Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Pashuteh YidMember
Itzik, we have debated the Zionism issue previously. But very briefly, what is wrong with anti-zionism is the word anti. This by definition is a hashkafa which is anti the work that others are doing and from which many are benefitting. It means there is pure hate directed at another segment of a population for no reason. To be Zionist does not connote any hatred towards other Jews. It means love of Zion, and the rebuilding of the land. But to be anti means nothing other than sinas chinam.
I am not saying all Zionists were perfect. But no group is made up of perfect people. This is not a reason to hate an entire group and their work. How can one possibly have it in his heart to hate hesder boys or what they stand for, when they are moser nefesh to learn, and also to put their lives on the line for all Jews?
January 23, 2009 4:52 am at 4:52 am in reply to: Daven With A Hat BeYichidus or Without it with a Minyan #1081838Pashuteh YidMemberNotPashut: When you say that I have tayna’s on Reb Chaim’s supposed psak, because of the six points I raised, you misunderstand. The six points I raised are the psak. You have quoted a footnote which I do not know if I am required to believe is correct unless somebody shows me the original. (I do not have that sefer.) Asking for reasons is not taynas. It is asking for the etzem psak. I have not seen a single reason yet for the psak, and you have not supplied one. I can’t possibly bring taynas on an as yet (to me) nonexistent psak. I am simply asking to see how he arrived at his conclusion. When a godol paskens, he is mechuyav to give reasons. Reb Moshe didn’t just write one-line teshuvahs saying “because I said so”. Neither did the Tzitz Eliezer or anybody else. It is not beneath a godol to reveal his reasoning. The entire shakla vtarya of the gemara could have been omitted and just the maskanahs kept, if that were the case, and shas would be 100 times smaller than it is now.
It occurred to me that possibly Reb Chaim may hold that tikun hamalbushim is meakev tefilah in which case that would explain his reason, as one could not be yotzei if not dressed properly. However, the Rambam in Tefilah (5,1) says it is not meakev bdieved.
Will Hill: I did the usual screaming against college, and against modern orthodox, and against various ethnic groups saying they were vilder chayas. One time a roommate had some issues that bothered him with emunah, and I yelled at him instead of trying to help him work it out. I thought the entire working world both jewish and non-Jewish were a bunch of fools. I probably caused friction in my family when I thought they were not frum enough in this or that matter. The usual run of the mill obnoxious behavior.
Boruch Hashem I realized it before it was too late that I was missing out on the gadlus of the RBSH that he provides parnasah to people in so many fascinating ways, and that we are all interdependent on each others skills and talents. I feel much more ruchniyus and appreciation for the chochma of the RBSH and the incredible beauty of his world in the hashkafah of ahavas habriyos than I ever did in my older hashkafah of gayvah and bitul of everything. This I believe is the lesson the gemara teaches us in that when Reb Shimon bar Yochai came out of the cave, everywhere he looked he burnt with his eyes and he kept saying meneechin chayei olam voskin bchayei shaah. But a bas kol came down and said get back into your cave, you are destroying my world. A year later he saw yidden running around frantically in the market for tzorchei shabbos, and he understood that we need the physical world for ruchniyos, as well. At that point everywhere he would look, he would heal with his eyes. (He stopped being mevatel everything, and started to appreciate the hard work of people even if they were not learning full-time.)
Pashuteh YidMemberI think there should be one coffee room thread for people who want to post an email address. Sometimes it could help with a shidduch or something else. Why not leave it up to each person?
January 23, 2009 1:33 am at 1:33 am in reply to: Daven With A Hat BeYichidus or Without it with a Minyan #1081824Pashuteh YidMemberBemused, you ask a valid question, and I have tried to address this on other threads. I normally never give mussar or tochacha to anybody. However, when somebody starts with another person and clearly hurts their feelings, I have no choice. In practically every case here (although not necessarily on other boards), somebody will offer an innocent opinion on some topic, and kannaim will come down and take the person to town.
You practically never see uncivilized behavior here initiated by the more moderate or even left-leaning posters, except when they are first personally attacked. Kannaim constantly overreact to posts that they do not agree with and launch these personal attacks, even though nobody has actually attacked them, just expressed an opinion.
The pattern occurs over and over. Because of a din of rodef, I need to soothe the one who has been attacked, and the only way to do that is to tell them that they have been wronged, although it is also effectively attacking the rodef, as you pointed out.
There are some kannaim here who are careful with bein odom lachaveiro, however, the majority are not. Just like in EY where they throw acid and beat people on buses. It is an entire mindset that must be changed. That is why I rail against it constantly.
I understand the mindset, as I used to be a bigger kannai than these people. But at one point I realized that almost every time I ever got angry or into some kind of major fight with anybody, it was because I thought I was doing some kind of big mitzvah or because of some religious issue. I began to think that this is not what the Torah is all about, and is a perversion. The Torah is only about shalom. The RBSH is an Av Harachaman, and hates this fighting in his name. While there are numerous rayos to this, one of the most obvious is the gemara in Sotah which says that He would rather have His name erased, if it can make shalom between a man and his wife. The meaning is that bein odom lamakom is subordinate to bein odom lachaveiro. We also see this by Avraham where gedolah hachnasas orchim yoser meikabalas pnei hashechinah. Imagine one is in the middle of speaking to Hashem and guests ring the doorbell. You could imagine a whole bunch of kannaim screaming APIKORUS, you interrupt the aibershter for some idol worshipping yo-yo at the door. How dare you!
But in truth the main thing the Aiberhster wants from us is to be menschen to each other. When we scream at each other for his sake, we totally destroy the whole reason for the Torah. It is all about us, it is not about some arrogant, angry G-d who we must constantly give his due praise or he gets furious. Everything he created is for us. Everything he told us to do is for us, so we make the maximum of ourselves, and have the happiest and most fulfilling lives.
There is much more to say, but another time.
Pashuteh YidMemberAmes, I think you have some insecurities, but don’t know if that should carry weight as a general practice.
First of all, doesn’t your husband think you are the most fabulous person he ever met, and would never even think about another woman? If not, try cooking him a fancier breakfast. That ought to do the trick.
But seriously, do you get upset if your husband walks into a CVS and there is a female cashier behind the counter? They always say hello. I mean this issue goes far beyond good shabbos. You must be nervous 24/7, and that is not healthy.
January 22, 2009 1:26 pm at 1:26 pm in reply to: Daven With A Hat BeYichidus or Without it with a Minyan #1081781Pashuteh YidMemberOomis, I feel your pain. You must understand that it is not a reflection on you. Time and time again on this board when certain kannaim come out of the woodwork on a particular issue, they say very hurtful and disparaging remarks to others. I hope they will apologize and change their ways. As you pointed out, embarrassing someone in public is far worse than never wearing a hat once in one’s entire life. (Unless someone can show me where it says that one who doesn’t wear a hat has no chelek in olam haba like it does say about one who is malbin pnei chavero. Look, I could be missing a very important chazal.)
I addressed this issue many months ago in various coffee room threads.
After thinking about it, I have come to the conclusion that two psychological factors cause this behavior.
1) These kannaim worship a very angry G-d. One who created the world and gave the Torah with so many details davka designed to trip up people so he can give himself the supreme pleasure of punishing them in all kinds of sadistic ways. (In truth the world was created so G-d could give of his goodness to people, just like we try to do to our children. Ratzah HKBH lzakos es yisroel, lfichach hirbeh lahem Torah umitzvos. Also, as Hillel said, the entire Torah in a nutshell is to treat one’s fellow man kindly.)
2) These kannaim imagine that they have a very unique and high place within this angry G-d’s hierarchy, and they are self-appointed ministers to dispense this angry G-d’s wrath, possibly by virtue of their imagined high-levels of learning. (Here again, they forget a chazal which all the rest of us simple Jews say every week, Talmidei chachamim marbim shalom baolam.)
I and others here have been the target many times of this behavior (including the dedication of an entire thread in our honor about pro-freikeit posters here on YW), but once you realize what generates this behavior, it is rather comical, and you won’t feel as bad as you do now.
In addition, the silliest thing of all, is that those same commentors who accused you of posting without sources, were davka the ones who said the whole issue is “Self-intuitive”, and who seconded that notion, i.e., based merely on their own feelings without any halachic backing.
What is even more interesting is that the Mechaber at first writes that there is an opinion that one should not daven bareheaded, and that there is an opinion that one should not go into a shul bareheaded. That seems to imply that there are other opinions that hold one could theoretically daven or go into a shul totally bareheaded (in theory). He then says that a straw yarmulka is sufficient. The Mishna Berurah’s chumra appears to be based on the styles of his times which were different than in the Mechaber’s times.
One last thought, if Reb Chaim Kanievsky did say one should miss minyan, I would expect a teshuvah with at least six paragraphs.
1) Showing why hat outweighs tefilah betzibbur.
2) Showing why hat outweighs kedushah.
3) Showing why hat outweighs kaddishim.
4) Showing why hat outweighs borchu.
5) Showing why hat outweighs krias hatorah.
6) Even if we prove the above five things individually, we must still prove that hat outweighs the aggregate sum of all of them together.
If such a six-paragraph teshuvah exists I will (figuratively) eat my hat.
January 21, 2009 6:42 pm at 6:42 pm in reply to: Daven With A Hat BeYichidus or Without it with a Minyan #1081716Pashuteh YidMemberWill Hill: Self-intuitive??? What exactly is that supposed to mean, and how does it have a halachic basis?
NotPashut: I didn’t like the tone of your language towards Oomis. Divrei Chachamim Bnachas Nishmaim.
UJM: Did you notice that the mechaber says even a straw yarmulka is sufficient. The Mishna Berurah prefaces his remarks with the very important word “Byameinu”. He says nowadays (meaning in the days of the Chofetz Chaim, about 75 years ago) since people then walked in the steet with a hat, one should also wear one by davening.
However, in 2009 when people do not walk in the street with a hat, why in the world shouldn’t it revert back to the mechaber’s din? BTW, I can imagine someone misreading the mishna berurah even worse and coming up with that a din that the mishna berurah holds one must even wear a hat in the street.
Are you all telling me that the hesder boys who do not wear hats are bad Jews?
In addition, I will not believe Reb Chaim Kanievsky paskened one should miss minyan unless someone shows me that in black and white. I am talking a teshuvah with sources, not a second or third hand account of what someone asked and the answer he received. Reb Moshe wrote his reasons in his own hand for all to see.
January 20, 2009 11:07 pm at 11:07 pm in reply to: Daven With A Hat BeYichidus or Without it with a Minyan #1081679Pashuteh YidMemberToday I saw a boy in shul who was out of school because his shoes tore. He was afraid of showing up at his mesivta in crocs because he thought either he would get thrown out, or people would make fun of him. He was forced to miss an entire day of learning.
Pretty sad commentary on the attitudes of certain segments of the population.
Pashuteh YidMemberShkoyach and ICOT, thanks for kind words. I am still here, but CR has grown exponentially and hard to stay on top of all threads.
Also, as I mentioned on another recent thread, sometimes the exact same discussion comes up months after it was debated in excruciating detail on an earlier thread. I sometimes don’t have the koach to start all over again, or even to look up where exactly the first thread was, so I stay out.
Would be nice if there was some way to catalog all the older topics.
Pashuteh YidMemberOomis, that is a beautiful story. Ultimately, our role is to help the entire world, not to knock others.
Pashuteh YidMemberSqueak, I find that using a laptop with any non-native resolution always looks terrible and blurry/jagged. A CRT monitor usually doesn’t have this problem.
Pashuteh YidMemberICanOnlyTry, thanks for the vote. I am worried, though, if I teased JFem once too many, because I haven’t seen her around here in a while. I really should ask her mechila, as she was a very sincere and well-meaning person who did not have an easy life. I hope she understood I was only kidding around.
Pashuteh YidMemberWill share one for Shabbos. It says when Moshe’s mother saw him Vateireh oso ki tov hu. The famous Rashi says that because the words ki tov are also used in Breishis about the light, that when Moshe was born the house filled with light.
Most people think this was because he was a magical baby, so his mother tried to save him. However, I am troubled, because we believe one needs to earn ruach hakodesh, and why was it fair to every other child that they didn’t get this special light as a baby?
I think pshat is that this light was the simcha of every yiddishe parent when they see a new child. She filled the house with light and simcha and didn’t worry about the difficult circumstances and danger that surrounded the klal at that time. She was bubbling with hope for the future. Unfortunately, other families had given up in despair at that time and were even not having kids.
Since she didn’t give up hope and always believed in the geulah, her son was chosen to lead them out.
Pashuteh YidMemberMdlevine: What a fine daughter you have.
Thanks, asdfg.
Pashuteh YidMemberSince I don’t see a new vort for today, will post a short one. We say Borei Nefashos Rabos Vchesronan. We praise Hashem for creating many beings and their lacks. Why thank him for what we lack? Possibly the pshat is that each of us have different talents. I may know nothing about shoes, but I know about farming. The other fellow knows nothing about farming, but he knows how to make shoes. Because we all need the talents of the other in order to survive, it enables us to appreciate each person. Each person is necessary lhachayos bahem nefesh kol chai.
Pashuteh YidMemberNossond, that was a nice hesber in your earlier post.
Pashuteh YidMemberJust happened to see this segment in a piece from the Mevakshei Torah journal in the name of Reb Dovid Povarsky Z”L.
He brings from a Rashba the following question. How come when Chazal said not to blow the shofar on RH when it falls on Shabbos, it does not violate Bal Tigra (not to subtract from mitzvos)? The Rashba answers that takanos do not violate Bal Tigra.
But Reb Dovid asks on the Rashba, look, we know that there is a mitzva to blow shofar, yet Chazal are allowed to be oker (uproot) a mitzvah b’shev v’al taaseh (passively, not to do the act) to protect Shabbos. So why is the Rashba any more bothered by Bal Tigra which is also passive, then he is about the mitzvah of shofar in the first place. If shev v’al taaseh is a good enough heter for not blowing shofar, it should be good enough for Bal Tigra. Reb Dovid answers that apparently, a passive act by Bal Tigra is not considered Shev v’al Taaseh, but rather Kum V’aseh (active violation).
It seems to me that the pshat in Reb Dovid’s words is that by definition all Bal Tigra is passive, i.e., omitting a mitzvah. So if the Torah asurs it, it must mean that even passive acts are considered an active violation of Bal Tigra. The Rashba must therefore be mechadesh that by takanos, Bal Tigra doesn’t apply.
(Not a parsha vort, but thought was a geshmaker kashya.)
Pashuteh YidMemberAs some people mentioned, it is a bit sad that we don’t have direct writings of R. Soloveitchik, with very few exceptions. Most of what we have is transcribed, or second hand notes. This has unfortunately led many people to say whatever they want, and attribute to him. We don’t have something like an Igros Moshe where you can look up and see the reasons and parameters in black and white.
Nevertheless, even in the gemara we often see machloksin among talmidim about what their rebbe said, i.e., Rav Huna amar Rav, Rav Chisda amar Rav.
Pashuteh YidMemberMod-72, When Lipa first stole my screen name, I consulted with my lawyers, as I noted here on YW at the time. I asked why Lipa couldn’t have named his album SammyGol, or ILuvChulent, or Jent, or GodolHador, etc. We could have had a whole bunch of bumper stickers running around town that proclaimed I am the Godol Hador. Imagine all that Daas Torah freely available. Why did he have to pick on me?
Pashuteh YidMemberThanks to all for the kind words.
SJ, glad to see you have drastically cut down on the amount of sinning you do in NYC.
Pashuteh YidMemberMod-42, thanks for the heartfelt compliment. I sometimes get frustrated that my words are hitting a brick wall. I am glad that somebody appreciates them.
I hadn’t been keeping up with all the recent threads, as there are so many new ones, and the number of responses has grown to over 1,000 in some, so it gets hard.
Also, I had been getting frustrated that I would debate some people on a news item or CR thread many months previously, and then all of the sudden they would bring up the same topic in a new thread and start from scratch with their position as if everything we had discussed the first time had totally been discarded. I felt like my posts were useless and not getting anywhere.
The bottom line of my whole hashkafa is that achdus is key, and we must appreciate every individual’s contribution to the klal and not be mevatel anybody. I think the current war and the Mumbai massacre has made the klal closer.
Pashuteh YidMemberBaltimore is very flexible and moves around from state to state. You never know which state it will be in at any given time.
Pashuteh YidMemberOn another topic, a word of caution about high-resolution laptops. I recently bought a laptop to replace my old one that died. It was hyped up to have super high-res graphics. The problem is that it will make all web pages look microscopic. Squeezing so many pixels onto a laptop screen means they have to be smaller, which scales down the size of everything proportionately. Even though there are settings you can fiddle with like text size, and display resolution and even a zoom page control in internet explorer, these all produce poor or blurred results. There is really no eitzah, other than getting a humongously-large sized laptop or monitor, if you like such high resolution.
Otherwise, I have found that with my older 13 inch machine which was XGA (1024×768) I was happy. For a 15 inch which I just bought now after exchanging, 1280×800 seems about as high as I would go, or for a 17″ , which was my previous machine, 1440×900 was about right. Going to higher-res than that will probably leave you disappointed and squinting and moving uncomfortable close to the screen to be able to see.
December 25, 2008 5:07 pm at 5:07 pm in reply to: Sixth Sensational Agent Emes Episode Now On Sale #712020Pashuteh YidMemberWe know the Cohen family personally, and my kids were in the same class as their’s for a few years. My kids love Agent Emes, and often dress up like him with sunglassses and throw their hats like frisbees.
May they be matzliach with their series. One point that does not need to be said is please don’t copy tapes or disks, as it hurts their parnassah.
Pashuteh YidMemberFirst of all, Rusty’s full name is Rustowitz, and he prefers to be addressed that way.
Second, in probability there is a priori and a posteriori probability. Given A, what are the chances that B will occur is a priori, sometimes called conditional probability. Given B, what is the chance that A has occurred is a posteriori. If Bayes rule sounds familiar, you will remember what I mean. I havenb’t had time to look up the sugya in Bava Kamma, but I believe that you need to keep the above in mind.
Third, on a related topic, I thought of a simple hesber for the din of kol deparish meruba parish, kol kavua kmechtza al mechtza. When a piece of meat is on the ground, and their are ten butcher shops of which 9 are kosher, we have an objective, physical leidas hasafek in front of us. We therefore use the rov. However, when a person forgot which butcher shop he went to, the leidas hasafek is in his own mind. It is not an objective physical reality. If he remembered, then it is kosher, but if he didn’t remember, then we don’t use rov, since remembering and forgetting are only in this person’s head, and the rest of the world doesn’t know what is really going on in his mind. However, I seem to recently have come across a din which doesn’t fit with this hesber. Let me know what you think.
December 25, 2008 12:26 am at 12:26 am in reply to: How Many Sufganiyot Did You Have Tonight? #836761Pashuteh YidMemberMy doctor said it is not good for your health to eat more than 20 at one sitting. I try to follow this advice whenever possible.
Pashuteh YidMemberSJS, two comments:
First, somehow when I read your name, it always comes across as SJ Sin NYC. I think the sin part gets me nervous. (I know its supposed to be SJS in NYC.)
Second, my wife tells me that in her HS class years ago it was the day of a regents, and she was in the room frantically cramming for the exam in the remaining minutes. next to her she sees a girl as calm as can be relaxing and combing her hair. My wife asked her aren’t you nervous? She said, no, not at all, we are all going to get married, anyway.
(I guess those were in the days before the shidduch crisis.)
Pashuteh YidMemberI would like to add my 2 cents worth regarding things that gross me out. People who lick money, or pages of books or bags in a supermarket. There are very effective ways to manipulate all these items without licking them.
Pashuteh YidMemberI have a shaila. I will be setting up a PC for my kids. Occasionally they will need to look up things for school. The rest of the time I do not want them to have access to internet. I am thinking about regulating this via my router, which I can allow or disallow access to a particular machine (via MAC address or other way).
My question is can I set up the wireless in their PC to only use my router’s wireless network name, and not to be able to connect to any other network which may be in range in the neighborhood. I will have administrative privileges (in XP), and the other accounts will not. Will this prevent them from changing the settings and getting access to any other possibly open networks?
I plan to use a filter as well. In the past I have had a problem, because I want them to have email, but they signed up for Yahoo. Yahoo is not a site I like very much, and I found if I blocked Yahoo, it would block Yahoo mail, as well, and vice versa. Can current filters block Yahoo search, but allow Yahoo mail?
Pashuteh YidMemberBTW, I read once that increasing stamina from 0 to 3 miles is much harder than increasing from 3 miles to 26 miles.
Pashuteh YidMemberYanky55, thanks.
YankDownUnder, I actually saw a chashuve Ben Torah who nebech can’t see, davening in the Bais Medrash of a Choshuveh Yeshiva with many Choshuveh Rabbonim. The dog sat in the corner with him and didn’t bother anybody. Apparently, this was totally accepted.
I seem to recall that Reb Moshe has a tshuvah on this and says it is fine. Just checked and it is in OC 1,45. Not only does Reb Moshe say that otherwise the person would have to be misbatel from tefilah btzibur and megillah and krias hatorah his whole life, but also that not being able to go to shul would be tremendous agmas nefesh for him, especially on yomim noraim when everybody goes.
Boruch Hashem the klal was given someone like Reb Moshe who was a godol in menschalchkeit.
Pashuteh YidMemberSmh1, it was started by a (Jewish) guy named Matt Drudge.
Pashuteh YidMemberWhere is Wolfish Musings? We could really use his expertise here.
Pashuteh YidMemberSqveek, when I wrote my words, I hadn’t seen the monumental and laborious work of exegesis you had just compiled. Had I known I would certainly have cited a reference to it, and bowed out.
Pashuteh YidMemberJoseph, come on, that is not being a good boy. A quick check on my Bar Ilan CD shows that in those Rambams it is follwed by the word Ra, i.e., a dangerous dog, maybe a pit bull. In Nizkei Mamon (5,9) he says they are ok if on a leash. It seems clear that the only fear was that they are dangerous. In those times maybe that was true, as I believe I read that they were originally bread from wolves. Nowadays, most household dogs are quite safe.
December 10, 2008 8:08 pm at 8:08 pm in reply to: Looking For a Mamar Chazal About Cosmetics #635034Pashuteh YidMemberI remember reading in Morris Mandel’s coumn in Jewish Press that any possible thing a women can do to make herself more attractive should by all means be done. It is part of feeling good about oneself that one is clean and neat. It is not healthy to let oneself go. One of the first signs of mental illness or depression is when you see a person who is wearing dirty clothes and looks unkempt. One should always try to look his or her best at all times. It is part of being professional as well. Many job interviews and promotions are probably decided based more on appearance, than on actual skills. The reason is that one who pays meticulous attention to every detail of his appearance will probably pay meticulous attention to every detail of his job. One who is shlumpy about appearance will probably be shlumpy about the job. This holds true for men and women.
Pashuteh YidMemberFeivel, the difference is that those activities you list will not help you reach your potential and accomplish great things. However, owning a dog may indeed help you reach your potential if it creates shalom bayis and entertains your kids, and teaches them chesed and love. Remember Moshe was appointed because he took care of a lost sheep.
Pashuteh YidMemberEssay describes how much dogs give to their owners
Dear Ann Landers: Back in 1992, you printed an essay that made a lasting impression on me. I have saved it for six years, knowing one day I would ask you to print it again. That day has come. Today, we had to put our dog to sleep. She was nearly 14 years old and couldn’t hold on any longer. Taking her to the vet for the very last time was one of the hardest things I’ve ever done.
Please reprint this essay for my dog, Penny. She was part of our family and will be greatly missed. Thanks, Ann.
— D.J. in Wausau, Wis.
Dear D.J.: Here is the essay you requested. I did not grow up with pets, but I confess, when I first read this essay, I had a clearer understanding of what a pet can mean to a family, and my eyes moistened a bit, too. It was written by Chuck Wells of Palmyra, N.Y.
Dogs Don’t Have Souls,
Do They?
I remember bringing you home. You were so small and cuddly with your tiny paws and soft fur.
You bounced around the room with eyes flashing and ears flopping. Once in a while, you’d let out a little yelp just to let me know this was your territory.
Making a mess of the house and chewing on everything in sight became a passion, and when I scolded you, you just put your head down and looked up at me with those innocent eyes, as if to say, “I’m sorry, but I’ll do it again as soon as you’re not watching.”
As you got older, you protected me by looking out the window and barking at everyone who walked by. When I had a tough day at work, you would be waiting for me with your tail wagging, just to say, “Welcome home. I missed you.” You never had a bad day, and I could always count on you to be there for me.
When I sat down to read the paper and watch TV, you would hop on my lap, looking for attention. You never asked for anything more than to have me pat your head so you could go to sleep with your head over my leg.
As you got older, you moved around more slowly. Then, one day, old age finally took its toll, and you couldn’t stand on those wobbly legs anymore. I knelt down and patted you lying there, trying to make you young again. You just looked up at me as if to say that you were old and tired and that after all these years of not asking for anything, you had to ask me for one favor.
With tears in my eyes, I drove you one last time to the vet. One last time, you were lying next to me. For some strange reason, you were able to stand up in the animal hospital; perhaps it was your sense of pride.
As the vet led you away, you stopped for an instant, turned your head and looked at me as if to say, “Thank you for taking care of me.”
I thought, “No, thank you for taking care of me.”
Pashuteh YidMemberDogs are the most kind wonderful animals there are. I know of no other animal that shows such simcha when he sees his owner. Many beg to be petted and lick you all over if you do. They can be taught to play all kinds of ball games and will gladly bring back the ball. They have a sense of humor and love to be teased. They mamash are man’s best friend. When I go out with my kids, we stop at every dog we see, and pet him and chat with the owner.
There is a chazal that says the dogs were given a tremendous reward because of lo yecheratz kelev lshono, and believe it or not, dog byproducts are used in the writing of a sefer Torah.
This business about being a bad omen or something is simply superstitious stuff which is probably asur to believe for a yid. Possibly darchei emori.
The only reason I don’t own one is that I think the tremendous work of cleaning up after them would be too much for us. They are wonderful animals, and one can see that with his own eyes.
The only dogs I don’t pet are seeing eye dogs which I have heard rightly or wrongly will get distracted from their mileches hakodesh of helping the poor soul who is their owner.
Pashuteh YidMemberHow about a big YW reunion bash, where we can all meet and fight in person. Everybody will have a nametag with their username on it.
Pashuteh YidMemberI think it is Azi, so it’s Azi’s hardware.
December 10, 2008 4:20 pm at 4:20 pm in reply to: Looking For a Mamar Chazal About Cosmetics #635022Pashuteh YidMemberIn fact, there is a halacha that if a woman does not use the cosmetics which are the norm of that era, it is potentially grounds for divorce. This is in Shulchan Oruch, but do not remember the siman. It is a shalom bayis issue when a women lets her appearance go. Just as it would be for a man who refuses to bathe and get haircuts, etc.
Pashuteh YidMemberDELETED. Yes, I know that you were trying to be funny.
Pashuteh YidMemberAzi, I think Lawrence’s nickname is Larry. You should call it Larry’s hardware.
Pashuteh YidMemberBoth my Rolls Royce and Lamborghini have a built in GPS, so I never worry about what type the little people should buy. It is beneath my dignity. When you reach my level, there are much more high-class things to worry about.
Pashuteh YidMemberNot pashut, that was written before the founding of the state, and probably before the holocaust in which Reb Elchonon ZTVKL perished, RL.
Pashuteh YidMemberThe only problem with running is the annoying cold weather. Then I have to force myself.
Pashuteh YidMemberYou really should know the streets well, and not just rely on the navigator. Once I was on the way to a chasunah in Lkwd with a guy who had one, and we were on Ave J and E15. Anybody would know to go to Ocean Pkwy and get on Belt to Verrazano. However, the guy insisted on following instructions to drive thru Boro Park to Fort Hamilton Pkwy. The amount of lights and double parked cars and blockages on the narrow streets in BP took an extra hour.
Also there is a famous story in Wall Street Journal about a guy who almost drove off a cliff as his navigator told him to continue on a certain path. At last sec, he turned around when he saw water and saved his life. You have to be careful.
Pashuteh YidMemberJoseph, what in the world does that have any bearing on the question? The anti-zionists are getting off topic again.
Pashuteh YidMemberExcuse me, but in order to moderate you need to be certified pro-freikeit.
-
AuthorPosts