philosopher

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 501 through 550 (of 1,053 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: bums? or finding their own path? #2017137
    philosopher
    Participant

    What is less? That’s a huge range. If people are eved Hashem, even if they don’t practice the same type of frumkeit as their parents, I don’t look down on them. But OTD or immature, barely holding onto Yiddishkeit, life is one long party types, i certainly look down on these people.

    in reply to: ADHD can be an expression of the creative mind #2017134
    philosopher
    Participant

    Syag, first of all, I totally read everything you wrote. It doesn’t mean that I agree with you.

    I didn’t mean what I said about labels in a sarcastic way. You said that if it will help other people understand you better then you don’t mind using them. That to me means that you have a positive opinion regarding labels since for you that helps to identify people. There’s nothing wrong with that.

    Now the fact is that people labeled ADHD CAN concentrate amazingly well when it interests them. So how exactly can they be labeled ADHD?

    in reply to: ADHD can be an expression of the creative mind #2017082
    philosopher
    Participant

    onto them, I meant to say

    in reply to: ADHD can be an expression of the creative mind #2017063
    philosopher
    Participant

    Ujm, I’m not sure about Asperger’s, but certainly autism is often mischarachterized with absolutely normal people being stamped with the “autism” label for no reason.

    There are people who have REAL mental and emotional issues. Years ago the distinctions between mentally ill people and normal people, who all have struggles, where very clear. Now with so many therapists, psychologists, pshycotherapists and “mental health” services, everyone needs a label or diagnose stamped into them.

    in reply to: Married Women Shaving Their Hair Off #2017019
    philosopher
    Participant

    ujm, he did not bring any source that says that shaving was a tekanah from the Vaad HaArbeh Arotzos nor did he bring any sources specifically regarding shaving only about concerns of chatzitzah.

    in reply to: ADHD can be an expression of the creative mind #2017016
    philosopher
    Participant

    AAQ, I like the comparison of ADHD labeled characteristics to a bug or feature in software😀 . It’s so true, but this could be about any characteristic of human behavior. And that is my point.

    I disagree with you that memorization was utilized 99% of the time. Creativity is not only about art but also about creating utensils and cookware, creating furniture and textile, etc since the beginning of time. Creativity is also scientific with inventions, breakthroughs and discoveries that have made a huge impacts on the world.

    Great people have come not from sitting in class and memorizing for hours, which is what education means today, but from thinking and analyzing and experimenting.

    in reply to: ADHD can be an expression of the creative mind #2016979
    philosopher
    Participant

    Syag, ok fine, if it’s easier to label people then go ahead and label them. However, that does not make ADHD a true thing. People whom you would label ADHD because they can’t sit too long in class or in an office setting or concentrate on projects or on many subjects, can sit in one place for hours on projects that interests them, even staying up entire nights if it is needed to finish a project. “Adhd” people can concentrate on technical and intricate subjects if they have an in it! So how is ATTENTION DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER an appropriate term to use for these people?

    Every person has characteristics which if you would force them into a certain situation can exhibit negative tendencies if it goes agianst their nature. Put non-adhd people in a world where adhd labeled people thrive and they may have major difficulties!

    ADHA label people CAN concentrate and don’t have a disorder! Generally, the people with this label can be very lazy when doing essential things important for an orderly and healthy life and not do them at all or at a slower pace because they are not interested in doing it. But that is a negative side of their characteristics but every single characteristic of a people has negative and positive sides to it and that is precisely how we grow, by overcoming the negative sides our personalities have and utilizing the positive power that our characteristics have.

    I would lael adhd people as intelligently attention hyperfocused.

    in reply to: ADHD can be an expression of the creative mind #2016900
    philosopher
    Participant

    Syag, if you like labels I can find five labels to put on you. This theorist, psychologist, physiotherapist, saturated society is being manipulated to think that people have major issues that only they can help.

    Now look at the goyishe world and see what they’ve done to people. We still have the Torah framework, but it’s edging more and more toward the precipice of destruction in our communities, although some are way worse than others in this regard.

    Every human being on earth struggles in different ways in how they respond to the world around them or/and to their own inner world. We are here to grow by becoming stronger and better people, by connecting to Hashem. Labels thrown at people by all these “experts” are useless.

    in reply to: Married Women Shaving Their Hair Off #2016893
    philosopher
    Participant

    barlshwartz1, thank you for your wonderful mussar shmuez… This is a discussion where we tried getting to the root of this minhug with everyone presenting what they know and you come along with this superior attitude…I’m not impressed at all. Perhaps you are right, but likely not. You do not bring any sources to your claim and so they can be as true as anyone else’s.

    I have heard from Satmer women who shave and they tell me it’s based on kabbalah that a married women’s hair is klippas and that’s why it needs to be shaved and also because it’s a big avaeirah for “bei hur” (hair that sticks out from the covering) to be seen. That’s what they are they are taught. Whether that is the original reason or not, I don’t know

    Now, not only did many of the countries you claimed the women shaved their hair, not shave their hair, but they also didn’t wear wigs or headcoverings either in many of these countries, even women whose husbands were talmidei chachumim. I highly doubt they would go from shaving to not wearing any headcoverings.

    Not only that, but Jewish who came from these countries to Israel in the in the late 19th and early 20th century do not shave either. Many Israeli Chassidishe women don’t shave at all.

    in reply to: ADHD can be an expression of the creative mind #2016848
    philosopher
    Participant

    There’s no such thing as “ADHD”. The characteristics of people labeled “ADHD” are simply characteristics of a creative and often very intelligent mind which doesn’t thrive in rigid environments that many of the frum schools have today. Kids are stuffed into classrooms for hours with barely any time to socialize, to stretch their muscles by playing sports and games, they barely have recess. And the way things are taught by relying totally on children’s memorization instead of visual tools and exploration of the topics is a recipe for disaster for a large percentage of our children.

    in reply to: Short Skirts #2016482
    philosopher
    Participant

    Yserbius, shorter jackets are more tzniusdig than long jackets?

    in reply to: Married Women Shaving Their Hair Off #2016281
    philosopher
    Participant

    Lostspark, I always assumed that to be the original reason the custom was adopted.reason.

    But I could be wrong though and the original reason may be the ones I heard which that shaving is done because the hair is klippas according to sources in the Zohar and because hair could stick out of the hair covering.

    in reply to: Women Learning Gemara #2016241
    philosopher
    Participant

    I’m so inspired by women learning gemorah. When females learn gemorah, most of the time it’s mamesh, mamesh learning only l’Shem Shomayim, it’s mamesh learning only lishmu, and it’s got absolutely nothing to do with modern ideology of women doing the same things as men.

    I’m going to start learning gemorah because I want to shteig in my levels of feminist aspirations, oops sorry, I meant that I want to shteig in my ruchnius, and learning gemorah is the ideal and proper way for women to appropriately shteig in all levels of ruchnius that a Jewish woman should aspire to in tznius, yira Shomayim, chesed, etc.

    in reply to: Married Women Shaving Their Hair Off #2016206
    philosopher
    Participant

    I think it started in Hungary. Hungarian women all shaved their heads, whether they were Chassidish or not.

    in reply to: Women Learning Gemara #2016205
    philosopher
    Participant

    AAQ, to think we are wiser than the gedoilim of 200 years ago is absolutely a folly. We are less wise, that’s for sure. Years ago almost no Jews converted except for a few individuals unless it was forced conversions, even then, masses of Jews died Al Kiddush Hashem. Today we unfortunately have individual Jews, mostly non-educated, who convert to Christianity. There Jewish women marrying Muslims and converting to Islam. And unfortunately we have boys and girls, too many too count, that go OTD. And we have adults who go OTD as well.

    We are a shvache dor, we are certainly not better than our ancestors.

    in reply to: Is the 27th booster effective? #2016056
    philosopher
    Participant

    Not related to the thread, but I always see my grammar and spelling mistakes after I post my comments… Sorry, there’s no option edit the mistakes. I hope my comments are understandable.

    in reply to: Special Thanks to The Moderators! #2016042
    philosopher
    Participant

    Yes, a big thanks to all the moderators!

    The moderators must have a lot of confidence though. I am always second guessing myself if I ruffled anyone’s feathers whether it was a justified response.

    I recently anaylized two posters comments on one thread and came to the conclusion that they are trolls. However I can only say that with 80% certainty and have been bashing myself for saying anything because if they really meant what they said then I hope I didnt hurt innocent people. I’m asking me mechila if these two posters on the chinuch thread weren’t trolls.

    in reply to: Is the 27th booster effective? #2015962
    philosopher
    Participant

    HaravPhil, how could I have possible stolen your name when I’ve had this using this name for 10+ years? 🙂 I cannot even believe I created an account so long ago…but I just checked and that’s actually the case.

    in reply to: Is the 27th booster effective? #2015961
    philosopher
    Participant

    AAQ, I’ve read a few articles that say that these vaccines does not price b&t cells. I can look up sources later.

    I’m certainly not saying advocating for people to willfully get covid. I’m saying billions of people got covid despite wearing masks, despite lockdowns and despite social distancing. Unless you and your family plan to live in protected bubbles your entire lives, eventually you will most likely at some point become infected with covid, unless you will be one of few exceptions who won’t get it, but the majority of will get sick with covid as they do with a virus that travels quickly and easily as covid does. And of course, thousands of people got covid even after taking the covid shot and that number will rise the further away we get from the initial doses. Which leads us to a 27th+ booster shot which will still not prevent people from getting covid.

    in reply to: Is the 27th booster effective? #2015837
    philosopher
    Participant

    AAQ, I’m not sure about traditional vaccines, but cell based vaccines (which all covid vaccines currently are) do not produce b and t memory cells while natural immunity to covid does.

    Your family being sick for months is exactly why lockdowns and social distancing is not a solution to preventing the spread of viruses. Immune systems grow weaker with masks, social distancing, and lockdowns. People should build up their immune systems naturally, not weaken their immune system by staying away from society or being injected with experimental vaccines. I do understand why older people would want to take the covid vaccine (personally I would not choose to do so would I be over 65 years of age), but I’m totally against mandatory vaccination.

    in reply to: Macha against men not giving gittin #2014772
    philosopher
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah, halacha is supreme to secular law. But, as you said, just because someone can do something according to halacha doesn’t mean they should take advantage of that.

    Imagine if I as a mother would “take advantage” of the laws of kibud eim and force one of my children to cook, clean the entire house and wash the laundry every day because my daughter would be obligated to do so according to halacha. That is abuse plain and simple.

    Now I forgot to add in my previous comment to ujm, that although individuals have “rights” according to halacha, we also have halachic “obligations”, so for example, we cannot cause pain for others. So when people disregard an halachik obligation to take advantage of an halachik right, they will go to gehinom for trampling on halacha, especially if it was bein adom lachveroy.

    in reply to: Is the 27th booster effective? #2014435
    philosopher
    Participant

    I know people who have had natural immunity and got covid again but with milder symptoms. This has nothing to do with the vax. As the varients mutate more and more, they are less and less potent.

    in reply to: Macha against men not giving gittin #2014433
    philosopher
    Participant

    Ujm, will you also sell your underage daughter to whomever you want because you could do so according to halacha?

    I really pity the women in your family. Unless you are a troll… Can you tell me of what purpose does it do to keep a woman chained who doesn’t want to be married to the likes of you?

    I’m telling you that many people have a straight path to gehinom paved with excuses of “but it was allowed according to halacha”! Whether such an excuse is used for untzniusdige dress when some women always find excuses like “it doesnt say anywhere in halacha that you can’t wear a long wig till the waist”, to abusers who abuse with an excuse that “halacha allows it”…there’s a path straight to gehinom, guaranteed!

    in reply to: Was the 2020 election stolen? #2014432
    philosopher
    Participant

    Was the 2020 election stolen. No, it wasn’t stolen according to FakeFactCheckers.com.

    in reply to: Real data: mortality of vaccinated vs non vaxed #2014431
    philosopher
    Participant

    Always ask, well, vaxxed people are dying as well, unfortunately, either from “breakthrough cases” or from side effects. And we are not even talking about long-term effects that were not studied or are in the process of being studied ( mostly by the pharmaceutical companies…which guarantees no honest reporting of results)

    in reply to: chinuch and discipline nowadays #2014425
    philosopher
    Participant

    According to smartbackgrounchecks.com, the number 718-854-xxxx”just myself” listed for the supposed “quisquam kiosk store” is a number listed for an individual named Abina Cruz 88 years old…doesn’t sound like quisquam computer kiosk store’s number to me…

    For the address of one supposed quisquam store on 5101 16th Ave there’s a cellular phone store named Big Man Cellular. Looking through the store’s window on my large computer screen, it appears to be a business not remotely related to a computer kiosk… Mamesh a few doors down the at supposed second quisquam location of 5100 16th is a residential building…

    And last but not least, located at the third “quisquam” location at 1282 52nd st is…NOTHING! There’s no such address! Bobov Cheder is at the corner of 13ave so it’s the last building on 12th st and the address is 1270 52nd street…

    This kind of trolling where you present yourself as someone you are not and cause people to give you of their time to answer you is not only trolling, it is geneivos daas.

    Kudos to mod-29 for spotting these trolls (assuming they are two people) right away.

    It really upsets me when people are so immature.

    But thanks trolls for the challenge! I enjoyed sleuthing a bit 😃

    in reply to: Mayor of the fate of NYC #2014426
    philosopher
    Participant

    Always ask, according to today’s definition of off the charts communist, immoral behaimo liberals, Adams APPEARS to be somewhat of a centrist…but certainly he cannot save NYC…

    in reply to: Mayor of the fate of NYC #2014391
    philosopher
    Participant

    Always ask, these things are gibberish, there’s nothing of substance here. Plus, 99% of his policies are totally liberal, including most of what you wrote. You looked for the needle in the haystack and found 1-2 non-liberal ones.

    Providing tax credits for businesses relocating to “certain areas”? I am certain which areas they are…is another liberal “jewel” serving nothing and no one.

    How will “empowering immigrants with voting rights” save NYC?

    Invest in “green infastructure”?! Didn’t we go through with that in the Obama era where he gave billions for solar companies which was money poured down the drain?

    Add housing “for everyone” in wealthy neighborhoods?! Right, that will surely make the last few rich tax payers stay in NYC. Make sure the bums, the drug addicts, the homeless, the drifters and criminals are transferred to wealthy together with the “low to no income” individuals… This is exactly what we need to turn NYC around…

    in reply to: Real data: mortality of vaccinated vs non vaxed #2014371
    philosopher
    Participant

    A month ago the doctors in Israel said 99% of hospitalized are non-vaxxers. Now they are saying 65% hospitalized are unvaxxed…let’s see the numbers in a year.

    in reply to: Macha against men not giving gittin #2014368
    philosopher
    Participant

    Ujm, your comment that it isn’t obligatory to give a get is absolutely disgusting. If a woman wants a get she has to get a get unless she is making unreasonable demands or withholding visitation rights from the husband. I am not saying that every single divorce was done out of necessity, but I believe the vast majority was necessary.

    You know what, a lot of things are not obligatory according to halacha, that does not mean we don’t do it. Withholding a get for no valid reason gets a man on the path straight to gehinom.

    in reply to: being in style #2014135
    philosopher
    Participant

    Ujm, ok so I guess you support the new “style”.

    Why stop at my great-grandmother, dressing like our ancestors Sura, Rivka, Ruchal and Leah would be better, no?

    in reply to: chinuch and discipline nowadays #2014118
    philosopher
    Participant

    Syag, perhaps they are bored bucharim, I dont know why I would think they are girls, perhaps because they are presenting themselves as females…

    I could be completely off, but I profile them as young, between 18-24 years of age , female, and working in graphic design or attending graphic design courses. I don’t believe it’s one person doing the talking for both people as their writing styles are different. Perhaps they are two bored girls in a sem dorm…

    in reply to: chinuch and discipline nowadays #2014105
    philosopher
    Participant

    I googled “quisquam” and no business with that name shows up. I googled computer kiosks in Boro Park, NY but they all open at 10:00 or later and none are named “Quisquam”.

    No frum kiosk store would think of naming their business with the unfamiliar Latin word “quisquam” . Perhaps you are graphic designers using a word from the “Loren ipsum” placeholder text…

    in reply to: Australia #2014059
    philosopher
    Participant

    There are numerous protests all over Australia and they would be more with bigger attendance, however the police litterally chase them away and arrest many of these protesters. Dissenters are being locked up , investigated and harassed. It is literally a police state. That the media goes along with it and presents their own “statistics” not rooted in reality is expected, the media support the stripping of human rights, that’s what liberals stand for these days unless we are talking about the lqtbq agenda.

    But even were the majority in favor of these lockdowns, it means absolutely nothing. Hashem created the world so that we serve, not stay locked in our homes for almost a year as they are in Melbourne and other parts of Australia. It is absolutely not a chillul Hashem to go daven with a minyan. These are the brave men fighting for freedom against the vicious regime.

    in reply to: Macha against men not giving gittin #2014063
    philosopher
    Participant

    And I should add that it’s vice versa, a woman paying for her kids expenses is not supporting her husband, or ex-husband if she’s the one paying child support ( which happens sometimes if she a bigger earner than the husband). No one says, if the wife contributes to the children’s expenses, that she supports the husband (or ex-husband) so why say the husband supports the wife (or ex-wife) if the money goes for the kids?

    in reply to: chinuch and discipline nowadays #2014023
    philosopher
    Participant

    just myself, you are at a kiosk at 8:14 am? Which one opens so early?

    in reply to: Sleeping in the sukkah #2014015
    philosopher
    Participant

    AviraDeArah wrote “You’ve also not said clearly that you do not believe in atzmus elokus theology, nor have you even tried the “you have to know what it means” retort – I’d like you to say on the record, a simple yes or no, if you believe that a rebbe is the essence of god wrapped in a body and therefore you can pray at the grave of a rebbe, and it’s not an intermediary, because he is the essence of god wrapped in a body.

    Yes or no.”
    I have noted that Yechi Hamalech has not responded.

    If AviraDeArah’s assertions are correct, which I hope they are not, then this ideoligy is a second Christian religion in the making. Unfortunately Yechi Hamalech has not responded in the negative. This is very concerning and eye opening to me.

    in reply to: Maricopa county audit #2013999
    philosopher
    Participant

    I found it surprising that so many states had Trump coming in ahead but in the last moment changing to a Biden win. I’ve heard many experts saying that is statistically impossible.

    in reply to: being in style #2013997
    philosopher
    Participant

    Paris is not the headquarters for fashion for many years already.

    If a style is nice and tzniusdig I have no problem with it. The weird thing is when people just buy stuff cause they see others wearing it or it’s in the stores and it’s ugly and doesn’t suit them. For example, these two piece shapeless outfits and shapeless dresses with ugly flower patterns on the fabric that look like they were shlepped out of my great, great grandmother’s basement. They just looks absolutely stupid. This season I’ve seen knitted vests made of thick yarn added to these outfits. Really?! Wearing the outfits that our great-grandmother’s wore wouldn’t occur to anyone but if the stores sell it it must be “in” and if some buy it cause it’s “in” then everyone else has to wear it and it becomes “really pretty”. Uch, monkey see, monkey do makes me want to vomit.

    in reply to: Macha against men not giving gittin #2013994
    philosopher
    Participant

    Abba_S, why would money for the kids mean that she does not support “herself”? Men often think that giving money for their wives to buy clothing and food for their kids means giving money to the woman. No, it does not, it’s for the kids. It does not say that a husband who gives money for his wife for their children supports his wife and therefore her wages belongs to him. It says that if she supports “herself” her wages belongs to her.

    in reply to: chinuch and discipline nowadays #2013993
    philosopher
    Participant

    Mod-29 now it makes sense… probably two teenage girls having fun…
    According to just myself, eishis chayil “suddenly” got married at 21…and “suddenly” turned into a tough woman…
    My personal experiences in real life have been that a person who is conscious that their abusive parents behavior is not ok is more sensitive and attuned to their children than parents who did not experience abuse. It doesn’t mean they are perfect parents and it doesn’t mean they won’t have scars that need to heal during parenthood, but generally they simply do the opposite of their parents because their parent’s behavior revolts them. I’be seen this happen numerous times. Generally, someone who is of average intelligence and above does not repeat abusive behavior of their parents.

    in reply to: chinuch and discipline nowadays #2013910
    philosopher
    Participant

    eishis chayil, first I read the opening question and then what was at that time the last two comments before I posted my comments and so I commented about chinuch in general. Today I read all the comments from the beginning and see that I’ve missed your main question, which in your posts reveal that it’s not so much a question about chinuch but about how to punish for your children’s “crimes”. Btw, crimes is a terrible words to use. Criminals who belong in jail commit crimes, not children who are learning and growing and can sometimes misbehave.

    Then I see someone posting that they know who you are. So I’m not sure if this is a troll thread or not because how in the world would that person know who you are and even post your first name if you did not give identifying details except that your mother punished you severely? I’m sure there exists more than one such a mother in the world…

    But if this thread isn’t trolling then I must say that thinking your kids are commiting “crimes” is the first problem with your chinuch. They are simply misbehaving and you as a parent must GUIDE them in how to properly behave. I don’t agree that if a child doesn’t listen and runs into he street to not give them perch, those warning petch, which should be symbolic, not hitting so that it hurts, can save a life. Girls and boys over 12 and 13 years of age should absolutely not be hit. Girls generally do not have to be hit, except perhaps when they are really young and do dangerous things like run into the street despite you telling them not to. Boys also rarely need to hit but some boys are an exception exhibiting unruly behavior and bullying other siblings physically.

    If a child is REALLY misbehaving or not listening to something important you are telling him, not for minor infractions, then discipline in most cases should be appropriately matched punishments like, for example, not coming on a trip, not getting nosh for Shabbos etc.

    But it is most important thing is to build your children with positivity. Compliments, encourement, helping them develope their talents and helping believe in themselves is crucial.

    in reply to: Please explain Ivermectin #2013900
    philosopher
    Participant

    Yserbius123, how do you know what the “majority of rational and educated world” is saying? I see plenty of “rational and educated” professors, scientists and doctors being anti-lockdowns, anti-masks, and anti-covidvaccines.

    In any case, what the majority of any class say is not necessarily relevent to the truth or to what is right. In just one example, the majority of cultured and educated Germans supported Hitler… That the majority of “enlightenment and educated” masses support anyone or anything does not necessarily make it correct.

    in reply to: How many active people are on cofferoom? #2013899
    philosopher
    Participant

    Always ask, lol!

    in reply to: i want my son to start shiduchim #2013898
    philosopher
    Participant

    FrumWhere, ok, I guess I didn’t get the joke …

    in reply to: Macha against men not giving gittin #2013896
    philosopher
    Participant

    AviraDeArah, I am assuming that a woman who demands a get supports herself and therefore the husband would have no rights to wages . (This is much more pro-woman and fair than the so-called “enlightened” US laws that devide all of a couple’s assets evenly regardless of who actually worked for the money or inherited it.)

    in reply to: Mayor of the fate of NYC #2013884
    philosopher
    Participant

    rightwriter, go to Adams website and you’ll see what he supports; he’s a total liberal. He will indeed be a second Dinkins but worse cause a bigger liberal ( a species that didn’t exist back when Dinkins was mayor).

    in reply to: Macha against men not giving gittin #2013882
    philosopher
    Participant

    AviraDeArah, just to clear up an halachic misconception; only if the husband supports the wife does the wife’s wages belong to her husband. If the wife however, declares that she is supporting herself then the wife’s wages do not belong to the husband.

    in reply to: i want my son to start shiduchim #2013876
    philosopher
    Participant

    FrumWhere, your point is what exactly? I’m not denying that there are a tiny minority of Chassidim marrying off at 16 but the vast majority of Chassidim marry off much later. We are Chassidish, my daughter is 20 and only 5 of her classmates are engaged (out of 27 girls)

    The majority of American Chassidishe boys and girls get engaged at between 19-21 years of age so your comment is ridiculous.

    in reply to: Out of Town – Chassidish community options? #2013068
    philosopher
    Participant

    Anyone who says most Chassidises are the same is not Chassidish.

Viewing 50 posts - 501 through 550 (of 1,053 total)