Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 27, 2019 8:33 pm at 8:33 pm in reply to: Why does my son’s Rebbi have a smartphone ? #1805314MilhouseParticipant
Maybe your son’s rebbi doesn’t buy into the propaganda against smart phones. In that case why should he not have one?
MilhouseParticipantReish Lokish was not a ger.
And what you write is not really true. Sure, some people will never respect a talmid chochm who’s a ger; no genuine talmid chochom would want their respect. Sure, some schools will not admit a ger’s children; those schools are far from the “best”. And sure some families will refuse to make shiduchim with a ger’s children; boruch Hashem for that, since it saves you wasting time with such unsuitable families.
MilhouseParticipantJoseph, how is it not obvious? If the body is not getting the nutrition it needs to grow properly, it won’t. That’s why in the middle ages people were unnaturally short, and now with proper nutrition they have shot up. And a child starved of calories and nutrients will not enter puberty for a long time.
The same applies to illness. A body that is fighting illness cannot devote the resources necessary to develop normally. I know a pair of technically identical twins who look nothing like each other, because one went through a serious illness and basically skipped at least a year of growth, while the other was healthy and grew normally.
MilhouseParticipantSerious advice: Make sure this is what you truly want, and don’t have unrealistic expectations. You should understand that although you will come out of the mikveh with a new and holy neshoma, you will not feel any different. Your yetzer hara will be just as strong, if not stronger, and it will be no easier to resist.
It’s like ne’ilah on Yom Kippur; you think that with a blank slate and a new start everything will now be different, but by Sukkos you realize that it isn’t. For you it will be a true blank slate, because your previous averos will have been completely erased and will not be your problem any more, but the yetzer hara that grew on those aveiros will still be there.
Remember the way the gemara phrases the instructions to a would-be ger. It doesn’t say to tell him, “Be aware that yesterday you could eat cheilev and tomorrow you can’t”. Rather it says to tell him, “Be aware that yesterday when you ate cheilev you were not punished with kareis, and tomorrow when you eat cheilev you will be punished with kareis”. In other words we expect that you will do aveiros, and you have to accept that as a result of your decision you will now be punished for them. Basically you’re signing up to go to gehennom. But if you accept that, and would rather be in a yiddisher gehennom than in a goyisher gan eiden, then welcome, welcome, welcome.
MilhouseParticipantMaybe they just don’t get sick. Have you ever thought of that?
MilhouseParticipantAshkenazim seem more prone to Machloket. I’ve heard this from many ASHKENAZIM
Of course you’ve heard it from Ashkenazim, who fondly imagine all kinds of things about a community they don’t know. You won’t hear it from Sefaradim, who know it’s not true.
MilhouseParticipantMeno, Avrohom only davened for any hypothetical innocent Sedomim, not for the guilty ones.
MilhouseParticipantRe: Haskala not happening in Sefardi countries, it actually did, in the form of the Alliance. The Alliance was closely linked to the Maskilim, and did lead thousands of Sefardi Jews ever-so-slightly off the correct path.
MilhouseParticipantThe people saying kaddish for terrorists are not Reform. They are “IF Not Now”, an antisemitic organization funded by Alexander Soros. All four of his grandparents were Jews, so he is one too.
MilhouseParticipantReform do not say kaddish for terrorists, and there are no videos of any Reform synagogue doing so.
Reform is a foreign religion, no different from Islam or Buddhism, but it so happens that a very large percentage of its members are Jewish by birth, with Jewish neshamos. That percentage is probably less than 50%, but still very high. The same is probably true of Buddhism in NY; there’s a very good chance that a randomly selected NY Buddhist, if s/he appears to be white, is a Jew. We have to love the Jew, but we have no connection at all to the religion s/he is practicing.
The Hirsh gang within NK (not the real NK) are ochrei yisroel; they actively collaborate with the enemies of the Jewish nation, which makes them traitors. If we know they’re Jewish we need to have pity on their neshamos.
MilhouseParticipantLearn Perek 32 of Tanya. If you think of yourself as a body in which a neshoma rests, then you will consider everyone else the same way, and in that case you can’t love every Jew, because some Jews’ bodies do very ugly things.
But if you first think of yourself as a neshoma, literally a part of G-d Above, that happens to currently be resting in a body, then you will think of others the same way; and when you see a Jew whose body does wrong you will love him all the more, and feel sorry for him, trapped in such a situation and unable to influence his body to do better.
MilhouseParticipantlaughing, Lustiger was a meshumad, a Jew who chose of his own free will to become an idolater. Nothing he did for Jews or Israel can possibly cancel that.
Now John Cardinal O’Connor was a true tinok shenishbeh, he never knew he was a Jew, it was only discovered after his death. So his avoda zara can be overlooked, and we can wonder at how his yiddishe neshoma, trapped in such a life, nevertheless managed to manifest itself and cause him to be such an ohev yisroel.
November 13, 2019 9:41 pm at 9:41 pm in reply to: After millions spent on promotion why are 30% of seats unsold? #1800637MilhouseParticipantBTW….Can anyone remember why the learning cycle was timed for a Siyum to occur in the middle of the winter
Are you for real? The cycle was started 96 years ago. Do you really think anyone calculated when the thirteenth siyum would come out?! And if they had done so, what could they have done about it? No matter when they started, some siyumim would have to come out in the winter.
MilhouseParticipantCharlie Hall, as usual, lies through his teeth. There is no evidence at all that Mrs Phillips was a spy, or that the RNC bought her silence. She was certainly pro-German; there was nothing wrong with that.
Harding was a good president and a good person.
MilhouseParticipantAnd yet you never hear Sephardim having any machloket …. Did you ever ask yourselves why?
Because you’re not paying attention. Sefardim are just as machlokes-prone as Ashkenazim, or more.
November 7, 2019 1:41 am at 1:41 am in reply to: Can you request an online purchase for delivery on shabbos?? #1798133MilhouseParticipantHow do you explain that people don’t send mail on Erev Shabbos?
What people? I’ve never heard of such people and doubt they exist. Maybe you don’t do this, but you are only “person”, not “people”.
And as Daasyochid pointed out, even if you are guaranteed Saturday delivery that is not necessarily Shabbos. It’s the nochri’s choice whether to make the delivery on Shabbos or after, so there is no problem at all.
MilhouseParticipantThere’s nothing wrong with fundraising, or with acknowledging donors. Even the Beis Hamidkosh had a huge tribute to the sponsor right over the front gate to the Har Habayis, which was also named in the sponsor’s honor. And naming rights — the main gate to the azara was named for its sponsor.
MilhouseParticipantI have never received such a ticket, but I would absolutely expect to if I were to drive with my brights on, and fail to turn them off whenever I saw a car coming in the opposite direction. If you can see the oncoming car, it can see you, or rather it could if you weren’t dazzling it with your brights.
October 23, 2019 8:38 pm at 8:38 pm in reply to: Requirement to tell your guests that your pasta is made from chickpeas? #1794326MilhouseParticipantLast Shabbos I had a vegan guest, so I made everything except the fish and chicken vegan. I made a potato salad with vegan “mayonnaise”. That guest had a reason to know this; the rest of the guests did not, so I didn’t tell them. I don’t think I did anything wrong. It was simply not their business.
MilhouseParticipant>:> Just remember a minhag brocht a din
> No it doesn’t.
Yes, it does, but only sometimes. Sometimes a minhag brecht a din, and sometimes minhag osiyos gehinnom, and it takes someone on a higher pay grade than mine to decide which is which.
MilhouseParticipantdrmom – “Mercury which isnt safe in any amount in the blood.”
Since when? What evidence exists that it’s in any way unsafe?
MilhouseParticipantAgain, ZD, your story is simply not true. Conagra didn’t drop Rabbi Stern because of marketing, they stopped using his hechsher because he passed away! That is a fact, not an opinion. They HAD to find a new hechsher, and Rabbi Ralbag was the most lenient they could find.
And the idea that the OU would suffer by taking on Hebrew National is just ridiculous. If the OU had taken it on, the brand would be universally accepted (for non-glatt, if that’s what it would still be). The problem is that meeting the OU’s standards would be so expensive it would drive away all the current customers who don’t care about kashrus, so it makes no economic sense to do it.
MilhouseParticipantZD, that makes no sense. If the OU had taken over Hebrew National its reputation would have been instantly repaired. I don’t know whether the OU was ever asked, but if it was I’m sure the reason it didn’t work wasn’t because of marketing but because they would have insisted on higher (i.e. more expensive) standards than the company was willing to pay for.
The actual reason they switched hechsherim was very simple: their old rav hamachshir, Rabbi Tibor Stern, passed away. No marketing research was needed; it was obvious that a hechsher cannot be given from Gan Eden. So they went looking for someone else and found Rabbi Ralbag.
That much is fact. Now what I have *heard* but can’t verify, so take it for the rumor it is, is that under Rabbi Stern the treifus rate was under 10%, which is not really plausible. When Rabbi Ralbag took over it jumped to the high 20s or low 30s, which is still low but not impossible. And of course it’s not glatt, because that would raise the reject rate too high.
Now here’s what I don’t understand: How is it economically viable nowadays to inflate non-glatt lungs? My understanding of the reason why almost everyone has switched to glatt is that once a lung is not glatt, the labor needed to determine whether it’s kosher (for Ashkenazim) cost more than it’s worth. It’s cheaper to simply send it to the treif line at the slaughterhouse and move on to the next animal. So if the Triangle K’s bodkim are truly inspecting the non-glatt lungs properly how does Hebrew National justify the cost? Or are they cutting corners?
October 8, 2019 1:49 pm at 1:49 pm in reply to: Can EY rely on U.S. committments of support if there was an Arab attack? #1791971MilhouseParticipantFIrst, as others have said, the US has never promised to fight for Israel, and nobody has ever expected it to. The most we can expect is that It will stand on the sidelines and resupply, as it did in the Yom Kippur War.
The sad truth, however, is that even if the USA had made such a promise, Israel would not be so foolish as to rely on it. The USA has a long and shameful history of abandoning its friends and allies whenever it gets tired or distracted or sees some other opportunity, or whenever some domestic political advantage can be squeezed from it, or whatever.
One of the most dishonorable episodes in US history was when South Vietnam successfully fought off a massive invasion and then turned to the USA to fulfill our solemn commitment to resupply its depleted arms and to provide air support, and the Democrats in Congress refused to fund it, KNOWING AND INTENDING that this would mean our allies would fall to the next attack and would be slaughtered and enslaved. This was unforgivable.
MilhouseParticipantThere is no rabbi in Crawley.
MilhouseParticipantIndeed this was what I wrote when the issue first flared up, and the fact that El Al refused to implement such a simple solution proved to me that they were not interested in resolving the issue, and were motivated only by hostility to religion. It would be very simple to implement both in prebooking and in airport assignment.
Even simpler, they could provide an explicit option to ask for seating next to someone of the same sex, and do the assignments that way. If there was enough demand on a particular flight they could even have single-sex sections. This is a very simple idea, that must have occurred to them but they refused to consider it.
MilhouseParticipantThere is no shul in Crawley, nor any rabbi or minyan.
MilhouseParticipantJoseph, the OU, which is the major hechsher in the USA, does not require NYC water to be filtered.
MilhouseParticipantYou’re okay with a Jew every now and then getting a little treif flavor?
Why wouldn’t I be OK with it? Why are you not OK with it? If a serving of a certain vegetable has less than a 10% chance of having an insect in it, we eat it without checking, even though that means every now and then we will eat an insect.
MilhouseParticipantJoseph, yes. If it doesn’t affect the taste then it’s not a problem. if someone ordering vanilla got some chocolate in it, they’d complain. So the rinsing must be good enough to prevent that. Tell me why that should not be good enough for kashrus purposes.
MilhouseParticipantHad Barack Obama welcomed so many apostates into the White House we would be up in arms.
That is a ridiculous falsehood.As is this:
The tax cuts created a trillion dollar yearly deficits.And this:
He puts the world including Israel in danger by breaking nuclear treaties with Iran and Russia.There was never any treaty with Iran. 0bama’s disastrous deal was a private arrangement that did not bind either the USA or Iran. To make a treaty he would have needed the consent of 2/3 of the senate, and he knew he had no chance of that so he didn’t even bother trying.
And his purpose in making this deal was deliberately to downgrade the USA’s power in the region and build up Iran as a rival power. His whole purpose in office was to take the USA down a notch, and he succeeded. His deal did nothing at all to rein Iran’s nuclear program in, and it deliberately gave Iran the money to enhance its international terrorist activities. It was an act of treason for which he should be prosecuted.
MilhouseParticipantIf it’s good enough for customers who don;t want any chocolate in their vanilla, why shouldn’t it be good enough for us?
MilhouseParticipantYes, Joseph, if “surely” is enough to permit imported lemon juice, when we have no information at all about what sort of keilim were used to cut and squeeze the lemons, or what was kept in the barrels before the lemon juice, etc., then kal vachomer that it’s enough here.
We rely on “surely” throughout halacha — we call it “chazaka”.
Of course if they did have separate scoops then the whole problem wouldn’t exist in the first place. So I assume they don’t, and I suggest that surely they rinse the scoop between flavors, so it should be OK.
MilhouseParticipantJoseph, surely they rinse the scoop between flavors.
MilhouseParticipantIt seems to me that bal teshaktzu is by definition something that happens in the human mind. Nothing is objectively meshukatz; it’s all in how one thinks of it. Therefore it seems to me that the fact that the coffee looks normal, and the “drinker is not exposed to anything that would be considered m’shukatz”, should be irrelevant.
The key point is that the drinker is exposed to the knowledge of how the coffee was produced, and that knowledge inevitably creates a subjective feeling of disgust, which the drinker suppresses only because his desire for the taste is so great. And it seems to me that that suppression is what the Torah forbids.
However since the whole thing is so subjective I don’t think it can be subject to formal rules and psokim. The Creator made people different, אין דעותיהן שוות, and if someone genuinely feels no disgust at the thought of drinking this coffee — not that he has trained himself to suppress it, but that from the first he does not feel disgusted — then i t is presumably permitted for him.
MilhouseParticipantWhy would you want to drink civet coffee anyway?
According to those who drink it, it tastes very good, much better than other coffees, which is why it’s so expensive. I’m sure they’re telling the truth, for the same reason that I’m sure lobster must be delicious: Why else would anyone eat something that looks so disgusting? To overcome the “bal teshaktzu” factor it must be really really good. In both cases, I’m happy to take their word for this and feel no temptation to test it myself.
MilhouseParticipanta bottom feeding fish is not kosher because of what it eats,
Huh? That is not true at all. What a fish eats, or where it eats it, does not affect its kashrus at all. Many bottom-feeding fish are kosher.
MilhouseParticipantRational, even if the bean is really changed by passing through the civet, it remains 100% kosher. Digested food becomes דם ובשר כבשרו, but undigested food does not, and retains its own kashrus status. Non-kosher food found in the stomach of a kosher animal is not kosher; kosher food found in the stomach of a non-kosher animal remains kosher. Therefore the same must be true of what is found in the waste from the stomach.
Honey would not be kosher if not for the pasuk explicitly permitting it.
Carnauba wax comes from palm trees, NOT insects, and is therefore kosher without any question.
MilhouseParticipantMitzad hilchos kashrus it is 100% kosher. The beans are not part of the animal! However, I would be inclined to asser it under bal teshaktzu.
MilhouseParticipantUncle Ben and Joseph, how is this even close to me’useh? Get me’useh is only when the compulsion is directly to give the get. The judge didn’t order him to give a get, he ordered him to fulfill his contract. The judge doesn’t care what the contract was for; it could be to give a get, or to eat ice cream, ככל היוצא מפיו יעשה. How is that different from the classic case where nochrim are not allowed to say “give a get”, but they are allowed to say “obey the beis din”?
MilhouseParticipantUbiquitin, if you are an able-bodied male US citizen between 17 and 45 you are a member of the US militia, whether you like it or not. That is the law.
But the right to keep and bear arms is not restricted to militia members. It’s not “the right of the militia”, it’s “the right of the people“. That means everyone. The same people who have the freedom of speech and the press, the right to the free exercise of religion, the right to be free from unreasonable searches and to due process, etc. It’s a fundamental human right that the Bill of Rights did not create but merely recognizes and protects.
MilhouseParticipantThe whole stupid argument doesn’t begin. The Jewish areas of Baltimore are NOT in Cummings’s district.
MilhouseParticipant“Well regulated” in this context means “well trained”.
And the US militia consists of every able-bodied man between the ages of 17 and 45.
MilhouseParticipant1. The OU permits Blue Marlin.
2. Because of the machlokes between R Belsky and R Shachter, the OU did not decide that NYC water needs to be filtered. Instead it published a fact sheet describing the metzius and the halachic considerations, and advised everyone to show it to their rov and ask for a psak. In restaurants under its supervision it requires filtering, but only as a matter of practical policy, not as a psak halacha.
3. The level of mercury that the FDA and EPA say you have to worry about is ridiculously low. There is no evidence whatsoever that any harm can result, even to pregnant women and their babies, from eating normal amounts of fish. The only known cases of mercury poisoning from fish happened in two bays in Japan, in the 1950s and ’60s, where mercury was being dumped into the water right in the fishing ground. Once it was realized that this is dangerous the practice stopped. The mercury level in the ocean, or in any fishing ground, is not nearly enough to cause any damage, even in pregnancy, unless you eat ridiculous amounts. I suppose if you live on nothing but fish, you might have cause for concern.
July 17, 2019 9:14 pm at 9:14 pm in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760733MilhouseParticipantAgain, says who, and on what basis? I’m not interested in your svoros, I want to know who says this, and what their source is.
July 17, 2019 4:01 pm at 4:01 pm in reply to: ICE Sweeps…It’s not just Brown and Hispanics being rounded up for deportation #1760656MilhouseParticipantOf course people run for Congress to change things. But the changes they seek should be to make things better conform with the values on which the country is built. To make the country great again. It requires a fundamental belief that America is essentially great, and therefore certain details need adjusting to enhance that greatness. Omar and her ilk are not coming to improve America but to transform it into something it never was and must never be. Something foreign and evil. They are not patriots, they’re revolutionaries; they want to overthrow the USA and replace it with a utopia of their own imagining. They want to turn the USA into Venezuela or into the Sweden of their imaginations And they must not be allowed to do so.
July 17, 2019 3:21 pm at 3:21 pm in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760632MilhouseParticipantThe Torah says that while we are in golus the land should lie empty — as indeed most of it did until we started returning.
July 17, 2019 3:20 pm at 3:20 pm in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760631MilhouseParticipantMilhouse: Before Moshiach it is forbidden to advocate the expulsion of the nochrim from Eretz Yisroel
Says who? And on what basis?
July 17, 2019 10:37 am at 10:37 am in reply to: Anti-Zionism as Anti-Semitism: Legal Implications under U.S. Law #1760486MilhouseParticipantGHT, it’s easy to distinguish someone (Jew or nochri) who opposes zionism because of the Torah from one who does so out of antisemitism. Someone who is against the establishment of Israel only because we belong in golus must also be against the existence of any non-Jewish residents in Eretz Yisroel. A nochri has no right whatsoever to live in Eretz Yisroel unless he is a Ger Toshav, a category that has not existed for the past 2439 years. The moment an anti-zionist starts chattering about the “Palestinians” and their rights, we can know that he is an antisemite.
July 17, 2019 10:35 am at 10:35 am in reply to: ICE Sweeps…It’s not just Brown and Hispanics being rounded up for deportation #1760520MilhouseParticipantThere was nothing racist about Trump’s tweet. It was stupid and ignorant, yes, just like his reference to the revolutionaries taking over the airports, but he did not mention race at all. Anyone who calls it racist is merely projecting their own racism on him.
And it was not stupid to tell these women that if they don’t like America they should go somewhere else. The only stupid thing was that he told them all to go back where they came from, not realizing that only one was an immigrant. The most reasonable explanation is that he simply forgot he was addressing four individuals, and those words were directed only to Omar, who should indeed go back to Somalia rather than trying to turn America into Somalia.
-
AuthorPosts