Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
*illegitimately
who needs foreign policy if you’ve got climate change under control.
Ted Cruz grew a beard.
imagine if there weren’t annoying ads that take over the page every time you open a topic or article here.
gosh what’s with this place. any thread about anything gets hijacked with trump talk. now that there’s a trump thread it became this emotional lovenest commune.
I can’t speak for everyone but I think health thought so cuz the priests said so.
*legitimately
I have credible information that the USA legitimately applied marital law. only it happened under the Obama administration. and due to Anthony Kennedy.
what a standard leftist thing to say. you’ve been listening to CNN too much.
what is trumps legacy?
gave you an easy one…!
(his legacy Will be his sore losing)
health so why do you quote them always?
after 4 years what has trump accomplished?
health are you Christian?
it’s ywn’s way of showing their not conspiracists. & that they know when inauguration time is.
pathetic.the significance of the oyster, walrus, & carpenter totally eludes me.
@ujm who wrote this?can people stop saying that Biden got more votes than any previous candidate, unless they mention that trump also did?
also can people stop saying that Biden won by a large margin? (don’t recall if this is relevant to this thread) the number I think was about 2% or so. that’s not large especially if you consider how much comes from N.Y. and ca.
I don’t get the post-term conviction. seems like that’s what’s happening. McConnell said no vote before inauguration and they’re working on trying 6him afterward. what does that accomplish? kill his 2024 Chance? even if so what are the legal mechanics behind that–i.e. what legality can the Senate’s conviction of a regular citizen have?
try contacting the magazine.
at least after the inauguration trump will open his own media outlet & finally we’ll have news we could believe.
the brave.
there are many traffic signs steering people left. if using public services to expand their base isn’t a conspiracy then I don’t know what is.
@ujm
if the position change is to a worse position.
less sleep or lesser quality = more tired.@dy what uncle m?
big round of applause to @ctlawyer for not using tzedaka $ for gambling!
sleeping in a different position could prevent the stiffness.
I’ll give the vaccine a bracha if it donates to kupat hair.
correct. robots elect Biden.
how would we know? easy. Biden would admit it.
he’s an honorable guy.@Dora
1 that a hijack.
2 why wait til life returns to normal?groceries are essential, not the owners. much better if the owners don’t come & make everything free instead.
@tvp
“the blom riots took place at other federal buildings…not much better than the capitol”
oh6sorry. I had heard it was a lot worse than the capitol riot. okay I’ll be more sympathetic toward blm.your 2nd post-
2 points:
1. election fraud vs murder
2. even if they believe it with all their heart, surely they understand that without proof they have no case?tvp
I actually said that the fact that they rioted was tolerable, not the excessive thuggery that they did . ie had they done what the trumpies done – storm government buildings and put their feet on Pelosi’s desk, I wouldn’t blame them.
my sole point is comparing the 2 riots is wrong. that’s not to defend blm’s actions. its to say blm had grounds to work with. trumpies didn’t.
maybe I should rephrase. my anger is less with those rioting for their lives than with the law & order prez’s sore losing to this degree. by all means go ahead and give it 2 blm . just imo its 2 different ballgames.
oh and about the fact that they don’t actually care about their lives, that they’re making it worse…entirely possible. for what it looks like on paper though its not the same category as the capitol hill riot and politicians (no one ever claimed they’re) may have viewed it as such.
what pence can accomplish in ten days…
sushi comes from China so they should pay for it.
whereas I agree that blm crossed many many lines, the actual fact that they rioted is tolerable, or at least doesn’t compare to the trump riots.
to say that either rioting is unexcusable, to say the end doesn’t justify the means, is a valid opinion. but a politician who condemns trump’s riot but not blm’s doesn’t make him a hypocrite.
and I love how selective rioting ‘comes down to whose side you’re on’. can the end never justify the means? you may think so but I certainly see the other side . at some times someone may see no other alternative to saving their lives than reporting to unbecoming behavior. (yes they crossed many lines . it was more than unbecoming behavior. I’m saying inherently the act of rioting)
“they are only the bad guys because you don’t agree with 8them on that.”
I’m not sure8what to make of that statement. there are things for which rioting could be excused, or at the very least, looked at in a lenient light. there are causes which don’t excuse rioting or even garner sympathy.
what would you say if someone says “killing is great. don’t we kill terrorists? so the only problem you have with my killing my neighbor in order to steal his treasures is because you don’t agree with me about that.”?
obvious differences btwn blm riots & trumpies’ riots:
blm was protesting (be it true or not) unfair treatment of their people on a fatal level. their riots had potential (and did) to change it.trump’s riot was the sore loser’s protest of an election which was not proven to be unfair. there was no chance anything would be accomplished with his tantrum (besides for waking the gop to its senses.)
ugh u briq
your idiocy has reached astronomical heights but more horrifying is the disgusting arrogance I almost vomited from. this time it really is my last time responding to u because ignoring my blood pressure is one thing; my stomach isn’t as easily appeased.
all hopes of u understanding someone smarter than you have been completely dashed but maybe pointing out a contradiction in your own words will make u realize how desperately u need help. (then again this isn’t the 1st time u seem incapable of realizing9what u yourself wrote.)
in your prev post to me you say “nah this isn’t a deadline not so sure what this is saying.”
now reread post 930315.u briq
1. then wth is the point of this thread?
2. whether or not it’s the point of the thread it’s certainly the point of every post I’ve made on this thread. so maybe I’m a hijacker but I’m not wrong.
3. funny how you woke up now that it’s not the point of this thread. in previous posts you’ve talked about potential deadlines and how they all passed.amazing how after such a clear and detailed post (my last on the first page) you’re still too dumb to comprehend.
I think even your idiocy would understand such a post if not for two other factors: 1. to think everyone else is also dumb and never passed elementary school. to spell it out for your pea brain , I know how the elections work in USA. 2. your firm belief that there was no fraud blinds you from discussing what if there would have been fraud.
I’m still waiting for you to thank me for taking the time & effort for dumbing it down for you.
now you’ll answer
participant
you should really take a civics lesson. the electoral college has to vote and it has to be ratified by congress. if there was fraud why hasn’t trump proven it yet? he had plenty of time to prove it . now all ships have sailed. when would you think is a reasonable deadline to have to 8prove fraud? do you agree with health? there are some who will always say there’s fraud. do u agree with them? December 13 was a reasonable deadline for him to have had to prove fraud. now all ships have sailed. there was no fraud.
there. simple. I said there was no fraud. I also said if there was fraud he had to have proven it by Dec 14 even tho that’s not the point of this thread. so what don’t you understand?there. wrote it for you. thank me for saving you the time.
either way it’s stupid. better double prick the elderly than half everyone.
your boiling my blood up. if you respond to me, read my post. besides for the line about imprecise quotations you apparently comprehended nothing of what I wrote. literally everything you wrote just now I addressed in my previous post but you keep on reiterating the fact that trump has no proof over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again when that has absolutely nothing to do with wether or not trump had an invented deadline for potential evidence.
refua sheleima.
Edited
I could use a new pair of skates, if you’re offering.
thanks! I’m more than interested in
buying a bridge. details?remember Donald’s preferred code word secret service should use for him? (end of 2nd debate)
“humble”