Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
snort. I still don’t even see how it is a troll…
well, pretty transparent troll, then
jmh: lol, I honestly do not have that much scope. Just a literary dilettante. ๐
c’mon, jmh gets a ๐ for that measly counterfeit, and I don’t get boo? I deserve at LEAST 4 (maybe 5 for good measure).
and now that you have finally dropped that long overdue Discworld reference, I commend your excellent jape/inadvertent troll. jolly good.
Also, have to say that sometimes I am pretty sure that #3 on that list of yours is actually true…
jest going with the flow here, good sir
how’s THAT for a plagiarism of a plagiarized plagiarism with an addition of yet another plagiarized element
(???s??o? ????d?o? ??? op ?,up?no? ?? os ???u??u? ?,us?? ???? ?????un??o?un) s???? ???u??u? ?o?? ?u??u?? s???????d?? ???u??u? ???? s???uo? ???u??u? :?q
?d???s ? ???? p?puno? s?
???? ?????? ?no pu? ‘uo ?p?? ??? s????p s? ??n?s ??ns ??? ??
??sn?d sn ???? ?sn? ‘??o? ????o? s??? ??o p????n?s ???? ?? u??? ??o? ??? s????p ???? ????p ?o d???s ???? u? ?o? ‘qn? ??? s,????? ‘?? :????p o? ??u?????d–d???s o? –d???s o? ‘??p o? ?p??s?? ?q o? ???no??p uo?????nsuo? ? s??, ?o? ???? s? ?s??? ???? s??o?s ???n??u pu?sno?? ??? pu? ‘????????? ??? pu? ?? ??s o? d???s ? ?q pu?–??o? ou –d???s o? ‘??p o? ????? pu? ?u?soddo ?q pu? s??qno?? ?o ??s ? ?su???? s??? ???? o? ?o ?un??o? sno?????no ?o s?o??? pu? s?u??s ??? ????ns o? pu?? ??? u? ???qou s??, ??????? :uo??s?nb ??? s? ????–?q o? ?ou ?o ‘?q o?
?s?????d ?????? u??o? pu? u?? ??? ??? pu? ????s ? s,p??o? ??? ???
??o??o?o? pu? ?o??o?o? pu? ?o??o?o?
?s?uoq ????? ???? p?????u? ??o s? poo? ???
;???? ????? s???? op u?? ???? ???? ??? ???? ?s???d o? ?ou ‘??s??? ??nq o? ??o? ? ;s??? ?no? ?? pu?? ‘u?????uno? ‘su??o? ‘spu????
–the one who fell down and bumped his head
I dunno, it’s still working by me…
So much bad taste on this thread, tsk tsk. LOTR and Discworld are the only two fantasy series. Neil Gaiman can get honorary mention.
Strictly speaking, neither the idea nor the content were “original.” ๐ But I liked it. ^_^
lol, you and every other bio major, yenta ๐
excellllllllllllllent Icot ^_^
did someone say galoshes
or why you hate Shakespeare. That works too (and depending on who you are talking to, is also conversely effective as a conversation ender). ^_^
yup, great conversation starters those
snort ๐
and uurrr as in argh or you’re? ^_^
or the ones with unhealthy obsessions with transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. ^_^
Mazel tov! ^_^
lol, so I see, lurker. ๐
cuz Firefox rocks and Chrome doesn’t. duhhhhh
yeah, I saw that actually; just replied a little late. Was ill and busy the past few days (bad combination :/).
heh heh, it’s a nice subtitle ^_^
You gotta be careful about what you say around here…my subtitle happened in about the same way. ๐
It disappeared. But I rather like the replacement. ^_^
I broke your record, actually (don’t have the sub anymore though).
hi there
And OOM, I don’t like ice cream, so I would definitely not like chocolate with ice cream.
WHATTTTT I HEREBY BANISH YOU FROM PLANET EARTH
OOM – have you ever TASTED a Schmerling bar?
Posterity upon reading court transcript:
We’re gonna have to put this on the list of “Most Loserish Cop-outs of All Time,” right below “Harry Potter, Book Seven.”
WOULD YOU LIKE SOME ICE FOR THAT BURNNNNNNN, YOU BREADED PIECE OF POULTRY WITH A -Y INSTEAD OF A -EL
Author’s final words on deathbed:
I retract everything I said in all my written works. It’s all rubbish. Burn it, please.
mmmm, that’s good.
*croaks*
Epilogue:
NO IT ISN’T
Yeah, yeah, heard that cop-out tripe already. ๐ But the fact of the matter is he didn’t end up dying and Voldemort did, so the interpretation still stands.
My point is, you have to admit that someone who can eat both is a more fitting judge. ๐
Hey–welcome, new mod! ^_^
(Oh no, I hope this doesn’t create a loop…)
Welcome, fellow TP maven!
I don’t remember ever being welcomed either… ^_^
Speaking of Harry Potter drashos…I saw this somewhere else on the interwebz, thought it was interesting:
There was a part of the prophecy that could have gone either way: “either must die at the hand of the other / for neither can live while the other survives.” In the book it means that in the end, one of them will have to kill the other.
What if it meant something else instead?
What if it meant the only way either of them could die would be at the hand of the other?
“either must die at the hand of the other”
Meaning, the one who didn’t die had no other means of achieving death. This means that by killing Voldemort, Harry sacrifices his death. It’s been made clear to us that death is the only way he’ll ever be with his loved ones. Dying isn’t such a bad sacrifice to make. But sacrificing his own death and living forever would be the ultimate sacrifice for Harry. By killing Voldemort, Harry would become immortal, never seeing his family or friends in death.
Harry Potter would forever be “The Boy Who Lived.”
My animagus form would be the offspring of a Crumple-Horned Snortkack and a Blast-Ended Skrewt. ^_^
FTFY
(unless you are brilliant and naturally highly talented in that area)
“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated failures. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent.”
chocolate doughnuts ice cream brownies pizza potato chips yummm~
>D
Develop-mentally is not a word.
glad to help ^_^
Many people use impeccable grammar but still don’t communicate.
thisthisthis