Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
gebrokts treif would be a better analogy. Chazer treif gets through.
selective tediousness. You’d think just pressing backspace and writing EDITED wouldn’t change much, but hey, no one ever claimed mods were too regular.
An American: “I’m so thirsty. I must have some beer.”
A Brit: “I’m so thirsty. I must have some milk.”
A Frenchman: “I’m so thirsty. I must have some wine.”
A Mexican: “I’m so thirsty. I must have some tequila.”
A Greek: “I’m so thirsty. I must have some olive oil.”
A Jew: “I’m so thirsty. I must have diabetes.”how’d you fight the tediousness to edit Politically Incorrect’s post?
There was none
Does anyone know what AAQ is talking about?
“The objective was to REDUCE infection rates in the context of communal spread, and REDUCE the severity of illness and rate of hospitalization for breakthrough infections.”
So there we have it. The dem in residence doesn’t believe there’s high efficacy in vaccines. Many republicans do.
Makes it a lot harder to excuse vax mandates…..Since when are vaccines one of the gop’s platforms?
And it’s funny, you admit vaccines work…..yet isn’t it the Democrat government acting their hardest to dispel that claim? Vaccinated still have to wear masks. Vaccinated still have to do covid tests. vaccinated still could pass the virus on. vaccinated must get some more boosters. Laws speak louder than words, especially when the words are “WAIT!!!!!!! I never said they’re COMPLETELY effective!”I’m curious….Did you take him as a baby to the beis medrash to hear the talmidei chachamim talking, but stood outside the coffee room?
🙂
you made a username just to say that? How’d u get ur profile to say “sometime ago”?I think Rechnitz composed it.
what’s a nerd market?
Except that it is a crime. Just not a felony.
“Last I checked most of those looters broke and stole less than $900 which, in Los Angeles, is not a crime.”
Which makes it even worse.I mean that if you’re trying to prove that you’re allowed to believe and/or take action in the case at hand because the torah says to believe two witnesses, then it’s not comparable. That doesn’t mean you can’t believe them. It means the reason to believe them has nothing to do with typical testimony in B”D.
“o you really believe that a Rav is not allowed to do anything in these cases until they have 2 witnesses?
Or even one witness?”
No I don’t believe that nor did I make any indication that I do.“Witnesses have clout before they enter the court. There are many Talmudic discussions about this.
”
First I heard of it.“Then I’m surprised that you did not point out that they are female, and not valid in court.”
That’s a good point. Although i believe there were also men.“The laws that pertain to what one is allowed/must believe, can be found in hilchos loshon horah. Not choshen mishpat.”
100%. Which is why no one but quayboard brought in hilchos eidus.what is an assumption?
What is incorrect about it?
Come on, talk. Don’t be a mod.@quayboardwriter
each incident had only one witness.
witnesses only have power after being duly interrogated in B”D, under oath.who were u responding to, syag? i can’t see any post which deserved such a disgusting tirade.
i write rough drafts on paper but my hand hurts when i use a pen too long.
So we had this family schism some time back, now i don’t talk to anyone.
At simchos, the only one I’ll talk to is my sister, but if her son comes over I promptly walk away.
My biggest enemy is one BIL who i try to topple his business indirectly, ever since he took me to a din torah over the Yerusha.Hope this helps.
what was wrong with my post?
My posts don’t go thru either. The ones that do are defaced with black ink by bored people who can’t use quotation marks correctly.
you sound annoyed, better I shouldn’t respond I guess
can you elaborate a bit?
No?
what had to be edited?
the middle
why was my post rejected?
cuz editing can be tedious
“but I liked Brandon shtick. Funny and harmless.”
Harmless enough, I guess. You don’t think it a tad childish to somehow allude to cursing out the president?“Seems like the biggest factor will be the degree to which the Rs can move beyond Trump (and the Trump waanabees) and find a principled conservative and whether the Ds can avoid a contest as to who among them is the most “woke’ and promises to give away the most “free stuff”.”
How did you surmise that based on the above posts?
The only one who mentioned disdain for Trump was AAQ. Anyone who opts for Cruz obviously doesn’t care that much.
And which post led u to write what the Ds have to do?Rubio and Cruz have proven themselves to be quintessential politicians. Although their policies are good, their character is not. Desantis was showing hopeful signs, then exposed himself when he signed that bill in Brandon.
Why can’t any politician be good and mature? And then electable?Delaney supports the obergefell v hodges verdict. Anyone who supports that besides for being an extreme danger to civil liberties, also has no business writing law (and certainly not interpreting law).
“And I don’t understand sending girls to male therapists. And where is the tznius as well of women going to male therapists?”
requoted due to likage.
one thing i and many others don’t understand is why these alleged cases always come put twenty years later? Suddenly one minor, now two decades older, breaks out of their cracked shell and then inspires ten others to do the same.
Same story every time.
So the answer everyone’s going to say is that the victims are scared. The abuser threatens them. They’re young, etc.
First of all every single instance every single victim is scared stiff??? Seems implausible. Secondly, when Cuomo ym”sh was exposed, it was also years later, by those who weren’t ten year olds at the time.R: Scott walker, mike pence.
D: John Kasich (Yes, i know…….)maybe also jim webb, don’t know much abt him
GH: “Participant: Pls gets your facts correct before posting.”
CA: “I don’t think anyone understood the opHe wants you to pretend like you believe the conspiracy theory”
so it’s a machlokes GH and CA whether or not I believe the conspiracy theory I posted.
Truth is, I do. If the facts don’t support it, then it’s not true. I never investigated the claim, I never claimed it to be true, and I don’t really care if it’s true or not. Whatever u posted about him making legal money doesn’t really shed any light on it. I’m sure there are countless deals and investments he has which ur not aware of.
Anyway I don’t care
Gut voch“would it be unAmerican to segregate masked/unmasked/unvaxed people into different planes or front and back of a plane?”
Probably, but it’s a lot more American than demanding planes only allow masked people on.All the stupidities and insanities coming from the radical left is pushed by george soros who wagers against the dollar. in other words he wants america to go doooooowwwwwnnnnn. and he’s succeeding.
hard question, for me
I’m currently in Jerusalem.
That’s about all I know.*nittel
oh i thought this thread was about niter
of course i agree that it may be frustrating. i’m not saying u always have to do it, for sure that there’s no halachic obligation–ask your LOR to be sure–but, sometimes things can be confusing. especially on the CR u don’t know who’s responding to what, what side of the political aisle they’re on, everyones looking for controversy. just be clear as u can. its usually not too hard.
i just read this whole thread beginning to end and must join the posters’ censor of AAQ. It is stunning, horrifying, disgusting, and many other adjectives how people admonish him to “just answer the question” and he answers a different question, many times over.
As an aside someone mentioning getting it the stewardess’ way….it is high time someone [in the airline dept, who has some authority] teach the stewardesses that no one has EVER died because the stewardess didn’t bring a sprite fast enough, the meals won’t spoil if they have to wait a minute at the mid-plane bathrooms, and it would be a much more enjoyable flight if we had no flight attendants, even at the expense of no food. (Or worse yet, having to fetch your own drink from the galley.)
Sorry for changing the subject, now carry on.
There are two ways you could find an explanation for this practice:
1. By posting it on this site,
2. Visiting imatroll.comyou’re a harry.
ummm………..
it’s not chanuka already.somewhere between the title and the posts, the subject went from reform every house must have to “good seforim”.
what aveira did the sheep do that he had to be misgalgeil?
“If you’re not into chasidish stories and torah, then don’t participate in discussions pertaining to it”
Sort of like someone not into Modern orthodoxy not participating in those discussions…?