Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Pashuteh YidMember
Please understand that putting tubes in the ear means you are puncturing the eardrum. You must check up on the risk that the drum may not heal properly, or may have scarring. This can affect hearing later in life.
It must be counterbalanced with the probability that the drum will be ruptured anyway due to the force of the fluid from the middle ear on the inside of the drum, or with the possibility that the infection can spread to other structures. It is not a simple decision. Please get 2nd and 3rd opinions from expert MD’s.
Pashuteh YidMemberRonrsr, if you look at Koufax’s plaque in the Hall, you will see that despite his short career, he set numerous records.
Pashuteh YidMemberShlomoZalman, in the above movie, they have a lot of footage of his playing, and also an interview of him now, which he rarely does.
You can see that aside from his overpowering speed, he had such control of the ball, and kept it wrapped in his hands for an extra few milliseconds or so to be able to guide it exactly where he wanted it.
He would whiff greats like Mickey Mantle effortlessly. He had a problem which he tried to work on that his pitches would be obvious to the hitters based on his windup. Another great hitter of the time said, we always knew what he was about to throw, but we still couldn’t hit it.
However, I was reading some info on him, and in the beginning of his career, he had such problems with control that he was about to give up baseball after a year or two in the majors, he got so frustrated. He decided to give it one more chance, and worked very hard on getting into the best shape he could, and practicing his throwing, and it paid off. It is a shame that he threw out his arm at an early age and was left with arthritis that ended his career.
Pashuteh YidMemberRuff, I also tried, and did not get any useful response, with each telling me that they don’t have access to the accounts and to try a different person or link in YW. I gave up.
Pashuteh YidMemberGbale, which kabbala sefarim are you reading?
Pashuteh YidMemberThe bottom line is that they brought a lot of simcha this year to many. Every kid in every school was singing it 24/7. Some of the comments said things like, I haven’t lit candles in over 20 years, but I did this year.
As far as using something non-Jewish, Henry Ford was not exactly Jewish, or a great friend of the Jews. If one drove a Ford to a shiur, does that make the shiur less pure and holy?
Pashuteh YidMemberSomehow, I was not active or on-line during that time frame, but I will take your word for it.
Pashuteh YidMemberMod-80, That could very well be true. Many of us are probably more than a little curious to see some of those.
December 14, 2010 5:58 pm at 5:58 pm in reply to: Davening – Do we really know the translation??? #717636Pashuteh YidMemberKinor and Navel are musical instruments and higayon means thoughts.
But here is a tough one:
Vhaofanim vchayos hakodesh braash gadol misnasim l’umas serafim, lumasam meshabchim v’omrim. This is the high point of birchos kriyas shema.
Pashuteh YidMemberI agree with Homeowner, and feel that while it is nice to banter with the Mods, however, that sometimes compromises their neutrality. Mods should ideally be totally neutral and behind the scenes. People do sometimes feel awkward and afraid to express an opinion that runs counter to the mods for fear of being banned. In all fairness though, I have noticed that most of the time they do a great job of allowing opinions that they do disagree with. However, sometimes they get angry at a poster, which is very tough on the poster, much more than when a regular poster disagrees.
On the other hand, I understand that the Mods are human, and one can’t read posts for hours without wanting to join in the conversation and express an opinion. So it is a difficult issue to resolve.
I also regret that many interesting threads have been closed. Normally the people here are menschlach enough not to allow flaming and hurt feelings to take place without strongly castigating the offender. The CR usually has a self-correcting nature to it. Only obvious comments meant to disrupt or totally off-color should be moderated. Hashkafa is a much tougher topic, since there is a wide spectrum of opinions that have valid sources.
I do agree that multiple screen names should be banned immediately. In my case I once had to reregister, but just used Pashuteh Yid 2.0. I still think I am banned from main news board, and may reregister as Pashuteh Yid 3.0. But there is no intent to deceive or create multiple personas.
Pashuteh YidMemberThere is a great movie out now called Jews and Baseball. Well worth seeing. Haven’t been to a movie theater since I was a child, but made an exception for this.
Pashuteh YidMemberI wish to support Wolf here. I missed the other thread before it was closed.
First of all, as many pointed out, it was downright rude behavior towards a Yiddishe neshama.
Second, the Rambam writes in Hilchos Sota that we try to get the woman to admit if she was unfaithful. By doing that, she is spared from drinking the mei sotah, and does not lose her life. All she must do is leave her husband (and forfeit the kesuva) but she gets no further punishment.
In order to encourage her to do that, we tell her that many great people have fallen into sin. The Rambam gives 3 examples from Tanach as follows:
Hilchos Sotah (3,2):
????? ???????? ?”? ????? ??????? ???? ?????? ???????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ???????? ???? ??? ???? ??? ????. ??????? ?? ??? ???? ???? ????. ???? ???? ????. ???? ????? ????. ???? ????? ???? ?????. ?? ????? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ?? ???? ??????? ?? ??? ???? ????? ??????. ?????? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ????? ??????. ??????? ?? ???? ????? ???? ????. ????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ????. ????? ????? ??????. ??? ???? ???? ?? ?????. ??? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ??:
So the Rambam takes it l’halacha that they did sin.
Second, the maamar of Kol haomer David Chata means that technically he did not sin, because the husband who he sent off to war, gave a get. Nevertheless it was an egregious breach of ethics, as the Navi told him. What he did was terrible, but technically was not adultery. Nevertheless the pasuk says that the episode happened because Vayar isha rochetzes. So that is not what Chazal meant.
BTW, for those here who have claimed that all kosher marriages require a shidduch, and it is unacceptable to meet on one’s own, pray tell, who was Dovid and Batsheva’s shadchan?
Pashuteh YidMemberI thought they don’t allow multiple screen names.
Pashuteh YidMemberGroucho Marx
Pashuteh YidMemberIt uses the word toevah about non-kosher food, as well.
It is somewhat ludicrous for somebody without the nisayon who gets no schar for it to focus his energies criticizing people who do have the nisayon. What a waste of energy. When I get upstairs, they will not give me one iota of schar for this mitzva since I was fortunate not to have any tayva for it. I can’t put myself in the shoes of somebody who does. Halevai I should focus my energies in controlling myself regarding things I do have a tayva for.
As far as Reb Moshe’s tshuva, it is very shver, since it seems to contradict the metzius. Reb Moshe claims that gays are regular people who adopted this tayva because it is extreme, and the only pleasure is that since it is wrong, it is exciting. But clearly the metzius is that gays have no tayva for women, and only a tayva for men. They didn’t decide to develop this tayva for the sake of doing extreme aveiros. They were simply born with it in place of the normal tayva for the opposite gender.
As far as the military goes, I have some questions whether it is wise to take gays in, since it makes their straight bunkmates uncomfortable. Just like the military would not advocate men and women sharing barracks, there may be an issue here as well. It may also be a battle-readiness issue, if there is improper behavior taking place when the soldiers are supposed to be getting a good night’s rest. But these are practical issues, not religious ones.
Pashuteh YidMemberOne of the mods once said you need a degree from SMU (Southern Moderators University).
Pashuteh YidMemberThe song is funny. The gemara says in Taanis that Eliyahu Hanavi pointed out two people who were bnei olam haba. An Amora asked them what do you people do? They said we are comedians, and we cheer up depressed people. So bringing simcha into the world is a very high madreiga.
There is nothing wrong with the song.
I am a poet and I didn’t know it.
Pashuteh YidMemberMy view is that if this song was good enough for the Chofetz Chaim ZTL, it is good enough for me. I don’t mix in.
Pashuteh YidMemberBennaishek, sorry to hear that. Will try to post some thoughts soon.
Pashuteh YidMemberTrying, why was that not an issue for movie theaters. In addition, in NYC they forced many adult theaters to close and/or to relocate more than some number of feet from each other and from schools or residential areas or something like that. If they can physically move them without violating free speech, why not do the same on internet?
Pashuteh YidMemberTrying, so why not make a law that forbids them from using .com, .org or .net. And include that by default, ISP’s would not be allowed to transmit anything with the new suffix unless specifically requested with proof of age.
Wouldn’t this clean up the major problem of the internet?
Pashuteh YidMemberSome have proposed to make a special domain suffix for inappropriate sites. I think that is a very good idea. Then one can request from his ISP not to carry that domain, and would solve a major part of the problem. This would avoid filters which are annoying and cumbersome and don’t make good decisions, often.
It would have to be a law that all these sites must use that suffix. However, some have argued that this would double the amount of inappropriate sites, since they would now have the new domains, plus their old ones. This argument is so ridiculous, as the law would require them not to use .com or .org, etc. any more. Yet people cloaking themsleves in self-righteousness, are actually trying to undermine the law and further the problem, but don’t want to appear to be doing that.
The other problem which is harder to solve is that many sites such as Rock Music sites or various Youtube videos are inappropriate for Jewish kids, even though some Youtube videos are fine and even frum. Nobody can possibly evaluate them all, so one either ends up letting them all through or blocking them all. Neither is a good solution. However, the first issue seems so clear-cut and easily solved with a law about domains. Rating systems worked for many years in movie theaters, and I don’t understand why they can’t be applied here.
Pashuteh YidMemberIsn’t it a gemara Asur l’odom sheyikadesh isha ad sheyirena? There is no crime in wanting to be attracted to a potential wife. It is not shallow. It is a metzius. Of course the midos and personality must be there, but if one is totally turned off by the looks, then it is rare that one will go ahead and marry the person.
Most men are attracted to about 90% of women in their age bracket, or we would not have so many halachos like yichud, etc. He just wants to verify that he finds her pleasant.
Pashuteh YidMemberWhile I go more for Carlebach style music, I did get quite a chuckle out of this. I believe it is a kiddush hashem for the following reason. These days religion is either considered to be nerdy or else fanatical, like the Islamic terrorists. This video shows kids it can be normal and cool. Imagine a child out in the midwest who knows little about Judaism and is embarrassed to do anything Jewish for fear his friends may find out. A video like this will blow his mind. There is nothing to be embarrassed about, and he can even be proud of his heritage. These guys are all normal, with-it, funny guys, who go to college like everyone else, and yet are clean-cut and sincere, and love their religion. It makes a very big roshem on a Jewish public school kid anywhere in the world. I would not be surprised if quite a few kids become frum because of this, down the road. Yiddishkeit can be cool.
December 6, 2010 6:39 pm at 6:39 pm in reply to: A Letter I Sent To Hadassa Chapters in US & UK #714918Pashuteh YidMemberMsseeker, as we all know, the mother kept running to Hadassah (not the other way around) telling them her child wouldn’t gain weight. Of course, Hadassah gave her the benefit of the doubt, and began looking for an organic cause. By definition, that involves medical tests. They did not begin any treatments or chemo, contrary to the sheker you write, just tests. They also inserted a feeding tube to help the child eat.
When complaints from other patients and suspicions from nurses started coming in, they put in a camera and caught her starving the child. At that point they removed her from the scene, and the child began to thrive. After a week or so, he was sent to an uncle and is fine.
As far as why they put her in jail at first. That is standard. If one commits murder, or attempted murder as the case was here, first an arrest is made, and only later do the courts and appropriate authorities make the determination as to what sentence she will get, or if she needs confinement in an institution. They do not assume at the outset that a perpetrator is mentally ill. They merely take steps to lock up the person until it can be determined that it is safe to release them on bail until trial. This is the same as the system in the USA or any free country, I believe. This woman could be a dangerous murderer, until determined otherwise. If she were black, you would have no kashyas.
Do doctors ever make mistakes. Of course. It can happen anywhere. But there is no evidence here that that was the case. It is obvious that anti-zionism is your negia here, as you freely bring up all kinds of irrelevant historical controversies in the course of your writing, making it clear what your goal is.
If, as you say, the child was always fine, and the Mengele doctors caused his condition, kindly explain why the mother had a healthy boy admitted to the hospital in the first place, (and she did this repeatedly). I assume Mengele didn’t kidnap the child and forcibly take him to the hospital. Don’t you see that the chronological sequence is completely out of order according to your version of the story. Any rational person can see this.
And if the child did have some serious condition that was misdiagnosed and mistreated by the hospital, how did sending him to the uncle cure him? How many serious illnesses do you know of where the cure is to send the patient to an uncle and no medicines or treatments are necessary? In addition, the mother insisted surgery be performed on a different child against the advice of doctors, who felt it was unecessary (she claimed he had symptoms of appendicitis, I believe).
Come on now, you know this was all a big bluff, but if one can “get” the Zionists with it, why not go ahead?
Meanwhile, everybody knows Hadassa has a sterling reputation for excellence, and even the head of the Eida Chareidi at the time that all this was going on, went there himself for a procedure. They treat all types, secular, Chareidi and Arab with warmth and expertise.
December 5, 2010 4:30 pm at 4:30 pm in reply to: A Letter I Sent To Hadassa Chapters in US & UK #714894Pashuteh YidMemberOh no, the kannaim are rehashing the sheker and foolishness of last summer. Recall that the baby had a miraculous recovery as soon as he was taken away from his mother. Chareidi patients saw her removing feeding tubes and grabbing away his food. Hadassah is one of the premier medical institutions, and the doctors on the case were frum and well-educated.
Please, enough with the nonsense. Reread my comments on the main board at the time.
Pashuteh YidMemberObvious, as Myfriend is saying, IDK stands for Into De Kitchen.
Pashuteh YidMemberHello99, Just on a hashkafic basis, I once heard a Chareidi Rav say in Megillas Rus that the words Amech Ami come first, and then Elokayich Elokai. A person may be inspired to become part of the Jewish people initially without knowing anything about their religion or G-d. Later, they search more and are willing to accept the religious obligations.
Pashuteh YidMemberTheChevra and SoRight, This is exactly why I wrote the first post on the board about Rabban Gamliel. Rav Amsalem has every right to learn a sugya and come to his own conclusions and psak, as long as he follows the standard, traditional method of learning with all that that entails. Rather than slinging mud at him, why not find the particular halachic issue upon which the nekuda of the machlokes rests, and learn it like a mensch understanding both sides, just as with any sugya or chakira in shas.
For example, the issue of a ger who says verbally he is mekabel mitzvos, but is not likely to do so is a complex issue. Reb Moshe writes from his father that an anan sahadi that one would not keep the mitzvos renders the kabalas mitzvos and the conversion invalid. For example, if one spouse of an intermarried couple wants to convert, while the Jewish spouse himself does not keep mitzvos, then we must assume that the ger will not keep any more than the Jewish spouse, and hence it is invalid.
However, counterbalancing to this is the principle that devarim sheblev einam devarim. For example, if a person makes a declaration in court that he has no intention of keeping, it is binding (unless he can prove coercion or issued a modaa beforehand). Another example is a person saying Harei At Mekudeshes Li and giving a ring, and then saying I didn’t really mean it and I never intended to marry her. Obviously, he must give a get, since devarim sheb’lev einam devarim. There are teshuvos about Bar and Bas Mitzvah age kids who were playing around and said Harei At in front of witnesses, and sometimes they were told they had to give a get, I believe. Because of this, I seem to remember that some poskim hold if a potential ger makes a declaration that he will keep mitzvos, then that is what matters.
Note, I did not see Rav Amsalem’s sefer, but the sugya needs to be approached from the point of view of lomdus, not mudslinging. I have no idea what your heter to call him Mr. Amsalem is, unless it was verified that he is an apikorus. Arguing with Rav Yosef in halacha does not render him an apikorus. Why don’t you find out the specific root halachic issues about which they argue.
As far as his statement that not all people should be in learning full time, it seems that Rav Yosef holds that way himself. Don’t you understand that Shas is upset at him because if he says this, then maybe people will say that the govt is not obligated to support the Shas yeshivos or kollelim at the same level as before. This may be the core reason for the extreme anger at Rav Amsalem, even though Rav Yosef agrees halachically, he may feel that it should be kept hush-hush. So there are a lot of political machinations going on here behind the scenes. None of which make Rav Amsalem deserving of the calumny that has been thrown at him, including that he is the cause of the lack of rain in Israel.
As far as Chillul Hashem, the Hamon Am has the highest respect for his academic honesty, and far from being a Chillul Hashem, in my opinion it is a big Kiddush Hashem. The Hamon Am sees there is a Rabbi who understands their concerns, and is not afraid to say what he believes is the truth, despite it not being the politically expedient thing for him to do. Remember that Kiddush Hashem is defined by Mah habrioyos omrim alav, not mah hatalmidei chachamim omrim alav.
Pashuteh YidMemberI am not saying kabalas mitzvos is unnecessary. I am saying that we need to educate them to be mekabel. However, if they try sincerely, and fail on occasion, then we do not invalidate the geirus.
If they are only saying it but don’t mean to be mekabel, that is not a valid geirus.
Pashuteh YidMemberThis reminds me of a certain car model a number of years back which had the horn on the turn signal. You pressed the stick in to blow the horn.
One furious man wrote into a car magazine, PUT THE HORN BACK WHERE G-d INTENDED IT TO BE.
Pashuteh YidMemberNote, a person who has a shem tov, even if he has no spouse, kids or money, has a priceless gift.
Not having those other things is upsetting, but nothing compared to having one’s face plastered all over the NY Post in disgrace. Realize how much you have before you start to feel bad for yourself. Nobody can ever take away your shem tov, except you.
Pashuteh YidMemberMy second car is a Rolls Royce.
Pashuteh YidMemberPopa, he wrote an entire sefer on geirus, from what I understand. He is no mere politician, but a big Talmid Chacham.
Just to note, the Rambam says modiin oso miktas mitvos kalos vchamuros, v’ein marbin v’ein medakdekin alav.
The Rambam also says bdieved if they forgot to tell him about the mitzvos, he is still a ger. Imagine, we all consider kabalas hamitzvos to be an ikar, but yet how can one be mekabel something if they forgot to tell him about it? So there is room to maneuver here.
Pashuteh YidMemberI believe my wife went to the manager, but I am not sure.
Pashuteh YidMemberAries, I am not defending what my wife did. She should not have paid by check (rather by CC), and should not have abandoned the item in their store, and then stopped the check. These were all unwise.
The bottom line is that she only did these things because of a mistake my child made when he opened the box. I don’t even know if it was possible to open the box without cutting through the serial number sticker. Never did I ever hear of such a thing, and I doubt it says this on the receipt which usually gives the return policy.
Be it as it may, in most places, there is courtesy, and a rule that the customer is always right. If an honest mistake was made by a child in how he opened a package, most decent institutions would right away not have made an issue over it and been understanding. This was outrageous customer service. It was only a 100 dollar item, and would not have put them out of business. This is not what you expect from a big chain.
Pashuteh YidMemberThe Torah Umada approach has produced gedolim. Examples include Rav Soloveitchik, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rav Willig, Rav Shechter, and Rav YY Weinberg, etc.
A further point in the analysis is that in the Torah-only approach, if one doesn’t become a big Rosh Yeshiva, he is in danger of not being able to suppport his family, and causing them untold suffering and shalom bayis issues. While this is difficult to have to point out, as it is such a sensitive and painful issue, but in all honesty, from which camp do the many meshulachim come from?
Pashuteh YidMemberSo right, you don’t seem to have any other approach, other than my option 3 (do nothing). So you are happy with the status quo. Many frum yidden are not, and think the current situation is a spiritual sakanah.
People like Rav Amsalem show that there are Rabbonim who are sensitive to the concerns of many of the hamon am, and are trying their best to come up with creative solutions that are within the bounds of halacha.
I would be willing to bet that if he creates a new party next election, he may get enough votes to get in. (Although I believe that recently the threshold was changed so one needs 3 seats, not 1 to get in.)
Pashuteh YidMemberHelpful, I believe he has Rabbanut semicha which is the most rigorous set of tests anywhere, so at the very least he is a Talmid Chacham who knows how to learn.
But the bottom line here is that Shas has every right to kick him out of the party if he does not toe the party line. In some votes, members of Knesset are allowed to vote their conscience by the party chairman; while in others strict party discipline is enforced. One who votes differently can be expelled. The thing is that one is allowed to keep his seat and remain in the Knesset as an independent according to Knesset rules, whereas Shas wants him to resign and give the slot back to them so they can appoint another in his place. Of course, Shas has every right to be mad at him, but this is politics as usual. However, the problem here is when they start slandering him personally and publicly embarrass him and call him an apikorus and an Amaleki and say that he was makdiach tavshilo brabim, that is all completely unacceptable, and moreover, completely false.
As far as the issue of geirus, as I have written here before, due to the Soviet ban on Jewish education all those years, unfortunately many Jews intermarried. Now, one spouse wants to make Aliya which they are entitled to do according to Law of Return. What is the Israeli govt supposed to do? Admit one member of the couple and tell the other they must stay in Russia? That would be rather barbaric. So they do the proper thing and allow these relatives to enter. SOmetimes there may be non-Jewish children if the mother is not Jewish. These people are a potential cause of trouble and a bad influence. Rabbi AMsalem is spot on that the best eitzah would be to make ehrlich Jews out of them. It would require a serious and intense program of study, and methods to insure the sincerity and kabbalas hamitzvos of these potential geirim. There is nothing wrong for him to suggest that this would be a good idea, especially when the spouse or parent may be Jewish to begin with.
This problem was not caused by the State of Israel or Rabbi Amsalem. It was caused by the evil Soviets. The State of Israel and Rabbi AMsalem are trying to solve the problem that they have been handed.
What is your idea, if you disagree with them? I see only 3 choices:
1) Split up families if some members are not Jewish and force them to stay behind in Russia. (Barbaric.)
2) Try to convert the non-Jewish family members if they will sincerely be mekabel ol mitzvos. (State’s preferred solution.)
3) Let these non-Jewish immigrants live their lives in hefkerus and potentially influence Jewish kids for the worse. (Do nothing approach.)
I do not see any other options. If you do, please enlighten us.
Pashuteh YidMemberHelpful, that is a totally inappropriate remark about Rav Amsalem. Does Stephen King know shas and poskim and cite rayos from them.
So right, where is the source for calling at the very least a kosher yid who is shomer Torah and Mitzvos a nobody? Did you ever hear of the concept of a tzaddik nistar? It is not our place to judge. We only deal with rayos, period.
What is interesting is that another site has the following quote from Rav Yosef (unfortunately without a reference) which shows that he holds the same way:
??? ????, ???? ??? ???? ?????? (?????? ???? ?? ??? ???, ????? ????? ????) ????? ???? (???????), ???? ????? (????? ?? ?????) ??? ???? ????
???? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ??? ????, ????? ???? ??? ????? ????? ?? ??? ?????, ???? ????? ????? ????, ??? ??????? ??? ???? ???? ??????? ?????? ????? ????? ?’ ?????, ????? ???? ??? ???? ?’ ???????? ???????, ?????? ????? ?????? ?????, ??? ???? ??? ???? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ??????, ????? ??? ??? ??????, ????? ?? ????? ?????? ??????, ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ????????,…???? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ??? ?? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ????, ???? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???????, ??????? ?? ????? ?????, ???? ?? ????? ????? ??? ??? ???? ????
So the entire episode is unfortunately rooted in politics, and not in anything to do with halacha. It is a total disgrace.
More later.
Pashuteh YidMemberMyfriend, please look at the beginning of Peah in the big shas, and see that at least one Rishon interprets the phrase Yafeh Talmud Torah Im Derech Eretz to mean that Derech Eretz is the ikar. In addition, in Kiddushin, it discusses the case where there is only money to hire a Rebbe for a son or a father, but not both. The gemara says it should be for the one with the most potential. Nobody is taking anybody out of klal yisroel for suggesting that many people need to work.
Pashuteh YidMemberMyfriend, my point is that paskening differently is not in any way being mevazeh somebody.
Pashuteh YidMemberMyfriend, hmmm, can you show me where he was mevazeh Rav Yosef? Did he put up any pashkevilim calling Rav Yosef an Amaleki?
Pashuteh YidMemberPopa, it has been all over the frum news for a while now. This is just one article. It is a lot worse than this, with public statements and posters threatening him and emabrrassing him b’rabim.
Pashuteh YidMemberWe had a much worse experience at Best Buy. My wife bought an item for my son that I did not approve. He had already opened it. When the box was opened, the serial number tore. They would not take it back THE SAME DAY EVEN WITH THE RECEIPT, as they said they need an intact serial number. Never in my life did I ever hear of such a thing.
My wife had paid by check. She tried to just drop the item at their store, and cancel the check. They then placed her on some national check registry which makes her check invalid at other stores, as well. We still get calls asking for the money we “owe”.
Pashuteh YidMemberI think it is a 3-way machlokes in Avodah Zara. One opinion is Lo siten lahem chaniya bkarka (don’t give them land in EY). I think another is not to compliment their places of idol worship from the lashon of chein. I don’t remember the last one.
November 26, 2010 3:51 pm at 3:51 pm in reply to: How Can I Change My Attitude About Shabbos? #712863Pashuteh YidMemberFrumLadyGit, I am reminded of the gemara where the daughter of one of the tannaim (Rabban Gamliel?) asked for a bracha. He told her, may the word woe always be upon your lips. She started crying. He told her, in a happy house, the wife is always saying, woe, my child just bumped himself; woe, my meal must come out of the oven or it will burn; woe, I must get the house ready for my husband, etc.
You are very lucky that everything you do is lshem shamayim. There are unfortunately some houses where they have been involved in scandals or embarrassing things. That is a true tragedy. In your case, you are so lucky that everything is bkovod and you bring nachas to the klal and to your family. I am sure you will find a way to ease some of the work, but be thankful for what you have.
November 25, 2010 3:40 pm at 3:40 pm in reply to: How Much Do You Pay For Your Car Registration #712338Pashuteh YidMemberIn NY I think it depends on the value of the car, and the weight and mileage. I think I read that the weight wears down the roads, so they consider that paying for usage. I have only a very vague recollection of reading this, so don’t quote me.
Pashuteh YidMemberJust curious about the pasuk which says Lavan sent Rivkah along with her meinekes (nursemaid) to Yitzchok. Did that mean Rivkah was nursing when she was 3? Or does it mean this nursemaid was for Rivkah’s own future children?
If the former, would a nursing child be alone by a well taking care of sheep?
Pashuteh YidMemberI am just curious, is it possible for me to win this two decades in a row?
-
AuthorPosts