Neville ChaimBerlin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 1,828 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1765828
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Not sure i tried.”
    I didn’t think you were. I didn’t mean that last post as a put down either. I was more confused as to why you viewed that other post as an attack when you seem to agree with what it said.

    in reply to: The Importance of Having Short Hair #1765778
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    It’s not a chiddush. It’s brought down in the shulchan aruch, as other posters have mentioned.

    This thread just further proves that some people will always say whatever is the opposite of what Joseph says. Joseph, you should start a thread about the importance of keeping kosher to see what happens.

    in reply to: Can a husband bring down his wife (take her farther from Hashem)? #1765757
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    The mashal I heard, which might not work for those unfamiliar with the business world, is the following:
    When a supervisor/manager has employees under him or her doing the grunt work, the manager receives some form of credit for the team’s accomplishments (even though they were done by the subordinates) and some form of backlash for when a team member makes mistakes (even though it wasn’t the manager’s own mistake).

    If you make a mistake, it’s nobody’s fault but your’s, yet it still reflects on your manager. You see the difference between fault and responsibility?

    By the way, I don’t say this in an attempt to start an argument, but the shittah Nechomah heard that a woman should not encourage her husband to make minyan/learn is absolutely not standard in any community I’ve ever heard of. While the OP is representing the rabbi’s talk in somewhat of a controversial way, he is much more in line with the standard approach to marriage. I really can’t imagine a kallah teacher telling a girl “your husband’s observance is none of your business,” or vice versa.

    in reply to: The wrong impression #1765466
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Would you make generalizations about any ethnic group you see doing something you don’t find right, or do you only discriminate against sub-groups of Jews who are more frum than you and thereby make you feel uncomfortable and inadequate?

    in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1765465
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    It wasn’t an attack and nothing in your response refutes anything I said.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Ubi:
    With all due respect, you’re wasting your time. You can’t bring proofs to an argument with anti-vaxxers. Just do your part to treat them feel like third class citizens, make their shittos socially not acceptable so that they never find shidduchim, and they’ll be gone within the next 50 years. Logic did not create them, and therefore logic cannot destroy them.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “this is what all the pro-vaccine religion”
    Tip: You can just call it Judaism. It’s quicker that way.

    “really you compare alumunim foil to vaccines????”
    Do you not realize that I was quoting you with that post? If so, then you are an extremely effective troll, and you have my utmost respect. If this is the case, I know you can’t admit to it, but from one angry internet loser (me) to another, just know that it’s a job well done.

    in reply to: Can a husband bring down his wife (take her farther from Hashem)? #1765309
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Recently, I had a Rav talk to me about how a wife is responsible for her husband’s mitzvah observance.”
    I think he meant more mitzvas aseh. I don’t know to which talk you refer, but I presume the point was that the wife gets credit for soliciting her husbands mitzvos such as allowing him to learn in yeshiva, reminding him to daven, etc. That speech is quite common and is used for chizuk for women who might be brought down by the fact that the Torah gives more mitzvos to men. I’ve never heard it having anything to do with issurim; are you sure you didn’t just assume that?

    As for the title question, obviously the answer is yes as well as vice versa. People can bring each other down. I don’t believe that was supposed to be the take-away of the talk you heard though.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “so maybe you can answer me why the governemnt is saying that alumunim is safe becuase its in mother milk when its 2 DIFFERENT Types of aluminum.”

    Wait, do you actually avoid using aluminum foil because you think it’s dangerous? This is actual kind of entertaining. Could you just provide us with a list of things you don’t think are secretly poisonous and being covered up by a giant conspiracy? It seems like that would be easier.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Even if it were linked to autism, at least there are high-functioning autistic people. Anti-Vaxxerism seems to be a much greater and more crippling form of mental retardation than autism.

    There will never be 100% vaccination, and nobody claims there ever will be. There are people who are actually unable to receive the vaccines for real, medical reasons. And, by the way, those are the people we actually care about who you anti-vaxxers are putting at risk, real, functioning human beings. If it was only anti-vaxxers putting themselves at risk, I would be fine just viewing measles as Hashem’s way of cleaning up the gene pool.

    in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1765057
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Back in the 1950s the C movement did present a threat to the O movement. But, now, the C movement is really in death throes.”

    It’s still probably upwards of 5 times the size of the Orthodoxy in America. You just don’t live in that world now and don’t realize it. Also, 90% of them only go to shul 3 times a year, so you wouldn’t realize it. This idea you apologists keep peddling that the poskim only had a problem with it because it “posed a threat” is completely insulting and shows that you probably don’t actually care about what rabbonim say because you’ll just inject your own “ulterior motive” theories when you don’t like their psaks.

    This thread has taught me one thing that will make me sound 100% like Joseph, but it’s true: [Some] BT’s will steadfastly refuse to accept how the halachah views Conservative/Reform Jews probably on account of sentimentality for their families. It’s understandable, but I still don’t think it should be publicized.

    in reply to: learning from an artscroll #1765056
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “The only argument against “Artscroll” is that translation is a de facto commentary”
    That is not the “only” argument. Don’t be ridiculous.

    in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1764892
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    It’s not opinion. It’s the simple definition of the word kefira. They do not believe that Hashem gave the Torah. Period. That’s all that needs to be said.

    They label themselves, not us. And, by the way, you absolutely are in the business of trashing yidden. 99% of your posts are trashing the Orthodoxy, and now you’ve added defending kefira to balance it out a bit.

    It’s not about censoring dissenting views. All I’m asking the mods to consider is the consequences of allowing this forum to be infiltrated by the Conservative/Reform. Not unlike an infiltration by Jews for Jesus, it would cause a lot of us to no longer feel comfortable using these forums. You can’t expect us to talk with a kiruv filter 100% of the time. We come here to avoid having to do that.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Neville, do you think it’s better for them to be stupid and uneducated?”
    I think it’s better not to put at risk the children who will actually stand to benefit from education on account of their functioning brains.

    “afraid of providing that info because of all the yentas that are unfortunately prevalant”
    So, they’d rather the yentas go around telling people they’re anti-vaxxers? Sorry, don’t buy it. If it’s true, then it shows that anti-vaxxers are too socially accepted, which is exactly why they need to be publicly shamed.

    in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1764669
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Obviously, some prefer to paint them all as kofrim so thats your option but many are true shomrei torah umitzvos.”

    That’s just flat out false. None of them are shomer Torah umitzvos, by definition. I hate to cry to mommy and daddy, but what ever happened to the “we don’t post kefira” policy on the CR?

    in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1764577
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “These “traditional” minyanim at some conservative shuls will not satisfy the standards of even the most progressive MO shuls”

    You aren’t saying anything wrong, but it’s overall very discomforting how much you seem to be avoiding saying they’re doing anything halachically wrong and instead saying stuff like “satisfy the standards,” etc. Maybe I’m just being overly cynical; it might just be me. Are you just being choshesh for people’s feelings by wording it that way?

    By the way, I’m aware of some split within the Conservative world, but it mainly revolves around the topics of female rabbis and toeiva marriages. Separate seating I have never heard of. That’s always been a defining characteristic of their “movement” as you can tell from that recent autistic daughter thread.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “The state can’t force them to vaccinate if they claim they are not doing it for religious purposes.”
    You yourself said they ended the religious exemption. Religion is not a magic wand that paturs someone from whatever American laws they want, and if people try to use it that way the state will only grow to resent religion more and more.

    Rebyid:
    Yeah, but the apple doesn’t fall far from the moron tree.

    in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1764555
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Abba:
    That’s for sure not what he’s saying, and that would be obviously assur.

    I’m going to be straight, unless someone can provide a clear, verifiable example, I do not believe that there are any Conservative shuls in America today that don’t count women and do have a mechitzah. Maybe, just maybe, that was true like 50 years ago.

    Gadol, even if these mythical traditional minyanim exist, they are still 100% koifers. They don’t believe that Hashem revealed the Torah to Moshe Rabbeinu, they still drive on Shabbos, they censor tefillos to exclude mention of the beis hamikdash and openly state that they don’t want it to return, they allow Kohanim to marry gerim, etc. This idea that Conservative kefira is a new thing and that they were still kosher at the initial split is a total fabrication. They are and always have been “Reform, but with Hebrew.”

    in reply to: What’ is a “Person of Color”? #1764422
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Tzipora was not black.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Who cares? If they’re dumb enough to be anti-vaxxers they’ll never amount to anything anyway.

    in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1763579
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “So the great world renowned Posek Rational differs with the Igros Moshe. So kind of you to share your learned teshuva with us, chock full of maareh mekomos and raiyos.”

    Actually, the renowned Rational tried to change his stance completely and hoped nobody would notice. He’s now talking about Orthodox communities taking over abandoned Conservative shuls and converting them to Orthodox shuls. Nobody says Conservative shuls have a din of beis avoda zara. His original argument was that Orthodox Jews can daven in active Conservative shuls alongside their kefiradik brethren.

    in reply to: What’ is a “Person of Color”? #1763373
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    I thought liberals hated the police.

    in reply to: What’ is a “Person of Color”? #1763190
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    A person of color is one who may not be criticized or reprimanded in any way, shape, or form no matter what egregious acts they commit.

    in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1762653
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    I think the OP was looking for a list of issurim (eg. kol isha, bracha l’vatalla, etc.) rather than inquiring whether or not it’s assur. The thread has taken a weird turn that’s probably a nightmare for the mods since we aren’t supposed to post kefira, but also don’t want to isolate not-yet-frum yidden.

    You wouldn’t go up to a Conservative Jew and scream koifer like we do to each other on the CR all the time. There’s a reason not to bash them like they bash us. I don’t see where this thread goes that’s positive at this point.

    in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1762475
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    rational:
    I really hope you’re trolling. The Conservative movement is much more Reform, and anti-Torah today than it was back then. Unless you’re claiming that it’s so radically different than Orthodoxy today that nobody will be tempted to join? Which, by the way, would still be an insanely stupid argument.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1762096
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    I ran over a crowd with my car and then sold a bunch of secret documents to terrorists and got caught red-handed. My lawyer told me they would drop all the charges if I got gender re-assignment surgery, and it worked! So, I have my freedom and I’ll be posting here forever.

    in reply to: What are any issues with serving a role in Conservative Shule? #1762095
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Motachah: DY was obviously joking.

    ZD:
    The OP clearly wasn’t about using a Conservative building for a wedding venue. That’s another discussion. It seemed like he was talking about actively participating in Conservative services, and which issurim are involved.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1761921
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Comments like that convince me it would be pointless to try finding a meeting of the minds.”
    What on earth ever gave you the idea it wasn’t pointless? Everything here is pointless.

    This is just a slightly glorified way of unleashing our aggression on each other and justifying our own beliefs. If you want a forum with purposeful information (a.k.a. recipes, school’s hashkafos) you have to go to imamother. Which, luckily, I can because I’m a female. I’m also black and muslim.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1761902
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “So in short, he knowingly makes comments he knows many take “extremely maliciously” but makes them any way with that knowledge”
    So, for example, you think he believes NYC is better than OOT, but he represents his views in such a way that he’s almost satirizing himself by making it seem more extreme than it is? That’s how I view it. I assumed people were accusing him of, chas v’shalom, actually thinking OOT is better and purposely posting the opposite to make the IT argument look bad. As for knowing how people will take them, I believe Joseph and I share this core belief: those who are easily offended deserve to be offended. There are plenty of folks on this forum that scream bloody murder at having to listen to the most mundane, mainstream shittah slightly to the right of their own, so the idea of bothering them a little extra is a noble cause in my opinion.

    “Is the obfuscation deliberate?”
    Are you referring to my last comment? I copied your entire quote for it. What more was there other than my original quote that you had copied? Am I doing it now?

    I wouldn’t put it past myself to do something like that, but I truly do not understand your AOC comparison. That’s not me trying to insult your intelligence or something; I guess I’m just out of the loop.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1761825
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “well maybe that explains why you don’t get it.”
    You think AOC reads into Trump in a hokey jokey way? Wow, I had her all wrong I guess.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1761661
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Syag:
    I might be out of the loop on AOC news. I truly don’t see the mashal you’re making. I personally think that “love it or leave it” is my more core, defining political belief as an American (not trolling; that’s one area where I’m consistent). Either way, I don’t see how the situation applies to Joseph and OOT vs. IT.

    Phil:
    Obviously, I represented Joseph’s comments as more polite and everyone else’s as more extreme in my summary for humor-purposes. That doesn’t change the reality that Joseph, who you all claim is just trying to rile people up, barely has to do anything nowadays to rile people up. I get the vibe that others read into his comments in an extremely malicious tone while I read them in a more hokey jokey tone.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1761584
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    I get a kick out of the fact that Joseph could probably save another poster’s family from a burning building, and they would still be mad and yell at him.

    He did some hardcore trolling with alt accounts and everything 5 years ago, maybe more. Some people just never got over it. My theory is that people on this site are overly sensitive to internet trolling because they aren’t as used to it, which also makes it a great place to troll.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    I’m out of the loop, who’s the 4th anti-American woman? I only know AOC, Omer, and Talib.

    in reply to: See It For Yourself #1761291
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “So when a Ben David arises to be king and he says to you lets go fight the wars of Hashem and build the Beis Hamikdash you will tell him, “listen buddy, I won’t believe you are Moshiach until after you fulfill all of the requirements,””

    So, when a Ben David who isn’t the Rebbe (because it won’t be) arises to be king and he says to you lets go fight the wars of Hashem and build the Beis Hamikdash you will tell him, “listen buddy, we already have a moshiach. Go away.”

    in reply to: What would it take for you to move “OOT” ?? #1761327
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Neville – are you also AOC’s speech writer?”
    Why do you think that? Just because I’m black? Racist.

    in reply to: Ask SIRI, Capital of Israel? #1761002
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Have you seen the viral videos online of Siri or Alexa or whatever being exposed as an extreme leftist? This particular answer should not be at all surprising.

    in reply to: What would it take for you to move “OOT” ?? #1760901
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Person:

    OOT seems nicer than NYC.

    Everyone:

    I respect your opinion.

    Joseph:

    I like NYC better. It has more religious resources.

    Everyone:

    You dumb, mean troll! Why are you alive?!

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760647
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “The issue here is a narrow one as to whether these continual rants by the religious anti-Zionists are inadvertently feeding the growth of anti-Semitism cloaked in the guise of political anti-Zionism.”
    No. Because, we still hate the Arabs more, and you don’t have to talk to us long to figure that out.

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760449
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “First, nobody proposes boycotting “E”Y”; they propose boycott the Zionist State of Israel.”
    Really? You think AOC and Ilan Omer would be willing to buy products with a badatz hechsher? Jeez, I had them all wrong. I thought they were just anti-semites.

    in reply to: See It For Yourself #1760413
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “On a serious note, I find it both humorous and a bit bizarre that anyone, including rabbonim from across the spectrum, purport to “know” who is moishiach or even speculate on his identity.”

    Across the spectrum? Nobody does this except for Lubavitchers. The example to which you were replying was pure hearsay, as you yourself pointed out. Why do you think there would be such a controversy around Chabad if this were a normal behavior?

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1760406
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “When it comes to a besulah its also gezel.”
    Proof?

    “It’s definately a crime according to Torah, with a reasonable punishment.”
    This point has been brought. The reason the argument is still going is because most 21st century thinkers would not consider a monetary penalty “reasonable” for this particular crime (myself included). So, the thread has now turned into trying to find new issurim to glue on to the offence.

    “In the Rambam you brought, he has a whole list of crimes and he neglects to bring rape!”
    He brings arayos. Why would he parse out each individual thing included in that? And, assuming we’re talking about the same Rambam, it’s not exactly a “whole list.” It’s just the well-known, 3 aveiros over which one should prefer death.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1760235
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Ubi:
    That just seems to prove that we can’t compare aveiros sh’bein adam l’makom with bein adam l’chaveiro. Within each category, it doesn’t show that you can’t infer based on punishment (I still think you’re right, I just don’t see this as a proof). Also, how does it help your argument that he explicitly says giloy arayos is not as chamor as murder? Doesn’t that go against exactly what you’ve been saying?

    “Look if you want to categorize rape as a form of gezel I’m ok with that. It is a terribly abhorrent gezel. that seems reasonable”
    How about if we categorize it as eating chometz on Pesach while we’re at it just to cover our bases?

    Before I get accused of defending rapists, I’m not (I don’t even defend it when it happens at yeshivas, which makes me a big koifer here apparently). I’m just commenting on the absurdity this has reached, which is actually a good thing. It’s un-derailing the thread. Re-railing, so to speak.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1759352
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    ” Molesting is something rarely done before witnesses other than the child.”

    Murderers generally try to avoid having 2 witnesses as well. What gave you the idea that “the Torah doesn’t bother prescribing a punishment because there wouldn’t be witnesses anyway” is a good argument? (P.S. I don’t disagree with your overall opinion, ethically. That’s just a really weak argument that I felt the need to point out).

    The reason you guys are getting so emotional is because this discussion forces you into a corner. You have to either say that we don’t weigh the gravity of wrongdoings on their punishment in the Torah, or that you simply don’t agree with how the Torah weighs this particular act relative to others (or more likely use the lashon “don’t understand”). You can’t have it both ways.

    Is there not just a definitive proof that we do or don’t weigh acts based on their punishments? I think I remember being told once by a Rebbe that we for sure do not infer from punishment, but I certainly would not know where to find a source for that.

    And, can someone catch me up on the sides here? Is kluger the one arguing that we DO infer based on punishment, or was it someone else and he’s using this case as an example of how we clearly can’t?

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    That best part of all of this, aside from giving liberals well deserved smack-downs, is that it’s exactly these kind of posts that got Trump elected the first time.

    Don’t change, Democrats. Keep pulling the race card at every corner, keep making Holocaust analogies, keep losing…

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “yidden should be on the forefront of working towards some realistic framework for providing asylum to those arrriving at our borders fleeing violence at home.”

    Yidden should be on the forefront of securing those spots for YIDDEN. You have a confused approach to the world. An interest in the safety of yidden does not make a kal v’chomer that we have to be interested in everyone’s well-being equally. It is not in our interests as a people to let boarder hoppers get away with it and refuse to enforce the law of the land.

    You’re sounding like a classic Conservative/Reform pulpit rabbi who throws out catchy buzz words like “tikkun olam” as a blanket defense of senseless, bleeding-heart leftist policy which serves no productive purpose to us.

    in reply to: A Study in Trolls: Updated #1758363
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    I started a thread about troll categories and it became about women’s voting rights, and then somehow seamlessly transitioned into being about whether or the not the Torah views molestation as such a bad thing.

    I’m so proud of this community…

    I will say, while I don’t see what kluger is getting at and my initial inclination is to think he’s just wrong, you guys keep accusing him of saying that rape is “OK.” Saying the Torah doesn’t prescribe a punishment for something is not the same thing as saying it’s OK. He clearly isn’t saying it’s OK. Which is more than I can say for many of you on that thread that came out when they increased the statute of limitations to sue institutions for these things.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “Any idea as to how many Chareidi “shaluchim” from EY overstay their visas and should be locked up by ICE and dragged to the airport and deported?? ”
    Assuming you aren’t just making all of this up, which I’m quite sure you are, what’s your point? That we should deport them? That we shouldn’t deport anyone and just let our country be lawless?

    “Yidden can be notoriously selective in applying moral outrage”
    That’s a middah tova that real frum yidden have. You, on the other hand, consistently seem to be more concerned with the well being of goyim than that of your own people. A “brotherhood of man” is not a Jewish idea, no matter how much the socialist, religious-left wants to pretend it is. If we didn’t put our own people first none of us would be here today.

    And, by the way, the ganzer Jewish world (including seculars) is actually notorious for self-loathing. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt that you were only referring to religious Jews.

    in reply to: See It For Yourself #1758296
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    “so as chassidim we hope that hashem will chose him”

    Apparently Hashem didn’t. Because, you know, he died.

    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    CTL:
    Are you arguing against your own comrades? It’s the liberals who keep insisting that ICE raids are racially biased. We Trumpists don’t care what skin color they are; if they’re here illegally they need to be deported ASAP. You seem to be the only one making assumptions here and claiming that they are “common assumptions.”

    in reply to: No mechitza? #1758254
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    Was it explicit that the daughter was post-bas-mitzvah age? Little girls come into the men’s section pretty commonly in Orthodox shuls.

    Either way, he was probably just using her as a sob story to bash Orthodoxy. He can say whatever he wants, and if you defend your beliefs you might as well be Jewish ISIS. It’s a societal problem, not a personal one.

    By the way, everything Joseph has said here is true and shouldn’t be controversial on a frum site. The lengths to which some of you have gone to disagree with him on this thread is borderline kefira at best.

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 1,828 total)