Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
OneOfManyParticipant
hee hee ^_^
OneOfManyParticipantwhy are you telling yourself to look at something you just spent 20 minutes on
OneOfManyParticipantRelying on statistics is way worse than relying on generalizations.
Read How to Lie with Statistics by Darrell Huff (favorite book of LIFE).
OneOfManyParticipantTorah613: Which one of us exactly do you find inspiring? o_O
OneOfManyParticipantand here I thought you so clever for making all that up whilst drunk.
OneOfManyParticipanthuh.
is that like a drinking song or something?
OneOfManyParticipantand I think that using generalizations instead of clear thinking is a cop out. Rots your brain. And is almost as bad relying on statistics.
OneOfManyParticipantOneOfManyParticipantpopa:
I don’t know why you think it is impossible to value seminary and to make a generalization that it is a waste of money.
I do not know what you mean by that, but as far as I can make out, that is not what I was trying to say.
Nor do I know why you think it requires a close and objective study for people who are living in that world.
I believe the exact opposite. I have no relatives that attended seminary, and wasn’t even entirely aware of what it was until I was in tenth grade. In fact, around that time, I was rather biased against it, being that so many people were being so ridiculous and hysterical about it. I looked into the matter further, though, and came to the conclusion that while it is easy to be dissuaded by the enormous amount of silliness and ill-judgment that most invest in it, it is something that is impossible to make any definitive judgments about. There are too many factors involved (admittedly, the most important being the silliness of the subject). Being surrounded and personally affected by that silliness has colored your view of this.
In a world where your wife, your sisters, your mother, your sisters-in-law, your wife’s friends and co-workers, etc, have all gone to seminary
And perhaps all of your relatives were in the “total bust” category of my earlier analogy. I think this supports my ideas more than it refutes them.
VM:
I readily admit that the hashkafah and halacha that girls learn in seminary is not something that I value at all, mostly because I believe that it’s not legitimate halacha or hashkafah.
[…]it is not susceptible to “objective” studies because it does not purport to offer anything “objective”.
My point precisely!
And as PBA pointed out, my mother, wife and sisters all went to seminary and I saw nothing in their experiences that justified the stress and financial strain that it involved.
See above.
OneOfManyParticipantpopa is a boggart.
OneOfManyParticipantI would be an evil sand witch who would hex all your sandwiches into bat-bogeys. ^_^
OneOfManyParticipantPeople often make artificial judgements out of what they perceive to be necessity. In reality, though, they are not actually assigning value but merely using the appearance of doing so to assuage or inflate their sense of self-importance (which may have tangential value of itself, but does not create a definition for the value of the object in question).
And Seminary really doesn’t seem to be a hard case.
Is this because you have done a close and objective study of the subject, or because you feel this is so?
OneOfManyParticipantOkay, look at the fourth Wikipedia listing on the disambiguation page. 🙂
OneOfManyParticipantAs an analogy, if a wealthy person spends $140 on sneakers
To illustrate this with a more apt comparison: a person chooses to attend a specific university. The tuition may be beyond his current earning ability, but the impact that the resources and mentorship of the program he chose may have on his future career, work ethic, and personal sense of motivation may very well turn out to be worth the cost. Or his time there could be a total bust, leaving him having just blown an enormous amount of money on nothing. The point is, whatever the outcome, it is impossible to assign any price or even a price range (as the result can range from nothing to something no amount of money can buy) to such an investment.
[correct me if I am mistaken] do not seem to have been developed by a close and objective study of the subject), and therefore cannot be successfully asserted as the basis of a sound line of reasoning.
OneOfManyParticipant?
First you say that money and seminary mean different things to different people. Then you say “…it’s [?] unlikely to be a financially prudent decision based on beneficial analysis of what money and seminary are worth to that person.” Given that money and seminary mean different things to different people, how exactly were you able to evaluate the financial prudence of the decision “based on…what money and seminary are worth to that person”? Do you know this person or something?
Also, how exactly does having less money and it having been harder to come by make someone less capable of making “financially prudent decision
based on beneficial analysis”?Finally: Can you explain how this statement
…you get to do all kinds of fun things that someone else pays for, while convincing yourself that it’s important for Hashem that you do it.
segued into what you have just explained?
OneOfManyParticipantnope
OneOfManyParticipantBarring unhealthy social pressure? It is a good decision when social pressure is involved? What exactly are you trying to say?
February 14, 2013 6:12 pm at 6:12 pm in reply to: Wherein Golders Greener Came Late For School�Serial Story #993823OneOfManyParticipantyour story needs some Tonks ^_^
OneOfManyParticipantVeltz: Why do you think seminary is a waste of money?
OneOfManyParticipantKindle app
OneOfManyParticipantReminds me of this thread: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/sopa-and-pipa. lol
OneOfManyParticipantoh
Hey Goq – some dude from Mishpacha is ripping off your thread titles. ^_^
OneOfManyParticipantI’m on doctor’s orders to do so twice daily. ^_^
OneOfManyParticipantIt’s best to enjoy each thing in its own time – and high school is a great experience too. Don’t let it pass you by! 🙂
OneOfManyParticipantNo…
February 14, 2013 4:14 am at 4:14 am in reply to: Oh emmm geeeee is it necessary to make thread about every seminary?! #981910OneOfManyParticipantI know… 🙁 🙁 🙁
February 14, 2013 3:49 am at 3:49 am in reply to: Oh emmm geeeee is it necessary to make thread about every seminary?! #981908OneOfManyParticipantOneOfManyParticipantSorry, I think this fellow has got that one copyrighted http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/i-can-only-try.
OneOfManyParticipantahem, make that MY intellectual property
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/whats-your-patronus/page/2#post-382339
And I’ve retained popa as my lawyer (http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/ywn-merchandise#post-376814). So you better watch out…
*cacklesnort*
OneOfManyParticipantsnort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort snort
SNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORT
OneOfManyParticipantMy opinion is that the important thing is to look nice and presentable, not to pander to some arbitrary standard of how everyone must behave. If you really feel that not doing all that lends you a slovenly or unattractive appearance, then I guess you could feel guilty about it. But otherwise, feeling guilt is just silly.
OneOfManyParticipantNARF
OneOfManyParticipantI never wear more than two inches (in which I just barely pass the lower limit of average height :P). I don’t think my feet would survive four inches…
OneOfManyParticipantSame as SaysMe, but not guilty at all. Not a whit. ^_^
OneOfManyParticipantNo problem. I like this thread. ^_^
Here are a few new words (/terms) I learned over the past few weeks:
asseveration
otiose
prestidigitation
zenzizenzizenzic
expiatory
hapax legomenon
parturition
recondite.
OneOfManyParticipantbumpity bump
OneOfManyParticipantcerebellum LEFT cerebellum RIGHT synapse hypothalamus striatum dendrite
axon fibers matter gray
BRAINSTEM BRAINSTEM
central tegmental pathway temporal lobe
February 11, 2013 9:29 pm at 9:29 pm in reply to: Impressively Arbitrary Literary Narrative Technique #928613OneOfManyParticipanthehe 🙂
February 11, 2013 9:16 pm at 9:16 pm in reply to: Impressively Arbitrary Literary Narrative Technique #928611OneOfManyParticipantand kudos to your impressively arbitrary nerdiness. ^_^
February 11, 2013 9:11 pm at 9:11 pm in reply to: Impressively Arbitrary Literary Narrative Technique #928610OneOfManyParticipantWay of life, huh…like Dr. Seuss?
“I like nonsense. It wakes up the brain cells. Fantasy is a necessary ingredient in living. It’s a way of looking at life through the wrong end of a telescope, which is what I do – and that enables you to laugh at life’s realities.”
lol ^_^
OneOfManyParticipantThe reason we wear high heels is what interjection said.
And ^_^ to Syag.
OneOfManyParticipantpopa: I don’t disagree with what you are saying, but I really don’t see how the comments about voting off islands and taking medication are helping you make your stand (even if you think they are deserved)…
February 11, 2013 3:12 pm at 3:12 pm in reply to: Should Harassing Other Posters Be Allowed in the CR? #929087OneOfManyParticipantdoes that include trolling
February 11, 2013 6:45 am at 6:45 am in reply to: Impressively Arbitrary Literary Narrative Technique #928608OneOfManyParticipanteeh eeh
OneOfManyParticipantSaysMe: + a lot!
As an English Literature major with a special interest in modern literature (which is comprises quite a few very articulate authors with perfect diction writing in what is apparently gibberish), I am very much opposed to enforcing the rules of a language at the expense of the authorial voice. I believe that everyone should try to at least master the necessary basics to use as a framework in which to express themselves, but never allow said rules to hamper their mode of expression. And believe me, it’s not the grammar that differentiates good writing from great writing – it’s the power of the voice.
so it’s okay to write like this, I say ^_^
OneOfManyParticipant^_^ ^_^ ^_^
OneOfManyParticipantI was going to go skiing a few weeks ago but I had to cancel because something else came up. Something that proceeded to get itself cancelled at the last minute.
Annoyingest Incident of the Month. -_-
OneOfManyParticipantoh and bymrer – you forgot nutty, wacky, geeky, and nerdy. (Don’t know about your year, but mine had all those in abundance. ^_^)
February 11, 2013 12:56 am at 12:56 am in reply to: Painful Shoes/Bruised Heel? (Shidduchim) #931634OneOfManyParticipantyep yep
OneOfManyParticipantRaayits? no no no. Definitely Raayans – this is a precedent established by the first year girls. 😛
-
AuthorPosts