OneOfMany

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,801 through 2,850 (of 3,080 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fun with your Subtitles #877853
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Funetik spelur. 😀

    in reply to: Why do ONLY seminary girls get to learn navi? #858996
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    “????? ??????? ?????? ?????”

    in reply to: Photos of Gedolim? #830955
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    I guess we have that in common with the Native Americans. 😛

    in reply to: Yo mama jokes #1004804
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    You can tell a lot about a person by their choice of humor…

    in reply to: More Zombies #830780
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    That’s pretty awesome.

    in reply to: 4 years old #1046322
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Mazel tov. 😀

    in reply to: NBA LOCKOUT IS OVER!!!!! #830338
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Well, you need SOMETHING to balance out the perfume thread…:P

    in reply to: Whats my problem I can't keep CR members straight? #1037164
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    She/He’s getting more sophisticated, I see…

    in reply to: British Posters #1096491
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    beamed in

    lol

    in reply to: Reviving an iPod …any Ideas??? #832881
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    whatelseisleft: Regular. Ancient, actually.

    in reply to: Favorite Perfume?? #830844
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    The Body Shop has some nice ones. They’re pretty inexpensive, too.

    in reply to: Reviving an iPod …any Ideas??? #832872
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Wow, thanks everyone for all the help!

    jemmapuddleduck: Yeah, so I usually charge it overnight. That’s what I do with all my electronic equipment. I never tried to change the brightness…hmm, I’ll try that…

    Toi: Yeah, that’s what I do every day (out of necessity :S). I do charge it overnight though…just can’t be bothered to check it all the time.

    WIY: I don’t use it for anything particularly battery intensive – which is why I’m perturbed that it’s just failing. I just changed the screen brightness to the lowest setting, and backlight is at 5 seconds.

    Busy As A Bee: Wow, I never heard that one before! I think I’m gonna try it! (I’ll just have to survive without my iPod for a day or two…)

    cinderella: I am guilty on both counts. :S I have to charge it every day, though – I use it for 1-2 hours, and it goes completely dead. I’ll try not to charge it overnight, but I really don’t want to be a slave to it…

    in reply to: Reviving an iPod …any Ideas??? #832864
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Shucks, I thought this thread was gonna address MY iPod problem…

    So I’ll just ask: does anyone know what I can do increase battery charge retention?

    in reply to: What exactly is Daas Torah? #830313
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    What’s “classical Jewish thought”?

    in reply to: Takes ages!! #830238
    OneOfMany
    Participant
    in reply to: Machon Raaya and Seminar�Info Please #934275
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    I wrote a nice long post about BYMR on another thread:

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/seminary-3#post-312954

    Hope that helps!

    in reply to: Brooklyn College #830057
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    mik5: Kensington, actually.

    in reply to: Jokes #1201961
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Ken Zayn: lol

    in reply to: Reasons why I DON'T like Lakewood #829946
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Health:

    So whose opinion counts – what words mean -YOURS?

    I’m not guilty of anything. I’m sorry that your education didn’t include all the definitions, but now that I educated you -why don’t you say Thanks?

    Read up on connotation vs. denotation. After that, we can talk.

    Perhaps you didn’t read all the posts?!? He attacked me, not the other way around. I guess you believe in the best defense – is an offense; but my only question to you is -Why are You the one on the defense? You aren’t both the same, are you? You should familarize yourself with what Chazal say about people who mix into other’s convos!

    I did read all the posts, and while I have no comment on your point per se, I think BaalHabooze is correct in picking on your negative phraseology. So I maintain that you stop trying to defame him.

    And as for mixing into other people’s conversations, I would argue that that is the premise of the whole CR. And that YOU in fact did exactly such when you posted your opinion on this thread. So I guess there’s wrongdoing all around, then…

    in reply to: Why do ONLY seminary girls get to learn navi? #858982
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    yitayningwut:

    Unless guys and girls are very different, I don’t think you are right, and if it seems that way, maybe it’s simply a you-want-it-because-you-can’t-have-it motivation that’s behind it. In other words if you would change the system and make girls learn just as much as guys, they would have less of an interest. Just my conjecture.

    Sheichus difference? Not sure what you are getting at. My point is this: there are people who like to learn and people who don’t. Girls who aren’t interested in learning torah most likely aren’t dying to learn advanced maths. Girls who like learning advanced maths will most likely also want to learn torah. Teaching the basics in halacha etc. and pushing secular subjects more won’t satisfy EITHER group.

    It could be he thought (clearly, mistakenly) that you personally could not handle such a course, and in his mind he believed that it would soften the blow to make a general comment about women than about your specific shortcomings, because in this way he is saying “don’t worry, you are normal.”

    I don’t think that’s what my principal meant, but good point. And I guess it’s all for the best anyhow. I still got to learn it later. 🙂

    *See, for example, his comments at the end of the fourth chapter in Hilchos Yesodei haTorah.

    Lol – aren’t you supposed to be referring me to math textbooks…

    in reply to: Why are they making us into boys? #829823
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    popa – How does the fact that women aren’t COMMANDED to do study torah logically lead to “go study math”? True, women don’t have a chiyuv, but if they want intellectual stimulation, why is mathematics better than torah?

    You say “applied mathematics” – are you specifically excluding mathematical theory?

    in reply to: On the topic of tznius… #829578
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    davkanik1 – …what’s the “inverse,” and how is it worse?

    in reply to: Reasons why I DON'T like Lakewood #829941
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Health: The word “burden” unquestionably has a negative connotation, even if you intend to use it neutrally. Dictionary definitions don’t prove anything. YOU are guilty of bad word choice. Quit picking on BaalHabooze.

    in reply to: Is it OK to believe in Torah U'Madda? #830548
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    RSRH: lol

    in reply to: approaching people #829672
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    I pass by a busy shopping center every day, and the salespeople on the sidewalk soliciting for their stores ALWAYS approach me, shove stuff into my hand, ask WEIRD questions (“Who cuts your hair?” – no joke), etc. I’ve started to think that there is some general target profile that I somehow fit exactly…

    Yeah, not the type of approachable I would like to be. 😛

    in reply to: On the topic of tznius… #829573
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    miritchka, gefen, Nechomah, yentingyenta – I don’t get what you find offensive about non-pregnant women wearing “pregnancy style” clothing. Gathered empire waists, etc. are not exclusive to maternity styles. If you automatically associate such cuts with maternity, fine. But they aren’t doing anything wrong.

    in reply to: Why do ONLY seminary girls get to learn navi? #858978
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Toi – If women really weren’t capable of analytical reasoning, they wouldn’t be able to manage advanced mathematics either. I guess I am a paradox, then…

    yitayningwut – You seem to be saying (correct me if I’ve misinterpreted) that since women don’t have a chiyuv in talmud torah, etc., their knowledge of torah can be technically be regarded as equivalent in value to their knowledge of other disciples. I don’t agree with that. Isn’t there intrinsic value in learning torah, regardless of its role in the scheme of things?

    And then there’s a logistical snag – girls that are content with learning the “basics” usually are really not interested in (or capable of) expanding their secular knowledge. The ones that are capable usually want the utmost in limudei kodesh too.

    And the principal thing really wasn’t that bad as I made it out to be. It was regarding a request for an advanced physics class, and I think he was just trying to say that we wouldn’t be able to handle the theory. He did phrase it very offensively, though. Plus, I don’t think it’s right to just throw out that generalization regarding specific cases.

    in reply to: Why do ONLY seminary girls get to learn navi? #858969
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    yitayningwut – A very choshuv principal of mine once said that to me (pretty much in that lashon, too). Still irks me to this day.

    Anyway, what does the gemarah mean, exactly? Is it better for a woman to learn science (over torah)?

    in reply to: Why do ONLY seminary girls get to learn navi? #858962
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    yitayningwut: According to some men, we are too stupid for that.

    in reply to: Why do ONLY seminary girls get to learn navi? #858951
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    They learn Navi because they don’t have anything better to learn. I would guess that’s sufficient reason…

    in reply to: Which are the great subtitles in the coffeeroom? #895078
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    lolkatz’s is really funny…

    in reply to: Best city in the world! #829205
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    BaalHabooze – nice subtitle! 😉

    in reply to: Which are the great subtitles in the coffeeroom? #895075
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    If you don’t know, then you are not a geek. Congratulations.

    in reply to: Good Shabbos! #1135794
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Good shabbos, all! 🙂

    in reply to: School Busing on Thanksgiving in Lakewood #834791
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    I’m not trying to draw legal parallels. I’m trying to look at it from the goy’s perspective. He doesn’t really care that what they are doing is legally correct, because he thinks it’s morally wrong. Same as by the B110, no?

    in reply to: School Busing on Thanksgiving in Lakewood #834789
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Hmm…maybe we should give in on this issue in order to save face from the B110 debacle…:P

    in reply to: School Busing on Thanksgiving in Lakewood #834772
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    I grew up in NJ and distinctly remember not having busing on legal holidays…when did they change this?

    in reply to: petition to ignore a certain someone… #827666
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    :::::::)

    in reply to: i am not joseph #827200
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    I really don’t think anyone’s taking this Ice-cream character seriously.

    in reply to: Orchestra or one man band? #829233
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Orchestra?! Is that what they get nowadays? Do they rent an extra hall for them?

    in reply to: why waste your efforts amking multiple screan names??? #827632
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Now, isn’t that the pot calling the kettle black?

    in reply to: petition to ignore a certain someone… #827658
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Sorry to say, but…+1

    in reply to: Motzei Shabbos #827128
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Clean-up time…:)

    in reply to: MADRICHOT #827135
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    (S)he’s cunningly trying to profile all recent sem graduates! STALKER ALERT!!!

    in reply to: Yalili #827257
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    midwesterner, charlie brown – and I thought it was me against the world.:P

    in reply to: Does anyone else view the occupiers as traitors?? #828189
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    The colonists were traitors against England, too. I’m definitely not saying that the OWS movement has as much justification as the American Revolution – just that a belief that opposes the establishment isn’t necessarily ideologically WRONG, even if it is “traitorous.”

    Disclaimer: I DO think they are a bunch of moronic idealists.

    in reply to: Shticky Guy #827284
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Very unique brand of humor. 🙂

    in reply to: 1990's #828626
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Ditto machine.

    in reply to: Copying a different members screenname. #826997
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Lol. That’s pretty good.

    in reply to: Copying a different members screenname. #826994
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    yitayningwut, does your screen name really mean something?

Viewing 50 posts - 2,801 through 2,850 (of 3,080 total)