Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
NaysbergMember
This thread is in the topic you put it in, not Decaf.
June 7, 2012 3:00 pm at 3:00 pm in reply to: HaRav Aaron Schechter and the Novominsker Rebbe shlita #878520NaysbergMemberThe Novominsker Rebbe shlit”a is the Rosh Agudas Yisroel. He gives direction for the everyday shailos the Agudah has as far as what to do. But as far as the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah itself, all the members are equal and none are its head.
NaysbergMemberLet’s have an asifa
NaysbergMemberHe is the self-styled Jewish Tea Party founder and a Kahanist.
NaysbergMemberrob, the gedolei poskim in Eretz Yisroel (incl. R. Elyashev) paskened the rca halachic prenup and other such prenups can cause a get meusa, and if relied upon can result in mamzeirim of her future children.
NaysbergMemberThe shul would provide a nearby trashbin if they felt it was a problem to temporarily place it on the table.
Sam: Because the halacha specifIcally states not to placce anything in your pocket on Shabbos.
NaysbergMemberWhich is, exactly, another reason why filters are incumbant upon any ehrliche yid, to block those shows online.
NaysbergMemberJbaldy, the pessimistic POV you just expressed about internet filtering was expressed many years ago when the rabbonim banned television. They said few will listen.
And look at the (lack of) place television has today in the homes of frum, ehrlich, families.
NaysbergMemberI don’t understand. Both legal and halachic prenups are redundant. Halachas address all these issues. If a wife had money prior to marriage, she takes it with her if there is chas v’shalom a divorce. Any money earned during marriage (by either parties) belongs to the husband. And as far as a divorce coerced from penalties accrued due to a halachic prenup, it results in a get meusa in any event, thus rendering it void.
NaysbergMembernycvoter: “Can you move your tissue a bit away from me, please?”
NaysbergMemberSam: I think its incorrect. And you don’t really expect anyone to rely on an anon internet svara for a real, live, halachic issue.
cherrybim: What if someone woke up with a cold Shabbos morning and is using a tissue every 10 or 15 minutes?
June 5, 2012 1:41 am at 1:41 am in reply to: MUST READ- Real Solutions to the Internet Challenge #922541NaysbergMemberMP: Most people who leave a loaded gun on their dining room table, their kids don’t kill themselves or a sibling with it. It is only the horror stories that you hear about. So it really is okay to leave a loaded gun on your dining room table.
NaysbergMemberCherrybim:
So please explain to us all exactly WHAT someone seated far from any trashbin, without pushing over many people in middle of davening, is to do on Shabbos after blowing his nose. If there is no eruv, pocket is assur.
NaysbergMemberYour father is from Yemen?
NaysbergMemberyiddishemishpacha: Can you share your details why you needed to prove your Jewishness, how you proved it and how you felt about it? It sounds very interesting.
NaysbergMemberThe only effective remedy for this crisis is that shul’s strategically place many trashbin’s throughout the shul near all the tables. In the absence of this solution, worshippers will feel compelled to continue placing their nasal mucus on the table, for lack of any viable alternative.
NaysbergMemberThe reason that many poskim ruled against this type of prenup, is because the text of the prenup purports to compel the husband to give a Get in cases where he is not halachicly obligated to do so. And it enforces this with a daily monetary penalty, another halachic problem where he is being forced against his wishes to provide the Get.
They therefore rule that a Get provided under those circumstances results in an invalid Get, and any remarriage by his wife is adultery and future children mamzeirim.
NaysbergMemberIt’s true that it depends on how you interpert it.
NaysbergMemberGavra, what was it about?
NaysbergMemberHaifagirl: That’s absolutely incorrect.
(Btw, you made a linguistic error in your post. You have been duly reported to the internet police.)
NaysbergMember.
May 29, 2012 6:30 pm at 6:30 pm in reply to: Are there filters that connect to the router instead of individual computers? #877192NaysbergMemberBaruch Hashem, it is such a gevaldike pleasure to see how much filtering has been increasing in Klal Yisroel ever since the Kinus.
NaysbergMemberAccording to many poskim (other than Rav Moshe), cholov stam is completely treif. Thus, cholov yisroel isn’t a chumra, but rather basic mandatory halacha. And you can ‘t even eat pareve food that was cooked in cholov stam keilim.
NaysbergMemberNational Review. (It is published biweekly.)
NaysbergMemberA Sefer Torah written by a kofer must be burnt. Ben-Yehuda (and his successors) is a kofer.
NaysbergMemberI would do without all those bench legislation by the thugs in robes. America is a Christian country. Despite what the ACLU secular (so-called Jewish) fanatics would have you believe. It would be wise for us Jews to stop trying to impose ourselves upon the gentiles, while we are in exile.
And the junk that today goes under the banner of “Free Speech”, much of should be illegal with an applicable jail term. Bench Thug declared “Free Speech” such as burning the American flag or posting subtle threats or lies against individuals online.
Or the Supremely bench-legislated “constitutional right to abortion” utilizing constitutional-logic unworthy of a third grader, somehow derived under a right to “privacy”.
So much for all your assumptions.
May 25, 2012 12:18 pm at 12:18 pm in reply to: MUST READ- Real Solutions to the Internet Challenge #922502NaysbergMemberThis is very helpful. But it must be said, the Asifa was absolutely wonderful and as close to perfection as possible.
NaysbergMemberI mean the actual paper magazines you can subscribe to by U.S. Mail.
NaysbergMemberNational Review
Newsmax
The Weekly Standard
The American Spectator
Rush Limbagh Newsletter
NR is the best. The others are very good.
NaysbergMemberImpeach the thugs who legislate from the bench.
NaysbergMemberMP: We ARE providing a (proper) education in Klal Yisroel. Our wonderful mechanchm working hard together with parents are providing a wonderful education, based on the Torah hashkofos espoused by the gedolim shlit”a, to our tinokos sheel beis raban.
AND IT IS WORKING!!
Yet, we still need additional tools to complement that. One of those tools are filters.
May 24, 2012 5:18 pm at 5:18 pm in reply to: Kinus Klal Yisroel: Acting Upon Our Inspiration #876371NaysbergMemberTake what was said to heart.
May 24, 2012 5:10 pm at 5:10 pm in reply to: Whitelist vs. Blacklist & Remote vs. Local Internet Filtering #876464NaysbergMemberHaving something like WebChaver (I think that’s what it’s called), or an equivelent program, that sends a report to someone else of all your web history, internet traffic and computer usage, is an essential component in addition to and on top of whatever filtering is utilized.
NaysbergMemberIt’s a MO BD.
NaysbergMemberEvery Siyum Hashas, from the inception of the Daf Yomi through the siyum 7 1/2 years ago, has always had prominent Yiddish speaking. There’s no reason for that to change and it should be expected from anyone attending.
NaysbergMemberThe Supreme Court forced the libraries to offer unfiltered. Congress passed a law requiring filtering. But the thugs in robes, who legislate from the bench, overturned it.
NaysbergMemberA head-covering was ALWAYS part of Jewish uniform for a ben Torah. Throughout our history.
NaysbergMemberSam, what the apikorus Ben-Yehuda put into Ivrit, is a very far cry from any natural growth.
NaysbergMemberNechomah, Thank you for that accurate definition about Ivrit.
NaysbergMemberSome people ended up being Conservative when the no driving to shul on Shabbos was enforced.
May 22, 2012 2:39 am at 2:39 am in reply to: property lines – who in the city can solve issues #876022NaysbergMemberCounterclaim? They have no claim. They put boards on their neighbors property. The neighbor removed it from her own property. The builder has no leg to stand on in court. What are they going to possibly claim? That they wish to seize their neighbors property?
NaysbergMemberThe Agudas HaRabbonim was established in 1901. The Igud HaRabbonim in 1942.
May 18, 2012 7:56 pm at 7:56 pm in reply to: property lines – who in the city can solve issues #876019NaysbergMemberExcept that the builders already engaged in self-help by putting it up, with no rights. By her taking it down, from her own property, she is doing no more than the other side — except she has rights.
NaysbergMemberThey still have a beis din. I’m not sure how active they are.
NaysbergMemberOn what grounds would anyone object to being googled? And facebook is only what someone themselves posted to it.
NaysbergMemberHow can a cellphone, that is not a smartphone, that uses a java browser like Opera Mini be filtered? As far as I know it can’t be done.
NaysbergMemberItche, They only sold tickets with an actual seat assignment. Anything else was sold at the other venue (also with a specific assignment.) Nothing was oversold.
May 18, 2012 1:44 pm at 1:44 pm in reply to: property lines – who in the city can solve issues #876015NaysbergMemberThe OP said its a Jewish owner. So civil court is forbidden due to arkayos.
NaysbergMemberAHR was led by Rav Moshe. But today it is a shell of its days of glory. Same with IHR, which is a newer rabbinical alliance that originally catered to the younger rabbonim. Similar to the MO’s RCA. Today Agudas Yisroel and its Moetzes essentially assumes the function of what Agudas HaRabbonim once did.
NaysbergMemberWow, my numbers need revising. They’ve rented another arena and now sold out 65,000 seats for a men-only gathering! Double that if women could’ve come. Add 25% for the children under 19 who aren’t being given tickets and the elderly and infirm. Figure if even 2/3 of Chareidim in the metro area are attending the Asifa (its probably less than 2/3), then you need to add an additional 50% to the numbers for those who chose to skip it or couldn’t come. (50% is the missing third.) Count all the Chareidim from other cities and countries.
-
AuthorPosts