniut Problems In The 5 Towns #1672870
    philosopher
    Participant

    WinniethePooh, thanks. I am constantly striving to become better in Loshen HaKodesh and try to use the words in the correct terms ..I didnt have the privilege of learning Loshen HaKodesh well because the school I attended has a shittah according to their Rebbe that girls should be good wives and mothers and not learn as much as the men…I understand their shittah but I don’t agree entirely. I taught/ am teaching myself with Artscroll sedarim and sefarim and my girls’ notes from the school they attend ( b”H they are learning Loshen HaKodesh on an advanced level)… I’d love to be able to speak and write fluently in Loshen HaKodesh like I do in Yiddish and English but I can’t see that happening since I’m not speaking the language, only davening and reading it…maybe if I would attend yeshiva I would be able to speak the language fluently…but I don’t think they’d let me study there 😉

Viewing 50 posts - 901 through 950 (of 1,053 total)