OneOfMany

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,151 through 1,200 (of 3,080 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Frum English #900236
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Why are you making this about English? Because it isn’t. It’s also not about me (or you).

    in reply to: Divorce: Whose Fault Was It? #932232
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    No biggee – she can just burn his supper.

    in reply to: Sefer for a Couple to Learn? #900302
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Sefer Hachinuch is a good sefer to learn – not too heavy or scathing. Sefer Kuzari is also interesting (if you are into stuff like that.)

    in reply to: Frum English #900234
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    If they did, they would be more apologetic about their English, not less.

    in reply to: Dinosaurs #1090068
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    If they turned into anything, they turned into lizards. Not birds. -_-

    in reply to: Artscroll Gedolim biographies #981804
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    gavra: I learned what Hagiographa means in limudei kodesh, not English. 😛

    in reply to: Frum English #900232
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    I believe that a person must have a solid (it need not be articulate) command of one language. If they don’t, then they are incompetent. If they feel superior in a shaky command of several languages, then I would call them an idiot.

    Did that help clarify things?

    in reply to: Philosophical Qs�NO KFIRAH #944049
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    yekke2: There are philosophical implications to the question – that are validated, in fact, by technical explanations of the phenomenon. Technically, sound waves needs to be processed by aural receptors before you can call it sound (because the waves that are in the air are actually changed by your ear, creating what you hear.) This ties into an issue that a large body of philosophy is concerned about – human perception and reality.

    But really, unless you like them from the purely analytical perspective, such conundrums are best summed up as “the finding of bad reasons for what we believe upon instinct.”

    in reply to: Frum English #900230
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    TCG: Girls’ schools do. BYBP has options of French, Spanish, Russian (and Yiddish :P), Manhattan High offers Mandarin, and my high school offered French (at the expense of Yiddish – they dropped the Yiddish class my freshman year).

    in reply to: Philosophical Qs�NO KFIRAH #944047
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    WIY: The point is that the sound that you hear is not just registered by your ear – it is synthesized by it. So calling sound waves sound (which is not a very solid delineation, Wikipedia or not – what about the ultrasonic vibrations that are sound to dogs? Note the label ultrasonic) is rather imprecise – because you do not hear sound waves. You hear sound, created by the resonance of the waves on your ear stuffs.

    in reply to: The funny things Goyters can do #899959
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    I think the prevailing attitude is Yaakov Soneh Es Eisav. In all my years of employment I was never refered to as “The Jew”.

    +1

    in reply to: Philosophical Qs�NO KFIRAH #944041
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    snort

    in reply to: Philosophical Qs�NO KFIRAH #944038
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Hey, I didn’t start this. 😛

    in reply to: Frum English #900207
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    No, because it rightfully reflects their incompetence. Why would you want the idiots running around spouting proper diction and locution? That would scare me…

    in reply to: first date nerves #900397
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Maybe you were on a Chrome high. I hear they make you jittery.

    ^_^

    in reply to: Philosophical Qs�NO KFIRAH #944036
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Depends how you define “hear.” 😛

    in reply to: Philosophical Qs�NO KFIRAH #944033
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Sound is only defined as sound vis a vis the resonance of sound waves on your inner aural workings. So technically, the oscillations without the ear are not sound.

    ^_^

    in reply to: So does anyone play WOW here? #932470
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Yeah…Ilustrator is the program for reflecting. Their reflecting tool is really good. Their manipulation tools are very comprehensive. My favorite is the Shear Tool – it’s great for creating shadows in perspective and stuff.

    I’ve never used that tool – I don’t use very much more than the basic artistic filters. Will go and try it out.

    in reply to: My Walkabout #899904
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    No, I meant the Eruv Rav.

    in reply to: My Walkabout #899901
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    lol is that what people really call them?

    in reply to: So does anyone play WOW here? #932467
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    lol, Photoshop also has a brush like that – the Impressionist brush. Only Elements has it though…not sure why. I used to love playing with it, but I never really put it to practical use…apparently its purpose is to give photographs a more “painterly” feel.

    in reply to: Chazal and science #923832
    OneOfMany
    Participant
    in reply to: So does anyone play WOW here? #932465
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    By the way, I finally decided to activate my Painter trial and play around with it last night…now I’m hooked! lol I spent the entire morning painting! It’s super cool! ^_^ ^_^ ^_^

    in reply to: I Ain't a Conspiracy Nut, But… #914176
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Okay, none of you think it weird that the coffee room is now officially called “Moderator-80”?!

    in reply to: Decade of 2000-2010 #900266
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    ’80s

    ’90s

    ’00s

    1980s

    1990s

    2000s

    in reply to: Women Driving #1161861
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Everyone ought to ne respect each other’s rabbonim. Live and let live.

    That’s a preeeeeeeeeeeeetty different tune than the one you usually sing…

    in reply to: The_Cool_Jew = moishy #899249
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    snortttttttttttt

    Sent from my NON-CRASHING browser.

    in reply to: Romney VS Obama poll #900060
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    BigGolem: That reasoning only will work if the people who are voting for Johnson prefer Romney over Obama. I for one do not.

    in reply to: The_Cool_Jew = moishy #899247
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    wha

    in reply to: Romney VS Obama poll #900052
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    The question was who did I want to win. I said neither. How does that mean I’m not voting?

    in reply to: Romney VS Obama poll #900039
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    neither

    in reply to: Shelo Asani Isha #1050878
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Yeah, I was referring to that post.

    in reply to: Shelo Asani Isha #1050875
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    oomis, very interesting (your first post on this thread).

    in reply to: Shiduchim, what else? #947464
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    TLKY: Okay, but the discussion of the relative merits and lack thereof of different Jewish communities is really irrelevant. The point is that the people the people who choose not live that way cannot feasibly adopt such a shidduch system.

    in reply to: I don't think that impressed Hashem #899296
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    No comment on the story, but welcome back, arwsf! ^_^

    in reply to: So does anyone play WOW here? #932463
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Just looked him up…oooh, I like that “Living at Lake Quaig.” Very Burtonesque. ^_^

    Also, I don’t know if you’ve already heard of it, but you should check out ConceptArt.org. I’ve only started being active there recently, but I’ve found it an amazing resource to help develop my skills.

    I just checked and I realized that Photoshop calls it “Flip” instead of “Reflect”…you should see it there right at the bottom of the Transform menu. 🙂

    in reply to: So What? #898936
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Hi! ^_^

    in reply to: Shiduchim, what else? #947456
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    twisted, TLKY: The reason that system worked then is becuase it was naturally suited to the social/cultural dynamic of the times. You cannot argue that it be implemented now without arguing that that entire way of life be recreated. Case in point: the people who that system still does work for are the ones who have pretty much preserved that dynamic.

    in reply to: So today, I was Popa #1141800
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Syag: I get annoyed when people encourage girls’ going to shul over “wasting time at home.” If they are wasting time at home, then they should be encouraged not to waste time at home. I think that by telling them to go to shul, you further exacerbating this problem by encouraging them (though unintentionally) to see their going to shul of more value than their helping out at home. Which is I think a major impetus in their being confused and doing dumb things.

    I am of course not saying this out of some warped desire to keep women shut up in their homes. I think it quite praiseworthy for a woman to go to shul, etc., but only if she can do it in conjunction with her other responsibilities.

    in reply to: So does anyone play WOW here? #932461
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    ej: Thanks, I just checked it out. 🙂

    in reply to: So today, I was Popa #1141790
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    That doesn’t make them feminists. That just makes them stupid.

    Shkoyach for being maybe the first person on this site to make this very seminal distinction. -_-

    QB has a point, though. You can’t call whatever we do that keeps us home “wasting time,” and also criticize those who would try to use their time “effectively.” You are right that what they did was dumb, but mixed messages are what make people do dumb things like these.

    in reply to: Calling OOM #986918
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    No, that was just a noncommittal grunt.

    in reply to: So today, I was Popa #1141783
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Some of them were sleeping in because they were up until 2 A.M. making chlupshes and kreplach, ahem hem.

    in reply to: I Ain't a Conspiracy Nut, But… #914174
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Hey, I didn’t say it was a conspiracy between you and mod-80…more like one between mod-80 and Jxxeph, I would say..

    in reply to: Shiduchim, what else? #947435
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    You two sound like a perfect shidduch… ^_^

    in reply to: Calling OOM #986913
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    hmmmmm

    in reply to: Calling OOM #986910
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    They’ve just spun out of my head…but why do you assume? *raises eyebrow*

    in reply to: Calling OOM #986908
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    snort @ both of you

    in reply to: Calling OOM #986904
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Bah, title pages and source pages don’t count. 😛

    in reply to: Calling OOM #986902
    OneOfMany
    Participant

    Only works where you have le interwebz though. :/

Viewing 50 posts - 1,151 through 1,200 (of 3,080 total)