Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2011 4:31 pm at 4:31 pm in reply to: A third of Litvish families I know, have one or more single daughters 25 and up #908904Pac-ManMember
correction: As AZ noted, those are the cold, hard, sad facts. Do you want him to lie?
At least they’re working on it being fixed for future generations, even though there is nothing to do about it to fully help the current generation (and perhaps not the next one too – if the close-in-age solution doesn’t fully take effect fast enough.)
Pac-ManMemberAsk the car owner for mechila.
June 24, 2011 3:20 pm at 3:20 pm in reply to: A third of Litvish families I know, have one or more single daughters 25 and up #908896Pac-ManMemberDr. P. –
It seems you just restated your disagreement (on methods not numbers) without providing an even general alternative. You’re saying something’s got to be done, and even something you don’t agree with is better than nothing. Understood. But in your ideal opinion (even understanding that you would agree to go along with a less than idea solution rather than arguing), what would be the most effective solution if you had a choice – and no one would argue with you?
June 24, 2011 2:41 pm at 2:41 pm in reply to: A third of Litvish families I know, have one or more single daughters 25 and up #908888Pac-ManMemberOfcourse – the MO have the same issue with the numbers. And marrying a irreligious is certainly wrong. (And almost no irreligious guy is going to allow his wife to keep the Torah, halacha, taharas hamishpacha, etc.)
June 24, 2011 2:32 pm at 2:32 pm in reply to: A third of Litvish families I know, have one or more single daughters 25 and up #908886Pac-ManMemberSo someone who never got married had been decreed 40 days before yitziras havlad that he/she will never get married?
June 24, 2011 2:24 pm at 2:24 pm in reply to: A third of Litvish families I know, have one or more single daughters 25 and up #908882Pac-ManMemberDr. P. –
Once you acknowledge his numbers, what is there to disagree with his methods and tactics? What would be your preferred alternative?
June 24, 2011 2:22 pm at 2:22 pm in reply to: A third of Litvish families I know, have one or more single daughters 25 and up #908881Pac-ManMemberAZ spoke to the Gedolim about the age gap. So perhaps he can enlighten us as to what to do about the girls who will never be able to get married since the current generation no longer has enough bachelors for them all.
June 24, 2011 2:03 pm at 2:03 pm in reply to: A third of Litvish families I know, have one or more single daughters 25 and up #908878Pac-ManMemberAZ has already explained that many of these girls will never ever be able to get married, since there are not anymore available bachelors for all of them. Simple math. They’ll never be able to get married. Once the age gap is closed, as AZ explained, future generations of girls will be able to all get married. But the current generation? As AZ has long pointed out there is no solution to get them all married. Closing the age gap will help the future generations. Many of today’s 25 – 35+ year olds are going to be up the creek, as AZ sadly noted.
Pac-ManMemberWhy the uncertainty?
Pac-ManMemberwhat are the mods?
MOD is an abbreviation for My Other Dad. Every poster is assigned a father-figure here who looks out for him.
Pac-ManMemberRon: You have something against Mod-105?
June 23, 2011 11:25 pm at 11:25 pm in reply to: Encryption � A Simple But Practically Unbreakable Trick #792539Pac-ManMemberI happened to remember it. I think the better question is what made Mother in Israel think to associate Pepper to Pfeffer. I would tend to think it is somewhat rare that a Pfeffer became a Pepper at Ellis Island. But MiI says her Pfeffer’s are Kohanim, so the question at hand is what’s the relation.
Pac-ManMemberI think that’s the first time I heard you scream adorable. You usually have such a soft sweet voice.
Pac-ManMemberMonday’s are a Litvish Maariv and Tuesday’s a Chasidish Mincha?
Pac-ManMemberHow do you refer to your parents and to your in-laws when speaking to your spouse?
Pac-ManMemberWelcome back adorable! (See the previous page here.)
Pac-ManMemberThe Gemorah in Shabbos 62b says that a reason for the destruction of the Beis Hamikdash was women used excessive cosmetics, and that a women should care about her appearance for the purposes of not being repulsive to her husband.
In the Shevet HaLevi there is a responsa about a woman who dressed herself nicely and put on makeup only when she was going out of the house, where she would be seen by her friends and neighbors. This is when she cared to appear attractive. However, in her own house, she did not care to enhance her natural appearance. Was this conduct acceptable, or did it indicate some degree of a breach in the standards of tznius? The answer given was that although we find in the Gemarah that Chazal emphasized that a woman should care about her appearance, this is specifically in terms of not being repulsive in front of her husband. If a woman puts a great effort into being noticed by strangers, this is reminiscent of the sins of the daughters of Yerushalayim at the time of the destruction.
Pac-ManMemberLike Health said, the Gemora specifically states that a reason Hashem didn’t destroy the goyim is because they do not give marriage contracts to mishkav zochor.
June 21, 2011 7:24 pm at 7:24 pm in reply to: Encryption � A Simple But Practically Unbreakable Trick #792536Pac-ManMemberI believe Doc mentioned Pfeffer was his family pre-immigration name.
Pac-ManMemberWhy don’t we ask Pac-man?
Pac-Man doesn’t know. He’s not Joseph, but is quite amused to be thought that he is. Besides, you can’t fight City Hall.
Pac-ManMemberHave you looked for them?
Pac-ManMemberHi coffee addict!
Pac-ManMemberzees maamin, daas, goq thanx for your support
our styles r so differant i dont know how they could make that mistake..
Pac-ManMemberBAAB: I can’t believe you did this to me. Now I will have to change my longtime SN.
June 20, 2011 1:51 pm at 1:51 pm in reply to: Kula Creep – The Creation and Use of Non-Existent "Kula's" #779688Pac-ManMemberGavra: The Rov never said that and the only uproar was what was manafactured by Torah hating bloggers.
Pac-ManMemberThe Torah is the blueprint for the world.
June 19, 2011 3:55 am at 3:55 am in reply to: Are you allowed to buy cut up fruits in a non jewish store? #778557Pac-ManMember1st timer: There is no such premise. These stores are not catering to kosher customers and make no commitment that the fruit is kosher.
Pac-ManMemberHe spaced out.
June 19, 2011 2:27 am at 2:27 am in reply to: Are you allowed to buy cut up fruits in a non jewish store? #778551Pac-ManMemberYes he would, if a health inspection would occur when that happend and he was caught doing that, the store would receive a heavy fine
Health inspectors can’t and don’t do surprise visitis (like Kashrus supervisors) that will burst into the room and catch him red-handed using the fruit knife to cut his bacon sandwich. He will have at least a few minutes, if not days, advance notice before the health inspector comes to the back of the store where he keeps the bacon.
Secondly, there is no law against using the same knife for fruits and bacon or cheesecake.
Pac-ManMemberYRK: Eishes ish is also a “chumra”?? What kind?
Pac-ManMemberWHAT Gavra!? You’re borrowing Wolf’s Eeees!?!
Pac-ManMemberMost of the so-called chumra creep listed above don’t exist in real life other than as exaggerations by those who don’t like the idea of chumros altogether. Let’s take some examples:
“Shidduchim must only be made by a registered Shaddchan from the Yated Shidduch Forum.”
“Girls must walk in pairs ONLY”
I’ve never heard of anyone anywhere anyhow imposing such conditions. It seems purely mockery. The second one above may exist in some limited circumstance for all I know (perhaps when a girls camp goes hiking so no girl should get lost) but to imply anyone imposes it as a hard rule at all times and demands all women follow it, is a joke.
Pac-ManMemberIn the real world an issue far far worse and far far more prevalent than chumra creep, is kula creep. It is a lot more fun and a lot easier to take unrealistic leniencies (kulas) that seem to make your life easier than to take upon unrealistic stringencies.
Pac-ManMemberThe Arizal explains that at the simcha on Tu B’Av there was not literally women dancing.
Pac-ManMemberIt’s true. Many people CAN determine guilt by looking at the defendant. They may be wrong, but at least they think so. I think they should honestly let the judge know their perceived abilities.
Pac-ManMemberIf someone doesn’t wish to serve on a jury there are plentiful ways to accomplish that. Announce you saw the defendant is guilty the moment you first laid eyes on him and you are so happy to serve on the jury so you can convict him. See how long the judge allows you to continue volunteering for the jury.
Pac-ManMemberIt’s 1492. A new law is passed in Spain. All must bow to the cross. Dina D’malchusa Dina. It’s the law of the land. Homeowner knowing not to C”V make a public Chillul Hashem in front of the head inquisitor and all the goyim, dutifully fulfills his duty as stipulated by the law he was sworn to uphold in his bar exam. He even saved a life by so doing. What a Kiddush Shem Shmayim!
Pac-ManMemberDid anyone try out the new software program developed in Israel? I think it’s called Shailos & Teshuvos. You enter your shaila into it; then you enter the teshuva you are seeking. The program then gives you the name of a rabbi who rules the way you like, so you can act as you wish.
Pac-ManMembercharlie: Did you ask this shaila to the Rabbi (Avi Weiss) where you pray?
Pac-ManMemberhudi: The average NY salary premium more than makes up for the average NY cost of living expense premium.
Pac-ManMemberSpecifically why is there a concern bpt?
Pac-ManMemberbpt: Chasidish?
Pac-ManMembergavra paskened it’s okay to shop around for rabbis by the shaila. 🙂
Pac-ManMemberChicken, water.
Pac-ManMemberA person (man and woman) SHOULD be embarrassed to eat in public.
Pac-ManMemberWhat’s his #?
Pac-ManMemberBut the assumption was frum rather than obviously frei?
Pac-ManMemberMod: Did you ask the posek if you could find against that defendant if you served on that panel?
And was their a difference if was a shomer Torah u’mitzvos or not?
Pac-ManMemberIf there is a prob, should we be walking round with tichels all day?
That’s not a bad idea.
Pac-ManMemberBut there’s a light at the end of the night.
-
AuthorPosts