Neville ChaimBerlin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 201 through 250 (of 1,828 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: what makes people like the cofferoom so much? #1736589
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    It’s the only place with thorough information about which languages are holy.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Don’t even bother, Joseph. He can say whatever he wants and we can say nothing. PC culture.

    Yup. Ashkenaz pride is racism. Sphardim are abjectly superior; denying this is racism… blah blah blah. Sounds pretty familiar to anyone acquainted with the liberal media.

    in reply to: U.S. government #1736261
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Avi K, it’s just CTL trying to defend Obama, whenever he can. He feels good that he may have caught me on a technicality, when he didn’t.”
    I don’t know that it had anything to do with Obama. He likes catching people on technicalities, which is fine by itself. This is barely even a technicality; it’s just different countries using different words for their head of state. CTL is more than capable of making good points, but he and I share a bad habit of fighting to the bitter end and going down with the sinking ship when we make a silly statement.

    Avi: I understand the logic behind it. But, if a minority makes up only 3.25% of the population, then that’s how much sway they should have in a democracy (in my opinion). In practice, this would not be good for chareidim in Israel or Jews in America. So, I guess I’m talking on a mostly theoretical basis.

    in reply to: Wearing a טלית once married #1736254
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Atifas Yishmoelim should be done and therefore covering the face is a mistake.”

    The M”A says to cover up to the upper lip (don’t cover the eyes), and M”B seems to prefer the opinion that one should cover down to the upper lip (do cover the eyes).

    My minhag is like the M”A, and I don’t really understand the logic of covering the eyes, but we aren’t really in a place to call it a “mistake.” Sphardim also seem to leave the eyes uncovered, but they seem to scrunch the tallis up more like a scarf when they do it. I’m not really sure why this is.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Gadol HaDor is a not a thing. It’s a contemporary, Litvish invention”

    And yet you use Chacham Ovadia as an example. It’s a globalism thing now that we have mass communication. By the way, I believe “posek hador” was said in regards to the Chasam Sofer, so it’s not totally new. The only thing new today is the concept of it applying internationally, which is played up much more on YWN than is the reality.

    in reply to: U.S. government #1735825
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “It has the advantage of stability but the disadvantage of a very unpopular POTUS staying until the end of his term”

    In defense of the system, the term limits in the Roman Republic were much shorter. Maybe our’s are just the wrong length.

    My problem with the Israeli system is that parties that get ~5% of the vote can end up being the “swing party” in building a coalition and get a disproportionate amount of say in government. Why should a party with 5% support get more say than the party that came in second place? I acknowledge that this helps the frum parties, but it’s extremely anti-democratic.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Neville — Count how many current members of the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah have a father who was one of the Gedolei HaDor and how many do not.”

    Why bother? Not every member is colloquially known as the “gadol hador” so it has nothing to do with this discussion.

    in reply to: Is the art of bonsai too cruel? #1735737
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Is this because you saw the book called the art of bonsai where it shows instructions of people forcefully tying up trees with wire in what looks like some form of torture?

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Yes, we all know there are some well known roshei yeshivos whose fathers and or grandfathers were gedolim, but it’s by no means exclusive.”

    Then name some of the exceptions that are around today. Nobody is disputing that the European generation was more merit-based.

    My original post was that the Litvish world is moving towards being yichus based. The fact that Joseph had to use previous generations as examples proves my point better than it proves his.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Nope. Just accepting the reality that every person called a “gadol” happens to be descended from a previous “gadol.” You’re allowed to think that’s total coincidence, and I’m allowed to call you silly for it.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Gedolei HaDor do not come about from yichus or from succeeding one’s father.”

    I think the rest of us are in agreement that this point is silly and untrue.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1734917
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “According to the theorem, is there really no such thing?”

    No, according to the theorem, character trolls usually give up after a year or so. Then, they either do a grand reveal, or just disappear without a trace, which is what RGP did for several years here apparently. There might be some flaws in the theorem, which is why it’s not a law yet.

    Both myself and Daas Yochid have been accused, in the past, of being Joseph alt accounts simply because we harbor non-MO views. I believe that what Joseph reveals on the CR is that the modern orthodox are amazed that Chareidim exist to the degree that they have to try to explain it away as “trolling.” Keep in mind, if Joseph is a true troll, the ones being trolled the worst are those of us who occasionally agree with him.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Syag:
    I don’t regular imamother (I guess we are allowed to say it) on account of my manliness, but I’ve never noticed any anti-religious activity over there. I occasionally see imamother forums when I google a certain community to find information about it. The posts over there tend to be more informative than here (eg. this school has this hashkafah, then this one is like this, etc…).

    Over here, when someone tries to make a post like that the responses are just: “why not move to Israel!? Why do you love galus?!?!,” and “no! what’s wrong with Brooklyn?! Or Lakewood? Do you hate frum yidden, you koifer!?!?!”

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Neville: There is strong halachic basis to favoring the child of the deceased rabbi in appointing his successor.”
    Yasher koach. Thanks for helping me disprove your original statement.

    “What’s silly is to pretend that anyone claims yichus isn’t a factor at all.”
    Joseph did.

    in reply to: U.S. government #1734260
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Obama Would be gotten thrown out in 2 years, if we had a parliament.”
    And you would have gotten someone like Hillary or Jeb; is that really much better? They just vote for parties over there, not people. With no possibility of an outsider upset, it’s a phony democracy as far as I’m concerned. US is way better.

    in reply to: What is Chasidus? #1734259
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “The chasidim don’t follow many of the psokim of Reb Moshe rather the Chasam Sofer for example cholov stam, mechitza and bima in the middle etc because he mainly wrote them for Lithuania were keeping Torah and mitzvas was more complicated. He did not want his Teshuvas translated into English.”

    Neither Reb Moshe nor the Chasam Sofer wrote their teshuvas in Lithuania. I would add to TT’s rebuttal that you haven’t even been talking about cherry picking. You’re giving examples of Litvaks following Reb Moshe, our posek, to the letter. How is that bending for those who disrupt the Torah?

    And, by the way, the Chasam Sofer was a central European posek, Reb Moshe was Eastern European, which is part of why who follows whom in some of those disputes. It’s nothing to do with strictness.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1734059
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Kluger:
    I think the alleged brilliance in it is supposed to be that he made an observation that many others had made of the internet, but worded it in such a way that could be effectively restated and reused as “Poe’s Law.” Thus, saving humanity from having to type out “that thing on the internet where you can’t tell whether or not someone is being facetious because they are saying something extreme, but not giving signals of sarcasm or humor such as an emoji.” Now, we can just say “Poe’s law.” With the amount of time we save, we’ll be colonizing the moon in no time.

    I say that Joseph is not a troll because of something I’ll call Neville’s Theorem:
    Character trolls will always have a probability of eventually revealing the hoax to be entertained by the reactions. With every unit of time, this probability increases and thus the probability of them continuing the hoax decreases. For our case, the likelihood that Joseph has built an “extreme Chareidi man” character and has been trolling on this forum for over 10 years without breaking character is extremely low.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Not that yichus doesn’t have an impact, but there are plenty of cases where the son isn’t worthy and therefore doesn’t take over”
    So what? It goes to a nephew or grandson who is more qualified, not to some random, best-qualified candidate with zero family connection.

    The point is, it isn’t decided by looking at the entire population and picking out who the most learned and qualified is. It’s decided by looking at the portion of the population with the right yichis (a much smaller number of people) and then seeing who’s most qualified. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing, but it’s kind of silly to pretend it’s not true.

    in reply to: What is Chasidus? #1733971
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Rand0m3x,, saying י’ג מדות at night where most say that he is doing more harm than good.”
    Where have you seen litvaks do this?

    There are far better examples you could have used. Litvaks are much more willing to be meikel to avoid offended others, eg. eating over at a household with different kashrus standards, possibly shaking hands with a female, etc.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1733970
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Me looking at the thread I started:

    Look how they massacred my boy…

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “No one is groomed to be. Gedolei HaDor are self-made.”
    Except every Chassidishe Rebbe ever. I don’t think it would be totally inaccurate to say the yeshivish world is also moving more towards being yichis-based.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    ” However, IMO it’s horrifically ugly that there are zero frum forums where serious females (the types who shrink from aggressive debating)”

    There is a very well-known one that is heavily moderated and has ads that somehow get past ad-blockers. I don’t know if I can say the names of competitors here.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1733613
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    This is bizzaro land. It’s like you’re all fighting, yet making all the same points. What’s the machlokes?

    in reply to: What is Chasidus? #1733615
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Growing in chassidus” could mean middos chissidus, unrelated to the sectarian meaning.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1733476
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    I’m not deeply troubled

    Said no one ever.

    😉 😉 🙂 😉
    :0
    🙂
    :)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1733181
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Are you saying an anti creationist can’t be a genius?”

    I’m saying that someone who’s sole claim to fame is making fun of creationism on the internet is an unlikely candidate to be described as a “genius” on frum forums.

    If he went off and became a successful neuroscientist and had a claim to “genius” there, it would be one thing. But, the fact that you seem to respect him purely as an atheist who bashes on religion is a bit alarming (I took your advice and googled it; he is not known for anything else).

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “his halachic “lifnei ivers” were no different then threads where people are bashing other peoples’ halachic presentations with THEIR rabbonim vs. the other side with THEIRS”

    Are you kidding? Did you just not read RGP’s threads, or do you really not see the difference?

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “My point was that Yated Israel and Yated US are different unaffiliated publications just like Vizhnitz Monsey and Vizhnitz Bnei Brak are different unaffiliated organizations.”

    I’m not exactly an insider, but from what I understand that’s not entirely true. I was told that are upwards of 10 Vishnitz “Rebbes” now between US and Israel that just serve different communities. It’s not a machlokes-driven split. I could be wrong.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1732639
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Do you actually think an anti-creationist was a genius, or was that sarcasm without a smiley emoji to prove a point?

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Lol, he’s not trying to hind it. The username makes it clear who the OP is. So, RGP got blocked?

    As much as I found his antics entertaining at times, it was inevitable. Trolling will always involve trickery, but doing so with the halachah is for sure lifnei iver. There’s a dark possibility that RGP actually thought it would be funny if he could convince unlearned readers to follow a made-up halachah (similar to how trolls on the ganzer internet think it’s funny to convince people that things are secret racism when they aren’t).

    in reply to: Is Harry Potter kosher #1732637
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “YA, this has nothing to do with chassidim vs. non chassidim.”

    You’re comparing the frummest Litvaks to chassidim. B’klal, we all know Litvaks are more likely to be OK with this than chassidim. Most normal yeshivas have English classes where they read books (not necessarily Harry Potter).

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Multiple chassidus sharing a mesorah doesn’t always translate into their taking the same position on political and public policy issues as we have seen over and over again in EY”
    Who said it does? When did having a shaychus start meaning two things had to be 100% identical in every regard?

    “The CR will now return to topics flavored vanilla, decaffeinated and calm, welcoming the boredom of humdrum normalcy.”
    This is actually probably true. In a selfish way, I’m actually happy about it. The RGP drama got me way too addicted to the CR.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1732462
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Did you guys hear that internet trolls convinced liberals that the “A OK” hand gesture where you make a circle with your thumb and finger is a secret white supremacy symbol? No joke.

    in reply to: Is Harry Potter kosher #1732458
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “She has said countless times that dumbledore likes men”
    This thread is not about whether or not our children should be perusing JK Roweling’s twitter.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “It’s similar with Satmar Williamsburg and Satmar Kiryas Yoel.”

    Which also have a shaychus. They may be separate, but they share a mesorah.

    in reply to: Q regarding Tefillin #1732358
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Women listening to shofar and davening maariv etc, but for individual chumras it does not apply.”

    Women do not have a chiyuv in maariv according to anyone. Those who do so are encouraged to do it privately as an individual churah to avoid the situation you are describing.

    I believe the M”B holds that women are over on bal gaavah if they wear tefillin, so it is unlikely to ever become a minhag.

    in reply to: Is Harry Potter kosher #1732357
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    I personally don’t ascribe to the “everything created by goyim is assur” view. The problem with Harry Potter is that the author has allegedly said in the past that it’s a metaphor for Christianity. It could be a myth given that she’s known to be an extreme social leftist.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1732359
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    What’s Poe’s law?

    in reply to: Women’s Suffrage Must End #1732015
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    I question the validity of the assertion that no women’s suffrage would lead to republican victories. Is there statistical proof that there is such a disparity between women and men’s votes that women’s suffrage has ever actually made the difference? How many households are really 2-party households? (A.K.A. the kind that end in divorce 5 years later). Even for singles. It’s possible that for every feminist who will be alone forever (well-deserved) there’s a corresponding white knight who thinks being a male feminist will get him dates but will also remain alone forever (well-deserved).

    Luna: Actually Europe has tried putting women in charge. Merkel has pretty much let the continent turn into an Islamic terrorist haven, and Theresa May continues to refuse to represent her constituents. Do you really think if America put Pelosi, Talib, and Ocasio-Cortez in charge that it would usher in peace and prosperity?

    I would love to end women’s suffrage just to troll the feminists. I’m not convinced that it would make any electoral differences, but ruining a feminist’s day is enough motivation for me to support something.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Wow, RGP & Neville both agree on something!”
    What did we agree on? I said people kept using Hamodia, he said people switched.

    However, it appears you are correct; Yated did reach America first. I don’t tend to come across anyone who actually reads the Yated. Could this be another one of those arbitrary splits between Balhabatish and Yeshivish preference?

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “I googled this and couldn’t find it on any other site.”
    Same. Either YWN did some really good journalism and got this story before everyone else, or they got tricked into publishing a non-story.

    in reply to: Milchig Meal on Shavuos #1731204
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    This is great. I don’t even know who is a “character-troll” and who’s real anymore.

    in reply to: Mislabeled Kosher Products #1731190
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “It is accomplishing exactly what you claim to want — not to trick people into thinking that it is dairy.”
    You either aren’t understanding, or are pretending not to. The creamer being discussed is true dairy, not dairy equipment. There is actual dairy in the stuff. Jews have to treat it as dairy, and vegans can’t eat it. For all intensive purposes, it might as well be milk (except for the fact that Reb Moshe might not even matir it because of the casein).

    As far as the OU goes, it’s a problem when combined with their refusal to use a DE label. People conclude that creamers like this are only dairy equipment when this is, in fact, real dairy.

    in reply to: Shabbos Food #1731171
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “and why if it doesn’t reach yad soledes are you considering it assur?”
    Ask your rov. In this case, RGP is not wrong. There may be some who are meikel, but he isn’t making up a chumrah this time.

    Also, Laskern, at the very least what you’re describing would probably be nolad. Particularly in your first post in which you didn’t clarify that you were talking about already-cooked foods, which gave the impression that you might have even been implying that you can put raw foods on a timer to go off on Shabbos. As for having cooked food that goes into Shabbos hot, gets cold during Shabbos, then gets reheated via timer, I would imagine if that were mutar then everyone would be doing it.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Wow, RGP’s really hating on those who don’t have a subscription to cancel.”
    Good thing there’s almost nobody that falls into that category.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Most Americans never switched from Hamodia to Yated in the first place, so I doubt it.

    What was the machlokes actually about? The home page article is clearly intentionally vague.

    in reply to: Milchig Meal on Shavuos #1730240
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    So that you could say you attended a restaurant and fool people on the CR into thinking you ate there.

    Again, there are plenty of posters who could clarify this Chabad minhag. They prefer to let RGP lie on their behalf.

    in reply to: When did Chabad become a Kiruv oriented Chassidus? #1730238
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “The term “kiruv” is antithetical to everything that Chabad and the Rebbe stand for.”
    Sigh… Everything you’re saying is super kiruvdik. You’re talking to frum yidden. We all know the first rule of kiruv is to pretend you aren’t engaged in kiruv. I don’t know why you think you have to talk to us like that.

    Side note:
    To clarify what Milhouse is saying, he means Georgia the country, not the US state.

    in reply to: Milchig Meal on Shavuos #1730113
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Again, the unanimous reply was that “many Chabad mispallilim INCLUDING THE RABBI attend at the seuda shlishis”,”

    Notice the word “attend.” They don’t wash. Also, notice how none of the Chabad posters dissociate from RGP when he lies and twists stuff to defend Chabad. Every single Chabad poster here knows the minhag on seudah shlishis and could have ended this a long time ago.

    Kluger: I didn’t say he was a talmid chacham, but I don’t believe your theory is true either. It’s possible, but it seems a bit beyond google.

    in reply to: Did Rebbitzin Golden Pick Sponsor an Article Just to Troll? #1729860
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    There we go. Now he’s back.

    I’m not sure I see where you’re taking the “chabad blogs” don’t exist angle as anyone could just check and see that you’re wrong. But, the claim that I used them to justify my Chabad bashing is genius because it actually came up in a totally different context. It’s well done. This last post is much better quality than your defensive ones.

Viewing 50 posts - 201 through 250 (of 1,828 total)